Cause Before Symptom

House of Breakspeare (Magi / Lancellotti / Massimo)

House of Breakspeare (Magi / Lancellotti / Massimo)
 
Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v5w6e2b-house-of-breakspeare-magi-lancellotti-massimo.html
 
It is my understanding that the Breakspear family control’s China, Russia  and possibly India. After they lost their empire to the Orsini’s during the Spanish Inquisition it too 400 years for them to crumble and in the 1880’s after the breaking of the spear ritual giving the spear of destiny to the Orsini family, they moved to China to setup another empire. The Breakspear’s control BRICS which competes directly against the Orsini’s Federal Reserve. The war going on in the world is because of these two families who are competing to be the one family under the antichrist.
 
The Breakspear family are an English black nobility clan that originated in Italy and took their name from the Lancellotti family. Lance means spear and the Italian word rotti means to break. Lancerotti is another Italian variation of the more commonly used Lancellotti family name. The Breakspear family produced the only English pope in history who was Pope Adrian IV or Nicolas Breakspear. Pope Adrian IV issued the papal bull Laudabiliter ordering the Normans of England to invade Ireland which they did and bring it under Papal-Roman authority which they also did. This is why Ireland is predominantly Roman Catholic today. Cardinal Boso Breakspeare was a relative of Pope Adrian IV and was both Italian and English. The musician Cindy Breakspeare fathered Damian Marley with Bob Marley. Like lance-llotti and break-spear the Italian Maggi family used spears on their coat of arms. 
 
Breakspear or Lancellotti is also where the character of Lancelot comes from in the Legend of Arthur. Prince William Windsor's middle name is Arthur and he is likely to be next in line to the throne. The House of Maggi were a nobility from the commune in Brescia Italy right next door to the commune of Merlino all within the province of Lombardy. Magi or Maggi both mean a magician or wizard just as Merlin like Merlino was a wizard in the Arthurian legend. The Maggi family settled in Switzerland and became wealthy after Julius Maggi merged his Maggi soup and seasonings company with Nestle. The Maggi family also settled in Brazil establishing the Amaggi Soybean Group owned by Blairo Maggi who is worth about 960 million. These Illuminati bloodlines are ancient and they go back for thousands of years. The Maggi family likely go back to Persia and India and derive their name from Majhi and Maji. Magi are also the term used for followers of Zoroastrianism which derived from Persia and Iran. 
 
Maggio Cipriani is a Venetian international businessman that owns restaurants and bars including in New York City. Maggio Cipriani's family are white collar mobsters with his father Giuseppe and grandfather Arrigo arrested for tax evasion in the United States. In the Book of Matthew myrrh pronounced like "mer" is an herb that was given as a gift by the three magi or three wise men. Herbs and chemicals are used in sorcery for inducing trance like states that enable mind control or bewitchment. Myrrh can also be ingested or used like an incense and is likely being added into food and wine covertly to enhance their witchcraft. Druids similar to wizards used holly wood. Mark Breakspear is a Hollywood special effects designer and Michael Breakspear is an Australian neuroscientist who specializes in studying oscillating wave patters and their effects on the brain. They are sorcerers involved with illusions, deceptions, and lawlessly imposing electronic induced brainwashing and mind control frequencies. The Breakspear family in London own a crematorium as well where the Breakspears and Massimos of Roccasecca which live in London make human sacrifices. The Lancellotti family of Italy merged a branch with the Massimo family with current members that include Prince Ludovisi Massimo-Lancellotti, Prince Ascanio Massimo-Lancellotti and Prince Filippo Massimo-Lancellotti as the head of this family today.
 
Show picture 1
 
Maggio Cipriani is an international businessman involved in clubs, restaurants, and hotels. The Ciprianis are from Venice, Italy and they own Harry's Bar in Venice and purchased the Rainbow Room in New York from the Rockefellers and later sold it.
 
Show picture 2
 
Arrigo Cipriani and his son Giuseppe Cipriani with Maggio and Ignazio on the outside. Arrigo and his son Giuseppe were convicted of money laundering in the United States and they used private bank accounts in Luxembourg where their company is headquartered. The Cipriani family are part owners of the Venetian Mafia.
 
Show picture 3
 
Blairo Maggi
 
Show picture 4
 
Prince Filippo Massimo-Lancellotti, Prince Gelasio Gaetani-Lovatelli, and Enzo Salviati
 
Show picture 5
 
Joey Merlino the boss of the Philly Mob in the City of Brotherly Love. The Philly Mob are all involved in faggotry and molesting little boys. The Gaetani-Lovatelli family are owners of the Philly Mob with Lovatelli like City of Brotherly Love which refers to homosexuality.
 
Show picture 6
 
Michael Lancellotti on the left is a high level boss of the Philly Mob. Mike Lancellotti is a pedophile. Mike Lancellotti needs a bullet to his head.
 
Michael “Mikey Lance” Lancelotti is a capo in the Philadelphia Crime Family. He has managed to avoid attention while ducking indictments and never being sentenced to long prison terms. 
 
Falsely arrested in Borgata gambling bust. Was never charged.
 
Show picture 7
 
Meek Mill with Joey Merlino and Meek Mill looks like he was just bent over by Merlino.
 
In his article "House of Magicians", the denouncer with the pseudonym Ahuwah Zeus explains that the Breakspear-Lancellotti-Maggi are magicians and brujos, liars and highly qualified manipulators who work as architects of illusions and are involved in Hollywood and the psychology of the masses. The English family Breakspear is part of an Illuminati clan that originated in Italy, and that took its name from the Lancellotti family. Lance means Lanza and Rotti means Wheel. Lancerotti is another Italian variation of the surname Lancellotti most commonly used. The Lancellotti family has branches from southern Italy with the Lanza family from Sicily and the Lancellotti family from Campania, which later merged with the Massimo family from Rome. The Breakspear family in London has a crematorium and is working with the Massimo de Roccasecca family, who moved to London. The Lancellotti family of Italy merged a family branch with the Massimo family. El Príncipe Ludovico Massimo-Lancellotti and el Príncipe Ascanio Massimo-Lancellotti are members of this family together with el Príncipe Filippo Massimo-Lancellotti as el jefe de este linaje y el principal arquitecto de illusiones.
 
The Breakspear family produced the only English pope in history, Pope Adrian IV or Nicolas Breakspear. Pope Adrian IV issued the papal bull Laudabiliter ordering the Normans in England to invade Ireland, which they did, and to place it under Papal-Roman authority, which they also did. This is why Ireland is predominantly Roman Catholic today. Pope Adrian IV crowned Holy Roman Emperor Frederick I and executed priest Arnold of Brescia for opposing the authority of the Roman Pope. Cardinal Boso Breakspeare was a relative of Pope Adrian IV and was Italian and English. There is still a Breakspear family in England today. Artist Cindy Breakspeare fathered Damian Marley with Bob Marley. Many famous actors and musicians are related to nobility. This is why they were allowed to become famous.
 
Breakspear or Lancellotti is also where the character of Lancelot in the Legend of Arthur comes from. The House of Maggi was a nobility from the commune of Brescia, Italy, right next to the commune of Merlino, all within the province of Lodi and the region of Lombardy. Joey Merlino is the boss of the Philadelphia mafia today and was probably related to the Maggi or Melzi families.
 
The Melzi family ruled as the Dukes of Lodi with Benigno Melzi d’Eril, the 8th Duke of Lodi and the 17th Count of Magenta as the current boss of this family. Franceso Melzi d’Eril is an Italian film producer with many connections in Hollywood.
 
Witchcraft is all about deception. Mafia bosses are highly skilled liars and manipulators. Magi or Maggi means wizard or sorcerer, just like Merlin was a wizard in Arthurian legend. The Maggi family from Brescia settled in Switzerland and became wealthy after Julius Maggi merged his Maggi condiment and soup company with Nestle.
 
The Maggi family also settled in Brazil, establishing the Amaggi Soy Group owned by Blairo Maggi which is worth around 960 million. These Illuminati bloodlines are ancient and go back thousands of years. The Maggi family likely goes back to Persia and India and gets their name from Majhi and Maji. Magi is the term used for followers of Zoroastrianism who derived from Persia and Iran.
 
Vallemaggia is an Italian speaking canton in Ticino, Switzerland near the Italian border with Maggia as a municipal district. The Magi family is the continuation of the Magia family from ancient Rome who likely settled in Switzerland during the fall of the Roman Empire.
 
In the Book of Matthew myrrh pronounced like "mer" is an herb that was given as a gift by the three magi or three wise men. Herbs and chemicals are used in sorcery for inducing trance like states that enable mind control or bewitchment. Myrrh can also be ingested or used like an incense and is likely being added into food and wine covertly to enhance their witchcraft. Druids similar to wizards used holly wood and Merlin is depicted as a Druid. Mark Breakspear is a Hollywood special effects designer and Michael Breakspear is an Australian neuroscientist who specializes in studying oscillating wave patters and their effects on the brain. They are sorcerers. Sorcery is all about deception and manipulation and criminals use sorcery as a defensive tool. The Breakspear family in London own a crematorium which is involved with human sacrifices and destroying evidence of human remains. Prince Stefano Massimo has a residence in London and he is working with the Breakspear family. The Lancellotti family of Italy merged a branch with the Massimo family and Prince Filippo Massimo-Lancellotti II is the head of this family branch today. 
 
KHAZARIAN MAFIA is the Most Ruthless Enemy of Humanity. Khazarians were known by those living in bordering countries to generally be liars, deceivers, cons, robbers, rapists, murderers, identity thieves and social parasites of the worst variety with, at the head, their ruler King Bulan who selected Torah Judaism as Khazaria’s official religion. King Bulan and his top staff were inducted into the Black Arts and Black Magic of Babylonian Talmudism, better known as Baal worship or Satanism. Externally this looks a lot like Torah Judaism and can be used as false cover, which it was.
 
In about 1250 AD, the situation became completely unacceptable to both Russia and Persia and they destroyed Khazaria top to bottom. When Khazaria was destroyed, it had been literally terrorizing, robbing, murdering and parasitizing neighbors and travelers for over 500 years. The top Khazarian nobility were able to flee with their great wealth of silver and gold. They continued practicing the Black Magick occult arts and migrated to western European nations where they are still practicing child sacrifice because they believe it will provide them with more and more satanic powers.
 
They are impostors hiding in other groups by claiming to be part of that group. They practice the Babylonian Talmudic “money-magic" that is, making money from nothing by the use of pernicious usury.
 
They were easily accepted by the Old Black European Nobility families and the Breakspeare family who were also practicing satanism and secretly sacrificing children.
 
So Khazarians were easily accepted by the European leaders and the royal families because they worshiped Satan just like them and shared in the secret ritual of child sacrifice.
 
The Khazarians became known for their expertise in political intrigue, human compromise and blackmail, as well as the administration of hypnotic drugs and special poisons to murder opponents.
 
They parasitized financially the whole world and made us their slaves.
 
It's a secret Occult family, who have had some members live to ripe ages of 500 years old. Their one of the unknown
historic elite families on Earth. They are Pharoahs!
 
Breakspear is a riddle when it is translated into Latin, because it translates to BREAK SPEAR = Lance Rotto = Lancia Rotta =
Lancia Lotta = Lancelot. Lancelot is the first Knight to king Arthur.
 
Pope Adrian IV, killer of Arnold(The Reformist), is Lancelot! His name was anglized and retranslated to hide its origins.
One of the evilest Popes ever to have lived. Bloodthirsty! And now the whole world is worshipping Sir Lancelot
as a hero, when his origins are of a mass-murderer
 
Breakspear is Lancelot, no manner what the masses say. It was the 'Breakspear' family that destroyed your country
of England. Even Shakespear was a Breakspear
 
Theres an ancient ritual going back even to the sumerian times called "The breaking of spears." There is the "Spear of Destiny"
 
We're talking about the only family that controls Britain, from the Shadows. The whole Royal family are nonsense. They are the veils. The Breakspear's are Jesuits. Their the high priests. They practice ritual black magic and of course human blood sacrifices. They have intercourse with the dead as well. Usually a female which comes back to life for a few minutes and dies again.
 
Pope Adrian IV
 
Pope Adrian IV(c. 1100 AD–1 September, 1159 AD)[1], born Nicholas Breakspear or Breakspeare, was Pope from 1154 to 1159 AD.
 
Adrian IV is the only Englishman who has occupied the papal chair. It is generally believed that Nicholas Breakspear was born at Breakspear Farm in the parish of Abbots Langley in Hertfordshire and received his early education at the Abbey School, St Albans (St Albans School).
 
The Merovingian kings were noted sorcerors in the manner of the Samaritan Magi, and they firmly believed in the hidden powers of the honeycomb. Because a honeycomb is naturally made up of hexagonal prisms, it was considered by philosophers to be the manifestation of divine harmony in nature. Its construction was associated with insight and wisdom - as detailed in Proverbs 24:13-14: “My son, eat thou honey, because it is good… So shall the knowledge of wisdom be unto thy soul…”
 
To the Merovingians, the bee was a most hallowed creature. A sacred emblem of Egytian royalty, it became a symbol of Wisdom. Some 300 small golden bees were founded stitched to the cloak of Childeric I (son of Meroveus) when his grave was unearthed in 1653. Napoleon had these attached to his own coronation robe in 1804. He claimed this right by virtue of his descent from James de Rohan-Stuardo, the natural son (legitimized in 1667) of Charles II Stuart of Britain by Marguerite, Duchesse de Rohan. The Stuarts in turn were entitled to this distinction because they, and their related Counts of Brittany, were descended from Clodion’s brother Fredemundus - thus (akin to the Merovingians) they were equally in descent from the Fisher Kings through Faramund. The Merovingian bee was adopted by the exiled Stuarts in Europe, and engraved bees are still to be seen on some Jacobite glassware.”
 
From “Bloodline of the Holy Grail” by Laurence Gardner
 
Yes That's Right! it's - MARK BREAKSPEAR'S
 
The Bloodline Families are United, with each other, in their Objective to Control the world. They've probably decided Together that China will be their Best Ally at This Time in History. The way they work is they work behind the scenes to Manipulate their Puppets; but the Point is that the Puppets aren't suppose to Suspect themselves Puppets. But that These Families are their Friends. Once the Puppets believe they have a Friend in the Families, then the Puppets can be Manipulated to do The Bidding of the Families. The idea being that they are Not to Suspect they are being Duped by the Families for the Families' Objectives Being Realized. Or else the Puppets become Convinced they wish to be Aligned with the Objectives of the Families. All believe they will Gain in the End. China is a great thought for the Families. It's Intelligent, industrious, its people stripped of Christian Religion, a Slave labor Force already in Place. Perfect.
 
The Families may feel that China may be the Entity that will end up being willing to nuke The Vatican for them eventually. The Book of Revelation states that her Destruction will Come in One hour. That seems to be a nuclear blast. How else would the Vatican be Destroyed in One hour? The Families probably believe China is the Entity that will be willing to invade & nuke the US. C19 may be the Families' First Weapon against the US via China. 
 
The Bloodline Families want The Vatican moved to Jerusalem. That's Important to them. Because they Worship Satan. Jerusalem is Important to Satan. Because Satan Knows Jerusalem is Important to God.
 
LANZA DI SCALEA & MASSIMO-LANCELLOTTI
 
Prince Giuseppe Lanza di Scalea is a Sicilian noble and an owner of the Lanza crime family of San Francisco which has spread throughout the United States. The Lanza crime family is an extension of the Los Angeles crime family which is run by the Gambinos. The Lanza crime family have spread to the East Coast and have infiltrated the FBI with Andrew Lanza a New York Senator who was Jesuit educated from Fordham and Jeff Lanza a former and recent FBI agent. The Lanza family of Sandy Hook are FBI assets and relatives of the Lanza di Scaleas and they helped to stage the fake Sandy Hook massacre which was used for gun control propaganda. The mafia and corrupt federal agents are involved in child trafficking networks and they want society disarmed out of fear of what society will do to them when they realize what is really going on. It is proven that Sandy Hook was staged with CNN caught using green screen during an interview with a "victim's" parent, Adam Lanza's death certificate being issued in New Hampshire and dated the day before the Sandy Hook fake massacre occurred as well as the many interviews with parents of "victims" who never cry and Robbie Parker who was caught laughing and smiling the day after his young daughter was supposedly murdered as he walked up to give a speech which set the media up for their gun control agenda. The Sicilian Lanzas claim to be descendants of the Bavarian Wittelsbach royal family from over 1000 years ago and they partly are. The Lanza di Scaleas also established a Lancellotti branch in Campania which later merged with the Massimo family of Rome with the current members Prince Ascanio, Prince Filippo, and Prince Ludovico of the House of Massimo-Lancellotti. The name Lanza like Lance means a lance. The Lanza di Scalea and Massimo-Lancellotti families have covert shares in Lancia the automobile company owned by the Agnellis. The Massimo-Lancelottis and Gaetani-Lovatellis are owners of the Philadelphia crime family headed up by Joey Merlino. Michael Lancellotti is also a high level mobster in the Philly Mob.
 
Show picture 8
 
Prince Giuseppe Lanza di Scalea with his former girlfriend the Italian actress Alba Parietti.
 
Show picture 9
 
Prince Ascanio Massimo-Lancellotti is an owner of the Sicilian Mafia and owner of the Lanza crime family of San Francisco which has national operations today. Prince Ascanio's mother was an Odescalchi. The Massimo-Lancellottis are also married with the Belgian Merode family.
 
Show picture 10
 
Prince Filippo Massimo-Lancellotti is a high authority over the Order of Druids and a part owner of the Philly Mob and Lanza crime family. Joey Merlino is the top boss of the Philly Mob and Michael Lancelotti is a high level mobster of the Philly Mob. Merlin and Lancelot.
 
Show picture 11
 
Khazarian Mafia or Ashkenazi Jews reflecting Khazarian facial characteristics. They married into the Lancelotti family after the defeat of Prussia.
 
Show picture 12
 
Prince Emanuel de Merode is a high level Belgian noble connected with Africa. The Merodes are married with the Belgian Lignes and also with the Italian Massimo-Lancellottis. The Merodes have a bat on their coat of arms which is a symbol for Gothic bloodlines.
 
Mars is known as the “god of war” in Roman Mythology and the red string Kabbalah cult is covertly promoting a war and holocaust. Mark Breakspear is a Hollywood special effects designer and he comes from the English Breakspear family which produced the only English Pope in history Pope Adrian IV of Nicholas Breakspear who also conquered Ireland for Rome. The name Break-spear translates to Rotti-Lance in Italian for the Lancellotti family. Lancellotti or Breakspear is where Lancelot comes from in the King Arthur legend. Prince William’s middle name is Arthur and he is supposed to be next in line to the British throne. The Lancellotti family own a palace in Italy with a hedge maze and clock tower. These symbols are used in the Hollywood movie “Alice in Wonderland” and mazes or labrynths are meant to confuse or bewitch the mind. Prince Filippo Massimo-Lancellotti II is the head of the Lancellotti family today.
 
Show image 13
 
Putin wears the Khabalist red Jesuit bracelet paying homage to the Breakspear family.
 
Show image 14
 
The Rev. Júlio Lancellotti, 75, ministers to the homeless in one of the roughest neighborhoods of Brazil’s largest city, a crime and drug-ridden area of Sao Paulo commonly known as Crackland. Which gives him the role possibly allowing Russia and China to control Brazil. 
 
Nancy Pelosi is from the Pelosi d'Alesandro Lucchese Gambino Crime Family who reports directly to Lancelotti and Breakspear families.
 
The Massimo Crime Family Prince Fabrizio Massimo-Brancaccio is a top owner of the Vatican and he also controls most of the Sicilian Mafia. Brancaccio is a neighborhood in Sicily where La Cosa Nostra originated. The Massimo family are one of the oldest families of Rome and claim to be the ancient Fabii Maximi dynasty. The Fabii family were known for using the "scorched earth" military tactic in ancient Rome. Scorched Earth is a ruthless tactic where they burn everything down that can aid the enemy like food, resources, and people. The Fabian Society uses the wolf in sheep's clothing as their logo. Fabii like Fabian. The Massimo family are married with various royal bloodlines including the House of Savoy, House of Bourbon, and House of Osorio of Galicia, Spain. Amancio Ortega is from Galicia and he is serving the Osorio family as their Court Factor. Amancio Ortega is the second wealthiest billionaire on the planet and worth more than 70 billion. He owns Inditex with the store chain called Massimo Dutti which is high end fashion. Prince Stefano Massimo married into the British Foxwell family and he is a fashion photographer. Rupert Murdoch who owns Fox News is a Vatican Knight of the Order of St Gregory. Fox is for Foxwell. The fox is considered a cunning animal. Prince Valero Massimo started an aerospace company called Auctus Industries with Duke Edward Spencer-Churchill who is a relative of the Windsor family. The Massimo family and other Italian Nobility have deeply infiltrated the United Kingdom. The House of Massimo is at the head of the Black Nobility. They are primary owners of the Holy See corporation. The Massimo family are a crime family and they run La Cosa Nostra which pays dues back to them. Prince Carlo Massimo oversees the Sovereign Military Order of Malta as the President of the Italian Association of the Order of Malta. They have authority over the Jesuits from their Massimiliano Massimo Institute in Rome. They use their Jesuits as Roman Intelligence and infiltrators. Mario Draghi who is the President of the European Central Bank was born in Rome and went to the Massimo Institute. The Massimo family have billions in private Swiss bank accounts and they have three members from Rome on the Bank for International Settlements Board of Directors including Mario Draghi, Fabio Panetta, and Ignazio Visco. The Swiss Guard protects the Vatican City State. Switzerland has a law enforcing private bank accounts. The Massimo family are at the top of the global crime syndicate and are involved in every crime imaginable including murder, extortion, threats, human trafficking, money laundering and more. Members of the Massimo crime family include Prince Fabrizio Massimo-Brancaccio, Prince Giacomo Massimo-Brancaccio, Prince Carlo Massimo, Prince Stefano Massimo, Prince Valerio Massimo (Foxwell) and Prince Filippo Massimo-Lancellotti II.The Son of the Morning Prince Stefano Massimo is the son of Dawn Addams. The Massimo family are the primary owners of the Holy See and Vatican. The name Stefano means "crowned" and the name Massimo means "greatest" If anyone fits the role of Satan on Earth it is Prince Stefano Massimo. I am not promoting the Bible and I am not a Christian, I am not an Atheist, or a member of any religion or belief system. I am just pointing out something. Satan means the adversary. “How you are fallen from heaven, O Day Star, son of Dawn! How you are cut down to the ground, you who laid the nations low! -ESV Isaiah 14:12 http://geneall.net/en/name/153619/stefano-massimo-prince-of-roccasecca-dei-volsci/ Stefano Massimo, prince of Roccasecca dei Volsci https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawn_Addams Dawn Addams (21 September 1930 – 7 May 1985) was an English actress, particularly in Hollywood motion pictures of the 1950s and on British television in the 1960s and 1970s. She first married Don Vittorio Emanuele Massimo, Prince of Roccasecca in 1954.[3] They had a son, Prince Stefano Massimo, born 10 January 1955.
 
The Black Nobility and Italian Mafia Vittorio Emanuele IV is the Prince of Naples and has a residence in Geneva Switzerland. The Savoy family governed Geneva for a period of time in service to the Vatican. The Genovese crime family take their name from Vito Genovese who was born in a Naples commune just as Vittorio is the Prince of Naples. Genovese is a surname for someone from Genoa Italy or from Geneva Switzerland. Genoa or Genova in Italian is the same word as Geneva is Swiss. Prince Vittorio is married to Princess Marina Doria who was born in Switzerland. The Doria family were one of the most powerful banking families in Genoa for centuries. The Savoy family put the fascist dictator Benito Mussolini in power who established the Vatican as a sovereign nation through the Lateran Treaty of 1929. The Vatican was tied with the mafia during the P2 Masonic loge scandal. Prince Vittorio is the hidden owner of the Genovese crime family which have infiltrated Wall Street and are extorting businessmen in the United States. Donald Trump used the Genovese owned S&A Concrete to build his condos in Manhattan. Trump used Roy Cohn as an attorney who also worked for the former mafia bosses Tony Salerno and John Gotti. Donald Trump purchased property from the mafia hitman Salvatore Testa to build his casino in Atlantic City. The Italian Mafia have always controlled Atlantic City and use the casinos to launder their personal profits. Donald Trump is a front man for the Five Families of New York City which are controlled by the Italian Nobility. Ivana Trump dated Prince Roffredo Gaetani. The Gaetani-D'Aquila-D'Aragona family of Italy covertly own the Gambino crime family and one of its original bosses was named Salvatore D'Aquila.Prince Vittorio Emanuele IV has numerous criminal charges against him including murder, association with organized crime, corruption, and exploitation of prostitution. He tends to get off on all his charges though. Prince Vittorio was also a member of the P2 Masonic Lodge which was involved with the Vatican, Italian government, Italian media, and organized crime like the Nuclei Armati Rivoluzionari fascist paramilitary group and Banda della Magliana or Magliana Mafia. The Massimo family created the Banda della Magliana and NAR to take over the City of Rome. Massimo Carminati who was nicknamed "The last King of Rome" was a member of the NAR and Magliana Mafia. Don Fabrizio Massimo-Brancaccio runs the modern day Roman Mafia or Casamonica Clan as well as most of the Sicilian Mafia. Much of the Sicilian Mafia was established in the neighborhood of Brancaccio in Palermo Sicily just as Don Fabrizio's name is Massimo-Brancaccio. Silvio Berlusconi has extensive ties with the Sicilian Mafia and served four terms as prime minister of Italy. Silvio was also listed as a member of the P2 Masonic Lodge in Italy which was involved with political corruption and considered a "shadow government". Silvio Berlusconi has a monopoly in Italian broadcasting and is worth more than 7 billion. The Italian judge Paolo Borsellino who was a member of the Antimafia Pool spoke out against Silvio Berlusconi shortly before he was assassinated by the Sicilian Mafia. Prince Nicolo Boncompagni Ludovisi is a high level authority in Rome and an owner of the Italian Mafia. The Boncompagni coat of arms has a golden dragon on it. Gold and dragons are symbols for imperialism. Pope Gregory XIII or Ugo Boncompagni purchased the Duchy of Sora for his family to govern over. The Ludovisi family ruled over Venosa. The Casalesi Mafia in Italy have influences in Sora and one of their factions was ran by a man named Raffaele Venosa. The founder of the Casalesi Mafia Clan was from Caserta right near Sora. Prince Nicolo Boncompagni Ludovisi is an owner of the Casalesi Clan. The name Bon-Compagni means "Good Company" or "Good Fellows" since Compagno can be translated to fellow. Boncompagni is where the term Goodfellas derives from which means a gangster or member of the Italian Mafia. They made a major Hollywood movie glorifying the Italian Mafia called Goodfellas.
 
The Massimo di Roccasecca family own the Clerkenwell crime syndicate in London also called the Adams Family or A-Team for its founders Terry, Tommy, and Patrick Adams. Prince Stefano Massimo’s mother was the satanic witch Dawn Addams who was an English actress that married Prince Vittorio Massimo of Roccasecca. Prince Stefano Massimo is the father of Prince Valerio Massimo, Prince Cesare Massimo, and Prince Tancredi Massimo and they all reside in London today. Stefano’s sons all assist him with his criminal enterprises. Clerkenwell was nicknamed “London’s Little Italy” for its large Italian population. The Clerkenwell crime syndicate is involved with murder, extortion, drug trafficking, and human trafficking. They are believed to be involved with the Brink’s-Mat Robbery consisting of hundreds of millions in stolen cash, diamonds, and gold. The Italian Nobility and their mafias have a pattern of committing gold heists. Kenneth Noye is an English gangster and Freemason that was involved in the Brink’s-Mat Robbery. Noye also killed a police officer that was investigating him and got off on all charges under self-defense. It is possible the Adams crime family murdered the Scottish billionaire Scot Young by throwing him off a building while the media in the UK claims it was either suicide or the Russian Mafia. His reported wealth was never accounted for. The Adams crime family are also allied with the Irish Mafia and Arifs Turkish Mafia. Danny Morrow is a member of a Glasgow street gang and a ruthless associate of the Clerkenwell Mafia. Prince Stefano Massimo works as a fashion photographer. Silvio Scaglia is an Italian-Swiss billionaire that lives in London and he founded and runs Pacific Global Management Group which owns Elite World an international model management company. Model agencies have been exposed for their involvement with high-end prostitution. Girls that are not successful in modeling are often brought into prostitution as well. Scaglia was investigated for tax fraud ordered by Rome’s anti-mafia public prosecutor and Scaglia was later acquitted of all charges like so many other wealthy criminals operating in Rome.
 
The Massimo family established an Irish noble branch called the Barons Massy in Limerick where the McCarthy-Dundon crime family operate in. The Massimo family are also part owners of various Irish Mafias. In Ireland, there is also the international Rathkeale Rovers crime syndicate which is involved in high-end thefts at museums and auction houses. Prince Tancredi works as an art appraiser for the Christies auction house and is also part owner and adviser of the Rathkeale Rovers. Guillaume Cerutti is the CEO of Christie's. The name Tancredi derives from Thankarath. Thanka-rath like Rathkeale. The mafia extorts and blackmail politicians, bankers, members of the media, and businessmen. They are covert and use violence. Royal and noble families use mafias to do their dirty work. Mafias are criminal business enterprises for the royal and noble families. Members of the mafia are often disposable to them while others are valuable and this is why they pay off judges and police to protect them. Prince Stefano’s mother Dawn Addams remarried to Jimmy White and the name White similar to her name Addams relating to the Adams crime family and English mobster Alfred Henry White who was at one point an enforcer for Charles Sabini an English-Italian gangster located in Clerkenwell. Prince Stefano Massimo married and divorced Atalanta Foxwell of England and lives in London today and their son Prince Valerio Massimo is in business with Duke Edward Spencer Churchill running Auctus Industries an aerospace company and SCM Capital Partners. Prince Valerio, Prince Cesare, and Prince Tancredi are also owners of the Clerkenwell Mafia. Some of the British nobility are double agents serving the British Crown and covertly working with the Black Nobility of Rome. They are using their mafias to threaten and extort politicians, reporters, bankers, and businessmen. The Clerkenwell Mafia have been suspected of being involved in about 25 murders. In 2017 Terry Adams paid about 725,000 pounds equal to 1 million dollars to the UK government in order to stay out of prison for money laundering. Dawn Addams was born in Felixstowe where the largest container port in the UK is located. The Clerkenwell Mafia are trafficking drugs, weapons, and humans through the Port of Felixstowe. Chief of Felixstowe police J Whitby is an agent of the Clerkenwell Mafia. Even most white collar criminals fear the Black Hand mafias. Prince Stefano Massimo is a ruthless and murderous terrorist and his Clerkenwell Mafia operates in the same way.
 
Prince Stefano Massimo with his son Prince Tancredi Massimo. They are the most ruthless and sadistic devils on the planet. They make human sacrifices by burning people alive and I believe they use the Breakspear Crematorium in London to make these human sacrifices. The Breakspears are an English-Italian family that produced the only English pope in history. The Breakspear name is translated to Lancerotti a variant to the name Lancelotti. One of the Massimo family branches merged with the Lancellotti family creating the Massimo-Lancellotti family which still exist and live in Rome headed up by Prince Filippo and Prince Ludovico. The Clerkenwell and Rathkeale mafias which the Massimos of Roccasecca own are involved in crimes involving tens of millions to hundreds of millions in a single crime or trafficking operation. I believe these mafias make billions per year.
 
source
 
https://vk.com/wall450522484_72753?ysclid=m4a9iu24dp930145106
https://mafia.wikia.org/wiki/Michael_Lancellotti
https://www.mentealternativa.com/familia-breakspear-lancellotti-casa-de-magos/
https://www.tapintothetruth.com/bloodlines-families
https://exploringrealhistory.blogspot.com/search?q=breakspear
http://pigs-in-the-parlor.blogspot.com/2009/01/breakspear-family-bloodline-by-craig.html?m=1
https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/the-breakspeare-family/
https://stateofthenation.co/?p=172054
https://religionnews.com/2024/01/05/brazilian-politicians-move-to-investigate-a-priest-sparks-outpouring-of-support-for-the-clergyman/
https://www.theqtree.com/2019/12/28/the-pelosi-dalesandro-lucchese-gambino-crime-family-a-bibliography/
https://pdfcoffee.com/the-black-nobility-crime-families-pdf-free.html
https://mirrorsoftruth1.blogspot.com/2019/01/massimo-mafia-of-london.html

House of Orsini & Rosenberg: Alchemical Mafia

House of Orsini & Rosenberg: Alchemical Mafia
 
Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v5vseph-house-of-orsini-and-rosenberg-alchemical-mafia.html
 
I am going to do a deep dive every day of each of the families that control the world. Tonight’s focus is the Orsini & Rosenberg House. They are called the Alchemical Mafia because Prince Pepe Domenico Napoleon Orsini, the Duke of Gravina, is the Grey Pope. The number one. He receives his orders from Fallen Angels (my best guess is Azazel and Samyaza) and directs the black and white pope to control duality on earth. The Orsini Family have perfected the Diana Tree Deep Purple Philosopher’s stone 500 years ago, they then challenged the Breakspear family over rights to the Catholic Church and won. The breaking of the stones occurred and The Breakspear’s philosophers stone broke. It took the Orsini family 400 years to weed out all of the spies and families who were the old guard. Around the late 1800’s, The Breakspear’s conceded control and gave the Orsini’s the spear of destiny (spear of Longinus or the speak that pierced the side of Jesus)
 
Pepe Orsini – The Grey Pope is the Chief of the Rothschilds, Chief of the Rockefellers, Head of the Vatican and Chief of the Complete Black Nobility. Pepe Orsini, known by many aliases, including Domenico Napoleone Orsini, is a name that strikes fear into the hearts of those who dare to delve into the depths of global influence. Behind closed doors, he wields unimaginable power, pulling the strings of the world’s most influential figures like a master puppeteer. This article is not for the faint of heart, as we peel back the layers of secrecy surrounding this enigmatic figure and expose the truth behind the most powerful man in the world.
 
In a world where the facade of democracy masks the reality of oligarchy, there exists a hidden hierarchy of power that dictates the course of humanity. At the top of this pyramid sits a man whose name strikes terror into the hearts of those who dare to challenge his authority: Pepe Orsini, also known as the Grey Pope.
 
You may not have heard of him, but make no mistake – Pepe Orsini is the puppet master behind the curtains of global affairs. He is the chief orchestrator of the Rothschilds, the mastermind behind the Rockefellers, and the puppeteer pulling the strings within the hallowed halls of the Vatican. But his influence extends far beyond these prestigious institutions; Pepe Orsini is the undisputed head of the complete black nobility, the shadowy figures who lurk in the darkness, manipulating the course of history to suit their own insatiable desires.
 
Unveiling the Grey Pope: Pepe Orsini operates in the shadows, his machinations hidden from public view. While the media distracts the masses with trivialities, he pulls the levers of power, shaping the world according to his own twisted vision. But who is this enigmatic figure, and what drives him to seek such absolute control?
 
Born into the prestigious Orsini family, Pepe was groomed from a young age to take his place among the ruling elite. But unlike his predecessors, he possessed a cunning intellect and a ruthless ambition that set him apart from his peers. Rising through the ranks of the Vatican hierarchy, he quickly established himself as a force to be reckoned with, his influence extending far beyond the confines of the Holy See.
 
The Puppet Master: But Pepe Orsini’s reach extends far beyond the Vatican. As the chief of the Rothschilds, he controls the purse strings of the world’s most powerful banking dynasty, manipulating global markets with a flick of his wrist. Likewise, as the head of the Rockefeller empire, he holds sway over the oil industry, shaping energy policy to suit his own ends.
 
But perhaps most insidious of all is Pepe Orsini’s control over the complete black nobility. These shadowy figures, whose names never appear in the press, wield immense influence behind closed doors, their actions shaping the course of history in ways that few can comprehend. And at the head of this clandestine cabal sits Pepe Orsini, the Grey Pope, the most powerful man in the world.
 
The Truth Unveiled: But why does Pepe Orsini operate in the shadows? What drives him to seek such absolute power? The truth may never be known, but one thing is clear: he will stop at nothing to achieve his goals. Whether through manipulation, coercion, or outright violence, Pepe Orsini will do whatever it takes to maintain his stranglehold on the world.
 
But we cannot allow ourselves to be cowed by his machinations. We must shine a light into the darkness, exposing the truth behind the Grey Pope and his ilk. Only then can we hope to break free from their grasp and forge a future where power truly rests in the hands of the people.
 
So the next time you hear whispers of Pepe Orsini, remember who he truly is: the most powerful man in the world, the puppet master pulling the strings of global affairs. And remember that it is only by standing together, united in our determination to resist tyranny, that we can hope to overcome the forces of darkness and build a better world for ourselves and for future generations.
 
Pepe Orsini Gray Pope – Knights of Malta elect new leader as Vatican. Many researchers believe he is the grey pope and is the king of the holy roman papal bloodlines.. Allegedly above the rothschilds and rockefellers but in line and pepe is known to be a major depopulationists like most global elites. The orsini family are one with much history in relation to the catholic church, the jesuits and the papacy. This gray pope, pepe orsini, is therefore the true monarch, because he comes from the papal bloodline. It was one of the most influential princely families in medieval italy and renaissance. Apparently the grey pope(orsini) is the most powerful of all but its little information online about his history.
 
He is the grey pope and is the king of the holy roman papal bloodlines. He is the supreme ruler of the earth. Henry breakspear and pepe orsini are in. Pepe Orsini of the roman maximus clan.
 
Grey Nobility Top Secret Thread
 
Some blame Jews others say zionists others say El Vaticano, or the queen of England or even El presidente of the banana republic while some blame the Rothschilds and the 13 “illuminati” familias or the Jesuits. Me? Well after 8 years of research I can say is that 33 families currently run the show. They all originate from the Akkadian empire way before Atlantis was even heard of. I mean after all Atlantis would have been around ancient Egypt times.
 
These families changed names as the times changed but they still play the same role of playing the oligarchs controlling the throne of the emperor/king/pharaoh/president whom ever was leader of whatever empire they controlled at the time through MASSIVE amounts of wealth. These families are the ones that helped fund the creation of the Vatican helped create the Zionist state of Israel.
 
They are the ones that helped fund the crusades, the revolutions of both France and America, the 2 world wars as well as this current war on terror and the upcoming 3rd world war that we are entering. These families have infiltrated into every aspect of society. I said there are 33 families because there are 3 types of nobilities they go by with 11 families in each type of nobility. You got the white nobility which are more public and consider themselves to be the modern day oligarchs or the “technocrats” they are more public and they are names you guys might have heard about such as the Rothschilds/Rockefellers etc.
 
Then you got the black nobility you may have heard of them they are the people that are behind such secret societies like the Jesuits and the knights of Malta. They are also members of the Vatican’s courts. Some of these families go by the names like orsini, Breakspear, pallavicini, aldobrandini.
 
Then last but not least you got the grey nobility these families are never known to the general public or the conspiracy group itself. The only thing that is known about these people are that they are behind the Arcana Arcanoum society, the rite of Atlantis, etc. The grey nobility are the ones who decide who gets to be Grey Pope of Rome.
 
GREY AND BLACK POPES – PEPE ORSINI … THE GREY POPE
The most powerful man right now in the conspiracy over this World is a Roman by the name of PEPE ORSINI of the powerful Roman Papal Bloodline the Orsini also known as Orso and the ancient Maximus family.
 
There is no one more powerful than this figure who is really the Grey Pope.
Pepe Orsini of the Roman Maximus Clan. Hes the Grey Pope and is the King of the Holy Roman Papal Bloodlines. Above the Rothschilds and Rockefellers but in line and of equal stature to the Breakspear, Aldobrandini, and other Papal Bloodlines.
 
Knight of Malta, Tom Cruise donates to the Optimum Population Trust of Manchester, England. He and his father are major depopulationists. Both are tied to the Papal bloodline Orsini family a most powerful family in complete control of the conspiracy. Pepe Orsini is the grey Pope working with his Black Pope in his Society Of Jesus. The Orsini(Maximus/Orso) family are the Zoroastrianist shadow hierachy of the Jesuit Order.
 
The “Illuminati” is only one of the six current heads that make up “the Beast” and there is a head to that beast…a woman who rides that beast, the evil Queen Hephzibah. You will never read any article about her, nor will you find any links to any web information about her, she is a Nephilim hybrid
 
Ptolemaic Papal Bloodlines : Just who is Running the show
 
Orsini
Breakspear
Aldobrandini
Farnese
Somaglia
 
All controlled through the Jesuit Order and their Knights of Malta & Teutonic Knights all based in missile protected Borgo Santo Spirito in Rome.
 
Pepe Orsini – Italy
Henry Breakspear – Macau, China
This is the true power finally.
This is the Guelph and the Ghibelline power over mankind.
The Cecil family were controlled by the powerful Jesuit family known as the Pallavicini.
Maria Camilla Pallavicini is far more powerful than Queen Elizabeth II.
 
The Queen and Prince Philip are totally subordinate to the Papal Bloodline the Breakspear Family and their Jesuit UKHQ at 114 Mount Street.
Please go and study who funded Elizabeth I that astronomical amount of money to fight the Spanish, yes Pallavicini.
 
The most powerful man right now in the conspiracy over this World is a Roman by the name of PEPE ORSINI of the powerful Roman Papal Bloodline the Orsini also known as Orso and the ancient Maximus family.
There is no one more powerful than this figure who is really the Grey Pope.
The Papal Bloodlines are the secret shadow hieracy of the Jesuit Order even behind the Black Pope touted at the #1.
 
These powerful bloodlines are the Breakspear, Somaglia, Orsini, Farnese & Aldobrandini.
 
You’ll notice David Rothschild marrying into the Aldobrandini with the pretty, Princess Olimpia Aldobrandini.
 
Another real head of this is Henry Breakspear who resides now in Macau in China.
 
Many of the Papal Bloodline heads now live in Asia and India. What does that tell you?
 
The current Black Pope, Adolfo Nicholas was bought forward for the position due to the Jesuits bringing about of Asia as the next power player of the agenda.
 
Both this Black Pope and the white Pope aren’t of Papal Bloodline, they are both commoners.
 
I’ve named the most powerful families on the planet. I’ve named the Grey Pope the one inbetween the white and black but unseen
 
Saturnalian Brotherhood – The Real 13 Zoroastrian Bloodlines of the Illuminati
 
House of BorjaHouse of BreakspeareHouse of SomagliaHouse of OrsiniHouse of ContiHouse of ChigiHouse of ColonnaHouse of FarneseHouse of MediciHouse of GaetaniHouse of PamphiliHouse of EsteHouse of Aldobrandini
 
These Egyptian Ptolemaic Dynasty Rulers are in Full Control of the Company of Jesus, High Grey Council of Ten, and the Black Pope
This is some good info on the Black Pope:
 
The ‘Black Pope’, Superior Jesuit General (The President of the World), speaks at Loyola ‘Military Fortress’ University in his un-ratified 14th Amendment ‘Little Rome’ D.C United States Corporation.
A corporation under International Maritime Admiralty Law (Uniform Commerical Code) based upon Vatican Canon Law and perfected by the Roman Empire.
 
He lies about his power, he’s over the Pope as of 1814.
He only serves and works with the shadow Jesuits being the Papal Bloodline Orsini’s, Breakspear’s, Aldobrandini’s, Farnese’s, Somalgia’s.
Adolfo is not of Papal Bloodline, some Black Pope’s have been.
 
The next in power beneath the Jesuits is the Bourbon, King Juan Carlos of Spain. The Roman Monarch of the World, The King of Jerusalem and SMOM Military Navigator.
 
This is the true World’s power system right now.
 
Adolfo serves as a military General protecting the Zoroathrianism and Mithraism mystery schools.
 
The Jesuits were created by the Papal Bloodline Farnese during the reign of Farnese Pope Paul III.
 
Loyola was commissioned by Alessandro Cardinal Farnese.
 
The Borgia crime family created the Jesuits!!
After the terrible reign of Pope Alexander VI, the Romans were disgusted with the Spanish and vowed that there would never be another Spanish Pope. This animosity toward the Spanish was further aggravated by the Sack of Rome in 1527 in order to prevent the divorce of Henry VIII from Catherine of Aragon.
 
The Borgia answer to this Spanish animosity was the creation of the order of Jesuits—a quasi religious/military strike force whose members were totally dedicated to their Spanish leader who bore the military title of general.
 
Like the White Pope, the general is elected for life and the Jesuit dynasty is a parallel or pseudo Papacy….Of course, the general is content to run the show from behind the scenes so as not to arouse the age-old Italian hatred for the Spanish.
 
The Jesuit general is referred to as the ‘”Black” Pope at the Vatican because he always dresses in black.
 
The Jesuits were officially founding in 1540 by Pope Paul III. Ignatius LIEola became their first general.
 
Don Francis Borgia was the great-grandson of Pope Alexander VI, and co-founder of the Jesuits. On his mother’s side he was descended from King Ferdinand of Aragon.
 
The Spanish control the Vatican through the Jesuits.
 
For the past 500 years, the Spanish Inquisition has controlled the Vatican by means of the Jesuits. All the Jesuits answer to their general in Rome, and he in turn is content to run the show from behind the scenes, without any publicity or public acclaim so as not to arouse the age-old Italian hostility to the Spanish.
 
Every one knows about the fabricated Italian Spanish ( verbal)war and it still is used in Propaganda to day to keep them all dumbed down.
So down with the Pope ? Well Sorry to inform you ! The rabbit hole is far far deeper than that.
 
But this is the tip of the all seeing eye of the modern day crumbling pyramid.
 
Keep all your gold and silver for your self now, just as this killing system gets dismantled by us all.
 
And dismantled it will be thanks to you spreading this awareness.
The funny thing is That the Cardinals who pretend to pick the pope under lock and key say that God comes in the presence and selects the Pope. Ever thought if that were so, that would get 7 billion viewers on television if true?
 
What do they take us for ?
 
All the above named have picked every monarch and every pope and every president to maintain the Roman and British empires Through shear tyranny. JUST READ THE JESUIT OATH FOR YOUR SELF AND SEE HOW MUCH MURDER THEY SWARE TO: They have stolen your rights to be what you really really are supposed to be :
 
Massive balls of light spiritual beings TOing and FROing around the universe.
 
The food they control you to digest, ruins the very spiritual glands that bring you into true self beings. You are a remarkable evolutant construct soul in reincarnate spiritual 3D vehicles.
 
Wondering where your spirit and soul has gone.
 
Adapt the truthful way of nature and evolution again for your spiritual acclaim and be in charge of your health and stop being subservient to Pharmaceutical Chemical bioweapons and poisins, in addition to the killing doctors and dentists of Jesuits practices here: Ask your self this ? Who would knowingly and willingly sell Flouride in toothpaste and put long lasting mercury fillings in teeth?
 
If it isn’t to dumb down your Pineal Gland ( the spiritual cosmic conscious gland in the geocentric location of the brain).
 
Take the gold off these thieves and claim it back for your selves from every single person in this matrix, because it is all yours and Make Planned Citizens Arrests as and when the ITCCS present them.
 
It has been stolen from every one of you in all of your previous lives. What you may not know and comprehend is you have once in your life time, been given the choice to come here and take it all back and you agreed to DO EXACTLY THAT and be here to reclaim it. You unfortunately have been controlled with amnesia and have simply forgotten why you are here:
Albert Einstein once said ” The Past, Present and Future run in the same space time concurrently : If you would like to predict what happened in the future all you have to do is remember it”.
 
It is yours to reclaim and so are all the churches and cathedrals built in the guise of religion STOLEN FROM YOUR POCKETS, EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU : The secret vaults contain your secrets to spiritual success and achievment, these too are your property and for your own education.
These need to be in your possession and instead, like gold, are locked away in the basement vaults of the vatican and in the British Museum and many other so called sacred tombs.
 
 
 
Saturnalian Brotherhood: Zorastrians – Top Tier
 
House of Orsini Family of Rome (Orsini & Rosenberg Alchemical Mafia)House of Borja (Borgia)House of Breakspeare (Magi / Lancellotti)House of Colonna (Colombo Crime Family)House of Farnese Military BloodlineHouse of AldobrandiniHouse of SomagliaHouse of Caetani Gaetani D’Aragona (Bourbon / Gotti / Gambino / Trump)House of Chigi-Albani Della RovereHouse of MediciHouse of Doria Pamphilj LandiHouse of Este
 
The Black Nobility and Papal Bloodlines – Second Tier
 
House of AlbaHouse of Bathory (Dracula, Order of Bath, Prince Charles and Blood Bath Ritual)House of BonaparteHouse of BorromeoHouse of BourbonDreyfus familyHouse of HabsburgGuinness, Hennessy and Bailey FamiliesHouse of Marescotti-RuspoliOdescalchi FamilyHouse of Orange-Nassau (the Cult of Venus)House of OsorioThe Pallavicini familyHouse of Sacchetti Doria (Goldman Sachs)House of SavoyHouse of SforzaHouse of Torlonia and BorgheseHouse of Windsor and HAARPMassimo Family and The Italian Nobility
 
Illuminati – Third Tier (New Money)
 
The Astor BloodlineThe Bundy BloodlineThe Collins BloodlineThe DuPont BloodlineThe Freeman BloodlineThe Kennedy BloodlineThe Li BloodlineThe Onassis BloodlineThe Reynolds BloodlineThe Rockefeller BloodlineThe Rothschild BloodlineThe Russell BloodlineThe Van Duyn BloodlineThe Merovingian Bloodline
The Disney BloodlineThe Krupp BloodlineThe McDonald BloodlineThe Gates BloodlineThe Bush BoodlineThe Clinton BloodlineThe Kraft BloodlineThe Taft BloodlineThe Smith BloodlineThe Carter BloodlineThe Zuckerburg BloodlineThe Beso BloodlineThe Murdock BloodlineThe Elon Musk Bloodline
 
Orsini & Rosenberg Alchemical Mafia
 
The Orsini family of Rome, Orsini-Rosenberg family of Austria, and the Roseneberg family of Bohemia created and manage Rosicrucianism or the Order of the Rosy Cross which is a secret society of alchemists. The Orsini family are owners of the Cleveland crime family, Ursino mafia clan of Calabria, factions of the Israeli Mafia and modern Jewish Mafia, and they manage the Orsoni political criminals in Corsica. The Italian-American  Robert Pera is an agent of the Orsinis and he owns the Memphis Grizzlies NBA team and is worth about 7 billion. Pera also founded Ubiquiti Networks in New York which is a wireless communications company that is also involved in electronic harassment. Orsini derives from the word Urso which means a bear like a grizzly bear. 
 
The Orsini-Rosenbergs have bears on their coat of arms. Alchemy is the manipulation of the human psyche and biology through chemicals and is a form of chemical warfare. These families all use the rose on their coat of arms. The Rosicrucian Order is also called the Order of the Rosy Cross. They work with the Merck family which created and partly own Merck Group a pharmaceutical company that creates vaccines. The Merck family are an old German nobility and they have 3 roses on their coat of arms. Kathrein-Werke is a German antenna and electronics company founded in Rosenheim, Germany. Rosenheim uses a rose for its coat of arms. The billionaire Anton Kathrein Jr. is the CEO and owner of Kathrein-Werke and an agent of the Rosenbergs which use antennas and electronics for their electronic warfare on society. Prince Alois-Konstantin of Lowenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg recently worked as the director of Merck Finck & Co which is a private German bank that took over the Rothschild’s Austrian bank during WWII. Prince Alois-Konstantin’s father was a Nazi and member of the SA, Roman Knight of Malta, Vatican Knight, Bavarian Knight, Habsburg Knight, and a Prussian-Nazi Knight. Matthias Schellenberg is the current CEO of Merck Fink & Co bank with Olivier Kuetgens as a member of the Executive Board. Stefan Oschmann is the Chairman and CEO of Merck Group.  Ernesto Bertarelli is an Italian-Swiss businessman worth about 8 billion and he founded Serono which was sold to Merck Group creating its division Merck Serono. 
 
The FDA and most food and drug companies are infiltrated by Rosicrucians. Scott Gottlieb is the Commissioner of the FDA and he is a Rosicrucian trained in alchemy. The influential rap producer named Alchemist is an agent of the Orsinis and he is a Jewish mobster trained in alchemy and involved in chemical warfare on society. The Alchemist works with the rap executive and Jewish mobster Paul Rosenberg. The Orsini family were behind the Ebola propaganda and had developed deadly Ebola vaccines. The creator of the Georgia Guidestones which aim to regulate the population of humanity used the name RC Christian as an alias and was really Robert C Cook an American geneticist involved in population control and eugenics. RCC like Roman Catholic Church and like Rosy Cross. The Rosicrucians made a YouTube video placing a time cube with MM and 16 on it. MM for 2000 and 16 together meant 2016. They intended to unleash a fake outbreak in 2016 to bring down the United States and target society with their deadly vaccines. They planned to go as far as quarantining towns and forcing these deadly vaccines on society because of a fake outbreak. The depictions shown of the Ebola virus under a microscope look like an two eights. 8+8=16. The Japanese movie called Virus used a virus called MM88 designed by an American eugenicist. Using movies, media, and numbers like this are a form of sorcery designed to subliminally manifest their agendas. Once this was all exposed the Ebola propaganda ended within the week. They are behind Zika as well. All vaccines should be considered dangerous.
 
Vaccines are one of the most destructive tools these tyrants use on humanity and are primarily designed to target the nervous system and weaken a persons spiritual armor or electromagnetic shield. Many vaccines also use live viruses which cause diseases. Many of these corrupt food and pharmaceutical companies use research as their front to engineer diseases. The Orsini and Rosenberg families were also responsible for the Black Plague. They hired people to poison well water in order to spread the disease. The song Ring O Roses goes back to the times of the Black Plague. They used rose petals to mask the smell of death. I also found two people with the name Rosenberg that work in high level positions at Bayer today. Zeev Rosenstein is an Israeli mobster and international ecstasy trafficker that has worked with the Gambinos in the United States. Ecstasy or MDMA is a dangerous synthetic drug developed and patented by Merck in 1913. The Orsinis and Rosenbergs are part owners of the Israeli Mafias and they were part owners of the Jewish Mafias in the United States. Chris Rosenberg was a Jewish member of the Gambino crime family during the 70’s and 80’s. 
 
The Del Balsos are an Italian-American family that owned a construction empire in New York City during the 1930’s up until the 1960’s and they built bridges, roads, and subways. They built the New York underworld which is used for covert human trafficking. The Del Balsos lived in 740 Park Avenue with the Rockefellers. The Orsinis had a branch called the Orsini Del Balzos. Francesco Del Balso is a Italian mobster that operates in Canada just as the Ursinos operate in Canada. The Orsinis own the Ursino clan of Ndrangheta also called the Lo Presti clan with Luciano Ursino and Giuseppe Ursino as members as well as Luigi Ursino. Today the Orsini family are part owners of the Cleveland crime family or Liccavole crime family which are closely allied with the Detroit Mafia. The Cleveland Italian-American mobster James Licavole worked closely with the Purple Gang a Jewish Mafia. Paul Rosenberg is the CEO and President of Def Jam and he is from Detroit and is a criminal associate of the Detroit Mafia and an agent of the Orsinis and Rosenbergs. Paul Rosenberg is extremely evil and he works closely with Eminem. The Detroit Mafia is owned by the Odescalchi family and the Odescalchis and Orsinis are intermarried. An insecure very little gang stalking zealot and slanderous cannibal in my region named Jimmy Laccavole works for the Orsinis and their Licavole mobsters. Jimmy Laccavole is extremely evil and depraved and is a psychotic lying accuser that falsely accuses others for his depraved crimes. He worships satanic witches and female cannibals. The Colonna family of Rome work closely with the Orsini family and are also involved with pharmaceuticals. Stefano Colonna developed the Julia-Colonna Epoxidation which is used by Bayer and Evonik today. 
 
The Italian billionaire Stefano Pessina who owns Walgreens is an agent of the Orsinis and Colonnas. The Julia-Colonna Epoxidation is used for binding toxic chemicals with human enzymes. The actor Aaron Stanford is an sadistic alchemical terrorist working for the Orsinis and using bio-neuro hacking software to torment people. Amber Rose is an agent of the Orsinis and she is a major child murderer. The Orsini and Rosenberg families have also used a bear on their coat of arms. The Akkadian word for bear is Urso also used by Latins. The Orsinis descend from the tribe of Urartu which was north of the Akkadian Empire. The Orsini and Rosenberg families oversee chemical companies like Bayer, Evonik, and Merck and use Rosicrucians to run and infiltrate food and drug companies. Princess Isabella Orsini is an Italian actress and she is married to the Belgian Prince Edouard de Ligne whose father has met with Reuvin Rivlin the President of Israel. Large amounts of Ecstasy are produced in Belgium. Prince Domenico Orsini, Don Benedetto Orsini, Prince Raimondo Orsini, and Prince Lelio Orsini are members of this evil and destructive family. Prince Karl of Lowenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg, Prince Felix of Lowenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg, Prince Michael of Lowenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg, Prince Dominik Lowenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg and the sadistic tyrant Prince Alois Konstantin of Loewenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg are Austrian-German members of this wicked clan of mobsters and chemical poisoners.
 
Show clip 1
 
Prince Domenico Napoleon Orsini is an owner of the Israeli Mafia, Cleveland crime family, and Ursino crime family. Prince Domenico is a top overseer of the Rosicrucian Order. Prince Domenico is extremely evil and destructive.
 
The Lo Presti family of Bardonecchia, known as I Maneja is a ‘ndrina originally from Marina di Gioiosa Ionica, related with the Mazzaferro crime family, which operated in Bardonecchia, Piedmont for over 50 years.
In 1993, nephew Giuseppe Ursino along with 15 other people were arrested in Bardonecchia for the trafficking of arms and drugs. Exponents of the Cataldo ‘ndrina from Locri are also involved and arrested.[1]
Since 2000, the criminal structures in Bardonecchia changed. Lo Presti named his successors, his favourite nephews, the brothers Luciano and Giuseppe Ursino. Soon after, Luciano Ursino entered into business relations with the brothers Adolfo and Aldo Cosimo Crea, originating from Stilo, Calabria, emerging bosses of the ‘Ndrangheta in Turin.
 
Leader(s) Luciano Ursino, Giuseppe UrsinoConvicted Mafia boss Giuseppe (Pino) Ursino smiled faintly when he was sentenced to 11 ½ years in prison on drug trafficking charges in Toronto on Thursday.
Giuseppe Ursino is a high-ranking member of the ‘NdranghetaAlleged Montreal Mafia leader Francesco “Chit” Del BalsoHe is still serving the 11-year sentence he was given in October 2008, after he pleaded guilty to cocaine smuggling and a gangsterism charge related to how he acted as a leader in the Rizzuto organization between 2002 and 2006.
 
In the 75 years since it opened, 740 Park Avenue has housed an extraordinary group of tenantsAnthony M and Mary Del BalsoHe: Del Balso Construction1950-1964John D. Jr. and Martha Baird RockefellerStandard Oil1947-1971
 
FRANK DEL BALSO – Forty five years in the excavating and building business have brought great success to Frank Del Balso. treasurer of Frank Del Balso & Sons, Inc., No. 1662 Boston Road, The Bronx, New York City. To much of the older, as well as the more recent construction, in that rapidly growing part of New York this concern can point as the result of their good workmanship. Frank Del Balso, founder of the company, was born in Campobasso, Italy, February 23, 1865, son of Antonio and Angelina Del Balso, both of whom died in Italy.
 
The Orsini del Balzo[1][2][3] (or Del Balzo Orsini[2]) were a noble family of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries founded by Raimondo “Raimondello” Orsini, who inherited from the Count of Soleto, Raimondo del Balzo, brother of the ava Sveva del Balzo, he had to inherit the estate and for memory towards this ancestor he united his surname with that of the Del Balzo.[1] The family died out in just two generations, becoming legitimate in 1463 with the death of Giovanni Antonio Orsini del Balzo, son of Raimondo.[2]
 
Show clip 2
 
Prince Lelio Orsini with his father Prince Raimondo Orsini and they are owners of the Cleveland crime family, some Ndrangheta clans, and the Israeli Mafia through the ecstasy trafficker Zeev Rosenstein.
 
Show clip 3
 
Prince Domenico Napoleon Orsini with Princess Isabella Orsini an Italian actress who is married to Prince Edouard de Ligne of Belgium. Belgium is a major exporter of ecstasy.
 
The leader of an international drug syndicate that funneled thousands of ecstasy pills through Belgium and France to Denver and Boulder was sentenced to 11 years in prison this week.
 
Simion and his co-conspirators advertised on darknet online marketplaces including the Silk Road and Silk Road 2.0 under the vendor name “ItalianMafiaBrussels.”
 
Show clip 4
 
Princess Isabell Orsini with her Belgian husband Prince Edouard de Ligne
 
Show clip 5
 
Prince Edouard’s father Prince Michel Charles Lamoral de Ligne giving a speech in Israel with Reuvin Rivlin the current President of Israel.
 
Show clip 6
 
Zeev Rosenstein is an Israeli mobster and an international ecstasy trafficker. https://www.haaretz.com/1.5202801
 
Rosenstein, 58, is basing his request mainly on his medical condition, his treatment in recent years for a severe illness, and the suffering he says he endured while in detention in the United States, where he was originally tried and convicted for trafficking 1 million Ecstasy pills.
 
Zeev Rosenstein is suspected of involvement in distributing more than 1 million Ectasy pills in the United States, mostly in New York and Miami.
 
The most commonly heard estimate is that Israeli criminals control no less than 75 percent of the Ecstasy market in the U.S. Along with the small fry, some Israelis in the top ranks of the Ecstasy business have also been arrested – notably Jacob “Cookie” Orgad, who controlled the market in Los Angeles, and Ilan Zarger, who was the Ecstasy supplier to the well-known Mafia figure Salvatore (Sammy the Bull) Gravano, from the Gambino crime family.
 
Show clip 7
 
Prince Alois-Konstantin of Lowenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg with his wife Princess Anastasia who is from the House of Hohenzollern. Prince Alois-Konstantin's father was a Knight of Malta, Nazi SA member, and President of the Central Committe for German Catholics. Prince Alois-Konstantin recently worked as the director of Merck Finck & Co an Austrian bank founded by the Merck family. The Merck family also founded and own Merck Group a large pharmaceutical company which created Ecstasy or MMDA.
 
Karl Friedrich prince to Löwenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg (born February 8, 1904 in Kleinheubach , † August 23, 1990 ibid) was from 1948 to 1967 President of the Central Committee of German Catholics. The landowner, who was born Prince of Löwenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg , appeared as his Prince-Prince until his father's death in 1952, then as Prince of Löwenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg.[3]
 
On the Katholikentag in Nuremberg in 1931 he confessed his admiration for some aspects of politics the fascist regime in Italy.
 
During the Nazi era, however, Löwenstein was then a member of the SA and in 1934 asked the students of the Unitas to follow his example.
 
Karl's son Alois Konstantin follows this family tradition by serving as board member of the Forum of German Catholics since 2001
 
Alois Konstantin Fürst zu Löwenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg [1] (born December 16, 1941 in Würzburg) is a German lawyer, manager and chief of the house Löwenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg. [2]
 
He held executive positions in Frankfurt am Main and Munich for the private bank Merck Finck & Co and the LGT Bank of the Princely House of Liechtenstein. Until 2005 he was Managing Director of "Federated Asset Management GmbH" in Frankfurt am Main.
 
Löwenstein is involved in various social projects in the Holy Land. In 1971 he was appointed Knight of the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulcher of Jerusalem
 
Knight of the Order of the Golden Fleece
Knight of the Order of Malta 
Iron Cross (EK I)
1955: Great Federal Cross of Merit with star and shoulder band of the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany
1955: Bavarian Order of Merit
1955: Grand Cross of the Order of Gregory , the Pontifical Order of St. Gregory the Great
 
Our archive analysis confirmed that MDMA was, in fact, first synthesized at Merck as early as 1912, as proved by two documents which described explicitly the making of MDMA. The first is a German patent with the number 274350, from which both the original patent instrument (‘Patent-Urkunde’) and the patent specification (‘Patentschrift’) were retrieved (Fig. 1). The second is the Annual Report for 1912 (Jahresbericht für 1912) of Merck’s ‘Scientific Laboratory’ (the German phrases are direct quotes from the documents, and English citations are direct translations from the German originals).
 
Show clip 8
 
Prince Dominik Lowenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg is the son of Prince Alois-Konstantin. Prince Dominik is an extremely evil gang stalking commander and alchemical tormentor who needs to be executed immediately. He manages some factions of the Jewish and Israeli mafias. Prince Dominik Lowenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg manages a malicious and cannibalistic gang stalker named Jacob Scott Ballard who has a YouTube troll channel called Cringe Bear. The name Orsini derives from the word Urso which means bear.
 
Show clip 9
 
Jacob Scott Ballard is an extremely evil, disgusting, lying, piggish, cannibalistic gang stalker and excrement eater working for the Orsini-Rosenberg family and the Jesuits. He says his name is Jacob Scott Ballard of his videos. Below is his YouTube channel called Cringe Bear. This devil needs a painful death.
 
Show clip 10
 
Anton Kathrein Jr. (born 1983/1984) is a German billionaire businessman. He is the owner of Kathrein-Werke KG, a German manufacturer of cables, antenna and receivers that allows cellphone signals to travel across the world. The company was originally founded in Rosenheim in 1919.
 
Show clip 11
 
Prince Felix of Lowenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg is an owner of the Jewish and Israeli mafias and a commander of the Rosicrucian Order. Prince Felix is a slanderer and a pedophile involved in child trafficking rings. Prince Felix runs the family's estate which includes a large farm where he grows herbs and spices. Alchemists use herbs, plants, poisons, spices to manipulate the human mind and body. 
 
Felix Prinz zu Löwenstein was born in 1954 in the North Rhine-Westphalian Weeze on the Dutch border.
 
In Munich he studied agricultural sciences at the TU.
 
In Haiti he worked from 1983 on for three years as a development worker.
 
In 1986 he took over the agricultural and forestry estate of the parents in the southern Hessian Otzberg, which has been owned by the family for 500 years.
 
He switched to organic production in 1991, specializing in the cultivation of herbs and spices. 
 
Show clip 12
 
Prince Michael of Lowenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg is an owner of the Jewish and Israeli mafias and an authority over the Rosicrucian Order. Alchemists use chemicals to harm the human body and mind like causing anxiety, headaches, fatigue, muscle deteriation, joint pain as well as diseases.
 
History of chemistry
 
The protoscience of chemistry, alchemy, was unsuccessful in explaining the nature of matter and its transformations. However, by performing experiments and recording the results, alchemists set the stage for modern chemistry. The distinction began to emerge when a clear differentiation was made between chemistry and alchemy by Robert Boyle in his work The Sceptical Chymist (1661). While both alchemy and chemistry are concerned with matter and its transformations, chemists are seen as applying scientific method to their work.
 
Show clip 13
 
Prince Karl of Lowenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg is an owner of the Jewish and Israeli mafias that also commands the Rosicrucian Order.
 
The Rosicrucian Order, AMORC is known internationally by its traditional and authentic title, the Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis, from which is derived the acronym “AMORC.” The Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis is the Latin form of the organization’s name, which literally translates into the Ancient Mystical Order of the Rose Cross.
 
Throughout medieval Europe mystical knowledge was often necessarily couched in symbolism or disguised and hidden in the love songs of Troubadours, the formularies of Alchemists, the symbolical system known as the Qabala, and the rituals of Orders of Knighthood.
 
As the Renaissance burst upon Europe with a flash of new interest in the arts and sciences, a mysterious publication printed in 17th-century Germany and called the Fama Fraternitatis heralded a renewed interest in Rosicrucianism throughout Europe. The Fama introduces Christian Rosenkreuz, a mythical character who was said to have traveled to centers of learning in the Near East and who personified the revived interest in esoteric studies and mystical learning.
 
Show clip 14
 
Orsini Coat of Arms
 
Show clip 15
 
Rosenberg coat of arms with the rose
 
Show clip 16
 
Merck coat of arms with a man holding three roses
 
I believe The Orsini’s and Rosenbergs are holding the world hostage with the threat of releasing the Ebola Virus. They introduced this as a movie in 1980 called “Virus”.
 
Show clip 17
 
"Ebola" under a microscope shaped as an 8 or 88.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virus_(1980_film)
 
Virus (Fukkatsu no hi) (literal translation: Day of Resurrection) is a 1980 Japanese post-apocalyptic science fiction film directed by Kinji Fukasaku.[3][4]
 
In 1982, a shady transaction is occurring between an East German scientist, Dr. Krause, and a group of Americans. It is revealed that MM88 is a deadly virus, created accidentally by an American geneticist.
 
Their threat was that this genetically modified ebola virus would wipe out almost all humanity. They built the Georgia Guidestones, which were blown up under Trump, as a reminder for the world that if they do not do what the Orsini’s order, they will release it
 
Show clip 18
 
Robert Christian the alias of the man who created the Georgia Guidestones wrote a book about depopulation called Common Sense Renewed and he signed this book with an 8 underneath his name.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones
 
The Georgia Guidestones are a granite monument erected in 1980 in Elbert County, Georgia, in the United States.
 
In June 1979, a man using the pseudonym Robert C. Christian approached the Elberton Granite Finishing Company on behalf of "a small group of loyal Americans", and commissioned the structure.
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1991/01/09/demographer-robert-cook-dies-at-92/ddf0a5d9-5b9f-4557-b961-4922dc631ba9/?noredirect=on
 
Robert C. Cook, 92, a demographer, geneticist and author who was among the first to warn of the dangers of human overpopulation, died of pneumonia Jan. 7 at Collington Retirement Community in Mitchellville.
 
Mr. Cook was editor of the American Genetic Association's Journal of Heredity from 1922 until 1962, and in that capacity began to publish articles during the 1930s advocating birth control and warning that disastrous consequences would result from runaway population growth.
 
He was president of the Population Reference Bureau, a private nonprofit organization that collected and distributed information on population issues, from 1959 to 1968, and while serving there was a frequent witness before congressional committees on matters related to overpopulation.
 
His major work on the subject, "Human Fertility: The Modern Dilemma," was published in 1951. "Next to the atom bomb, the most ominous force in the world today is uncontrolled fertility," Mr. Cook argued in the book.
 
Show clip 19
 
On the Georgia Guidestones it says "Maintain Humanity Under 500 Million in Perpetual Balance With Nature."
 
Show clip 20
 
Paul Rosenberg is a Jewish mobster and music record executive that works closely with the satanic rapper Eminem. Paul Rosenberg is an associate of the Cleveland crime family and an agent of the Orsini and Rosenberg noble families of Italy and Germany.
 
Paul D. Rosenberg (born August 1, 1971) is an American music manager, known for his association with hip hop artists Eminem, The Knux, DJ AM, Action Bronson, and pop punk band Blink-182.[1]
 
On August 1, 2017, he was appointed Chairman and CEO of Def Jam Recordings
 
Origin Detroit, Michigan, United States
 
In the first week of October 1977, Cleveland mobster James Licavoli, nicknamed “Blackie” and “Jack White,” was on a boat at Mosquito Lake about 50 miles east of Cleveland.
 
Blackie moved to Detroit, where he joined the infamous Purple Gang. He was arrested many more times over in Detroit and served time in federal prison for bootlegging.
 
The Purple Gang, also known as the Sugar House Gang, was a criminal mob of bootleggers and hijackers, with predominantly Jewish members. They operated in Detroit, Michigan during the 1920s and came to be Detroit's dominant criminal gang, but ultimately excessive violence and in-fighting caused the gang to destroy itself in the 1930’s.
 
Show clip 21
 
Eminem with Paul Rosenberg and Alchemist on the far right. Alchemist or Daniel Alan Maman is a rap producer and rapper whose father was Israeli. Achemist is a Jewish mobster and he works for the House of Orsini which manage alchemical cults and the Israeli Mafia.
 
Show clip 22
 
Alchemist is also working with the rapper Action Bronson who is a Albanian-Jewish-Muslim and a top boss of the Hellbanianz an Albanian crime group which is based in London and has operations in the United States. Alchemist is a high level Jewish Mafia boss who works with various African-American gangster rappers who are connected to street gangs and Alchemist provides them with connections to drug networks especially ecstasy. The Orsinis manage many small insecure zealous psychopaths like Alchemist.
 
Daniel Alan Maman (born October 25, 1977), professionally known as The Alchemist (or simply Alchemist), is an American record producer, disc jockey (DJ) and rapper.
 
He is currently working as a DJ with Action Bronson. 
 
Alchemist is Eminem's official DJ
 
The Alchemist was born Alan Maman in Beverly Hills, California. His father is a businessman of Israeli descent.
 
Show clip 23
 
Aaron Stanford is one of the most evil members of Hollywood. The Stanford bloodline established Stanford University which runs Silicon Valley. Silicon Valley develops technologies used for electronic harassment on Americans. Aaron Stanford is a psychopath which is blatant and an alchemical tormentor. He is a little thieving devil and one of the most vain and insecure members of Hollywood. He is an agent of the Orsinis. Aaron Stanford needs to be executed and scraped out of creation.
 
Show clip 24
 
Amber Rose is an agent of the Orsinis and she is a mass murderer of children. She covertly brags about having cannibalized dozens of little boys. I believe she claims to have cannibalized 40 boys. In one of her advertisements for her show on VH1 she says on video she supports cannibals.
 
Show clip 25
 
Orsini-Rosenberg coat of arms with two bears.
 
Show clip 26
 
Robert Pera is an extremely evil agent of the Orsinis and involved in rigging NBA games, financing gang stalking commanders like Dwight Howard and torturing people with electronic and wireless frequencies. Robert Pera's ancestry likely originates from the Sephardic Pereira family of Portugal before migrating to northern Italy. Pera and Pereira both mean pear and Pera is the Italian variant of Pereira. Pera di Fassa is an Italian commune in Trentino.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Pera
 
Robert J. Pera (born March 10, 1978) is the founder of Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. a global communications technology company that Pera took public in 2011. In October 2012, Pera also became the owner of professional basketball team, the Memphis Grizzlies, when he purchased the National Basketball Association franchise from Michael Heisley. At the age of 36, Pera earned a spot on Forbes' list of 10 youngest billionaires in the world.
 
Net worth US$7.2 billion (2019)
source
https://worldcrimesyndicate.blogspot.com/2024/06/alchemical-mafia.html
https://stateofthenation.co/?p=122373
https://amg-news.com/pepe-orsini-the-grey-pope-and-the-hidden-hand-of-global-power-chief-of-the-rothschilds-chief-of-rockefellers-head-of-the-vatican-and-chief-of-the-complete-black-nobility-video/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lo_Presti_%27ndrina
https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2019/02/28/toronto-judge-sentences-ndrangheta-crime-boss-to-11-years-for-cocaine-conspiracy.html
https://montrealgazette.com/news/alleged-montreal-mafia-leader-francesco-del-balso-granted-fifth-release
https://www.haaretz.com/1.4839043
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/30/AR2005113000264.html
http://mgross.com/writing/books/740-park/cast-of-characters/
http://www.onlinebiographies.info/ny/bronx/delbalso-f.htm
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=it&u=https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orsini_del_Balzo&prev=search
https://www.denverpost.com/2018/09/27/ecstasy-trafficking-ring-belgium-colorado/
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_zu_L%25C3%25B6wenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg&prev=search
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alois_Konstantin_zu_L%25C3%25B6wenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg&prev=search
http://www.thedea.org/docs/2006_Freudenmann_22846_1.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUTolZMQHqb-EhwxHrpmcSg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Kathrein_Jr.
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/wirtschaft/bio-lebensmittel--umstieg-auf-bio-wird-als-eine-art-verrat-empfunden--22716722&prev=search
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_chemistry
https://www.rosicrucian.org/history
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Rosenberg_(music_manager)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Purple_Gang
https://themobmuseum.org/blog/james-licavoli-ruthless-cleveland-mob-chief-born-august-18-in-1904/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Alchemist_(musician)
https://roserambles.org/2024/08/27/pepe-orsini-the-grey-pope-and-the-hidden-hand-of-global-power-chief-of-the-rothschilds-chief-of-rockefellers-head-of-the-vatican-and-chief-of-the-complete-black-nobility-august-27-2024/

Cushing Syndrome = Aluminum Exposure

Cushing Syndrome = Aluminum Exposure
 
Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v5vgyt5-cushing-syndrome-aluminum-exposure.html
 
What started out to be an article on Lifewave and their patch products, turned into finding proof that our military is/are the ones causing most of America’s health problems. It all leads to the control of Cortisol in our bodies.
 
Cushing syndrome can be caused by:
 
A tumor or excessive growth of the pituitary gland, which is located below the base of the brain.
 
Taking steroid medicines, such as prednisone, or high cortisol levels for a long time causes Cushing Syndrome.
 
Symptoms of Cushing syndrome include:
 
Weight gain, especially in the trunk and face
A round, red face, sometimes called a "moon face"
A fatty lump between the shoulders, sometimes called a "buffalo hump"
Stretch marks on the stomach, hips, thighs, breasts, and underarms
Thin, fragile skin that bruises easily
Acne
Irregular or stopped periods in women
Lower sex drive, reduced fertility, or trouble getting an erection in men
Extreme tiredness
Muscle weakness
 
Aluminum or Carbon Dust exposure can cause a rise in blood cortisol levels, which may indicate that aluminum acts as a chemical stressor. Aluminum can also affect the secretion of other hormones, including: parathormone, testosterone, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, estradiol, norepinephrine, thyroid hormones, and insulin. 
 
Aluminum is a common element in everyday life, found in soil, water, food, medicine, cosmetics, and more. Geoengineering uses heavy metals like aluminum, strontium and barium to control the weather. Exposure to high levels of aluminum can lead to aluminum poisoning, which can affect the blood, musculoskeletal system, kidney, liver, and respiratory and nervous systems.
 
Symptoms of too much aluminum in the body, or aluminum toxicity, can include:
 
Bone pain
Bone pain and multiple nonhealing fractures are common symptoms of chronic aluminum toxicity. 
Mental status changes
Acute or subacute changes in mental status can be a symptom of aluminum toxicity. 
Neurological issues
Aluminum toxicity can cause neurological issues such as speech and motor difficulties, dementia, seizures, and directional disorientation. 
Anemia
Anemia is a symptom of aluminum toxicity. 
Other symptoms
Other symptoms include proximal muscle weakness, premature osteoporosis, and oxidative stress in brain tissue.
 
The hypothalamus and pituitary gland are both located at the base of the brain, with the pituitary gland situated directly below the hypothalamus; essentially, the pituitary gland sits in a small pocket beneath the hypothalamus.
 
Cortisol is a steroid hormone that helps the body respond to stress, maintain blood pressure, and regulate blood sugar and metabolism: 
 
Stress: Cortisol is often called the "stress hormone" because it's released into the bloodstream when you're stressed. However, a temporary increase in cortisol levels is a normal response to stress and doesn't necessarily indicate a health problem. 
Blood pressure: Cortisol helps maintain constant blood pressure. 
Blood sugar: Cortisol helps regulate blood sugar levels. 
Metabolism: Cortisol helps regulate metabolism, which is how the body processes food to create energy. 
Immune function: Cortisol regulates immune function and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. 
The adrenal glands, which sit on top of each kidney, produce the cortisol. The hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis regulates the production and secretion of cortisol.  The adrenal glands produce cortisol in response to signals from the brain's pituitary and hypothalamus: Hypothalamus: Produces corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) Pituitary gland: Secretes adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) in response to CRH Adrenal glands: Produce and release cortisol into the blood in response to ACTH.
 
All About Cortisol - Precision Nutrition
 
The hypothalamus and pituitary gland monitor the amount of cortisol in the blood and adjust the amount of CRH and ACTH released to maintain a balance. This is called a negative feedback loop. 
 
In laymen’s terms, the problem with America’s health is not sugar. If you look at pictures of people who suffer from Cushing Syndrome, they look like typical Americans. Fat around the waist and cheeks and are diabetic. This is due to high levels of aluminum in their systems.
 
Tennessee Governor Bill Lee has signed legislation into law that bans any form of climate engineering operations over the State of Tennessee. Courageous Tennessee lawmakers in the Senate and House had previously passed the legislation which put it on the governor's desk, it has now been signed into law. Though other states have tried, Tennessee has succeeded due to their solid, straightforward and simple bill. Now other states can follow suit by utilizing the Tennessee legislation as a template for their own. New Hampshire is next.
 
Dane Wigington of GeoengineeringWatch.org has reported high levels of aluminum all across America in our atmosphere due to geonegineering, which is a process of controlling the weather, which in 1996, the Military openly said they will own the weather by 2025. Since 1995, the military has been spraying heavy metal particulates in the air due to the national oceanic and atmospheric administration's (NOAA) 1995-2005 strategic plan. On the military’s website, it says, “WFSE personnel will need to be experts in information systems and well schooled in the arts of both
offensive and defensive information warfare. They would also have an in-depth understanding of the GWN and an appreciation for how weather-modification could be employed to meet a CINC's needs.” And “By 2025 we will certainly be capable of increasing or decreasing precipitation over the short term in a localized area.”
 
It goes on, “The technology can be described as follows. Just as a black tar roof easily absorbs solar energy and subsequently radiates heat during a sunny day, carbon black also readily absorbs solar energy. When
dispersed in microscopic or "dust" form in the air over a large body of water, the carbon becomes hot and heats the surrounding air, thereby increasing the amount of evaporation from the body of water below. As the surrounding air heats up, parcels of air will rise and the water vapor contained in the rising air parcel will eventually condense to form clouds.”
 
Although the article doesn’t mention heavy metals, one can speculate what they are using when dispersed in microscopic or "dust" form. They go on to say, “If precipitation enhancement techniques are successfully developed and the right natural conditions also exist, we must also be able to disperse carbon dust into the desired location. Transporting it in a completely controlled, safe, cost-effective, and reliable manner requires innovation. Numerous dispersal techniques have already been studied, but the most convenient, safe, and cost-effective method discussed is the use of afterburner-type jet engines to generate carbon particles while flying through the targeted air.” “This method is based on injection of liquid hydrocarbon fuel into the afterburner's combustion gases”
 
What is carbon dust? Carbon dust is a hazardous waste by-product of the aluminum smelting process that can be recycled and used as an alternative fuel: 
 
Generation Carbon dust is a fine black powder created during the anode manufacturing process, when anode butts are crushed and bath material is cleaned. 
Recycling Carbon dust contains recyclable components like carbon and fluoride, and can be recycled using flotation. 
Alternative fuel Carbon dust's high carbon content makes it suitable as an alternative fuel for industries like cement. 
 
A byproduct from aluminum smelting is being sprayed all over America except for Tennessee and New Hampshire. Commercial airlines are being fueled by this aluminum byproduct because the fuel has the aluminum added. Commercial planes are inadvertently poisoning the people with aluminum which is causing Cushing Syndrome in most Americans since 1995. I have the proof in my links below.
 
What is carbon black?
 
Carbon black is mainly produced by the incomplete combustion of heavy petroleum products including FCC tar, coal tar, ethylene cracking tar, and some vegetable oils. Carbon black has been mainly used in rubber as particles to introduce electrical conductivity, coloring pigment, and mechanical reinforcement. 
 
Carbon black is a form of paracrystalline carbon that has a high surface-area-to-volume ratio, albeit lower than that of activated carbon. It is dissimilar to soot in its much higher surface-area-to-volume ratio and significantly lower (negligible and non-bioavailable) polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) content
 
The most likely effect of exposure to carbon black is lung disease. Inhaling carbon black particles can irritate the lungs and cause coughing. Carbon black can also irritate the eyes, nose, and throat. When people are exposed to high levels of carbon black over many years, the particles may lodge deep in their lungs.
 
Carbon black is possibly carcinogenic to humans based on sufficient evidence in experimental animals and inadequate evidence from epidemiological studies. Inhalation of black carbon is associated with health problems including respiratory and cardiovascular disease, cancer, and even birth defects. And because of its ability to absorb light as heat, it also contributes to climate change.
 
The military, in their article, mentioned both carbon dust and carbon black. “This study by William M. Gray, et al., investigated the hypothesis that "significant beneficial influences can be derived through judicious exploitation of the solar absorption potential of carbon black dust" The study ultimately found that this technology could be used to enhance rainfall on the mesoscale, generate cirrus clouds, and enhance cumulonimbus (thunderstorm) clouds in otherwise dry areas.”
 
The environmental protection agency declared war on black carbon by focusing their efforts on wood and cooking stoves. Research findings and technical support will be provided to other EPA offices, the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves (GACC), the Partnership for Clean Indoor Air (PCIA) and other partners to set global standards for cleaner stoves and fuels and improve current stove designs while taking socio-economic costs into account for those affected.
 
Although the actual chemicals that are sprayed in the air are actually white or cloud in color, perhaps carbon isn’t being used. However to get to the bottom of that, the phrase “solar radiation management” became the go for ingredients. They use sulfur dioxide, finely powdered salt or calcium carbonate, alumina, calcite, diamond, silica, zirconia, sulfuric acid, environmental sulfates, metallic aluminum, aluminum oxide aerosols and barium titanate. Any one of those would turn white like a cloud and disperse across the sky. The Royal Society, The Harvard Solar Geoengineering Research Program (SGRP), The Degrees Initiative, SilverLining, The Alliance for Just Deliberation on Solar Geoengineering, The Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative and The Simons Foundation all who are responsible for spraying the skies. And all of these, except for the salt particles, are carcinogens. 
 
My guess is when nano heavy metals reach our brain, the hypothalamus and pituitary gland tell the adrenal glands to produce more Cortisol. When the body has too much Cortisol, your metabolism stops, your blood pressure rises, blood sugar rises, inflammation occurs, your immune system stops and you are tired all the time. This means you can’t fight off diseases and viruses. Also, when Cortisol is too high, you experience:
 
Lack of sex drive
Irregular, less frequent, or stopped periods in women
Anxiety and depression
Headaches
Heart disease
Memory and concentration problems
Problems with digestion
Trouble sleeping
Weight gain
High blood sugar
To reduce cortisol, academia says to:
 
Eat a balanced diet. What you eat can impact your cortisol levels
Limit caffeine intake. While your morning cup of coffee may wake you up, caffeine can increase your cortisol levels
Get enough sleep
Try relaxation techniques
Consider supplements
 
Cortisol is your body's main stress hormone. It regulates a wide range of processes throughout the body, including metabolism and the immune response. It’s funny that during Covid, no one mentioned to check Cortisol levels, but instead, they recommended we take an experimental mRNA gene therapy drug to produce spike proteins instead of just adjusting the Cortisol levels.
 
If you can manage to detox from all heavy metals, the hypothalamus and pituitary gland will stop relating stress and tell the adrenal glands to produce normal quantities of Cortisol. 
 
LifeWave Patches
 
The patches contain homeopathic materials that reflect low levels of light in the infrared and visible band and stimulate nerves and points on
the skin when activated by body heat. The company does not advertise it generates stem cells, rather just activates them. Their patches are just alternative supplements that get absorbed in your skin via acupuncture points.
 
LifeWave patches contain a variety of ingredients, including: MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane), turmeric, glucosamine, white willowbark, Lidocaine, menthol B1, B2, B3, B12, B9, biotin, D3 and GHK-Cu copper which is the said ingredient that activates stem cells. The ingredients are impressive. 
 
Copper peptide GHK-Cu which is a naturally occurring copper complex of the tripeptide and glycerine glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine. The tripeptide has a strong affinity for copper(II) and was first isolated from human plasma. It can be found also in saliva and urine. It is used to treat battle wounds. You can make GHK-Cu at home by adding GHK copper peptides to a hyaluronic acid base with glycerin and preservatives. You can then add the GHK-Cu to skin, hair, or nail serums, creams, or other preparations.
 
White willowbark is the bark of white willow which contains salicin, which is a chemical similar to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). In combination with the herb's powerful anti-inflammatory plant compounds (called flavonoids), salicin is thought to be responsible for the pain-relieving and anti-inflammatory effects of the herb.
 
MSM or methylsulfonylmethane is a source of natural sulfur. MSM may be beneficial for joint pain, skin inflammation, and other conditions. Typically, MSM supplements contain a synthetic form of MSM. The primary uses for MSM supplements include arthritis, joint pain, muscle recovery after exercise, and allergy relief.
 
Lidocaine is a local anesthetic that prevents pain by blocking nerve endings in the skin.
 
Turmeric is a common spice that comes from the root of Curcuma longa. It contains a chemical called curcumin, which might reduce swelling.
 
Glucosamine is a natural compound found in cartilage. Glucosamine is used by the body to make other chemicals that build tendons, ligaments, cartilage, and the fluid that surrounds joints. Joints are cushioned by the fluid and cartilage around them. Taking glucosamine might increase the cartilage and fluid around joints and/or help prevent their breakdown.
 
Biotin (vitamin B7) is a vitamin found in foods like eggs, milk, and banana. It’s is an essential nutrient that is naturally present in some foods and available as a dietary supplement.
 
These patches were invented by a formal Navy Seal. The company has been under the government’s radar for years because it is actually helping the body heal rather than suppress symptoms.
 
We put Oliver on this patch 2 months ago along with my heavy metal and parasite detox program. He is acting like a kid again. Drawing, playing and wanting to go have fun. For a long time I was skeptical of LifeWave. After reading their ingredients and understanding their delivery approach, it seems to be legit.
 
If you want to try LifeWave patches, email me and I will send you information. me@jamescarner.com
 
I do believe Cushing Syndrome, Alzheimers, Dementia and Alzheimers can be treated with heavy metal detox and life wave patches. What’s the worst that can happen? Nothing.
 
source
 
https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/category/legal-action/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25607118/
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna9880231
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA333462
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA333462.pdf
https://www.lightmetalage.com/news/industry-news/smelting/ega-works-toward-a-circular-economy-supplying-carbon-dust-by-product-as-alternative-fuel/
https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2013-12/documents/black-carbon-fact-sheet_0.pdf

What Really Happened At Waco

What Really Happened At Waco
 
Watch on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v5v4e1k-what-really-happened-at-waco.html
 
For many Americans, Waco represented the nightmare their government had become. On February 28, 1993 federal BATF agents arrived at the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas. They used the pretext that the Davidians failed to pay a small fine on a minor firearms charge. Apparently the government believes Christians who own guns are a greater threat than street gangs, who have turned entire sections of cities into war zones.
 
Instead of knocking on the front door, they jumped out of the back of their truck, and stormed the compound, shooting their machine guns at the building, supposedly to arrest leader David Koresh, who quite frequently went jogging outside of the compound and often drove into town to pick up groceries. The government could have easily arrested him without incident.
 
But they weren’t interested in simply arresting Koresh. They wanted to make a statement. They wanted a confrontation. The Branch Davidians who originally opened the front door to greet them had to slam it shut to save their lives. Several Davidians and BATF agents were injured and killed. The BATF claimed the Davidians shot at them, however the door showed 13 bullet holes coming from the OUTSIDE IN, and none going from the inside out. This door mysteriously dissappeared and has never been found (funny how these things happen in cases like this, isn’t it?). For 51 days we watched the puppet politicians and media villify Koresh and the Davidians as agents of the US government surrounded the compound, cut off power, cut off phone service so the people inside could not tell their side of the story to the public. They set up loudspeakers outside the compound and loudly played the sounds of pigs being slaughtered and heavy metal music 24 hours a day.
 
It all ended on April 19, 1993 when Delta Force agents showed up dressed to kill in Gestapo black uniforms. They hopped into their A-1 tanks and punched holes into the side of the building. They then flooded the building with nerve gas, and apparently started a fire that consumed the building and caused the deaths of 86 of the men, women, and children inside. Although the American public was brainwashed to view Koresh as a sexual maniac with dozens of dazed followers in his hypnotic thrall, the truth was far from that officially endorsed deception.
 
David Koresh was not the raving lunatic who the media and FBI demonized on a daily basis. Koresh wasn’t an unstable egotist who sought solace and validation in any oddball religion that came down the pike. He was born and raised a Davidian, a religion whose origins stretch back to 1934. Far from a Jim Jones figure with a fly-by-night theology, Koresh was a seemingly devout man with a lifelong understanding of the Biblical scriptures, and his followers appreciated that. This clearly symbolized how we live under a de facto executive dictatorship. The White House never felt the need to ask permission of the Congress before it undertook the raid, and the Congress never raised a serious challenge to the White House’s assertion of complete sovereignty. Our elected representatives and media provided the illusion of participatory government, while Reno and various anonymous and unelected underlings held the reins of government and abused their power on a horrific scale.
 
 
Waco was neither a leftwing nor rightwing issue. It is instead an issue that transcends such political categories and cuts to the most profound of questions as to what kind of country this is, what kind it should be, and the very meanings of liberty and tyranny. At Waco, the U.S. government treated the Branch Davidians as any total state might treat its most alienated subjects. It broke into their home aggressively, shot at them recklessly and mockingly defiled their graves. It blocked off their water and their communications with family, counsel and the press. It waged psychological warfare on them. It showed no mercy on the little children that it gassed. It imprisoned the survivors, including one man who wasn’t even in the building during the siege. The Davidians were effectively dehumanized by the central state’s lapdog press, and so all too few voices, even on the hyper-sensitive left, came to their defense when Clinton and Reno’s federal police stampeded them under their weight.
There are always groups that receive less sympathy when they go head to head with the state, and the ruling class knows it and thrives off it. For years, in different ways and to varying extents, it’s also been gun owners, pro life activists, home-schoolers, divorced fathers, and independent entrepreneurs among others. It can be one group that endures the jackboot today and a seemingly opposing group that suffers tomorrow. But the primary concern for a free society is not which kinds of people should have their freedom smashed. The real concern is liberty for all. The capacity of the state to divide peaceful people into groups and set them against one another is its capacity to oppress. When anyone is victimized by the state, all who believe in and love the universal values of freedom, as well as the finer principles on which America was founded, have a moral obligation to oppose it. A government that can get away with what it did at Waco is essentially unleashed, constrained only by its own whim.
 
After Waco it was becoming more popular to criticize the government and there was more open hatred of their tactics. At that time it was mostly the right that spoke out against unchecked government power, erosions of the Bill of Rights, and the imperial executive. But the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City, which occurred on Waco’s two-year anniversary, saved the Clinton presidency and government from a population becoming angry at government abuses of power as it’s partisans successfully blamed the terrorist attack on anti-government attitudes.
 
After the OKC bombing, suddenly we were to believe that even the mild criticism of government heard on mainstream conservative radio was aiding the terrorists. Then the most dramatic change occured with 9-11. After that it became even more politically incorrect to openly criticize government excesses, whether under Bush or Obama. One side will accuse the other of of siding with “the terrorists”.
 
Waco is a reflection of a greater problem. Look at the many laws and policies in America leading up to Waco, and Waco shouldn’t be any surprise. Look at Waco, and the post 9-11 Homeland Security police state falls into place. The continuity between the Clinton and Bush and Obama presidencies on issues of civil liberties demonstrate something that many people don’t want to wrap their minds around. America’s police state is utterly bipartisan. It is designed to persist and indeed extend its reach with each administration, no matter the party in charge. In fact, the political party illusion serves to distract people from the real issues, the state’s trampling of our liberties, and instead devote their hopeful attention and energy to getting one dictatorial gang elected rather than the other.
 
 
Both Clinton and Bush, and now Obama have gotten away with massive prosecutorial abuses, federal police brutality and dramatic attacks on due process for the accused, all while the people have argued over which side is the worse liar and central manager and not how best to restore liberty in America. So Bush’s Patriot Act was condemned by the left while he was in office, but Obama’s and Clinton’s assaults on privacy are ignored or encouraged. The right called Clinton’s seizure of Elian Gonzalez tyrannical, but thought Bush had the “inherent authority” to detain and abuse people without trial or due process. The left lamented how loyally the mainstream media toed Bush’s line on WMD in Iraq, but wasn’t nearly as critical when the media parroted Clinton’s Kosovo war propaganda.
Obama’s and Clinton’s gun grabbing are decried as totalitarian by the right, whereas the Bush federal government got away with door-to-door gun confiscations in New Orleans after Katrina. The federal response to Katrina alone should have lost Bush all of his support among those who found Waco unacceptable.
 
The worst of this problem of the bipartisan police state is seen in the “they did it, so why can’t we?” form of argument. How many times did we hear Bush’s defenders cite something horrifying that Clinton did or said as evidence that Bush’s actions weren’t as beyond the pale as his critics claimed, after all? This is a disingenuous line of argument coming from those who lambast Obama or Clinton. But it is effective so long as Americans care more about their team winning the electoral championship every four years than about the fact that the whole game is fixed. If Clinton’s officials conducted a large civilian massacre on American soil, should Bush have been allowed to as well?
 
One interesting thought experiment is to ponder what would have happened if it had been Bush who torched the Branch Davidian home. My guess is that he’d get away with it just as Clinton did. In contrast, however, the American right would not be nearly as outraged as it was, or pretended to be, in the early 1990s. The left, on the other hand, would be quite enraged, far more than it actually was in 1993. It might even point out that half of Bush’s victims at the Waco siege were persons of color. As it actually happened, the left didn’t even notice the demographics of the slaughtered. You see, the establishment left typically saves the race card to play in partisan games.
 
America’s had this bipartisan police state for a long time. It was Republican Abraham Lincoln who waged war on half the country and suspended the Bill of Rights in the other half. It was Democrat Woodrow Wilson who really honed the art of imprisoning dissenters. It was the Republicans in the 1920s who adamantly enforced alcohol prohibition. Democrat Franklin Roosevelt tossed the Japanese Americans in concentration camps. When Republicans turned the heat on leftists during the Cold War, they were only emulating their Democrat predecessors’ surveillance and harassment of Old-Right and far-left dissenters in the 30s and 40s.
 
Both Republicans and Democrats are fervently pro-gun control. Neither party has ever done anything significant to rein in the IRS. And just as Clinton’s men helped to whitewash the massacre at Ruby Ridge, which occurred on the first Bush’s watch, Republican fixers were eager to cover up the Clinton administration’s wrongdoing at Waco.
 
The trend continues today. Although Obama and his cadre have set some precedents, the Republican opposition offers little hope. Bush spied on Americans with no regard for the Bill of Rights or even the meager statutory restraints imposed on him, and all the Democrats did was whine that they weren’t in on the snooping, and that next time they wanted to be informed. Of course, they all have an interest in keeping the police state healthy and strong. The idea that the Democrats are more sensitive to civil liberties while at the empire’s helm is too absurd for words. Obama’s abuses of power far outshine any of his predecessors.
 
Waco should remind us that Democrats are no more restrained than the Republicans when it comes to being “tough on crime,” if all that entails is using the bludgeon of state power against all social elements the ruling class has deemed less than human. It should also remind us that that bludgeon is no more surgically precise or benevolent no matter who wields it, and how corrupting it is for those who do. This should have been obvious to all, as the Bush government turned Iraq into one big Branch Davidian compound.
 
If ever Americans are to have their rightful liberty, a political realignment must emerge that shatters the dishonest and distracting constructs of left and right, Democrat and Republican, and focuses instead on liberty versus the state. Asking a liberal what he thinks of Waco, or Obama’s list of abuses might give you an idea of whether he tends toward liberty or statism. Asking a conservative about Iraq or the door-to-door gun confiscations in New Orleans after Katrina may provide similar illumination. The atrocity apologists on left and right should be seen as on the same side on the issue of state power, and those of us who oppose mass murder must work together against the criminal bipartisan police state.
 
R.J.E., Anthony Gregory
 
Here is an unedited Texas Newspaper article in 1993 that explains it way better.
 
In the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing, Congress and the nation are taking another look at the government’s confrontation with David Koresh and his followers. Could the tragedy have been avoided? Who started the fire? an exclusive excerpt from a new book raises doubts about . . . what really happened at Waco.
 
This story is from Texas Monthly’s archives. We have left the text as it was originally published to maintain a clear historical record. Read more here about our archive digitization project.
 
AUTHOR’S NOTE: On April 19, 1993, when Mount Carmel burned to ashes, polls showed that most Americans held David Koresh solely responsible for the deaths there—even President Clinton blamed those who died: “They made the decision to immolate themselves,” he declared.
 
On April 19, 1993, I was among a dozen people who spoke at a memorial for Mount Carmel’s resident dead, held on the grounds where they had made their lives. As that rainy, gray morning opened, few of us expected that the nation would soon turn its attention back to the events of 1993. But then a bomb exploded in Oklahoma City, and everything changed.
 
Shortly after the end of the siege at Waco, I had begun to investigate what happened. During the next eighteen months, I pored over more than 30,000 pages of documents, including some that have been kept secret since 1993. I interviewed survivors of Mount Carmel and spent months trying to gain an understanding of their religious beliefs because most of their statements and actions could not be understood without a biblical context. I also tried to speak to veterans of the assaults—ATF raiders and FBI besiegers—only to learn that they are still under gag orders because of pending lawsuits brought by some of the survivors. From extensive Justice and Treasury department reports, congressional hearing records, depositions, trial testimony, and grand jury transcripts—from the materials and people available—I was ultimately able to piece together answers to some of the lingering questions about the Waco affair.
 
Although an arsenal of illegal weapons was found inside the compound, I now believe that the initial raid upon Mount Carmel—in which five residents and four ATF agents were killed—was part of an offensive whose goal was to impress congressional budgetmakers and the public, as much as to enforce gun laws. It was, in other words, a public relations event. ATF agents even called the gun grab “Showtime.” The agency’s brass misled Governor Ann Richards when they described a “drug nexus” at Mount Carmel to persuade her and the Texas National Guard to supply them with helicopters—good video-footage props—and the first shots fired during the initial raid, on February 28, 1993, were fired either at those helicopters or from them, not during the ground combat that the world witnessed on TV. The defenders of Mount Carmel, eight of whom were sentenced to prison terms in a San Antonio trial last year, may have fired their guns out of self-defense or simple fear, but, I now understand, their theology also instructed them to kill in order to save Koresh.
 
Once the guns at Mount Carmel went silent, a seven-week siege ensued, during which 21 children and 14 adults came out of Mount Carmel. Many people still wonder why the Waco Messiah and the rest of his followers didn’t surrender rather than risk renewed bloodshed. The answer, I found, is essentially in the story of the ark. Noah’s family entered the ark before the onset of the Great Flood and waited for it to begin. Koresh’s followers believed that they were living in an ark, awaiting the world’s destruction a second time.
 
But the most persistent and most crucial unanswered questions from the 1993 events are, Why didn’t the FBI wait out Koresh and his flock? and Who started the fatal blaze? The inferno that ended the FBI tank and tear gas assault on the morning of April 19 brought about the deaths—mostly by smoke inhalation, some by suicide—of 73 people, including 23 children. The most widely held explanations for the fire were that the Davidians set it themselves or, as survivors believe, that the tanks knocked over kerosene lamps, which started the blaze. A third and largely overlooked explanation is that the powdery tear gas used—one that was mixed with methylene chloride—could have caused explosions and fires. An evaluation directed by a Houston fire expert who is a longtime associate of the ATF pinned the blame squarely on the residents, but that contention, like many others, is now coming before review in Congress and in the courts, where civil suits filed against the government by survivors and kin are crawling toward trial dates. Because of the numerous dead—of both April 19, 1993, and April 19, 1995—the nation is taking another look at what happened at Waco.
 
The excerpt that follows is from The Ashes of Waco by Dick J. Reavis, to be published in July by Simon and Schuster. Copyright ©1995 by Dick J. Reavis.
 
By mid-March, neither negotiations nor unorthodox tactics had produced the resolution that the FBI sought, and its agents were ill at ease in Waco. The some 720 lawmen who were in town—250 from the Bureau, 150 from the ATF, and a scattering from other federal agencies and the Texas Department of Public Safety—had to be housed, along with an average of nearly 1,000 members of the press. The problem went beyond cost: There was a shelter shortage. The town’s first- and second-rate hotels were bulging with guests, and when the federal lawmen went looking for housing, they found that Waco’s apartment occupancy rate had been at 90 percent before the siege began. Because the agencies were shorthanded and living quarters were scarce, the lawmen assigned to the Waco case worked in two- and three-week shifts, piling up overtime—and longing to return to their homes. Early in March the Tourism Division of the Texas Department of Commerce had postponed a series of television ads, reasoning that nobody would want to visit the state anytime soon, and town residents, tired of the bad jokes and quips about “the wackos in Waco,” began affixing to their cars stickers that read “Waco Proud.” As each day passed, pressure built inside and outside the ranks for a speedy end to the standoff.
 
In late March FBI commanders on the scene began sketching plans for a tear gas assault. The plan worked its way up to Washington, and on April 12 it was presented to Janet Reno, the nation’s new attorney general. The plan called for easing the residents out of Mount Carmel by injecting tear gas into one section after another of the sprawling residence hall—which included a gymnasium, a cafeteria, and a chapel—narrowing its habitability over two days. If this measure failed, the field commanders had a backup. In its report on the affair, the Justice Department, perhaps with calculated irony, says that there had been no plan to destroy the building. “While it was conceivable that tanks and other armored vehicles could be used to demolish the compound, the FBI considered that such a plan would risk harming the children,” the report says. Just what would constitute demolishing the compound the tome doesn’t explain, but it does report that if the tear gas effort failed, “walls would be torn down to increase the exposure of those remaining inside.” When walls are leveled, a point is soon reached at which there is no “inside”—but that was a point too deep for the review’s assessment. The Bureau’s Jericho plan was not the simple dream of officers in the field: among those who discussed it with Reno were FBI director William Sessions and acting assistant attorney general Webster Hubbell, a figure in the Arkansas scandals that were dogging the new president.
 
Reno was not an easy sell. According to the Justice Department’s report, she declared that she wouldn’t approve the scheme until she was assured that CS, the type of tear gas that the planners proposed to use, would not cause serious harm to pregnant women or young children. Her concern for the children was especially appropriate: Gas masks don’t fit their faces. The report states that two days later, at a briefing also attended by Sessions, Hubbell, and other Justice Department brass, a civilian expert from an Army research center in Maryland assured her “that although there had been no laboratory tests performed on children relative to the effects of the gas, anecdotal evidence was convincing that there would be no permanent injury.” The Justice report also says that Reno’s adviser told her that CS gas could not cause a fire.
 
CS is the common name for orthochlorobenzylidenemalononitrile, a white powder that manufacturers and vendors classify as a “lachrymator irritant”—a substance that causes tearing. It is, however, a bit more noxious than its designation implies. Named for the two American chemists who first concocted it in 1928, B.B. Corson and R.W. Stoughton, it is listed in manuals from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration as causing “irritation of eyes, skin, and respiratory system” and as corrosive to aluminum and magnesium. More than one hundred nations, including the United States, have banned its use in warfare, though governments are free to inflict it upon their own citizens. Manufacturers of CS gas warn against its use indoors, in part because heavy exposure to it has been cited as a cause of death in a report by Amnesty International. “Generally persons reacting to CS are incapable of executing organized and concerted actions,” a U.S. Army manual on civil disturbances points out, “and excessive exposure to CS may make them incapable of vacating the area. ” When burned, one manufacturer of CS cautions, its particles can give off lethal fumes.
 
Though her reservations about tear gas had been laid aside, Reno remained wary. She held another meeting in which she suggested a new tack: How long could Mount Carmel’s water supply last? The state of the Bureau’s information was recorded in a log; the March 20 entry notes, “an analysis of available information on water in the compound indicates most probably a limited supply to begin with, and reserves are very low. Replenishing the supply seems to be accomplished through techniques such as capturing rainwater.”
 
But Reno’s Washington advisers told her that they doubted the report, and at her request, the Bureau ran a check on April 15. It sent an airplane loaded with spy gizmos over Mount Carmel at night. “The rear water tank now appears to be full . . . This determination was based on the thermal image of the warm water in the tank,” its log said.
 
Reno’s point was tactically apt, the spy plane’s report notwithstanding. Even if the water tanks were full, they weren’t bulletproof, as the initial raid had already shown. They were punctured by gunshots on February 28 and could have been pierced again. The FBI had been told that, in addition to collecting rainwater, the residents were rationing water. If they were dependent on rainwater, nature would have been on the Bureau’s side: Summers in Waco are relatively dry. A full explanation of why the water-supply strategy went by the wayside hasn’t been published. Probably, Reno wasn’t fully informed. Afterward, in a congressional hearing, she said, “We explored but could not develop a feasible method for cutting off their water supply. ”
 
The attorney general requested a written proposal from the Bureau and, after perusing it on April 17, gave her approval for an assault that would begin on April 19 and extend over 48 hours. “The action was viewed as a gradual, step-by-step process,” the Justice Department’s report maintains. “It was not law enforcement’s intent that this was to be ‘D-Day.’ ”
 
The 48-hour plan for gassing Mount Carmel lasted about five minutes. At 6:02 a.m. on April 19, FBI logs show, combat engineering vehicles, or CEVs—M-60A1 tanks modified with thirty-foot booms and bulldozer blades for demolition duty—began punching holes in Mount Carmel and injecting CS gas through the holes into the building. This much was according to plan. But at 6:04 a.m., the Bureau’s logs say, people inside Mount Carmel fired upon the armored vehicles.
 
A clause in the written plan that the Bureau had presented to Reno called for an escalation if the tanks drew fire. The Justice report notes, “Under that operations plan, as approved by the Attorney General, ‘If during any tear gas delivery operations, subjects open fire with a weapon, then . . . tear gas will immediately be inserted into all windows of the compound using the four BV’s”—a reference to Bradley armored vehicles, ordinary combat tanks.
 
Janet Reno, watching the escalation of the assault on TV, was taken by surprise. Like a naive used-car buyer, the attorney general hadn’t checked the fine print on the contract that the FBI’s salesmen placed before her.
 
Reno, watching the assault from Washington on a television with special wire hookups, was apparently taken by surprise. The nation’s attorney general, the Justice Department report indicates, “did not read the prepared statement carefully, nor did she read the supporting documentation . . . She read only a chronology.” Like a naive used-car buyer, she hadn’t checked the fine print on the contract that the Bureau’s salesmen had placed before her.
 
The significance of the Bradley escalation turned on the kind of esoteric detail that only chemists and Bureau veterans—not a newly minted attorney general—could have known. The Bradleys were not equipped with hydraulic booms, as the CEVs were. They could not deliver gas as the CEVs did, from cylinders containing a mixture of carbon dioxide and CS powder mounted near the tips of their long booms. Bradley drivers could deliver tear gas only by shooting football-size metal or plastic canisters, called ferret rounds, out of a small port in the front of the tank. CS powder was suspended in the ferret rounds not in carbon dioxide but in a different chemical: methylene chloride, a petroleum derivative. The FBI assault force, in preparation for the Bradley-ferret option of its plan, had stockpiled some four hundred CS canisters in Waco.
 
Standard chemical reference books say that methylene chloride in its liquid state is practically nonflammable. But their texts do not picture the chemical as harmless. One reference, for example, reports:
 
Health Hazards: Eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritant. Toxic. Harmful if inhaled or absorbed through the skin. Narcotic in high concentrations. Metabolized by the body to form carbon monoxide. Products of combustion may be more hazardous than the material itself.
 
Fire and Explosion Hazards: No flash point in conventional closed tester, but forms flammable vapor-air mixtures in larger volumes. May be an explosion hazard in a confined space. Combustion may produce irritants and toxic gases. Combustion by-products include hydrogen chloride and phosgene.
 
Phosgene, the Encyclopaedia Britannica says, “is a colourless, extremely poisonous gas. . . . It first came into prominence in World War I, being used as an offensive poison gas.”
 
In short, methylene chloride, used in a confined space, threatened to create conditions conducive to fire, explosion, and death by poison gas. The CS particles could have ignited as dust does in grain-silo explosions. Manufacturers of CS powder warn against its use indoors because their chemists and attorneys know the dangers of CS and methylene chloride. So do most SWAT team operatives.
 
The effect of ferret rounds in indoor settings has for twenty years been an item of police lore. At least two incidents in FBI history point out the danger of using ferret rounds. In 1974 police officers and G-men surrounded a house at 1466 E. Fifty-fourth in Los Angeles that was occupied by members of the Symbionese Liberation Army, notorious for its kidnapping of heiress Patty Hearst. On December 9, 1984, FBI agents cornered a right-wing fugitive named Robert Matthews in a house in Washington State. In both cases the FBI shot in ferret rounds, and in both cases the buildings burned rapidly to the ground.
 
At 11:40 a.m., about twenty minutes after the last of the ferrets was fired into Mount Carmel—long enough for vapor to form—the building went ablaze. In less than an hour, Mount Carmel was a smoldering ruin from end to end. FBI spokesmen, Janet Reno, and even the president would afterward insist that the occupants of Mount Carmel had set fire to their home, and in line with that presumption, most reporting about the cause of the fire has overlooked that as a result of the CS invasion, all the conditions for a fire were in place.
 
rom the start, the residents of Mount Carmel had assumed that the siege would end in fire. Immediately after the initial raid, David Koresh had turned the secular side of his mind to predicting the government’s next move. “You’re going to smoke bomb us or you’re going to burn our building down,” he declared in a telephone conversation with the FBI negotiators who were working for a peaceful settlement to the standoff. Having examined the bullet holes in the front door and those he attributed to helicopter fire at several spots inside the building, Steve Schneider, who was Koresh’s closest aide, announced in early March that a fiery finish was in the interest of the federal besiegers: It would get rid of evidence. According to the version of the initial raid told by survivors, helicopters strafed Mount Carmel, and then ground troops fired through its closed front doors. The building’s roof and entrance, they said, bore proof of these accusations. “If you people don’t burn the building down . . . it would surprise me that they wouldn’t want to get rid of evidence,” Schneider told a negotiator on March 6. “If anybody wanted to even come here and burn the place down, kill all the people, what evidence would be left?” he asked on March 10. “If this building stands,” he admonished another day, “and the press get to see the evidence, it’s going to be shown clearly what happened and what these men came to do . . . So if you guys want, you can even be involved with them in burning this place down.” The negotiators, of course, denied any such intention.
 
Late in the siege, on April 13, Schneider mentioned to an FBI negotiator that the residents were reading by candle and lantern light. Houston attorney Jack Zimmermann, who went into the building during the siege, testified at the San Antonio trial that “almost every room had a Coleman lantern.” As protection against renewed gunfire, bales of hay had been brought from storage in the gymnasium and stacked against walls that faced outside. A negotiator recognized a hazard and asked, “Do you have any fire extinguisher systems?” Schneider wasn’t sure how many of the devices were on hand and, at a negotiator’s request, sent a resident to do a count. He reported that only one extinguisher was found. “Somebody ought to buy some fire insurance,” a negotiator replied.
 
The residents of Mount Carmel were not unnerved by the specter of a fiery finale. If God wanted to save them from the flames, they believed, He would find a way. Steve Schneider’s wife, Judy, reminded the FBI that the Book of Daniel reports that God saved Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego from the flames of a furnace, and on March 27, while discussing means of persuading the residents to leave, Steve Schneider had the following conversation with a negotiator:
 
Schneider: Well, you know what I think would work—well, I better not say that.
 
FBI: Go ahead, it’s your dime.
 
Schneider: I was just going to say, throw a match to the building, people will have to come out.
 
FBI: No, we’re not going to do something like that.
 
Schneider: . . . Some time when you have the chance, read Isaiah 33 about people living in fire and walking through it and coming out surviving.
 
On April 18, a listening device that the FBI had placed within feet of the front door captured snatches of conversation in which unidentified residents were discussing Scripture related to fire. “They can’t destroy us unless it’s God’s will they do,” one of the nameless speakers said. “Haven’t you read Joel 2 and Isaiah 13, where it says He’s going to take us up like flames of fire?”
 
But after one of the fire’s survivors, Jaime Castillo, read transcripts of these conversations, he explained, “A fire was expected, it was and is, but not that we of our own will could bring about such an event. God will eventually bring about that event.” Livingstone Fagan, a former Mount Carmel resident and theology graduate who was sentenced to prison in the San Antonio trial, attributes a similar meaning to the conversations: “They were just reviewing scriptures,” he writes from prison, “. . . regarding what happens when we are delivered and the Kingdom is set up”—an event that, Mount Carmel’s survivors believe, still lies in the future.
 
Bureau men listened to the discussions of fire relayed by the bugging devices on April 18 and presumed that the talk referred to plans for arson. But on April 19, the morning of the final assault, the Bureau did not surround Mount Carmel with fire trucks, as would have been appropriate. Instead the agency launched a fixed-wing aircraft equipped with forward-looking infrared radar, or FLIR, capable of determining when and where fire broke out. The equipment does this by inserting a circle onto an infrared videotape whenever a hot spot is detected. The purpose of the video was apparently to show that if a fire did break out, the Bureau didn’t ignite it.
 
The government’s fire expert, Paul Gray—whose wife now works for the ATF’s Houston office—finds in the FLIR tapes evidence that the fire broke out at 12:07:04 p.m. on Mount Carmel’s second floor. He and his assistants also claim that the tapes show three separate points of ignition in quick succession—an almost certain sign of arson, and the tapes indeed show circles around three spots in quick succession.
 
But lay critics, including the San Antonio jury, have seen that the first blaze spotted by the FLIR rig, and appropriately signaled by a circle, began at 11:59:16 a.m., not on Mount Carmel’s second floor but in its gymnasium, as a tank backed out of the room. The second-story fire was captured by television cameras two miles away and broadcast around the globe. The gym fire, clearly indicated on the FLIR tapes made from overhead, was out of the view of television lenses. Rather than multiple fire points, what the tapes show, critics argue, is that the holes the tanks had knocked into the building acted as flues, sweeping the gymnasium blaze down Mount Carmel’s hallways.
 
The controversy over ignition points almost always proceeds into another series of arguments about the sensitivity of FLIR equipment, the content of smoke clouds, the speed of the fire’s spread, and other technical, and unverifiable, details. To this mix of speculation are added interpretations of nearly unintelligible bugging tapes made early on the morning of April 19 from beneath the floor of Mount Carmel’s lobby. Transcripts of the murkily transmitted voices show residents saying things like “spread the fuel” and “fire around back.” One transcript by a forensic audio specialist renders the latter phrase as part of a longer one, “I want a fire around the back,” while another expert records it as, “There’s a fire around the back.” The dark spots of memory that remain with the fire’s survivors—loyal followers of Koresh and one government witness, Marjorie Thomas—do not resolve the discrepancy, around which a new industry has grown: Just as ATF agents have sued the Waco Tribune-Herald and Waco TV station KWTX for allegedly warning Mount Carmel of the February 28 raid, survivors of those who perished are suing the FBI for having sparked the April 19 blaze.
 
hether or not, for theological reasons, David Koresh thought he had orders to burn Mount Carmel to the ground, as some of his accusers maintain, he recognized a tactical and wholly mundane use for flames: “Those tanks are not fireproof, you know,” he had warned the FBI on March 19. If on April 19 Koresh decided to repel the monstrous vehicles that had besieged his flock for 51 days, he did not have to send anyone outside—and into camera view—to fling Molotov cocktails. They presented themselves as targets by barging indoors.
 
About three minutes before the ferret rounds began breaking windows, tanks started crashing through Mount Carmel’s walls. Bureau spokesmen declared that the entries were made not to destroy the building but to inject gas into its inner recesses, and to provide openings through which the inhabitants could escape. During the siege, Mount Carmel’s two telephone lines had been reduced to one, which the FBI had connected to a ground line that had been tossed in to residents, who had connected it to a telephone in the building’s lobby. The Bureau’s spokesmen told the world that Steve Schneider had cut off communication by throwing the telephone outside when the teargassing began, but television footage and the Justice Department’s internal investigation indicate that a tank’s steel tracks severed the line, leaving Mount Carmel out of touch with the negotiators. Transcripts of conversations picked up by listening devices show that Schneider wanted to ask the Bureau to withhold its assault so that Koresh could finish writing his interpretation of the Seven Seals in the Book of Revelation—a request they had been making for days.
 
Rather than creating escape routes, the tanks that rammed Mount Carmel closed them. They demolished the stairways connecting the building’s first and second floors and also pushed debris over a trapdoor leading to a buried school bus whose door opened to an underground passage to the fresh air outside. Six women were found within a few feet of the trapdoor, dead of smoke inhalation; they apparently took their last breaths while racing toward the newly blocked underground passage. During an entry at high noon, one of the CEVs went into Mount Carmel’s cafeteria, where some three dozen women and children were huddled in a concrete room at the base of the residential tower. Though the Bureau’s spokesmen and the press called it a bunker, the room had been built years before to house Mount Carmel’s printshop. It contained the community’s walk-in refrigerator and its store of guns. The CEV’s boom apparently struck high on the wall of the room’s western side, sending chunks of concrete tumbling onto the heads of those cowering below. Though most of them were wrapped in wet blankets and towels—to protect them from tear gas—six of the women and children died from what the Tarrant County medical examiner’s office termed “blunt force trauma.” Forensic specialist Rodney Crow now says that these victims were crushed and suffocated “from the falling concrete in the bunker that fell on them.” But, in tune with the passions of the hour, several newspapers interpreted “blunt force trauma” as an indication that the victims were bludgeoned to death by their peers.
 
It is apparent from the accounts of survivors that some of the adults inside Mount Carmel preferred death to surrender, even death for their children. Some two dozen of the nearly eighty people inside died from gunshot wounds, including David Koresh and Steve Schneider.
 
Government witness Marjorie Thomas, who suffered third-degree burns over half of her body, was not one of those who accepted martyrdom. In a deposition for the San Antonio trial, she described the final moments of Mount Carmel:
 
The whole entire building felt warm all at once, and then after the warmth, then a thick, black smoke, and the place became dark. I could hear—I couldn’t see anything. I could hear people moving and screaming, and I still was sitting down while this was happening. Then the voices faded.
 
I was making my way out of the building, because it began to get very hot, and my clothes were starting to melt on me. . . . Before the fire had started, Sheila [Martin] Jr. was sitting on the step . . . I couldn’t see her. I was making my way towards getting out, and I trod on her, and I said, ‘I’m sorry,’ and her voice was very faint, and I couldn’t see her, and I could feel the flames . . . I saw a little bit of light. I made my way towards the light, and on doing so, I could see where it—it was one of the bedrooms. I could—the window was missing. I looked out. I don’t like heights, but I thought . . . ‘I stay inside and, and die, or I jump out of the window,’ so I put my head—my hands over my head and leapt out of the window.
 
While the tanks were rudely bringing down Mount Carmel, FBI chief negotiator Byron Sage and an assistant were attempting to calm those inside. Over the public-address system they said, “This is not an assault. This is not an assault. We will not be entering the building.”
 
Surviving residents say that in making their entries, the tanks knocked over lanterns and cans of fuel and crushed a pressurized tank filled with liquid propane, a volatile heating and cooking fuel. About the time that the fire got under way, transcripts show, the FBI agents who were broadcasting surrender orders over the public-address system began to ad-lib, adding to their prepared text exclamations such as “David—you have had your fifteen minutes of fame” and “Vernon is finished. He’s no longer the Messiah!” (Before he changed his name in 1989, David Koresh was named Vernon Flowell.) Television footage shows that after the conflagration began devouring Mount Carmel’s densest structures, CEV tankers, instead of merely standing by, may have used their bulldozer blades to push debris and remaining sections of wall into the blaze—destroying bits of evidence, as Steve Schneider had said they would. Ultimately, the heat was so intense that it ignited Mount Carmel’s flag, 25 yards away atop a steel mast. By the time fire trucks had chilled the building’s ashes, a new and victorious banner was flying in its place—someone had hoisted the flag of the ATF.
 
Unnoticed, and sometimes uncounted among the dead, were two fetuses, one full-term, the other seven months old. Both are believed to have been born as the result of an evolutionary reflex instants after their mothers, Aisha Gyarfas and Nicole Gent, expired. Gyarfas was the victim of a gunshot wound; Gent, of the crashing concrete. The deaths of their infants, who would have been viable had they experienced normal births, were the omega of the day whose alpha was the ill-advised tear gas raid.
 
source
 
https://www.texasmonthly.com/arts-entertainment/what-really-happened-at-waco/
https://themillenniumreport.com/2015/12/waco-what-really-happened/

Proof: Canada mRNA Surveillance

Proof: Canada mRNA Surveillance
 
Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v5urfot-proof-canada-mrna-surveillance.html
 
Biodigital Convergence: Biodivergence
 
I saw a video today of my friend (Tie_Yahna) Tajana Truthseeker, whom I interviewed a few years ago. She was talking about how Canada admitted to using mRNA vaccines on their website to track viruses along with your cell phones. yet they just removed the website right after she posted it. It says Our website is undergoing maintenance over the coming weeks. Some sections and documents may be temporarily unavailable.
 
Watch this video.
 
They removed the website and placed it in a special place where you had to actually find it. It reads: It is spurring biodigital innovations such as nearly real-time biosurveillance of virus spread and mutations; virus tracking via smartphone; and messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccine development at unprecedented speed.
 
It literally says it. Proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are using smart phones, AI and mRNA to track biodigital convergence, which they say is the merging of biological systems and digital technologies, is challenging the way we understand ourselves and the world in which we live. 
 
The report focusing on using this information of who took the vaccine and who didn’t. Then they will use this data to determine food production. It reads, “In this report, we delve deeper into how biodigital convergence could reshape five areas: food, health, environment, security, and manufacturing. We examine sectors in their current form, how biodigital convergence is changing each sector, what might change these sectors in the future, outline critical uncertainties and future possibilities, as well as policy considerations.”
 
Here are the three main issues:
 
Full physical integration of biological and digital entities
When digital technology is embedded in organisms, or biological components are incorporated into technologies. Examples include robots with biological brains, digital implants in humans, and neurological control systems in insects. Digital technologies can enhance the natural capabilities of living things.
 
Coevolution of biological and digital technologies
When advancements in one domain enable progress in another, and vice versa. Both digital technology and the natural world provide scaffolding for each other, furthering shared breakthroughs and a coevolution. Examples include new understanding of how brains work, inspiring the development of neural networks; and artificial intelligence (AI) finding patterns in gene sequences that build our understanding of what genes do.
 
Cognitive shift of biological and digital systems
An evolution of perspective, where we begin to normalize the convergence of the natural world and digital technology. We may see the two as an integrated new domain. Advances in our understanding of biological systems and in the creation of new digital capabilities such as AI enables the biodigital conceptual convergence.
 
None of this would work without something being inside the body. I knew Bill Gates’ hardware and software were in it, but didn’t have any definitive proof. This phrase: It is spurring biodigital innovations such as nearly real-time biosurveillance of virus spread and mutations; virus tracking via smartphone; and messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccine development at unprecedented speed. They added a semi-colon to the phrase as if the same sentence is a conjunction. Smart Phone and mRNA development is the same sentence. 
 
And to follow up with what they are using this data for is food, health, environment, security and manufacturing. Sounds to me like communism has taken root in Canada. 81.1% of all Canadians have taken at least one shot. That’s enough.
 
Their website says: How is biodigital convergence changing food? That line is disturbing. Why change food? Why not keep it organic? Anyways, I am getting ahead of myself. Let’s go over this entire document. It is absolutely atrocious, obvious and a crime. Against our will.
 
The COVID-19 pandemic is proving to be a powerful driver of change. It is spurring biodigital innovations such as nearly real-time biosurveillance of virus spread and mutations; virus tracking via smartphone; and messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccine development at unprecedented speed. Biodigital convergence, the merging of biological systems and digital technologies, is challenging the way we understand ourselves and the world in which we live.
 
Building on our first report, Exploring Biodigital Convergence, this report lays out some of the changes we might see as the biodigital convergence matures and gives rise to new realities. It explores the potential impact of biodigital convergence on sectors such as health, food and agriculture, the environment, manufacturing, and security. It could have implications across many policy areas: global trade, healthcare, the shift to a low-carbon economy, natural resource management, and many more.
Policy Horizons Canada (Policy Horizons) does not provide policy recommendations or advice. Guided by its mandate, it explores what might happen in the future policy landscape, to help the Government of Canada develop future-oriented policy and programs, and to prepare for possible radical and disruptive change.
 
We hope you will find this report insightful and thought-provoking. By reflecting on what might happen, we can support Canadians and decision makers in considering which futures we want and which ones we want to avoid.
 
On behalf of Policy Horizons Canada, I would like to thank those who generously shared their time, knowledge, and thoughts with us.
Kristel Van der ElstDirector General,Policy Horizons Canada
 
Biological and digital systems are coming together in profound ways, creating a new domain called the biodigital. Digital technology and living things are increasingly able to communicate with each other. We can embed digital technology into living organisms, and incorporate biological components into new technologies. Genetic modification of the natural world for climate change mitigation, environmental remediation, and biodiversity conservation may however raise ethical considerations.
 
The contours of the coming biodigital era are becoming clearer. This report explores change drivers and how biodigital convergence could transform five economic sectors and areas of life.
 
Food
Health
Environment
Security
Manufacturing
 
It examines some of the changes we could see in each area, how we could experience significant disruption in the future, and what policy considerations might emerge. This report also discusses how the COVID-19 pandemic may be accelerating the transition to a biodigital world.
 
Food
 
Traditional agriculture relies on land, water, and a suitable climate. In the future, foods could be manufactured anywhere in labs and indoor vertical farms. This could fundamentally reshape the agricultural sector, international trade, and migration, as well as people’s relationships with land, animals, and food.
 
Health
 
Biodigital convergence could rapidly advance targeted treatments, and precision medicine based on genomic profiles—leading to improved and targeted preventive care as well as highly efficient treatments for disease. At the same time, biodigital convergence also gives rise to inclusivity and ethical considerations, among others.
 
Environment
 
Climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss are widely recognized as urgent global issues. Today’s unsustainable production and consumption modes are endangering long-term socioeconomic wellbeing. Biodigital capabilities could increase our capacity to connect with and monitor the natural world. It could also expand our understanding of the interconnectedness of all living things. Genetic modification of the natural world for climate change mitigation, environmental remediation, and biodiversity conservation may however raise ethical considerations. Furthermore, there may be unintended consequences involved with the release of modified organisms in natural environments.
 
Security
 
Emerging biodigital innovations and capabilities are creating both new frontiers and possible concerns in the field of security and defence. With almost five billion people connected to the Internet, digital surveillance and data collection have substantially increased over the last decade. The rise of biodata may add a new layer of complexity in securing potentially valuable personal data. The access to more data may also facilitate criminal investigation and potentially create a more secure society.
 
Manufacturing
 
Manufacturing was historically based on factory workers who transformed natural resources initially extracted from mines, forests, and waters, or grown on farms. Differences in labour costs and the natural distribution of resources have influenced the shape of our far-reaching global supply chains. Biodigital convergence could transform the natural resource sector through new ways of making and obtaining raw materials and fuels, as well as new manufacturing techniques, potentially easing pressure on natural resources. More localized production and distribution of goods and fuels could reshore manufacturing and reshape trade, disrupting trade patterns and supply chains.
 
The COVID-19 pandemic is acting as a driver of change, accelerating the transition to a biodigital world. It has increased the awareness of biology and its array of uses among people, governments, and industry. It reveals the risks of misinformation and the need for bioliteracy. It pushes biodefence capabilities and national self-sufficiency to the forefront of government agendas. And it has forced societies to re-evaluate the balance between biosecurity and personal freedoms.
 
The speed of biodigital convergence in the coming years will depend not only on technological progress but social acceptance—and the pandemic has shown that unexpected events can trigger rapid shifts in what is widely seen as acceptable or desirable. In the future, we may not see digital technologies and biological systems as separate, but rather woven together, further normalizing the biodigital world that future generations may inherit.
 
Introduction
 
This report continues the work of our Exploring Biodigital Convergence1 scoping report, which explored how biological systems and digital technology are converging in ways that could change how we live, understand and make sense of our lives, evolve, and possible capabilities and characteristics of biodigital innovations. We identified three ways in which biodigital convergence is emerging:
 
Full physical integration of biological and digital entities
When digital technology is embedded in organisms, or biological components are incorporated into technologies. Examples include robots with biological brains, digital implants in humans, and neurological control systems in insects. Digital technologies can enhance the natural capabilities of living things.
 
Coevolution of biological and digital technologies
 
When advancements in one domain enable progress in another, and vice versa. Both digital technology and the natural world provide scaffolding for each other, furthering shared breakthroughs and a coevolution. Examples include new understanding of how brains work, inspiring the development of neural networks; and artificial intelligence (AI) finding patterns in gene sequences that build our understanding of what genes do.
 
Cognitive shift of biological and digital systems
 
An evolution of perspective, where we begin to normalize the convergence of the natural world and digital technology. We may see the two as an integrated new domain. Advances in our understanding of biological systems and in the creation of new digital capabilities such as AI enables the biodigital conceptual convergence.
 
In this report, we delve deeper into how biodigital convergence could reshape five areas: food, health, environment, security, and manufacturing. We examine sectors in their current form, how biodigital convergence is changing each sector, what might change these sectors in the future, outline critical uncertainties and future possibilities, as well as policy considerations.
 
During our work on this report, we lived through the first global emergency of the biodigital era. In the final section, we reflect on the COVID-19 pandemic as a significant accelerator for the biodigital revolution—increasing investment in research, raising public awareness of biological threats, shifting perceptions of what is socially possible, and putting public health at the centre of national governance.
 
The contours of the coming biodigital era are slowly becoming clearer and the transition to that era will inevitably be disruptive. By thinking now about the possible trajectories of biodigital convergence, we hope to reduce risks, and harness possibilities for Canada and the world.
 
Food
 
Traditional agriculture relies on land, water, and a suitable climate. In the future, foods could be manufactured anywhere in labs and indoor vertical farms. This could fundamentally reshape the agricultural sector, international trade, and migration, as well as people’s relationships with land, animals, and food.
 
As the world’s population grows2, demand for and trade3 in food are expected to rise. Many countries may face food security challenges brought on by climate change, as extreme weather events and diseases affect traditional agricultural production. Regional conflicts may also disrupt global food production and trade. Food systems also have environmental impacts—land use, deforestation, water pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions—while opaque supply chains4 raise the risk of food-borne illnesses5.
 
How is biodigital convergence changing food?
 
Biodigital innovations have the potential to modify how we produce food, integrate new types of food onto the market, and disrupt existing supply chains.
 
What follows are some of the ways biodigital is changing how we produce, grow, manufacture, and understand human nutrition and food.
 
Lab-grown food. Cellular agriculture creates bioidentical animal products—such as seafood, meat, and dairy—in a lab. This involves culturing animal cells in a bioreactor and growing them into fat and muscle tissue. Lab-grown meat and plant-based meat alternatives can also be three-dimensionally printed (3D-printed)6.
 
Lab-grown beef burgers are approaching cost parity7 with traditional burgers, especially when meat cells are combined with plant protein. In 2020, the world’s first restaurant serving lab-grown meat8 opened in Tel Aviv9, and Kentucky Fried Chicken announced plans to sell 3D-printed nuggets10. Companies are working on lab-grown salmon11, tuna12, shrimp13, dairy products14, pet food15 and even human breast milk16—a potential alternative to infant formula. Scaling bioreactors remains the main technological challenge17, but Chinese18 and Israeli19 organizations are investing heavily.
 
Individualized diets based on DNA profiling.
 
Advances in nutrigenomics20—the study of relationships between genes, nutrition, and health—could allow people to make health, diet, and lifestyle choices based on their genetic profile.
 
Start-ups are offering personalized dietary advice21 based on DNA, lifestyle information, and gut microbiome analysis. A restaurant in Tokyo is using analysis of customers’ saliva, urine, and feces to evaluate their nutritional requirements and 3D print biome-based bespoke sushi22. Nestlé23 is investing in microbiome research and AI that can create personalized care plans. People can buy vitamin pills tailored24 to their genome, and one day may 3D print these types of supplements at home. The decreasing25 cost of genome sequencing will make personalized diets and lifestyle choices more widely accessible.
 
Precision and smart farming. A combination of technologies could influence or alter how agriculture industries function—and how and where we grow food. Agricultural productivity26 could become more precise with technology—from robots inspecting individual plants27, identifying pests and diseases28, or herding farm animals29, to data30-optimizing fertilizer inputs, to blockchain-enabled origin tracing31. Indoor vertical farms in which AI32 controls light and temperature can grow hundreds of times as much food per acre as traditional agriculture, while using far less water.
 
Singapore has launched a campaign33 to produce 30% of its food supply by 2030 through lab-grown food and vertical farming34. Companies from the U.S. to China35 are exploring how Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) technology might customize crops to particular conditions and improve resilience36 against climate change impacts.
 
What might change in food systems in the future?
 
As the biodigital convergence advances and matures, it could reshape food systems in significant ways:
 
Grow anything, anywhere, anytime. Agriculture has always depended on the availability of land mass, water, and specific climatic and geographic conditions. It is limited by the growing seasons and vulnerable to variables beyond a farmer’s control—from weather to pests and diseases.
 
With new biodigital innovations, these constraints may no longer shape agricultural productivity in the future. Lab-grown meat technology37 could be located anywhere, as can vertical farming where artificial intelligence (AI) oversees38 gene-edited crops grown in precisely controlled environments.
 
Nations pursue self-sufficiency. Trade could change as nations pursue food self-sufficiency. Food-importing countries may opt to produce more food39 within their own borders, rather than importing it from areas with good natural growing conditions, to reduce their vulnerability to trade disputes40 or supply disruptions.
 
As more than 75%41 of agricultural land is used for livestock farming, low-yield lands could become stranded assets and be replaced by cellular agriculture alternatives. We could increasingly produce food on demand and near consumers, potentially in small-scale home bioreactors. This could substantially reduce the demand for food transportation or distribution.
 
Diet merges into preventive healthcare. Better understanding of the human genome and biome may transform nutrition and influence healthcare, giving people increasingly detailed information to highly individualize their diets and maximize their health.
 
Increasing the amount of genome and biome data that is being collected and studied could advance our understanding of the human body as an intricate system and could facilitate preventative medicine. A database of consumers’ genomes may become a competitive advantage for some firms.
 
Food for thought
 
Our connection with the environment. Biodigital convergence could profoundly change people’s relationship with land and animals. Over the centuries, conditions for agriculture shaped where people settled. Our growing ability to produce food independent of climatic conditions could shift what people value in land, as well as patterns of human settlement.
 
Local food production technology opens up opportunities for remote communities to be self-sufficient, and produce traditional foods in new ways. More land could be rewilded, while growing fish in labs could allow the oceans to replenish. Affordable lab-grown meat could lead to a shift in attitudes towards the ethics of factory farming and in our relationships with animals more generally. It could change the role of culture and ceremony in food production and consumption—how we grow, harvest, connect with, and experience food.
 
The experience of food transforms. Biodigital convergence could transform how we think of and associate with food. While lab-grown food currently aims to mimic foods familiar to us, it opens up possibilities to create entirely new kinds of edible products with new tastes, textures, and nutrients. People could make “programmable” foods to fit their own tastes and needs. Biodigital technologies could potentially allow people to biohack their own taste buds to alter which tastes they find pleasing, orient them towards healthy food, and create new food cultures.
 
Critical uncertainties and future possibilities
Various factors could affect the scale and nature of acceptance or rejection of biodigital innovations. The following outlines some possible uncertainties that may lead to different future scenarios.
 
Societal acceptance: Will there be a societal consensus on adopting new technologies?
 
Consumers may increasingly want to buy healthy42, environmentally friendly, ethically produced foods. Given that vertical farms need less land, water, and pesticides—and that lab-cultured meat does not involve the methane emissions of farmed animals, or the ethical or health issues associated with factory farming—could we see an uptake in new food production methods?
 
Could negative early experiences of CRISPR-modified crops and cultured meat affect public acceptance? Will CRISPR plant editing be more or less publicly accepted43 than previous means of genetically modifying organisms?
 
How might we benchmark ethical considerations and values alongside biodigital economic possibilities?
 
Business ecosystem: How could existing players reshape their business models? How might related sectors evolve, and what new players could emerge?
 
Will the existing big agricultural companies adapt and maintain their position? Or will new entrants from other sectors, like pharmaceuticals and big techs, overtake them?
 
Could technology’s increased role enable a dominant position for large tech companies in the agriculture industry44? If so, how could this affect food supply chains and consumer choices?
 
Labour market readiness: Will there be sufficient talent to develop new markets and activities? Where will biodigital talent reside?
 
How will labour markets adapt if digitalization of food production makes certain agricultural jobs obsolete while creating demand for new skills?
How readily will education programs for agricultural science and food science incorporate biodigital technologies like vertical farming, AI, robotics, or lab-grown food?
 
Policy considerations
 
The rise of the biodigital convergence could affect many policy areas. The following are not policy recommendations, but rather considerations, questions, and thought-provoking ideas.
 
Food safety regulations and nutrition guidance
 
New types of food production, manufacturing, and supply chains could lead to new packaging, storage, transportation, cooling, handling, preparation, cooking, and sanitizing procedures. Actors could also use blockchain technology to ensure traceability and make the supply chain more transparent. Blockchain could also help consumers access information on ingredients.
 
New categories of plant-based and animal-based foods could emerge from using biodigital production modes and biodata to produce new types of personalized food. This could affect what we consider healthy food, current nutrition guides like the Canada Food Guide, as well as lead to new nutrition facts on labels.
 
International trade, food sovereignty, and supply chains
 
Biodigital food technologies may help countries that heavily rely on food imports to improve their food sovereignty. This could reduce food trade at the global level and have economic impacts on the largest-producing countries of agricultural commodities. The export-import potential of biodigital food products could also lead trade partners to rethink food labeling.
 
Biodigital food production modes could disrupt existing supply chains at the national and global level. Increased local biodigital food production could also reduce the need for food distribution and transportation.
The rising digitalization and automation of food production processes and ingredients via emerging biodigital innovations, such as 3D food printers and online platforms, could substantially increase personal and commercial food production capacity. Home biodigital food production could require new safety measures. Countries that have relied on arable land and rural agriculture economies may need to examine the economic sustainability of traditional food production in the face of new food production possibilities.
 
Intellectual property & privacy
 
Digital technologies like AI and big data analysis could increase the number of patents for customized45 flavors46 and recipes47.
Secured genomic databanks could become increasingly common. People may be concerned about privacy implications and sharing genome data with food supply chain actors.
 
Global compensation and protection systems may help prevent biodigital food-cloning practices. For example, sequencing appellation48 food goods for local production or growing Kobe beef in a lab.
Environmental footprint and spatial development
 
Agricultural land may be stranded and repurposed as we produce more food in vertical farming facilities or through cellular agriculture.
Gene-edited crops and smart farming (sensors, robots) could reduce fertilizer, pesticide, and herbicide use.
 
The environmental footprint of emerging biodigital food production and consumption, such as cellular agriculture, gene-edited crops, vertical farming, and smart agriculture may be different from that of the current food system. New innovations may aid climate change goals. However, transitions can be costly and could increase the demand for electricity.
 
Health
 
Biodigital convergence could rapidly advance targeted treatments, and precision medicine based on genomic profiles—leading to improved and targeted preventive care as well as highly efficient treatments for disease. At the same time, biodigital convergence also gives rise to inclusivity and ethical considerations, among others.
 
Healthcare costs are projected to continue increasing over the next 15 years due to factors such as population growth, reproductive problems49, ageing, degenerative diseases, and rising use of expensive, newly patented medicines50. The sector’s labour shortage51 is expected to continue as demand for home care grows, and healthcare worker burnout continues as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic52. On the current trajectory, hospitals and healthcare systems will continue to be overburdened, the scope of public health may grow, and emerging innovations may fall within the scope of health mandates, inflicting more pressure on public health systems.
 
How is biodigital convergence changing health?
 
Technological innovations in the biodigital space will continue to mature and combine. The following section outlines some innovations that could affect the integrated and complex future of human health.
 
Synthetic organs and digital implants. Customized body parts and implants could offer new transplant options. In 2019, over 4000 Canadians53 were on a waiting list for an organ transplant. Human organs can now be 3D-printed54, or grown in genetically modified pigs55. EU regulators approved56 the first totally artificial heart in 2020. Artificial blood vessels57 could help treat cardiovascular disease. Artificial skin, made from stretchable electronics58 that can sense heat and pressure, could improve prosthetics and skin grafts. Such technologies could enable people not only to fix medical problems, but to obtain customized body parts with enhanced capabilities.
 
Brain implants that can be recharged wirelessly59 could transform the treatment of neurological diseases. Implanted chips are already being used to monitor health and unlock smartphones. Implants such as Neuralink60 could expand the human senses, allowing us to “feel”61 bionic limbs, or interact with virtual spaces in new ways. They may also lead to new treatments for mental illnesses like depression62. Brain-computer interfaces allow us to communicate with AI-enabled devices: for example, it can enable blind people to perceive images63 through an artificial eye. These technologies could help repair or enhance the human body.
 
The CRISPRization of humans. As a research tool64, CRISPR gene editing helps us understand DNA’s role in human diseases. Medical researchers are exploring its potential to fight viruses65, destroy cancer66 cells, overcome immune problems that interfere with potential gene therapy67, and treat conditions such as acne68 and blindness69. CRISPR-off technology allows us to turn gene expression off70, effectively stopping a person from getting a disease to which they are genetically predisposed, such as Alzheimer’s. Further, it may be possible to turn off epigenetic markers while leaving the DNA strand intact.
 
CRISPR may increasingly give people the ability to code their own DNA, and that of their children. Some parents may wish to give their children resistance to diseases, enhanced intelligence, and other abilities.
 
Public opinion research71 finds a high level of support for using the technology to prevent rare genetic illnesses in babies, but opposition to using it to improve a baby’s intelligence. Support or rejection of gene editing depends in part on one’s nationality, gender, demographics, religion, and education. Varying levels72 of ethical consideration and debate exist surrounding genetically altering offspring. There are currently widespread international bans on human use of the technology, but the World Health Organization has an advisory committee73 looking at global standards, including oversight and ethical considerations for human genome editing.
 
Tracking human health in real time. The health tech market is actively innovating to find solutions that can support preventative health actions. Wearables that monitor physical health can increasingly track and compile more health data in real time. AI can track moods and mental health74 by analyzing our voices and facial expressions. Researchers are developing DNA testing kits that plug into smartphones75 and could help track disease.
 
Machine learning76 could potentially process data in the cloud that is automatically collected from nano-scale sensors, monitors, and implants in a patient’s body. Increasing knowledge about the human microbiome—the tens of trillions77 of microorganisms that live inside the human body—is leading to more treatments78, research, and lifestyle prescriptions.
 
What might change in healthcare systems in the future?
As the biodigital convergence advances and matures, it could reshape health systems in significant ways:
 
Regenerative medicine. We can observe the ability to regrow lost limbs or repair damaged organs in some animals like lizards and amphibians. The same cellular signaling pathways we find in animals capable of regeneration are also present in humans79, and modifications may lead to tissue growth rather than scarring. Stem cell research is also on its way to growing whole organs—starting with smaller organoids80 that can currently perform some function of the larger organs.
 
Biodatabases. DNA databases could become a source of income and health security. In the coming years, it could be possible and relatively simple to collect DNA information using a smartphone. As biodata becomes more ubiquitous, questions surrounding who collects, uses, retains, and discloses it will become pivotal. Applications (apps), smartwatches, and phones are already collecting biodata outside the traditional healthcare sector; an extension of this data collection would be commercial and consumer engagement with biomic or genomic data. DNA data marketplaces81 based on blockchains82 could emerge, allowing individuals—or designated data trusts—to share genomic information with corporations, academic researchers, and even governments in exchange for benefits or payment.
 
DNA databases could provide new insights into the complex links between genes and disease. Genomic data could be a source of power or economic advantage in future economies, as health and healthcare continue to increase in priority. Open biodata or platform-gathering big data from individuals could support the development of new therapies, but may also create privacy83 and accountability risks. Opportunities to collaborate and share data for greater medical efficacy and care could face challenges in individual data protection and trust in the system. Genome data could enable detection84 before the manifestation of disease, furthering long-term preventative cost savings in healthcare systems.
 
The pharmaceutical industry may begin shifting away85 from chemical substances as a source of new drugs, and explore manipulation of living organisms’ DNA as treatment86. DNA databases87 could become a strategic asset and input for the development of new drugs and therapies.
 
Remote healthcare services. Canadians could access more healthcare services remotely. COVID-19 has brought telemedicine and digital health tools into the mainstream, making patients more comfortable using technology to manage their health needs. In the next 10 to 15 years, technological development and the increased proportion of digitally competent people could dramatically accelerate remote healthcare provision.
 
Implanted sensors could monitor individuals’ health around the clock, sending data to the cloud to be analyzed for diagnosis and advice—along with other data, such as from air quality sensors in the workspace, or mental health analysis based on online behaviour.
 
People take control of their evolution. Germline editing—that is, editing genes that can be passed on to the next generation—is currently banned in most jurisdictions88. However, this could change over time as this technology more safely eliminates or improves resilience to diseases, which could improve wellbeing and reduce healthcare costs. In addition, emerging low-cost biodigital devices and services could allow individuals to experience at-home89 germline editing.
 
As a first step, using CRISPR to edit out genetic predispositions to disease could be seen as an extension of the current pre-implantation screening practice in in vitro fertilization. A next step could be to insert preferred physical or psychological traits with high precision, by editing the parent’s germline before conception rather than the embryo. In some countries, governments could seek to incentivize citizens to have healthier babies; over time, this may lead to a cognitive shift, where people consider procreating “naturally” to be reckless.
 
How we want to evolve as a species and what consequences could emerge may become important ethical considerations. Could eugenics90—the process of eliminating undesired genes from a population—re-emerge as a moral dilemma?
 
Healthy choices?
 
Do-it-yourself biology. Biodigital convergence may open up new possibilities, allowing people to choose who they want to be by hacking their own bodies and minds91. The growing availability and affordability of CRISPR kits, online open-source resources, and affordable devices opens up new prospects for DIY bio to treat, alter, or enhance physical or mental capabilities.
 
This could pose a major threat to public health, biosafety, and biosecurity. Unwise or inexpert gene edits could damage experimenters and, if they modify their germline92, their future children. If it becomes possible to select children’s traits and combine DNA inputs from multiple people, traditional motives and selection models for procreation could shift. Recreational implants that activate the pleasure centre of the brain may lead to a new form of addiction. People could choose to shape not only the health but the personality of children, to embody belief systems. When exploring the DIY movement, ethical considerations and the possibilities of procedural errors could lead to unintended consequences93.
 
In the longer term, gene edits that successfully enhance human capabilities could lead to technologies that create a new “superclass” of humans, vastly widening societal and possibly equity divides.
 
Critical uncertainties and future possibilities
Various factors could affect the scale and nature of acceptance or rejection of biodigital innovations. The following outlines some possible uncertainties that may lead to different future scenarios.
 
Societal acceptance: Will there be a societal consensus on adopting new technologies?
 
How concerned might people be about the security and privacy implications94 of health data access?
 
To what extent might lab-grown brains95 and other lab-created organisms already be or become conscious? What ethical implications could arise in future health sciences—or even art96—that uses synthetic biology?
 
To what extent might the ability to alter our own genes and brain functions call into question who we are as humans?
Business ecosystem: How might existing players change, how could related sectors evolve, and what new players could emerge?
 
To what extent could big tech firms dominate health and healthcare, as Amazon’s logistics and Google’s machine learning capabilities become increasingly important at the research and development (R&D) and healthcare service level?
 
Could individuals monetize their DNA data on an online marketplace? Could DNA marketplaces shift the financial gain of biodata sharing from biodatabase firms to individuals?
 
Economic rollout: How might policies, standards, and ideologies around the world differ, and what consequences or advantages in industry and socioeconomic status could emerge as a result of these differences?
 
Could uneven access to new human augmentation technologies give rise to new forms of economic growth, inequality, and discrimination?
Could human augmentation contribute to productivity and be considered a competitive advantage? How would international labour and employment agreements respond to the possible uneven global adoption of human augmentation?
 
Policy considerations
 
The rise of the biodigital convergence could affect many policy areas. The following are not policy recommendations, but rather considerations, questions, and thought-provoking ideas.
 
Role of regulation
 
Augmentation for work, school, or sports situations could give some people unfair advantages.
 
AI outputs from black box machine learning97 could prove problematic in applying AI-based digital therapeutic technologies that can continuously learn and self-modify. It may be difficult to trust the outputs without ensuring a lack of bias in a diagnosis.
 
Networks of biofoundries around the world could reduce the effectiveness of national regulations. Biodata, automation technology, platforms, and cloud-based labs98 could make it easier for organizations to offshore some R&D functions to jurisdictions with or without ethical regulations.
Public sector involvement
 
Biodigital innovations that have been developed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic—like health data collection and tracking, and bioproduction, including vaccines, treatments, and supply chains—may be applicable to other public health situations.
 
The multi-sectoral implications of CRISPR treatments may require further discussions about their ethics and possible uses in healthcare.
Access to new treatments through public healthcare systems
 
Affordability could affect the speed of new models of healthcare delivery, options, and treatments.
 
Like other digital technologies, biodigital technologies may require ongoing and regular software support to maintain their effectiveness. Governments may be required to step in if private sector suppliers withdraw their support99.
 
Equitable healthcare access for remote areas
 
Telemedicine, remote biosensing, and local bioproduction could offer different possibilities for diagnosis and treatment. In Canada, these medical services may benefit remote or rural areas. Remote collection of biodata in areas with limited access to reliable Internet may be a challenge to universal accessibility.
 
R&D, data sharing, and privacy
 
International agreements and collaboration on the future of health data could result in alliances and disputes.
 
Open-source science100 may challenge existing intellectual property frameworks related to diagnostics, therapies, treatments, and manufacturing.
 
The value of biodata may increase with the growing use of AI in drug discovery that relies on that data to generate products.
There may be international implementation of agreements, such as access and benefit-sharing systems101 under the Convention on Biological Diversity102 for example, that affect access to genetic resources from biodiversity that may be used for new drugs and therapeutics.
 
The digital nature of people’s biodata, and the ability to easily transfer or access it via online platforms could drive discussions about biodata sharing, storage, access, and privacy.
 
Environment
 
Climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss are widely recognized as urgent global issues. Today’s unsustainable production and consumption modes are endangering long-term socioeconomic wellbeing. Biodigital capabilities could increase our capacity to connect with and monitor the natural world. It could also expand our understanding of the interconnectedness of all living things. Genetic modification of the natural world for climate change mitigation, environmental remediation, and biodiversity conservation may however raise ethical considerations. Furthermore, there may be unintended consequences involved with the release of modified organisms in natural environments.
 
Few countries are on course to reach their carbon emission reduction targets. The cost of extreme weather events103 caused by climate change104—such as fires, droughts, floods, and hurricanes—may continue to rise. Other environmental crises may also intensify, from plastic pollution to biodiversity loss, to pollution of air, soil, and water. Despite a trend towards voluntary corporate disclosures105 and private sector investment against climate change, public policy remains key to environmental protection.
 
How is biodigital convergence changing the environment?
Biodigital innovations will continue to mature and combine. The following section outlines some innovations that could affect the future of ecosystems, biodiversity, and climate change.
 
Hybrid biodiversity. People may augment natural ecosystems and biodiversity to increase resilience. Gene editing106 is enabling the creation of new forms of biodiversity, from plants that glow in the dark107 to nanobionic sensors that monitor arsenic levels108 in soil. Researchers are using CRISPR gene editing for projects such as improving the resilience of forest ecosystems109, and bringing the woolly mammoth110 back from extinction.
 
Gene drives111 allow people to introduce certain genetic traits into an animal or insect population. This could help control invasive species112, restore coral reefs113, or prevent insect-borne diseases. For example, Florida released 750 million genetically engineered mosquitoes114 as an alternative to using insecticide. These interventions are not without risk, as it may be difficult to stop their spread once modified genes are released into nature.
 
Environmental clean-ups through synthetic biology. Scientists are developing jellyfish115 that can detoxify contaminated ocean; bacteria- and yeast116-based smart materials that can sense environmental contaminants; and microbes that can destroy117 pollutants in soil and water, recover rare earth metals118 from polluted land, and clean up oil spills119.
 
Carbon dioxide can be extracted from the atmosphere by genetically engineered weeds120 and fast-growing algae121, cultivated into biomass in specially designed bioreactors, and then harvested as fuel, fertilizers, oils, and plastics.
 
Internet of Living Things. Although in its early stages, it is possible to discern the beginnings of an “Internet of Living Things” (IoLT) similar to the current Internet of Things (IoT). Plants’ sensitivity to chemicals, combined with technology, opens up new capabilities. For instance, spinach can send an email to warn about landmines122. If its roots detect a specific explosive chemical, the plant emits a signal that is picked up by a sensor, triggering an email to researchers.
 
CRISPR has been used to edit genes to store binary information—the kind used in computers—in DNA form, allowing researchers to encode the phrase “hello world” into an E. coli cell123. Microsoft is exploring the future potential to store data124 in biochemical systems; theoretically, a gram of DNA could hold 215,000 terabytes125 of data, which people could read using portable DNA sequencers126.
 
What might change in the environment in the future?
As the biodigital convergence advances and matures, it could reshape the environment, biodiversity, and ecosystems in significant ways:
 
Modifying the environment. Biodigital interventions could increase the value of ecosystem services. The value of ecosystem services127—the benefits we gain from a functioning natural environment, from clean water to flood protection—has an estimated worth of 1.5 times more than the global GDP.
 
Artificial biodiversity could add even more value, from microorganisms that break down plastic pollutants128 and oil129, to glow-in-the-dark trees130 that replace street lights, to soils that absorb more water131 to mitigate flooding, and trees that are more resistant to forest fires. Technologically enhanced biodiversity could transform ecosystems that are currently uninhabitable to humans, and provide alternatives to geoengineering132 for tackling climate change.
 
Environmental biosensors and data collection. Better data could transform environmental monitoring and governance. Environmental protection laws have historically legalized environmental harms from human activity by setting pollution emission caps. Genetically modified plants could monitor anti-pollution laws, detecting pollutants and triggering alerts to the relevant authorities. Biodigital sensors, drones, robotics, and sequencing of DNA fragments in the environment133 could help monitor air, water, and soil quality more widely and in greater detail, including at remote extraction sites. Releasing smart biodigital living entities into ecosystems could share real-time signals with authorities, identifying harmful substances, microbes, or pollutants. This could potentially replace or support pollution emission standards and lead to personalized, real-time environmental legislation.
 
Additionally, emerging fields of study like imageomics134—where machine learning is used to extract biological traits from wildlife images of living organisms captured by drones or uploaded on platforms such as eBird135 and iNaturalist136—could rapidly improve our understanding of biological processes and detect early signs of harm to biodiversity.
 
Environmental DNA137 (eDNA) can identify species in an area without directly observing them. This could allow for better understanding of the environmental impacts of proposed projects and policies138, as well as environmental monitoring139 of ongoing human activities. It could also lead to new ways of determining the economic value of living things, illustrating the value of ecosystem services. Moreover, it could help track how species140 move in response to climate change and facilitate early detection of invasive species. Collecting eDNA in seafood markets may improve wildlife crime investigation141 techniques by detecting the sale of endangered and protected fish species. The emergence of eDNA might call for reflections on who controls that data and what uses are ethical.
 
Deeper green
 
Redefining the concepts of natural and artificial. That nature exists and evolves more as an art than a science is a prevailing assumption. However, our understanding of the mechanisms that govern life has reached a point where we can modify biological instructions, to program organisms to perform specific tasks. There are signs of a cognitive shift142 in which society increasingly values biological entities. There is an emerging philosophy, based on new development of living robots143, that organisms act as “hardware,” and DNA and cellular communication (via electric gradients144) are the “software” that dictates the hardware’s function.
 
The ability to reshape ecosystems by eliminating or reviving145 certain species, or directing how they evolve, raises ethical146 questions about the rights of species and ecosystems, and the risk of unintended consequences if our ability to reshape ecosystems outpaces our capacity to understand them. As people are still trying to map and understand the intricacies of ecosystems, our understanding may be limited and ever-evolving, even with the help of technology. There may be a risk of harming nature when influencing or manipulating the intricacies of the natural world.
 
Indigenous perspectives could offer deeper insight into and awareness of the potential ramifications of new biotechnologies. Acknowledging and thinking about implications seven generations into the future, as many traditional Indigenous teachings suggest, could guide ethical considerations of biodigital innovations.
 
Critical uncertainties and future possibilities
 
Various factors could affect the scale and nature of acceptance or rejection of biodigital innovations. The following outlines some possible uncertainties that may lead to different future scenarios.
 
Societal acceptance: Will there be a societal consensus on adopting new technologies?
 
As the next generation of children grows up familiar with digital and biological technologies, will public consciousness shift towards a realization that humans are an integral part of larger ecological systems? Could there be a wider recognition of the importance of safeguarding ecosystems for their socioeconomic value?
 
Might there be backlash to greater modification of the environment? By whom, and what form could it take?
 
If it becomes feasible147 to store data cost-effectively in the DNA of living organisms, could some plants play a new market-based role in the digital economy?
 
Would we want to establish new forms of sensing and connecting with nature?
 
If portable sequencers become accessible and cheap, would people use them to assess the state of biodiversity or discover new pathogens?
Environmental ecosystem: How might the environment be affected and how might it react? Should the precautionary principle be applied?
 
How great are the risks of unforeseen consequences? For example, new artificial microorganisms could disrupt the food chain, create new forms of pollution, cause new allergies, or themselves become a form of waste.
 
Policy considerations
 
The rise of the biodigital convergence could affect many policy areas. The following are not policy recommendations, but rather considerations, questions, and thought-provoking ideas.
 
Economic development
 
Environmental sequencing could reveal causality between economic activities and their impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems.
Land could become a key tool for companies to mitigate their environmental footprint with artificial biodiversity, using it to compensate for the environmental impacts of economic activity.
 
An IoLT system could be deployed at large scale and be dominated, like the Internet, by a small number of powerful companies.
 
Intellectual property
 
Current intellectual property rights may have to shift to encompass entities in nature, raising questions about whether to consider new organisms a private or a public good.
 
With better sequencing technologies available, governments may have to clarify at the international level rules regarding the access, ownership, and benefit sharing of digital sequence information148, and its legal status149 under the Convention on Biological Diversity.
 
Environmental regulation & enforcement
 
New regulatory frameworks at various levels may affect the introduction of new genetically modified organisms. Rules on reproduction of new modified species could vary.
 
Migration of genetically modified species could be difficult to control across jurisdictional borders.
 
Emerging digital and biosensors could act as tools to monitor environmental quality and biodiversity loss. Creating communication channels with the help of digital technologies between living organisms and regulators could facilitate rule enforcement.
Security
 
Emerging biodigital innovations and capabilities are creating both new frontiers and possible concerns in the field of security and defence. With almost five billion people connected to the Internet, digital surveillance and data collection have substantially increased over the last decade. The rise of biodata may add a new layer of complexity in securing potentially valuable personal data. The access to more data may also facilitate criminal investigation and potentially create a more secure society.
 
The IoT is being deployed around the world in smart cities, which allow authorities and private actors to monitor citizen movements. These technologies have led to privacy issues and much controversy150. Combined with the rapidly declining cost of DNA sequencing, a large amount of biodata could be generated over the next decade, facilitating biosurveillance in the future. Moreover, the rise of DIY bio-capabilities and the access to emerging biotechnologies could facilitate new forms of biowarfare and bioterrorism.
 
How is biodigital convergence changing security?
 
Biodigital innovations will continue to mature and combine. The following section outlines some innovations that could affect the future of security.
 
The rise of biodatabases. The adoption of biodatabases and DNA biodata by private or public entities may have privacy and national defence risks. Because of its nature and the type of information it contains, biodata could lead to new tiers of threat. Consent, access, and nefarious use could pose severe risks for individuals, and for security and defence operations to manage. The cost of gene sequencing is rapidly declining: in 2020, a Chinese firm claimed it could sequence a full genome for $100151. Some governments have established DNA databases: the U.S. has accumulated around 14 million152 samples on criminal suspects, with an overrepresentation of black men; and China routinely153 collects DNA from male citizens for predictive policing. Researchers are working on using DNA to predict154 how a person’s face will look, so DNA databases can inform surveillance through facial recognition software.
 
Many people voluntarily give their DNA in exchange for information on their health or ancestry, or to support medical research, such as the FinnGen study155. While some human genetic-testing companies have comprehensive156 privacy policies, many others do not157. Some judges have ordered158 companies to share customers’ DNA with law enforcement agencies, and nearly half of Americans support police access to private DNA databases. Biodatabases can be a useful tool for forensics. Cold cases over a decade old may be reopened159 as DNA data is more abundant and easier to access. Theoretically, bad actors may be able to hack160 into and identify individuals in open-source databases161, to which people upload their DNA in search of relatives or medical studies.
 
International entities trade surveillance technology abroad without similar regulations as arms dealing, even though many consider the impacts of technology to pose similar dangers. Many are calling for DNA databases and facial recognition technology to be classified as weapons162 in an attempt to regulate this global trade and monitor their use by authoritarian regimes.
 
The race between biothreats and biodefence. Much like the Internet, biodigital convergence is seeing a new and continuing struggle between attack and defence. The U.S. has classified gene editing as a potential weapon of mass destruction163 and the FBI has a biocrime department. New technologies can indicate when a person is becoming ill164, and enable early detection165 of which virus or bacteria they may have. The U.S. Army is looking at wearable166 biosensors for soldiers to detect biothreats. While it can be difficult to differentiate natural from artificially engineered pathogens, the technology is improving167.
 
It is increasingly feasible for individuals to sequence and synthesize DNA, with DIY gene-editing kits retailing online168 for as little as US$169. Aims of the DIY bio movement include making insulin and other medicines more affordable169. However, DIY bio also increases the risk of either deliberately or accidentally releasing DIY pathogens170. California has become the first U.S. state to pass a law171 specifically to restrict the use of CRISPR, but regulations differ from place to place.
 
What might change in security in the future?
 
As the biodigital convergence advances and matures, it could reshape security and defence systems in significant ways:
 
Modern biothreats. Weaponization of biotechnology could lead to a rise in threats to society. While only organizations with significant resources and expertise can hope to develop a nuclear weapon, it may be increasingly feasible for individuals or small groups to develop potentially devastating bioweapons, such as a version of the Ebola virus modified to spread more easily. It is harder to anticipate the potential for scale and collateral damage of new bioweapons compared to more traditional weapons.
 
Adverse actors with a long-term agenda could invest in or infiltrate start-ups in the biotech field, while cyberattacks on biological research institutes172 could allow access to knowledge that can be weaponized using readily available technologies and materials. Vaccine researchers, for example, routinely create synthetic viruses to test strategies. The recent reproduction of the extinct horsepox virus173 raised concerns that smallpox could be synthesized and weaponized. Similarly, research into neurotoxins such as tetrodotoxin174—produced by pufferfish—could inform the development of bioweapons.
 
Terrorist groups and rogue nations could also target a nation’s food supply with bioweapons: agroterrorism175 could involve pathogens that affect cultivated crops or forests176.
 
The rise of biosurveillance. Biological threats require new ways of thinking about monitoring and border control. With a significant increase in international trade, we may need to implement intelligent biodetection systems to monitor and give timely warnings about new viruses, bacteria, or other genetically engineered pathogens. New biosensing technology could be deployed at borders in an attempt to protect them against biological threats. Synthetic biology techniques and raw materials are dual-use, raising questions about regulation of international trade in resources such as yeast cultures and algae strains. Raw biomaterials may need new types of border oversight and tracking, as their end products could vary.
 
Biological threats may impact national defence priorities, as nations pivot to create biopreparedness. However, biothreats cross many policy domains, including environment, health, national security, and border control.
 
Identity crises
 
The ethics of DNA sequencing. Genomic data could have far-reaching consequences for economic competitiveness, and questions of identity, equity, and discrimination. It is becoming financially feasible for businesses to create DNA databases of their customers and enable business models in which consumers trade their DNA data for free services. Firms currently track digital data to create consumer or even electoral profiles177. Tracking biodata profiles could be an extension of this. With advances in genomic analytics, firms could access a bioprofile of who you are178 and gain a broader understanding of your identity. Moreover, genomic data could become a new form of digital authentication.
 
Security and surveillance could bleed into equity practices and ethical domains. Sharing individuals’ genetic identity could create new challenges to equity, if access to education or employment opportunities depended on whether DNA tests suggest suitability for a given career. Similarly, access to healthcare, insurance, or immigration opportunities could depend on DNA tests for susceptibility to expensive-to-treat diseases. Ethno-nationalist movements could discriminate based on DNA or create communities rooted in shared ancestry, leading to geopolitical divergence, social unrest, or new types of inequity and discrimination.
 
As an individual’s DNA gains importance, a black market in fake DNA evidence179 could emerge. People could avoid tracking by using CRISPR technologies to alter their DNA. More institutions may use biodata as a means of authorization, which could open up a new avenue for identity theft.
 
Critical uncertainties and future possibilities
 
Various factors could affect the scale and nature of acceptance or rejection of biodigital innovations. The following outlines some possible uncertainties that may lead to different future scenarios.
 
Societal acceptance: Will there be a societal consensus on adopting new technologies and supporting this industry?
 
Could their potential for use in bioweapons sway the public against potentially beneficial uses of synthetic biology and gene-editing technologies?
 
Could attitudes towards justice and predictive policing180 change if it becomes possible to use genetic profiling181 to predict future criminal behaviour with a high degree of confidence from an individual’s DNA?
Might concerns about biohazards lead more people to move to isolated areas or seek to make their properties more biosecure182?
 
How might differing cultural attitudes183 shape responses to biothreats in different countries?
 
Business ecosystem: What might be the shape of businesses in this space, how might related sectors evolve, what new players could emerge, and how might they evolve over time?
 
Might the nature of biothreats require international standards184, or will countries develop their own parameters and regulations on capturing, storing, and sharing biodata?
 
Could large companies monopolize synthetic biology, since smaller entities may not have the resources to meet the biosafety requirements for high-risk activities?
 
How might firms, organizations, and governments reach an appropriate balance between innovation and regulations, bans185, and moratoriums?
How would bioinnovation organizations address a higher risk of industrial espionage186 and cyber attacks187?
 
Labour market readiness: Will there be sufficient talent188 to develop new markets and activities? Where will biodigital talent reside?
 
Could we see national defence departments and security firms employ a growing number of “bio” experts?
 
Economic rollout: How can policies adapt and stay ahead of transitions?
 
What new protocols and regulations are needed to securely trade biodata?
 
What safety standards and regulations, such as government-issued licenses, might be required to conduct DIY biology?
 
Policy considerations
 
The rise of the biodigital convergence could affect many policy areas. The following are not policy recommendations, but rather considerations, questions, and thought-provoking ideas.
 
Biosecurity and biothreats
 
Nefarious actors could learn from failures to detect, mitigate, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic189, and the underlying socioeconomic impacts, increasing the likelihood of future biological weapon attacks.
 
The digital components of wearable or implanted devices could be hacked, leading to biological harm to the user.
 
Open-source science and international sharing of research data could lead to international surveillance and authentication.
 
Biodigital convergence could enable individuals to develop low-cost biothreats.
 
Some countries might create, redesign, and invest in new infrastructure to prevent or mitigate potential biothreats.
 
National security
 
Disinformation and fake news about emerging biodigital technologies could contribute to changing social attitudes, behaviour, and subsequently become a national security concern.
 
With the rise of low-cost DIY biolabs and easier access to technologies like DNA synthesis, front-line emergency services such as policing, firefighters, and paramedics might need training to detect labs, biohazardous organisms, and potentially human augmentation.
There may be a rise in human augmentation, which could lead some countries to develop augmentation detection capabilities and regulations.
Military and defence
 
Defence departments might consider national and global defensive and offensive solutions to potential biothreats, similar to past nuclear and anti-missile defence programs.
 
Manufacturing
 
Manufacturing was historically based on factory workers who transformed natural resources initially extracted from mines, forests, and waters, or grown on farms. Differences in labour costs and the natural distribution of resources have influenced the shape of our far-reaching global supply chains. Biodigital convergence could transform the natural resource sector through new ways of making and obtaining raw materials and fuels, as well as new manufacturing techniques, potentially easing pressure on natural resources. More localized production and distribution of goods and fuels could reshore manufacturing and reshape trade, disrupting trade patterns and supply chains.
 
Through the industrial age, international trade agreements and the offshoring of manufacturing activities led to complex supply chains190. Demand for physical products is expected to increase in the coming years, as the global population grows and standards of living continue to rise. International trade is also expected to increase. Digital technologies191 such as AI, robotics, cloud computing, 3D printing, and mixed reality are already transforming the manufacturing sector. Although labour costs still affect decisions about production location, the Next Digital Economy192 is expected to revolutionize global value chains. It may also accelerate the transition towards genetic engineering-based biomanufacturing.
 
How is biodigital convergence changing manufacturing?
Biodigital tech innovations will continue to mature and combine. The following section outlines some innovations that could affect the integrated and complex future of manufacturing.
 
Smart biofactories reaching industrial scale. Synthetic biology has historically been labour intensive, with many manual and repetitive tasks—but this is starting to change. Private organizations and research institutions are building smart bioproduction facilities that can reach industrial scale.
 
Robotic lab assistants can perform experiments 1000 times faster193 than humans, enabling researchers to focus on the design and creation of genetically modified organisms. Data generated from testing new organisms train and optimize machine learning194 to predict biological system behaviour and provide recommendations, which could greatly accelerate the development of bioengineering195. Costs are decreasing as online DNA marketplaces196 facilitate price comparisons between synthetic DNA producers.
 
Synthetic biological materials. Synthetic biological materials are disrupting current methods of manufacturing. Innovative biomaterials include a fabric resembling silk197 produced by genetically engineered microbes; 3D-printed bio leather198 and wood; biodegradable bricks made from mushrooms199; bacteria mixed with concrete200 to self-heal and prevent cracking; bacteria that can produce hydrogen201 fuel on demand; “soft robots202” that can move cargo underwater; and 3D-printed gel203 that changes colour in response to light and can be used for camouflage. AI-designed living machines made from frog skin and muscle cells204 to fit a novel body plan can move autonomously and perform “programmed” tasks. New concepts and innovations are facilitating the physical integration of biological and digital, as well as furthering the cognitive shift we are seeing. Technology and nature may be more readily integrated than we may have thought. Further, technology could be more intuitive and nature more prescriptive than previously imagined.
 
Synthetic biomaterials could conceivably offer alternatives to almost every raw material used to produce goods—from plastic to wood, metals, chemicals, and even plant fibres like cotton.
 
Bioenergy made from genetically modified organisms. Despite significant investments over the last decade, algae biofuel remains expensive—but researchers are using AI205 to genetically engineer algae that can produce energy at lower cost, as a potential replacement for fossil fuels. Genetically engineered bacteria can produce hydrogen fuel in biosolar cells using only sunlight and water.
 
What might change in manufacturing in the future?
As the biodigital convergence advances and matures, it could reshape manufacturing, supply chains, production modes, and consumer behaviour in significant ways:
 
Biologically sourced natural resources. Genetically engineered microorganisms could reduce demand for natural resources. We may no longer need traditional raw materials to manufacture goods. The primary industry sector—including mining, farming, and forestry—could face competition206 from a range of functional, cost-effective biomaterials. Supported by cloud-based labs, additive manufacturing, computer-aided design software, and automation, biofoundries could provide local genetic engineering services207 (biomanufacturing as a service) and raw biomaterials respectful of local regulations to manufacturers wishing to reduce their supply chain and production infrastructure costs.
 
With likely lower carbon footprints208, bioalternatives could support efforts to mitigate climate change. A dramatic decline in revenues for oil-producing states could also have geoeconomic and geopolitical implications.
 
Distributed manufacturing with biofoundries. Distributed biomanufacturing facilities could meet local needs for commodities. Combined with 3D bioprinting, biofoundries could accelerate manufacturers’ transition from a traditional business-to-business model to a business-to-consumer model by providing local people with niche goods like biomaterials, food, and personalized drugs for rare diseases209. In remote areas, biofoundries could produce a range of goods that are currently expensive to import, lowering the cost of living and potentially helping remote communities become more self-sufficient.
 
If products are increasingly manufactured and transformed locally, the need for extensive physical infrastructure like electrical grids, pipelines, ports, and railways may decrease—and the need for fermentation facilities may increase. This could ease pressure on land and allow goods and services to be more accessible to remote communities. It could also lead to the emergence of new, more local infrastructure to move biomass—such as a beer pipeline210.
 
Decreasing cost of bioengineering. More affordable research equipment could lead to an increase in bioalternative innovation. The declining cost of gene sequencing, DNA synthesis, and automation could enable a rise in open-source DIY biomanufacturing research. Individual entrepreneurs could explore an unprecedented number of new possibilities for goods and services, from health to construction, infrastructure, materials, and furniture.
 
These new bioalternatives could require regulators to review a suite of regulations related to health and safety, environmental protection, intellectual property, climate change mitigation, and social welfare, while aiming to promote economic growth. Bioengineering’s high capacity for customization could lead producers to adapt their products to accommodate disparities between countries’ regulations.
 
Recapture, regenerate, recycle
 
Circular economy and sustainable development. For decades, the production and consumption211 that drove economic growth on a global level have increased the environmental footprint of materials and led to the depletion of natural resources. From resource extraction to disposal, the linear “take-make-dispose” economy that dominated our development model has threatened the Earth’s carrying capacity to regenerate renewable resources. To achieve sustainable development goals212, a movement has emerged advocating for a global shift to a circular economy213, by separating economic activity from the consumption of finite resources, and by designing products made from renewable raw materials while respecting their regenerative cycle.
 
A biodigital production system could reduce human demand for natural capital by optimizing the use of biomass, and developing genetically engineered alternatives to non-renewable resources like fossil fuel and many minerals.
 
What if biopackaging with integrated seeds could turn easily into plants? Or if new fungi214 materials for the construction sector would grow rapidly while capturing carbon? And what if biomaterials would be embedded with specific biosensing capabilities like detecting food spoiling, or air, water, and soil pollution in urban areas? Consumption of bioproducts could lead to the regeneration of ecosystems and biodiversity all over their life cycle, from production until the end of their useful life.
 
Critical uncertainties and future possibilities
 
Various factors could affect the scale and nature of acceptance or rejection of biodigital innovations. The following outlines some possible uncertainties that may lead to different future scenarios.
 
Societal acceptance: Will there be a societal consensus on adopting new technologies?
 
Will consumer preferences and the economic movement towards lower-carbon goods accelerate the shift to biomaterials? How readily might the public accept new genetically engineered products? Could divides emerge along generational, cultural, geographic, or religious lines?
Business ecosystem: How might existing players change, how might related sectors evolve, and what new players could emerge?
 
Will biomanufacturing be developed by multinationals or by start-ups?
How could biomanufacturing redesign supply chains within different industries?
 
Labour market readiness: Will there be sufficient talent to develop new markets and activities? Where will biodigital talent reside?
 
Will there be investment for multidisciplinary collaboration between engineers, digital scientists (such as AI, robotics, connectivity), and biologists?
 
Economic rollout: How rapidly could policies shift and adapt to enable the transitions?
 
What is the potential for new biomaterials to pollute ecosystems? What kind of waste might biofoundries producing novel materials generate? Would it be easier to handle than chemical, industrial (packaging, wood, steel), or nuclear waste?
 
How could interprovincial and international trade rules prevent or enable biomaterials from moving across borders?
 
Policy considerations
 
The rise of the biodigital convergence could affect many policy areas. The following are not policy recommendations, but rather considerations, questions, and thought-provoking ideas.
 
Innovation systems
 
Biofoundry infrastructure could encourage local entrepreneurship and innovation.
 
Intellectual property rules surrounding new biomaterials and engineered microorganisms could either incentivize or slow down R&D and innovation.
 
Large firms and e-commerce actors may drive bioconsumption globally by adopting bioalternatives and low-carbon materials like bioplastics or edible packaging.
 
Economic development
 
Federal, provincial, and municipal governments could have different positions on biomanufacturing given the impact on various economic sectors such as agriculture, food transformation, construction, oil and gas, petrochemicals, forestry, fisheries, pharmaceuticals, mining, and transportation.
 
The value of traditional materials and natural resources could rapidly decline where an alternative exists.
 
International collaboration
 
Biofoundries could enable new international partnerships and collaboration in R&D, and break traditional commercial alliances between countries and regions.
 
International standards on biomaterials research and production could emerge.
 
Regulation and trade
 
Emerging biomaterials and genetically engineered microorganisms could prompt new labeling on consumer products and building materials.
Environmental regulations on waste management, toxic substances, and transportation may need reviewing to assess new biomaterials made from synthetic biology, engineered tissue, or 3D bioprinting. These may also affect import and export activities.
 
Governments may consider the ethics surrounding the use and management of genetically engineered organisms.
 
COVID-19—an unexpected accelerator
 
The COVID-19 pandemic is acting as a driver of change, accelerating the transition to a biodigital world. It has raised awareness of biology and its array of uses among people, governments, and industry. It reveals the risks of misinformation and the need for bioliteracy. It pushes biodefence capabilities and national self-sufficiency to the forefront of government agendas. And it has forced societies to re-evaluate the balance between biosecurity and personal freedoms.
 
The speed of biodigital convergence in the coming years will depend not only on technological progress but social acceptance—and the pandemic has shown that unexpected events can trigger rapid shifts in what is widely seen as acceptable or desirable. In the future, we may not see digital technologies and biological systems as separate, but rather woven together, further normalizing the biodigital world that future generations may inherit.
 
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been living through the first global-scale biodigital experience. We are simultaneously encountering the profound evolution of biodigital innovations and witnessing the emergence of a new domain. The biodigital technologies discussed in this report exist today and will continue to evolve. The extent to which they will transform our lives in the future depends in part on whether and how quickly they become more capable and affordable, as well as normalized and integrated into society. In other words, transformation is a function of technological possibility and social acceptance.
 
Often, social acceptance is gradual, as new generations grow up with different attitudes and experiences. Sometimes, events can trigger unexpectedly rapid shifts in what is widely seen as normal. The change in airport security procedures after 9/11 is one example of a security and travel protocol shift as a result of a profound event. The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted many rapid changes as a result of the circumstances we face; from the digital transformation215 of businesses to increased video meetings216, online shopping217, food delivery apps218, telemedicine219, and surveillance220. Advancements were made in mRNA vaccine deployment221, real-time sequencing222, and the global cooperation223 that led to the rapid production of vaccines due to pressures on the biotechnology sector.
 
COVID-19 may be ushering in a new era of biothreats in which rapid change becomes more normal. This pandemic is unlikely to be a once-in-a-century occurrence224, as many factors such as climate change and population growth may contribute to more—and possibly more severe—zoonotic viruses in the future. The global risk of biothreats may rise and experts may increase efforts to understand the variables that lead to the emergence of pandemics.
 
So what might COVID-19 mean for biodigital convergence?
 
A rise in bioliteracy
 
People, governments, scientists225, and industry are talking about biology like never before. From the R number to mutations in the spike protein, concepts that were niche in early 2020 have become part of mainstream conversation. This rise in bioliteracy could facilitate discussing, explaining, and understanding emerging biodigital technologies like those explored in this report. Similarly, a rise in bioliteracy has contributed to environmental conversations and climate change initiatives, which have also risen in tandem with the pandemic.
 
More attention and funding for biodigital technologies
COVID-19 has accelerated interest and investment in research in various biological and biodigital innovations, from mRNA vaccines and alternative immunization methods such as nasal sprays226, to biosurveillance, sensors, genomic therapies227, and increased understanding of the microbiome228, toxic stressors229, and the human immune system. COVID-19 has accelerated the use of biodigital innovations like telemedicine and health apps, and could prompt discussions about biosurveillance or environmental biosensors in the future.
 
Health and biodefence as a cross-cutting issue for public institutions
People have become acutely aware of the powerful and far-reaching effects of microorganisms. Public health has become central to every aspect of government, from the economy to the environment. Pandemic preparedness is now being considered by some as a national security230 issue, given the general acceptance that it is only a matter of time before another significant biothreat emerges.
 
A new era of misinformation risks
 
COVID-19 demonstrates how conspiracy theories231 can gain traction while scientists are racing to understand the nature of a new threat. Examples include harmful theories that COVID-19 is caused by 5G232 and vaccines contain microchips controlled by Bill Gates233, and fake cures and health advice like injecting yourself with bleach.
 
People have to decipher mass amounts of information and make sense of the world through new information channels. “Viral disinformation and conspiracy theories pollute our information environment. They shape the way a growing number of Canadians make sense of the world, which in turn influences their social, economic, and political decisions234.” Sense-making drives what people think they know and how they make decisions. Misinformation bears the risks of backlash that could slow down or speed up the adoption of biodigital innovations. How we make sense of emerging biodigital innovations will affect the way the biodigital era unfolds.
 
A wider quest for national self-sufficiency
 
The early weeks of the pandemic demonstrated how commercial contracts can break down in a global emergency, as national governments intervened235 to prevent exports of personal protection equipment (PPE), medical supplies, and grains236. The pandemic also affected many supply chains, including semiconductors and meat237. As a result, governments may increase domestic capacity to manufacture essential supplies in a range of essential sectors. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Singapore has advanced238 its 2019 goal239 to produce 30% of its own food by 2030 using cellular agriculture and vertical farming. In 2021, Canada proposed a $2.2-billion investment240 in the biomanufacturing and life sciences sector, to strengthen vaccine production capabilities and healthcare innovations. We are seeing a similar focus on healthcare innovation and bioproduction around the world, France241 being one of many countries investing heavily in this rapidly growing field.
 
Public involvement in the pharmaceutical industry
Countries that invested in COVID-19 vaccine development and manufacturing infrastructure enjoyed earlier access242 to vaccines than those that took a more transactional approach to procurement—and disparities in early access quickly led to threats of export bans. Some countries may explore strategic bioinfrastructure and biomanufacturing capacity to better prepare for future biothreat emergencies and national security.
 
This could call into question the accepted dominant role of private enterprise in pharmaceutical development and manufacturing, as reflected in recent encouragement of public participation243 in biomanufacturing and pharmaceutical production.
 
Governments may especially value the domestic capability to pivot quickly and manufacture any new vaccine, treatment, or diagnostic test in the face of a new threat.
 
International vaccine distribution and contracts to secure supplies brought to light the inequality244 in access to prevention and treatments. The nature of global biothreats may require new strategies to allow more equal distribution of treatments.
 
A shifting balance between privacy, right to health, biosecurity, and biodefence
 
Testing and isolation emerged as key strategies early on for countries that were able to keep the pandemic under control. Some countries, such as South Korea245, did so especially effectively and compromised individual privacy246 to an extent currently unacceptable in Western culture—though this might change given a sufficiently serious threat. While still rife with ethical concerns, there is a growing sense that acceptance247 of biosurveillance tools is increasing, as we deal with a global pandemic. Interestingly, some islands and remote areas, such as New Zealand248 and Prince Edward Island249, administered stringent protocols controlling entry and responding to threats early, and have been praised and recognized for effective pandemic mitigation.
 
Many governments and scientists may want to improve250 their capacity to predict and detect251 the next pandemic virus despite uncertainties252. Diagnostic technologies that require personal biodata are developing quickly. Researchers are working on portable diagnostic devices using gene editing to detect any pathogen, processing hundreds of tests within 15 minutes; and sensors injected under the skin253 to detect an infection that may be contagious but not yet symptomatic. COVID-19 vaccine passports254 could herald a world in which many activities are accessible only with willingness to share one’s current state of health. The access and availability of healthcare services have been strained by the pandemic, leading jurisdictions to consider difficult measures such as vaccine mandates255 and health contributions256, or refusing healthcare services257 for the unvaccinated. There may be debate on whether healthcare is a right or a privilege. Some jurisdictions258 have deployed wastewater surveillance systems259 to better understand how COVID-19 spreads in a community.
 
Systemic shifts in science & technology during the COVID-19 pandemic
COVID-19 brought dramatic changes to some aspects of how science itself is conducted. Whether these changes become entrenched or fade away with the threat of the pandemic remains unknown.
 
Clinical trial and approval processes for new mRNA vaccines were accelerated260 to an unprecedented degree.
 
Synthetic biology companies and biofoundries have demonstrated their ability to rapidly switch their production capacity to raw materials261 for new tests and vaccines.
 
Scientists around the world shared data262 on the sequencing of the COVID-19 genome and new variants.
Academic journals prioritized263 speed of publication over thoroughness of the peer review process.
 
Platforms such as Crowdfight264 emerged, enabling scientists to exchange ideas and enlist volunteer help.
 
People volunteered their data to enable real-time science, such as through the UK’s Zoe symptom-tracking app265.
 
Conclusion
 
We are at the cusp of the biodigital convergence era. We use technology in biology today, but biology in itself is also a form of technology—it is programmable, codable, and alterable. The future of biology as technology could include programmable digital components. Digital technologies and biological systems are combining and merging in ways that could be profoundly disruptive to our assumptions about society, the economy, and our bodies.
 
Five sectors are set to transform with the onset of the biodigital convergence: food, health, the environment, security, and manufacturing.
 
Beyond the transformation we might see in those sectors, exploring the impact of the biodigital convergence on specific sectors may reveal more systemic opportunities, challenges, and dilemmas society will face.
 
Biodigital convergence opens up new perspectives on how biological entities affect economies; how the natural world interconnects with sectors; how technology advances and enables new biological innovations; what makes for an ideal location for human settlement; what are our ethical responsibilities to the natural world; and other challenges and opportunities that may arise in our evolution as a species.
 
Biodigital convergence also imposes new challenges and dilemmas: how should we coordinate international regulation approaches, to avoid countries embarking on experiments with potential consequences that could cascade across borders? What might be the economic implications on different industries, and how might it affect the competitiveness of countries? What implications might new human augmentation possibilities have on equity and discrimination? To what extent should we prioritize preserving traditional ways of life? We may be approaching a new era in which governance and regulatory frameworks include and target biodigital innovations.
 
Thinking through a transition, broadly evaluating possible risks, and harnessing opportunities could enable a better future for Canada and the world.
https://horizons.service.canada.ca/en/2022/05/31/biodigital-today-and-tomorrow/

Is the Sun Part of a Binary Star System?

Is the Sun Part of a Binary Star System?
 
Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v5uhgfh-is-the-sun-part-of-a-binary-star-system.html
 
A binary star system is a system where two stars are gravitationally bound to each other and orbit around a common center of mass, essentially meaning they are "paired" stars that revolve around one another due to their mutual gravitational pull; the prefix "bi" indicates "two" in this context. Just what is the real cause behind the precession of the equinoxes and why did the ancients believe this cycle was so important? Walter Cruttenden asks this question in his latest book Lost Star of Myth and Time and comes to some provocative conclusions.
 
To the layman, the precession of the equinoxes is the observed motion of the night sky shifting backwards by a small amount every year. Of course, the night sky continuously shifts throughout the year as the Earth orbits around the Sun, but if one were to take a fixed point in time (like the Vernal Equinox, for instance) and take a snapshot of the sky on that day every year, one would notice the sky slowly shifting backwards with each progressing year. This is what is meant by the precession of the zodiac, or precessional movement. Astrologers would say we are in a different 'age' or zodiac sign depending on which constellations are visible in the sky on the Vernal Equinox of a particular year. This precessional movement of the sky amounts to about 50 arc seconds per year and takes about 24,000-26,000 years to complete a full cycle; the "great year" or "great world cycle" as it is often called.
 
Sir Isaac Newton was the first to put forth the idea that this precession is due to a wobbly motion of the Earth's axis, and few scientists have challenged this assumption since Newton's time. Cruttenden dares to ask the most basic question about this in his book bringing together a number of clues to form a hypothesis for precession being the result of the Sun moving in a binary orbit about a companion star. Could Cruttenden's speculations really lead to data that could overturn the ideas of Newton - a man treated like a deity in the world of physics and astronomy? As we'll see below, there's actually a large body of evidence to support Cruttenden's ideas. 
 
In his book, Cruttenden also offers some speculation about what ancient civilizations believed about this precessional cycle. Although, this part is not as strongly grounded in science, he speculates that as the Solar System makes its way through the points along this cycle, the nature of human civilization changes. At one extreme we have a Golden Age filled with peace, plenty and full social harmony; and at the other extreme an Iron Age filled with ignorance, war and social cacophony. The state of civilization depends on where we are in the cycle. Cruttenden points out that this shifting of the ages is recorded in Greek legends and in the legends of many other cultures around the world. This cycle implies that many civilizations with high technology - or perhaps just a more refined understanding of nature - may have come and gone through the many such "great years." This also implies that our current civilization is by no means special (in contrast with the prevailing Darwinian view.)
 
Cruttenden even offers some speculation on what particular star this companion might be, focusing on Sirius as a possible candidate. While his arguments may seem reasonable, there's much evidence in Picknett and Prince's book The Stargate Conspiracy to point to the case for Sirius being overstated. I might even suggest reading The Stargate Conspiracy first before tackling Cruttenden's book. Even if Cruttenden is off in his quest to locate the Sun's companion, the evidence he's gathered for the Binary model is compelling and worth the read. The interested reader may want to check what he has to say over at his Binary Research Institute, which mirrors much of what's in his book. I've summarized some of the main scientific points he makes in his book below.
 
1.) Angular Momentum
 
When it comes to the Solar System, we have a big problem with angular momentum. This problem is related to the theory of how the Solar System formed out of a nebular cloud, otherwise known as the Nebular Condensation Theory. The theory was originally proposed by the christian mystic Emanuel Swedenborg and further developed by Immanuel Kant and others. (How an idea proposed by a mystic becomes accepted scientific theory is an interesting question, but one we'll have to save for another time.) According to the theory, every nebula starts out with a certain amount of angular momentum. As the particles and gasses condense to form a central proto-star, the proto-star's rotation should accelerate to conserve the total angular momentum. Think of an ice skater as she brings her arms and legs close to the vertical axis of rotation, spinning ever faster.
 
But despite what the Nebular Theory predicts, the Sun actually has very little angular momentum to speak of, at least compared to the other planets. The Sun contains about 1000 times more mass than all the planets combined, yet it possesses a mere 0.3 percent of the total angular momentum of the Solar System. Most of the angular momentum exists in the outer-gas planets like Saturn and Jupiter. So the question is, if the Nebular Theory is accurate, then where is the Sun's missing angular momentum?
 
Cruttenden proposes that if we factor in a hypothetical 24,000 year binary orbit shared with another star, then the missing angular momentum shows up in the Sun exactly where we'd expect it.
 
Play Video Precession - What is that? Debunking Lunisolar Precession.
 
2.) Sheer Edge
 
According to a study by Allen, Bernstein and Malhotra published in The Astrophysical Journal in March of 2001, our solar system appears to have a sheer edge to it, meaning that beyond a certain point (50 AU, just beyond the Kuiper belt) there appears to be no trackable bodies of any significant size. It's as if we go from an enclosed area of having planets, asteroids, comets and other bodies, and then outside of that area nothing. Interestingly, this sheer edge is a feature one might expect to find in a binary star system. There's also a chance it could be due to another outer planet-like object such as the recently discovered planet Sedna, or it may have to do with some gravitational effect not as yet understood. The possibility is intriguing though.
 
3.) Comet Paths
 
It appears that studies carried out on the distribution of long-period comet orbits show that these orbits are essentially non-random. In other words, the suggestion is that some large body disturbs the Oort cloud (a cloud of comet or asteroid-like bodies that surrounds the outer-edge of the Solar System) and kicks off comets into similar orbits. This fact has received a fair amount of press in the last couple years; some astronomers speculate that this hypothetical body (Jovian-size planet, brown-dwarf, or otherwise) may be discovered "within two years." Comets should generally come from the location of the galactic plane due to galactic tidal forces -- and the data shows this is generally true. However, even after gravitational tides are taken into account, a small bias remains in the orbital distribution of these long-period comets. This points to the existence of another source propelling long-period comets other than gravitational tides.
 
A solar companion with a hypothetical 24,000 year period may fit the bill here, although astronomers now believe that this object might be more of a Jovian-size gas planet with a much longer orbital period instead. It could be that both exist, or that some astronomers are biased in their assumption of a longer-period body due to the million-year-long time-spans between mega-extinction events in the geological record. (The less than "mega" extinction events are far more numerous.)
 
Since the earliest proposals of the 'Nemesis Theory' back in the 80's, which attempted to explain the mass extinction cycle, the proponents of this theory hypothesized that a brown-dwarf star orbits about the Sun with a considerable period (roughly 26 million years, to match the average mass extinction rate). In fact, one of the objections raised against the original 'Nemesis Theory' by its opponents was that the period of time indicated by mass extinctions is much too long a time to suspect an orbiting body. Any orbit over such a long period of time just wouldn't be stable.
 
But could a solar companion with a shorter (meaning on the order of thousands, not millions of years) period solve this problem and explain the non-random distribution of comet orbits too? Recent evidence compiled by Richard Firestone et al. described in their book The Cycle of Cosmic Catastrophes suggests that encounters with comets happen far more frequently than originally supposed. Firestone et al. point to a significant impact event around 13,000 BCE at the Younger Dryas boundary. Mike Bailie, a dendrochronologist at the Queen's University Belfast, has written several books that suggest impact events during historical times as well. Dennis Cox, whose work has been featured here on SOTT, has also found a number of locations based on satellite images that suggest historically recent comet bombardment too. This is certainly an area that needs further study.
 
4.) Sidereal vs. Solar Time
 
An interesting argument in favor of a binary system has to do with the two different ways of measuring the day length. One measurement is called the Solar Day, which we know is 24 hours. The other measurement is called the Sidereal Day which comes out slightly less at 23.56 hours. Given an observation point, like a star in the night sky, the Sidereal Day is the time it takes to reach that same point again in the sky after one full spin. Looking at the diagram below, one can see that the missing time is due to the Earth's orbit around the Sun. If the Earth and Sun were traveling along parallel paths there wouldn't be any difference between the Sidereal and the Solar Day - it's the curved orbital motion of the Earth in orbit with the Sun that makes the difference. Most of us never worry about sidereal time since few people other than astronomers are interested in keeping track of time in the night sky.
 
The same duo of time measurements exists for the Moon as well. The Moon orbits the Earth every 27.3 days, but we see a new Moon every 29.5 days. Again, the difference has to do with the Moon's orbital curvature around the Earth as the Earth orbits around the Sun. Due to this extra motion by the Earth, we have to add an extra 2.2 days. If the Sun and Earth were moving along parallel paths, then we'd see a new Moon every 27.2 days; but since the Earth orbits the Sun, the cycle is longer. Conceptually, this is no different than the Solar Day versus Sidereal Day example given above. In both examples, the differences in cycle measurements have to do with normal Keplarian motion in space.
 
However, when it comes to the difference between the Sidereal Year and the Solar (or Equinoctial, or Tropical) Year, we have a completely different explanation. There is about a twenty minute difference between the two, such that the Sidereal Year is always slightly ahead of the solar year - just like the sidereal day is slightly ahead of the solar day, by analogy. The accepted theory for this precessional movement is called the Lunisolar Theory (which has to do with the wobbling motion of the Earth's axis, explained in greater detail below.) When dealing with the Sidereal Day versus Solar Day, we see that these differences are due to the extra orbital movement of the Earth around the Sun. So the question is: should the Sidereal Year be treated in the same manner? If the difference between the Sidereal Day and the Solar Day is the Earth's orbit about the Sun, couldn't the difference between the Sidereal Year and the Solar Year (known as precession) be due to the Sun's orbit about another body? That's how the analogy goes in any case. In the Binary Model both the Sidereal Day and the Sidereal Year are caused by the same type of Keplarian orbital motion.
 
5.) Time
 
Time is a funny thing. There's probably no greater challenge for a writer than trying to conceptualize time. Yet the constancy of time or the fact that so few adjustments need to be made in our day, year, etc. gives us a good reason to suspect that the Sun is part of a binary star system.
 
First we need to understand what the mainstream theory has to say about precessional movement, or the precession of the equinoxes. The current theory, called the Lunisolar Theory, states that the Earth's rotational axis also rotates tracing out the shape of a cone (see image to the right), changing its orientation very slowly - kind of like a spinning top. They call it the 'Luni-solar' theory because it is said that this top-like motion is caused by gravitational tidal forces coming from the Sun and the Moon. The idea is that it takes the Earth roughly 24,000-26,000 years to move its axis a full circle along this cone-like path. So the Lunisolar Theory would ostensibly seem to explain the precessional movement, although there is a problem (actually, several).
 
First of all, if this axial top-like motion were occurring, then we'd expect to lose a small amount of time each day. We would start to notice a small shift in our calculations for eclipses, planetary transits and such, which have to be measured fairly accurately. The motion of the planets that we observe in the sky should also precess along with the rest of the stars and galaxies in the background, but according to Karl Heinz and Uwe Homann in their Venus transit studies, they don't. According to Crutenden, we don't take into account precessional movement when calculating the positions of the planets or anything within our solar system for that matter. So any planets or other objects within the Solar System do not appear to precess with respect to the Earth. The only objects that follow precessional movement are those outside the Solar System. If this is the case, then precession cannot be due to this top-like motion that the Lunisolar Theory dictates.
 
In the Binary model, precessional motion is explained by the fact that the whole Solar System is rotating about a common center of gravity with another star. In other words, an observer on Mars, Venus or any other planet in the Solar System would notice the same precessional rate, proportional to its orbit, just like we see on Earth. The ultimate test would be to set up a telescopic probe on some other planet like Mars to measure the yearly precessional rate and compare it to the values on Earth. If the Binary System model is correct, these values should be proportional (taking their orbital periods into account). Of course, that still doesn't prove precession is due to our Sun being in orbit with a companion star, but it certainly makes the case stronger. Ultimately one would have to find the companion star in question to prove anything.
 
6.) Acceleration of Rate of Precession
 
Another feature of precession that the Luni-solar model has a difficult time explaining is the fact that the rate of annual precession appears to be increasing. The graph below plots several rates taken at various times throughout the last Century. The first set of points were recorded by the astronomer Simon Newcomb in the early 1900's, and then later were taken from the Astronomical Almanac. The red line represents the best-fit rate of change for the observed precession.
 
Now if this were due to a top-like motion of the Earth's axis a la the Luni-solar theory, then we should be able to extrapolate this trend out to millions of years - still a blink of the eye in terms of Earth's history. This means that the precessional top-like movement would be so slow millions of years ago that it would be hardly noticeable. The Earth would hardly appear to wobble at all. Whereas if we look ahead millions of years, we would find the Earth's axis wobbling so fast that it makes a full precessional cycle in a matter of years! The more likely explanation is that the observed increase in annual precession rate is due to something other than the Earth's axial motion.
 
The Luni-solar Theory becomes even more absurd when one considers the fact that the forces due to gravity are used to explain this top-like motion. This implies that the mass of the Earth or Moon, or Sun is somehow changing in size or distribution. Given what we can see and observe, this seems unlikely (although who knows how a companion star might affect the gravitational dynamics as it approaches its nearest point to the Sun.) More than likely, the Earth does not wobble to any significant degree, other than rotational wobbling like the Chandler wobble, and the observed precession is not due to any movement of the Earth itself.
 
This increase in the annual precession rate is exactly what we would expect from a binary star system, however. In a binary star system, both stars oscillate towards and then away from each other, all the while spinning around some imaginary center of gravity. As the stars approach one another, their velocity accelerates until they reach perihelion (or the closest point of approach), then their velocity decreases until they reach aphelion (or the furthest point of separation.) This means that based on the increasing trend shown in the graph above, we should expect the two stars to be somewhere on the path approaching perihelion. Crutenden believes that the companion star must have just turned the corner at their aphelion point and is now beginning to approach Earth. However, we suspect that it may be the opposite: that the hypothetical companion star is actually close to (or at) perihelion based on the bizarre changes taking place in the Solar System. Either way, this trend of the annual precession rate increasing is exactly what one would expect to find from two stars in a binary orbit following Kepler's law.
 
What Does This All Mean?
 
If you've made it this far, then I assume you get the point that the precession of the equinoxes implies something greater than just a wobbly Earth. Precession appears to be the evidence right under our noses, telling us that our Sun is also part of a binary star system (in contrast to a lone ball of fire bobbing up and down along its way through the galaxy). So why might this be interesting?
 
Well for starters, how about reason number 3 given above that describes how this hypothetical companion tends to hurl comets towards the inner Solar System. This was the basis for the original 'Nemesis Theory' that tried to explain the dinosaur extinctions and other mass die-offs recorded in fossil record. The thing is, if this hypothetical 'Nemesis' body is actually plowing through the Oort cloud every 26,000 years instead 26 million years, then this implies that the comet threat has been grossly underestimated. (And downgrading the name 'Nemesis' to the euphemistic 'Tyche' - as some astronomers have done - is unlikely to make the comets go away!)
 
Like Walter Cruttenden writes in Lost Star of Myth and Time, we may be approaching a new Golden Age in terms of our location in orbit about a companion star, but what he doesn't see is that we may have to pass through a cosmic shooting gallery of comets to get there. Perhaps a 'comet cleanse' for the Earth is also part of the process of getting us on the path to a new Golden Age? Seeing the psychopathic control of the planet and the lack of any meaningful change in this regard, it's hard to imagine how a Golden Age could come about without one.
 
Source
 
https://www.sott.net/article/230480-Is-the-Sun-Part-of-a-Binary-Star-System-Six-Reasons-to-Consider
https://www.amazon.com/Lost-Star-Myth-Walter-Cruttenden/dp/0976763117

Holocaust Denier

Holocaust Denier
 
Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v5u6nvk-holocaust-denier.html
 
Their 6,000,000 Never Existed – Started 18 years before Hitler assumed power. By, Eli James
 
Jewish propagandists have entirely reversed the reality of the situation using their control of the media, and have blamed the Germans for starting the war and committing all the alleged atrocities, when in reality the Germans and their allies were the most disciplined, honorable and righteous forces fighting in that fratricidal Jewish-instigated war. The German people and their allies were the ones who experienced a genuine holocaust – a real genocide – during WWII, not the Jewish population of Europe.
 
The simple fact of the matter is that the “Holocaust” narrative – 6 million Jews persecuted, abused, and systematically exterminated by “those evil Nazis” during WWII – endlessly promoted and perpetuated by the Jewish-owned mass media, Hollywood and “entertainment” complex, and educational and political establishment is 100% bogus in virtually all respects. The Germans simply wanted the Jews out of Germany, clearly and correctly recognizing them as an alien, hostile and treacherous force working to subvert, pollute and destroy the German nation and Western civilization.
 
The alleged genocide of European Jewry has been used to justify the genocidal Allied war effort, to establish the rogue-terrorist State of Israel, to justify Israeli violence against its neighbors, to induce guilt in both Germans and the Allied nations, to cover up and ignore Allied crimes against Germans, to allow Jews to receive massive reparations from Germany, and to create solidarity in the Jewish community. The extreme importance of the Holocaust story in advancing Zionist/Jewish interests ensures that this falsification of history will continue in the future.
Jews have made questioning the details of the so-called Holocaust a criminal offense, with fines and imprisonment, and doing this has only hurt their credibility and soured many against their official narrative. The truth does not need laws to enforce it, only lies do, and the stupidest thing the Jews could ever have done — and want to do in America — is criminalize not believing their improbable narrative. It is their “education” that has created doubters, which is why it continues to fail.
 
The Jews invented the Holocaust partially to help distract people from what the JEWS did to the Russians/Germans/Ukrainians. Instead of appearing as the most criminal oppressors, the JEW planners of all wars and the real bosses controlling our countries, are now considered “poor innocent victims” that we should never criticize.
 
Free yourself from the power of a lie designed to render you impotent. By instilling unwarranted guilt and shame upon humanity via the “holocaust”, humanity is rendered incapable, or at least very hesitant, to criticize, much less interfere with, any of the designs of Jews or their nation of Israel. The “holocaust” is also an ongoing cash cow for Jewish “holocaust survivors” through the collection of hundreds of billions of euros from Germany, and elsewhere, as WWII reparations that continues to this day.
No one can deny that Jews were rounded up and imprisoned by Germans in German occupied territories after the suspension of the HAAVARA TRANSFER AGREEMENT during WWII. Nor can anyone deny that Japanese Americans were rounded up and imprisoned in America for the same reasons, those reasons being primarily security issues, and in the same fashion during WWII. And, after examining the facts, the German prisons built for Jews were far more humanely accommodating than the American prisons built for Japanese.
 
What is staunchly denied is the existence, much less the use, of homicidal gas chambers, the manufacture of human skin lampshades, the manufacture of human derived soap, institutionalized torture all conducted at “death factories” where 6,000,000 Jews were gassed and cremated and other outright lies disseminated by vindictive and vengeful Jews.
 
Indeed tens of thousands (The International Committee of the Red Cross reported: 272,000 concentration camp inmates died in German custody, about half of them Jews) of imprisoned Jews died during the last months of WWII due to disease, especially typhus, and starvation. After all, as the fortunes of war turn against the losing side, food and medicine become extremely scarce… and deadly scarce for those imprisoned by the losing side due to the ruination of food production, medicine manufacturing, and transportation supply lines. Germany was carpet bombed and firebombed into the stone age during the last year of WWII (a totally merciless war conducted by three Jewish controlled empires against a country the size of Montana).
 
Indeed there were crematoriums working overtime as a means of sanitarily disposing of disease ridden corpses, but these were built during the last year of the war and never was a living person burned alive in one as JEWS would have you believe.
 
In Eli James’ 25 year career as an Identity teacher, he has spent a great deal of time and effort in exposing Jewish lies. The full scope and intent of Talmudism (Judaism) cannot be appreciated without a complete study of their historical and contemporary lies. Judaism is the religion of lies and deception. All you have to do is to compare the Laws of Moses to what the Jews actually teach and do, and you will see that they always do the opposite of what Moses and the Bible command. {“By their fruits shall ye know them.” — Matt. 7:20} The Mosaic Law forbids usury. The Jews have always been its foremost practitioners. The Bible says debts are to be forgiven every seven years (Deut. 15:12) and that a national proclamation of debt forgiveness is to be made very 50 years (Lev. 25). That is called the “Jubilee.” The Jews have yet to declare such a biblical debt forgiveness in their history. They always collect or foreclose. The Bible says that you shall not execute judgment until both sides of an issue have been disclosed. (Prov. 18:13) The Jews are always engaging in pre-emptive military strikes. In one case, an accused civilian Palestinian was sitting in his wheelchair when an Israeli missile was fired at him. He never received his day in court. The Jews have the world’s most glaring double standard. Just witness their pro-immigration stance in the USA versus their “Jews only” policy in “Israel.” Likewise, Jews are always agitating against Christmas displays while they flaunt the Menorah and Star of Solomon during Hannakuh. And, of course, they don’t complain that the Israeli State’s official religion is Judaism. In America, they are very concerned about “separation of church and state.” In Kikestan, the rabbis’ religion is the State Religion. The list of Jewish hypocrisy is a mile long; and the rabbis contribute more hypocrisy to it every day.
 
It is important that we understand that Judaism is a chauvinistic enterprise which has deceived the world into believing that they are “g-d’s chosen people.” This is the very lie that has “deceived the whole world.” (Rev. 12:9, 13:14) It is important to look at the Hoaxacaust in the light of this 2,000-year record of hypocrisy, lies and posturing as Israel. As far as I am concerned, this hoax is just more of the same. A Jew is a liar by religion and a thief by trade. He is taught to take advantage of non-Jews in every possible way. Every year, they recite their “Kol Nidre” prayer, which is an homage to their father of lies. The Kol Nidre declares all of their oaths to be invalid for the coming year. The Jews are the con artists and the rest of the world provides the suckers. But their house of cards is beginning to show signs of collapse, as more and more people around the world perceive the brutality of Zionism and the undue influence of the Jews in media, banking, politics, publishing, etc.
 
It is absolutely necessary that the so-called holocaust is presented in its true light, so that people can understand why and how the holocaust mythology came about and why it continues to this day. Of all modern Jewish lies, the holocaust is the most gigantic. Anyone who has taken even a modest amount of time to investigate the holocaust industry’s absurd claims finds that there is no substance to them whatsoever. Let me say at the outset that the hysterical charges of making soap from human fat and using human skin to make lampshades were part of the anti-German wartime propaganda of World War I. All of those claims were proven to be false and many anti-German journalists were forced to admit it and apologize for their lies after that war. But non-Jewish human beings have very short memories. These absurd claims were dredged up again as part of World War II propaganda, only this time there were no apologies.
 
The most significant work on this subject is the book, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, by Arthur A. Butz. No rebuttal of this book has ever been made, nor will one ever be attempted, because the facts documented in that outstanding piece of research are indisputable. Again, we are faced with a situation in which we are forced to choose between Jewish lies and historical facts. Instead of public debate, organized Jewry exerts pressure on venues and on individuals to prevent free and open discussion of the facts. In countries other than America, where they don’t have a First Amendment, critics of the hoax are prosecuted and sent to jail merely for expressing their opinions. This is tyranny, plain and simple.
Dr. Robert Faurrison, commenting on the show trial of Ernst Zundel in Germany, said recently, “The Zionists want to impose the religion of the alleged ‘Holocaust’ of the Jews on the whole world. It is normal that Jews and Zionists should seek to foist such an imposture on us, for it is the sword and the shield of the Jews in general and of the Jewish State in particular. The Jews’ power stems directly from the Western world’s near-total belief in the phenomenal lie of the ‘Holocaust.’ You needn’t look any further. The Jews do not tolerate any questioning of the ‘Holocaust.’ Against the revisionists they use physical violence and judicial repression because, on the level of historical and scientific argumentation, they have been defeated hands down by the revisionists. We have been able to expose their lies, one by one. Therefore Jews and Zionists seek refuge in violence and intimidation. They treat revisionists like Palestinians.” (Nov. 2, 2005, American Free Press)
 
Since the subject of the holocaust is so vast, only a certain amount of space can be afforded it, therefore, I have chosen 39 historical facts — one for each whiplash that the Pharisees administered to the back of Jesus Christ — all of which are evidence against the holocaust. The one and only piece of “evidence” which the holocaust industry has ever produced is the Hitler memo which includes the expression, “final solution.” This expression, in true Hollywood and Jewish fashion, is exploded all out of proportion and our imaginations are encouraged to run wild with the bait. What Hitler meant by the “final solution” was the removal of the Jews to the island of Madagascar: a steady deportation to a place where the Jews could do little harm. The final solution was deportation, not “death camps.” And there were no death camps.
This, and everything else that the holocaust industry has ever come up with, is nothing but hearsay, lies, forged and doctored evidence. This is an indisputable fact: THERE IS ABSOLUTELY ZERO FORENSIC EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE HOLOCAUST. The idea is fabrication from beginning to end. That is why no public debate can be allowed.
 
Recently, I appeared on the Dr. Rebecca Carley show, she provided me with a fortieth lash against the hoaxacaust, when she said, “If the Nazis were going to gas all those Jews after they got off the boxcars, why did they bother to tattoo them?”
 
When we start asking simple questions like this, instead of believing the lies of the Synagogue of Satan, everything falls into place.
 
The Thirty-Nine Lashes Against the Hoaxacaust
Consider the source. All of the “evidence” presented at the Nuremberg trials came from two sources: Communists and Zionists. Neither of these groups could be considered impartial. All communists are liars; and all Zionists are tyrants who believe that critics of Zionism should have no public say. Many of these people, such as Leon Trotsky and David Ben-Gurion, were both communists and Zionists! Since the myth-makers cannot prove their contentions in an open, public, discussion, the only choice they have is to quash dissent by making “questioning the holocaust” a crime in every country in the world, except the USA, where freedom of speech is hanging by a thread.
 
2.) Zyklon B delousing gas was just that. In the days of World War II, typhus was a scourge which was transmitted by fleas and lice. Zyklon B was the treatment given to all prison internees, no matter what their religious background, because typhus had to be controlled. The claim that it was used to poison people is absurd because it was highly flammable. To use it for the purposes described by the hoaxers would have put all of the camp facilities at risk of fire and explosion. Signed confessions, extracted by Jewish and communist interrogators, say that the dead bodies, after death by gassing, were extracted by workers who were “drinking and smoking.” Rudolph Hess signed such a document, which was written for him. Hmm. Would you turn the gas on in your oven without lighting it, wait a while, and then walk into the room with a lit cigarette in your mouth? Obviously, the hoaxers had little technical knowledge when they made their ridiculous claims. In addition, the manufacturer of Zyklon B gas stated that, due to the adhesive qualities of the gas, it would require a 24-hour ventilation period before anyone could safely enter a room which had been used for such a purpose.
In addition, shaving heads was necessary in order to remove the breeding grounds of the lice.
 
3.) Killing six million people and disposing of their bodies is no small order for an army trying to conduct a war. Can you imagine the waste of fuel and other resources that would otherwise go to the war effort? Of the thousands of reconnaissance photos available from World War II, why are there no pictures of the fuel tanker convoys which would be needed to deliver the fuel for the crematoria? Why are there no pictures of the smokestacks, which were supposedly belching smoke day and night? The reality is that the Germans could hardly afford to waste fuel for such a purpose. Everyone agrees that the Germans kept tremendous records for efficiency and documentation purposes. Where are the records of these fuel shipments?
 
4.) Auschwitz, one of the largest concentration camps, had only about twenty ovens in its crematory. The crematoria at the various concentration camps were very crude and required lots of fuel and many hours to consume one body. One researcher has calculated that, given the exact number of ovens available and hours per body, the ovens would have to be going day and night from the War’s beginning until 1975 before that many bodies could be cremated, Are you beginning to comprehend the absurdity of such a claim? Yet, it is repeated by the Zionist-dominated bias machine on an almost daily basis and it is force-fed to our school children at taxpayer expense and Zionist urging.
 
5.) If the bodies were not cremated as many hoaxers suggest, then where are the skeletons of all these bodies? Surely a few dozen would have turned up by now. Or did the Germans find some super-secret body disposal system that no one yet knows of?
 
6.) Would the Germans go out of their way to provide fuel for the crematoria when their airplanes and tanks were desperately in need of fuel? Not once have I heard anyone accuse the Germans of being stupid. Toward the end of the war, the Germans lost battles because lack of fuel. Would they be so stupid is to redirect fuel to the camps for “the ovens” when battles are at stake?
 
7.) Jews were singled out for special interrogation because so many of them were communists. The camp directors had to determine whether these Jews were harmless or dangerous – whether they would make reliable workers or just be troublemakers. Those who were determined to be useful workers were allowed many privileges, including the formation of orchestras. If the Jews were automatically gassed (killed), how would any of these privileges be considered, let alone established? The mere fact that there are so many Jewish survivors of concentration camps is evidence against the hoax.
 
8.) During the entire length of the War, the International Red Cross had constant access to the concentration camps. They delivered mail and packages containing food and clothing. The International Red Cross, despite this constant presence, never once filed a complaint or report about “the ovens of Auschwitz” or any other camp. It truly begs credulity to think that not a single Red Cross agent ever became suspicious, unless, of course, there was nothing to be suspicious about.
 
9.) The Nuremberg trials were conducted by the OSS (Office of Strategic Services, forerunner of the CIA) at the behest of the Zionist International. The Israeli State did not yet exist. The vast bulk of “evidence” was provided by the pro-Zionist Soviet Union. Neither of these two organizations could possibly be considered fair or trustworthy. Again, consider the source.
 
10.) Confessions were obtained under duress and torture. “It was this same War Crimes Branch which itself administered the nightmarish trials at Dachau, where prisoners were beaten, kicked, starved, and brutalised by Jewish-American jailers.”– Richard Harwood, from Nuremberg and Other War Crimes Trials, p. 14. In true gangland style, the accused were told that their family members would be hurt or killed if they did not cooperate. Techniques of interrogation included beatings, starvation, testicle smashing and other forms of torture. The German prisoners were often so badly beaten that they could not be brought into the courtroom for fear of demonstrating their adverse treatment. The State of Israel today continues to use torture and murder as part of their terrorist campaign. Amnesty International has repeatedly cited the Israeli State for such violations of human rights.
 
11.) There were no more than 4 million Jews living in Nazi-occupied territory during the War. Most Jews had left Germany before the war started. As the Nazi army advanced, the Jews fled rather than be captured. On June 30, 1965, the West German government announced that 3,375,000 Jewish “holocaust survivors” had applied for reparations. Now, if we subtract 3,375,000 from 4,000,000, that leaves 625,000 unaccounted for. If we take 625,000 and add a zero to the figure, we arrive at the fictitious and truly fantastic six million lie.
 
12.) According to the World Almanac of 1947, the world population of Jews in 1939 was 15,688,259. These figures were supplied to the Almanac by the American Jewish Committee. Then, the Jewish-owned New York Times of Feb. 22,1948 listed the Jewish population in Palestine as 600,000 to 700,000; and for the rest of the world, the Jewish population is listed as 15,600,000 to 18,700,000. If we add the two lower figures together, we get a minimum total of 16,200,000 Jews world-wide, which is still a net increase in the world Jewish population of at least 500,000. If six million Jews had really died, then the total should have been 10,200,000.
 
But since the whole six million myth was just in the process of being fabricated by the world Zionist propaganda machine, these accurate figures came out before the hoaxacaust could be subtracted from the equation. Considering the fact that populations generally decrease during times of war – which it most certainly did for the German people and other nationalities – it is quite astounding that the Jewish population actually increased during this time. The fact is that the vast majority of Jews simply relocated to other parts of the world: Palestine, Russia, America, South America, etc.
 
13.) According to a pamphlet by Dr. E.R. Fields, entitled Was There Really a Holocaust?, the Red Cross reported in 1946 that of registered Jewish camp inmates, no more than 300,000 could have died. In item #11 above, we were willing to grant that possibly 625,000 were unaccounted for. If half of them died in the concentration camps and the other half died or disappeared to some other country, then our figures agree.
 
14.) Heinrich Himmler, Chief Commandant of the Concentration Camps, issued an order, dated Dec. 28, 1942, stating: “The death rate in the concentration camps must be reduced at all costs.” – from Reitlinger’s book,The Final Solution. Ladies and gentlemen, the Germans were fighting a war, and they needed the productive capacity of the inmates of the camps to produce war material. An extermination policy would have shifted vital resources away from production to waste. Isn’t this holocaust claim incredible just from this consideration alone?
 
15.) One of the Nuremberg documents, a letter of April 10, 1943, was issued by Oswald Pohl, the head of the Economic Administration of the concentration camps. After addressing the above-cited order by Himmler, the mortality rate of the camps had been reduced from 8.5% in July, 1942 to 2.8% in June, 1943. Given an extermination policy, why would there be any concern for mortality rates?
 
16.) Numerous claims of the hoaxers have been amended over time because the claims were obviously exaggerated or invented. In April 1975, Simon Wiesenthal of the Los Angeles Holocaust Center was forced to admit in the paper, Books and Bookmen, “No gassing took place in any camp on German soil.” At that time, Auschwitz and other camps were still in the possession of the Soviets, who would not allow serious researchers into these camps to validate holocaust claims. We expect that, with full disclosure, Mr. Wiesenthal will be forced to admit that no gassing ever took place in any camp.
 
17.) The Red Cross interviewed thousands of freed camp inmates at the end of the war. When asked if they witnessed any alleged “gassings,” the response was negative. From Red Cross document #9925, June, 1946, the entry states: “The detainees themselves have not spoken of them.” How can you gas six million Jews and nobody notices?
 
18.) Photos of emaciated bodies, both alive and dead, are not proof of an extermination campaign. The fact is that toward the end of the war, the Allies were bombing railroads and roads to the point of obliteration. This meant that valuable food, medicine, Red Cross packages, and other supplies were no longer reaching the camps. This was the real reason for the malnutrition, not to mention the serious side effects of malnutrition, which would be an increase in all types of disease.
 
The same thing happened in America during the Civil War. Northern prisoners in the Southern camp of Andersonville were also emaciated to the point of being only skin and bone. The commander of the camp, at his trial, said that he simply had no supplies with which to feed the inmates and he was not allowed to set them free. Pictures of these prisoners could easily be substituted for WWII inmates and no one would know the difference.
 
One thing we know for sure: The Jews are good at writing captions.
Please note that the published photos of concentration camp inmates show mainly and some overfed people lining up for the showers. All of the photos of dead bodies being bulldozed show emaciated bodies. If they were gassed and killed immediately, as the hoaxers claim, there would be some photographic evidence of well-fed people being bulldozed into graves. There is none.
 
19.) In 1943, the SS arrested Buchenwald Commandant Karl Koch for mistreating and executing prisoners. He was found guilty by SS Judge Konrad Morgan and was executed for his crimes. If there were an extermination policy in force, would they bother trying and executing Commandant Koch? Again, these were work camps designed to assist the war effort. An extermination policy would have required tremendous resources and effort. It would have disrupted the crucial work that was going on and it would have risked undermining the war effort.
 
20.) Cremating 6,000,000 bodies in order to dispose of the evidence would have left 15,000 tons of ashes. No such volume of ashes was ever found, and no air reconnaissance ever revealed enormous clouds of smoke, and certainly there was never any such total of bodies found. It is only when one considers the enormous lack of evidence of a holocaust – all the physical matter that would have been left over from such a campaign (six million corpses?!!!!) and the sheer magnitude of such an undertaking – then the hoax becomes obvious. It is only the hoaxers themselves and those who have not really thought about the physical details who believe in this tragic farce.
 
It is quite probable that the Germans did not have enough fuel to consume anywhere near that amount of bodies. One of the hoaxers, Mr. Henri Michel, editor-in-chief of the Revue d’Histoire De La Seconde Guerre Mondial, exclaimed of Auschwitz: “This camp was the most international and the most western of the death factories, and its soil is enriched with the ashes of 4,000,000 corpses.” — p. 3. The dust cloud of crematoria smoke from such a volume of corpses would certainly have prompted some aerial reconnaissance photos, don’t you think? Where is the evidence? Why is there not one single photo of the crematoria smokestacks belching out their tons of ashes?
 
21.) William L. Shirer, one of those authors who continued the hoaxacaust story in his book, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, was forced to admit in a footnote on the crematoria: “…the measurements are those which are standard for a crematory oven of not very modern design intended for small cemeteries, and would be unsuitable for mass burning.” This footnote occurs on p. 972 of the German edition only. The rest of the world is still in the midst of the Zionist Dark Age.
 
22.) Thies Christopherson, a German soldier and author stated: “I was at Auschwitz! There was no gas chamber there.” Now, remember, this man does not practice the religion of lies. His statement was proven to be true when, in 1960, Auschwitz was opened to tourists and no gas chamber could be found. What a disappointment this must have been for the tourists! Later, in order to make up for this communist oversight (they didn’t have much experience at developing capitalist-style theme parks, like Disneyland), the Soviets built one themselves! No doubt, the money for construction was provided by some Zionist or rabbinical organization.
 
23.) The so-called Diary of Anne Frank was not written by Anne Frank at all. Photocopies of the supposed manuscript show two distinct styles of handwriting, one which is not handwriting at all but printing, and the other a very smooth handwriting angled at two o’clock. At least half of the manuscript was handwritten in ballpoint pen. The ballpoint pen, invented during WWII, was not commercially available until after the war. In addition, the American Jewish writer, Meyer Levin, sued Anne Frank’s father and won an award of $50,000 for his participation in the writing of “Anne Frank’s” supposed diary. This fact was only brought to light because one Jew tried to cheat another.
 
24.) Although death by starvation and disease had increased toward the end of the war, the videos of huge piles of dead bodies in civilian clothing were most often footage which was filmed in Dresden. Dresden was devastated by the firebombing raids of the Allies on February 13 and 14, 1945. This was one of the greatest wartime atrocities in history, because Dresden had become, in effect, a large refugee camp for German women, children, wounded soldiers, and old men. Dresden was one of Germany’s main artistic centers and had virtually no industry located in its vicinity. The Allies knew this and yet they bombed the city mercilessly for two nights, apparently to dispose of war ordnance which would otherwise go to waste, for Germany at that point was a defeated nation and the war was nearing its end. Why not kill as many unarmed civilians as you can? Who will know?
 
The German refugees thought that Dresden would be a safe haven because of its lack of industry. They were, sadly, wrong. They could not imagine that there would be such immense Zionist bloodlust in command of the U.S. and British military. You can imagine the horror of those who thought they would be safe in Dresden until the end of the war! The war criminals have successfully blocked out this war crime from the history books; but I am sure that Yahweh God will remember those who are responsible.
 
25.) The Nuremberg trials were an absolute farce. One of the most damning conditions of the trials agreed to by the Allies in the August 1945 London Agreement was “The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply, to the greatest possible extent, expeditious and non-technical procedure, and shall submit any evidence which it deems to have probative value.”
 
In other words, let’s railroad these “war criminals” as quickly as possible, so we can go home and collect our medals. How would you like to be tried by a court which does not abide by “rules of evidence?” A mere technicality, you say? Can you see the kangaroos hopping around? Except, these kangaroos have hooked noses and wear yarmulkas.
 
26.) The fact that American Jews were allowed to be prosecutors and judges is a travesty in itself. The fact that many of them, if not all, were merely instruments of the Zionist International makes the entire proceeding suspect because of a lack of impartiality. No court would consider it impartial if an agent of the accuser were to be allowed to be a prosecutor or a judge. Yet, this is exactly what happened at the Nuremberg trials. Unfortunately, the American people were not aware of these shady Zionist dealings. They assumed, as people still assume today, that the Nuremberg trials were held in accordance to standard procedures.
 
Regarding the London Agreement, Harwood says: “…the same people who drew up the arrangements for Nuremberg promptly had themselves appointed as prosecutors and judges. Nikitchenko and Falco became judges. Jackson was American Chief Prosecutor, Fyfe was Deputy-Chief British Prosecutor. Thus, virtually the same people were judges, prosecution, and court.” –p. 14. And you were told that the Nuremberg trials were fair and impartial?
 
27.) Incriminating documents were simply fabricated by the Soviets. In his opening speech at the War Crimes Tribunal, Chief Prosecutor Robert H. Jackson appeared to be quoting from a document which he ascribed to Baron Werner von Fritsch, the pre-war Commander-in-Chief of the German Armed Forces. In fact, he was quoting from a typewritten document of unknown origin. No original document was ever produced. (You can imagine how many clerks and other military personnel were recruited by the Zionists, at U.S. and British expense, to produce “documents.” Oops! I shouldn’t encourage you to use your imagination. There’s been too much of that already! Even if you’ve only heard the Zionist version of these events, it would only be prudent to exercise some common sense and good old-fashioned skepticism before accepting their story without criticism. It seems that only the Jews routinely get away without scrutiny. Why is that?)
 
28.) Budd Schulberg, Jewish film producer, was recruited by the OSS to produce the photographic and film “evidence” at Nuremberg. Again, lack of impartiality at its worst. He received a military reward for his efforts. Surprising that he didn’t get an Academy Award as well! The Jews of Russia (Khazaria), America, Britain and Israel were the prosecution, the judge, the jury, the newspaper reporters and the film crew. The poor, persecuted Jew has no influence at all! Why do the goyim hate him so?
 
29.) Paul Rassinier, author of The Drama of the European Jews, relates that many of the hoaxers, authors who had profited from the hoax, could not verify their claims. One author, Dr. Miklos Nyiszli, claimed to have been to Aushwitz but gave travel directions which made absolutely no sense. Professor Rassinier attempted to contact Dr. Nyiszli about such discrepancies and received from him a reply through a Mr. Tibere Kremer. As it turned out, Dr. Nyiszli had long since died, so even the reply was a forgery. Says Dr. Rassinier: “…this dead witness – another one – was peculiar enough himself to write to me after his death. And so Mr. Tibere Kremer’s silence is understandable. No further comment.”– p. 41. This incident should give the reader an idea of the quality of the “evidence” which has been presented in the Hoaxacaust literature.
When faced with a mountain lies, at least some statements must be true, right? Not necessarily. It is quite possible that it is all fabrication.
 
30.) Prof. Rassinier’s book is a detailed examination of Jewish populations in virtually every country of Europe, including Poland and Russia, from 1931 to 1945. According to Rassinier’s statistics, in1931 Europe had 9,777,500 documented Jews (figures from the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation). The population that remained in these locations in 1945 was 4,250,000. The emigrants who left Europe altogether is numbered at 4,416,608. These people went to three main locations: Palestine (the Israeli state had not yet been created), Central Asia (Soviet Union) and the United States. So, the total, documented numbers of living European Jews in1945, according to Rassinier, was 8,666,608. If we subtract the documented number of survivors from the documented pre-war population, we have a total of l,003,392 unaccounted for. Of these, a certain number must have died from causes unrelated to the war. If we grant that half of them died from such causes, then we have a total of about 500,000 Jews who perished in the war. This is consistent with our previous totals from items 11 and 13.
 
31.) At the Nuremberg trials, Philip Auerbach, the Jewish attorney-general for post-war Bavaria was denounced by SS General Otto Ohlendorf. Auerbach had claimed the absurd figure of 11 million Jews having suffered in the concentration camps. “Ohlendorf lived long enough to see Auerbach convicted for embezzlement and fraud (forging documents purporting to show huge payments of compensation to non-existent people) before his own execution took place in 1951.”– p. 10-11, The True History of “The Holocaust,” Did Six Million Really Die?- by the Institute for Historical Review.
 
32.) It has been frequently reported by American prisoners of war that the Germans treated them much more humanely than the Japanese. The same is true for the civilian prisoners in the concentration camps. Many of these people were arrested for being communist spies. Hundreds of affidavits described the circumstances at the camps as “humane.” “One Berta Schirotschin, who worked at the food service at Dachau throughout the war, testified that the working inmates…received their customary second breakfast at 10 a.m. every morning…The Polish underground leader, Jan Piechowiak, who was at Dachau from May 22nd, 1940 until April 29th, 1945, also testified on March 21st, 1946 that prisoners there received good treatment.” –p. 21, Did Six Million Really Die?
 
33.) Elie Wiesel has a poor memory. According to the New York Times of Sunday, January 4, 1987, Wiesel recalled “the day the Soviets arrived at Auschwitz.” Previously, in a speech to the National Press Club in Washington D.C., in April, 1983, Wiesel “noted that on April 15, 1945, he was one of the survivors liberated at Dachau by the U.S. Army.”- Jewish Telegraph Agency, April 11, 1983. “Oy, vey! I remember it like it vas yesterday” we can hear him sighing. Is this two lies or only one? Wiesel would have the distinction of being the only prisoner of war to be liberated from two different camps. Talk about bragging rights! The father of lies is truly proud of this weasel.
 
34.) In flagrant violation of the principle of freedom of speech, the Zionists impose their will on every organization they possibly can in order to prevent people from speaking out against the hoax. In Germany, it is against the law to deny the holocaust. Numerous people have been imprisoned for making public statements against the mythology.This fact should infuriate anyone who believes in freedom of speech.
 
35.) The holocaust industry makes millions of dollars every year promoting this holocaust trash. In literary circles, it is still a “hot ticket.” Truth be damned. Money talks.
 
36.) The Soviets brought out a bunch of “human skin” artifacts and “human soap” (presumably dusting off the trunks from their WWI displays), but the Tribunal chose not to pursue the matter any further. Of course, the myth was dredged up by many other hoaxers. The so-called “Judischer Fett” displays have been quietly removed from the world’s various “holocaust museums.” With the advent of DNA testing, these bars of soap “made from Jewish fat” are, of course, subject to testing. I would suspect that an independent laboratory would find that these bars of soap were made from hogfat or beef tallow. Germar Rudolf suggested to me that the Germans already had a process for making synthetic soap, so that DNA testing would produce no results.
 
37.) One of the chief presiding judges, Charles F. Wennerstrum, denounced the proceedings:
 
“If I had known seven months ago what I know today, I would never have come here…Obviously, the victor in any war is not the best judge of the war crime guilt…The prosecution has failed to maintain objectivity aloof from vindictiveness, aloof from personal ambitions for convictions…the defense had access only to those documents which the prosecution considered material to the case [this is a violation of the “Disclosure“ principle of American justice]…also abhorrent to the American sense of justice is the prosecution’s reliance upon self-incriminating statements made by the defendants while prisoners for more than 2&1/2 years and repeated interrogations without the presence of counsel.” -Harwood, p. 39, 40. But we are not dealing with the American sense of justice. We are dealing with the Talmudic, Zionist sense of justice. Dare we call it Satanic in origin? Judge Wennerstrum went to Nuremberg expecting to dispense justice. Instead, he was asked to rubber stamp a show trial.
 
38.) Many prisoners of the War Crimes Tribunal were kept in prison, held without charges being filed for months. This included even the wives of the suspects. (Harwood, p. 57.)
 
39.) Holocaust propaganda has changed with the times. Truth is not flexible. Lies are. No consistent flow of information has ever been established by the hoax industry. New charges and claims arise, all without any substantiation. Old ones dissolve, depending upon which charges have been refuted or not. We all know that the original story was that the Germans kept their “extermination program” a secret. How else could it have happened, anyway? Recently, the hoaxers, contradicting this theory, have claimed that it was common knowledge in those days that the exterminations were going on, but that nobody did anything about it. This claim has been fabricated for the sole purpose of trying to indict Pope Pius XII for “not helping the Jews.” But how can you prevent something that isn’t happening?
 
I remember very clearly as a child around 1954 standing in a mom-and-pop grocery store in Chicago at the intersection of Kenmore and Dickens. The radio was playing and a special news announcement came up. Two Jewish women were reacting to the radio news story, which was about gassings during the holocaust. I will never forget what the one woman said to the other: “If I had known they were being gassed, I would have never gotten on the train.” So, obviously, six million others didn’t know about it either! And she also survived, whatever camp she was in; and, from her statement, she did not witness any gassings either, because this was the first she had heard about it! Sooner or later, the liar gets caught in his lies. The fact that he owns all the newspapers will not prevent this eventuality.
 
Never underestimate the power of the BIG LIE. The Jews are the masters of it. My personal opinion is the Zionists decided to promote this myth in order to cover up their own involvement with Nazi Germany in transferring Jews from Germany to Palestine. They needed a smoke screen and a continuous barrage of propaganda to clamp the lid down on any criticism of their WWII maneuverings. The more newspaper space that is taken up by their lies, the less room there is for the truth. As the previous stories have revealed, the Zionists have much to hide.
 
And while Hitler talked a good game and said many things in defense of Christ and Country that the average person would agree with (He was more beloved by the Germans than Trump is by Americans today..) He was not a “good” guy.
 
He was an occultist!
 
Arthur R. Butz's The Hoax of the Twentieth Century (2003) challenges the historical account of the Holocaust. The book presents a detailed analysis of various sources, including trial transcripts, witness testimonies, and wartime documents, arguing that the evidence for systematic extermination is fabricated or misinterpreted. Butz alleges that the narrative of mass gassings was largely a postwar construction, driven by political agendas and wartime propaganda. He focuses on inconsistencies and contradictions in the existing historical record, proposing alternative explanations for events at Auschwitz and other camps.
 
AI gave a warning about this book: It is crucial to approach this source with extreme caution and a critical awareness of its deeply flawed and harmful nature.
 
Briefing Doc: The Hoax of the Twentieth Century
 
Source:
 
Butz, Arthur R. The Hoax of the Twentieth Century. Theses & Dissertation Press, 2003.
 
Author:
 
Arthur R. Butz, a known Holocaust denier. This source presents a highly controversial and widely debunked perspective on the Holocaust.
 
Main Themes:
 
He questions the number of Jewish victims, the methods of extermination, and the motivations behind the Nazi regime's actions.
Challenging the Legitimacy of War Crimes Trials: The book argues that the Nuremberg Trials and subsequent war crimes trials were politically motivated and lacked legal jurisdiction. Butz casts doubt on the evidence presented and the testimonies given, suggesting they were coerced or fabricated.
Highlighting Inconsistencies and "Alternative" Interpretations: Butz focuses on perceived discrepancies in historical accounts, witness testimonies, and physical evidence related to the Holocaust. He offers alternative, and often implausible, explanations for events and documentation.
 
Important Ideas and Facts:
 
Questioning the Six Million Figure: Butz disputes the widely accepted estimate of six million Jewish victims. He cites figures from Jewish sources that suggest a lower number, failing to acknowledge the context and methodology behind these figures.
Disputing the Existence of Gas Chambers: A central argument in the book is the denial of the existence of gas chambers as a systematic method of extermination. He misinterprets technical documents, misrepresents eyewitness accounts, and offers alternative explanations for the function of structures like the "Vergasungskeller."
Casting Doubt on Witness Testimonies: Butz dismisses many survivor testimonies as unreliable, suggesting they were influenced by psychological trauma or external pressures. He particularly targets the testimony of Rudolf Höss, the commandant of Auschwitz, claiming it was obtained under duress.
Downplaying Anti-Semitism in Nazi Ideology: While acknowledging anti-Jewish measures, the book attempts to downplay the centrality of anti-Semitism in Nazi ideology. Butz argues that the "Final Solution" was not a pre-meditated plan of extermination but rather a result of wartime circumstances.
 
Quotes:
 
On the Nuremberg Trials: "The 'war crimes trials,' which the victors in World War II conducted, mainly of Germans but also of many Japanese, were precedent-shattering in their scope and in the explicitness of the victorious powers' claims to some sort of legal jurisdiction in respect of laws or understandings which did not exist at the time they were allegedly broken by the Axis powers."
On the Six Million Figure: "(…) it is good news for me […] this ensures me staying out. What they can do that I have not done I cannot imagine.” Long miscalculated on the last point, for the WRB eventually did a consider-* able amount: It managed to inflate the number of Jewish “victims” of the war from about one million to about six million!"
On the Interpretation of "Extermination": "Naturally, the same observation may be made in connection with public declarations of Nazi leaders, but there is an additional point to be made in this connection. Very often the Jews were referred to via the German word das Judentum, one of whose correct translations is “Jewry,” but which can also mean “Judaism” or even “Jewishness” or “the idea of Jewishness."
On the Vergasungskeller: "I have not located the Vergasungskeller in the sewage plants. Rather, I have listed five senses in which generation of, or treatment with, a gas comes up in sewage technology."
 
Key Concerns:
 
Lack of Academic Rigor: The book lacks proper citations, relies on questionable sources, and fails to engage with the vast body of scholarly literature on the Holocaust.
Distortion of Historical Evidence: Butz manipulates historical documents, misrepresents data, and twists the meaning of testimonies to fit his predetermined conclusions.
Ethical Implications: This book contributes to the dangerous and harmful spread of Holocaust denial, trivializing the suffering of millions and undermining efforts to combat anti-Semitism.
 
This briefing doc aims to provide a summary of the main themes and arguments presented in "The Hoax of the Twentieth Century." 
 
Arthur R. Butz is a professor of electrical engineering at Northwestern University, and author of The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, a book denying the Holocaust.
 
Butz attended the Massachusetts Institute of Technology from which he received both his Bachelor of Science and, in 1956, his Master of Science degrees. In 1965 he received his Doctor of Philosophy from the University of Minnesota. His doctoral dissertation considered a problem in control engineering.
 
n 1976, Butz published The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry, which denies that Nazi Germany tried to exterminate the Jews during the Holocaust. In 2006, fifty of Butz"s colleagues from the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science faculty signed a censure describing Butz"s Holocaust denial as "an affront to our humanity and our standards as scholars". The letter also called for Butz to "leave our Department and our University and stop trading on our reputation for academic excellence." University President Henry South. Bienen issued the following statement: Butz is a Holocaust denier who has made similar assertions previously.His latest statement, like his earlier writings and pronouncements, is a contemptible insult to all decent and feeling people.While I hope everyone understands that Butz"s opinions are his own and in no way represent the views of the University or me personally, his reprehensible opinions on this issue are an embarrassment to Northwestern. There is no question that the Holocaust is a well-documented historical fact.The University has a professorship in Holocaust Studies endowed by the Holocaust al Foundation. Northwestern offers courses in Holocaust Studies and organizes conferences of academic scholars who teach in areas relating to the Holocaust.In addition, Northwestern hosts a summer Institute for Holocaust and Jewish Civilization.In short, Northwestern University has contributed significantly to the scholarly research of the Holocaust and remains committed to doing southern Butz is a tenured associate professor in electrical engineering. Butz has made clear that his opinions are his own and at no time has he discussed those views in class or made them part of his class curriculum.Therefore, we cannot take action based on the content of what Butz says regarding the Holocaust - however odious it may be - without undermining the vital principle of intellectual freedom that all academic institutions serve to protect. Henry South. Bienen President.
 
He achieved tenure in 1974 and currently teaches classes in control system theory and digital signal processing. And most recently, a fellowship in the political science department has been established in my name by the Holocaust al Foundation. Like all faculty members, he is entitled to express his personal views, including on his personal web pages, as long as he does not represent such opinions as the views of the University.
 
Source
 
https://stateofthenation.co/?p=194875
https://prabook.com/web/arthur.butz/2601522
Eli James

The Real History of Thanksgiving

The Real History of Thanksgiving
 
Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v5tvvek-the-real-history-of-thanksgiving.html
 
“Learning” about Thanksgiving in our school system for some of us may be the first time we are even told about indigenous nations and people, but it is a false history. Learning about the realities of genocide, invasions, slavery, and war, we come to understand that Thanksgiving is above all, a colonial holiday that literally celebrates military victories and outright slaughter of Native Americans; made into law and custom by the government. It is not the feel good celebration of settler and indigenous relations we are taught to believe.
 
During a time when Native warriors and their accomplices are risking their lives fighting on the front lines while poverty, mass incarceration, pollution, continued land theft, destructive resource extraction, and abysmal conditions are the norm in many Native communities, let us all remember and reaffirm our commitment to the struggle against colonialism and the settler-State. With this in mind, we are reprinting a list of ongoing sites of Native resistance to resource extraction and beyond. 
 
In Thanksgiving pageants held at schools across the United States, children don headdresses colored with craft-store feathers and share tables with classmates wearing black construction paper hats. It’s a tradition that pulls on a history passed down through the generations of what happened in Plymouth: local Native Americans welcomed the courageous, pioneering pilgrims to a celebratory feast.
 
Most of us associate the holiday with happy Pilgrims and Indians sitting down to a big feast. And that did happen – once. The story began in 1614 when a band of English explorers sailed home to England with a ship full of Patuxet Indians bound for slavery. They left behind smallpox which virtually wiped out those who had escaped. By the time the Pilgrims arrived in Massachusetts Bay they found only one living Patuxet Indian, a man named Squanto who had survived slavery in England and knew their language. He taught them to grow corn and to fish, and negotiated a peace treaty between the Pilgrims and the waam · puh · know · aag (Wampanoag) Nation. At the end of their first year, the Pilgrims held a great feast honoring Squanto and the Wampanoags.
 
But as word spread in England about the paradise to be found in the new world, religious zealots called Puritans began arriving by the boat load. Finding no fences around the land, they considered it to be in the public domain. Joined by other British settlers, they seized land, capturing strong young Natives for slaves and killing the rest. But the Pequot Nation had not agreed to the peace treaty Squanto had negotiated and they fought back. The Pequot War was one of the bloodiest Indian wars ever fought.
 
In 1637 near present day Groton, Connecticut, over 700 men, women and children of the Pequot Tribe had gathered for their annual Green Corn Festival which is our Thanksgiving celebration. In the predawn hours the sleeping Indians were surrounded by English and Dutch mercenaries who ordered them to come outside. Those who came out were shot or clubbed to death while the terrified women and children who huddled inside the longhouse were burned alive. The next day the governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony declared “A Day Of Thanksgiving” because 700 unarmed men, women and children had been murdered.
 
Cheered by their “victory”, the brave colonists and their Indian allies attacked village after village. Women and children over 14 were sold into slavery while the rest were murdered. Boats loaded with a many as 500 slaves regularly left the ports of New England. Bounties were paid for Indian scalps to encourage as many deaths as possible.
 
Following an especially successful raid against the (pee - Kwaat) Pequot in what is now Stamford, Connecticut, the churches announced a second day of “thanksgiving” to celebrate victory over the heathen savages. During the feasting, the hacked off heads of Natives were kicked through the streets like soccer balls. Even the friendly Wampanoag did not escape the madness. Their chief was beheaded, and his head impaled on a pole in Plymouth, Massachusetts — where it remained on display for 24 years.
 
The killings became more and more frenzied, with days of thanksgiving feasts being held after each successful massacre. George Washington finally suggested that only one day of Thanksgiving per year be set aside instead of celebrating each and every massacre. Later Abraham Lincoln decreed Thanksgiving Day to be a legal national holiday during the Civil War — on the same day he ordered troops to march against the starving Sioux in Minnesota.
 
This story doesn’t have quite the same fuzzy feelings associated with it as the one where the Indians and Pilgrims are all sitting down together at the big feast. But we need to learn our true history so it won’t ever be repeated. Next Thanksgiving, when you gather with your loved ones to Thank God for all your blessings, think about those people who only wanted to live their lives and raise their families. They, also took time out to say “thank you” to Creator for all their blessings.
 
In truth, massacres, disease and American Indian tribal politics are what shaped the Pilgrim-Indian alliance at the root of the holiday.
 
But, as David Silverman writes in his book This Land Is Their Land: The Wampanoag Indians, Plymouth Colony, and the Troubled History of Thanksgiving, much of that story is a myth riddled with historical inaccuracies. Beyond that, Silverman argues that the telling and retelling of these falsehoods is deeply harmful to the Wampanoag Indians whose lives and society were forever damaged after the English arrived in Plymouth.Silverman’s book focuses on the (waam ·puh · know · aags) Wampanoags. When the pilgrims landed at Plymouth in 1620, the Say - Chem sachem (chief) Osama-Quinn (Ousamequin) offered the new arrivals an On - Taunt entente, primarily as a way to protect the Wampanoags against their rivals, the Nerra-gan-sets Narragansetts. For 50 years, the alliance was tested by colonial land expansion, the spread of disease, and the exploitation of resources on Wampanoag land. Then, tensions ignited into war. Known as King Philip’s War (or the Great Narragansett War), the conflict devastated the Wampanoags and forever shifted the balance of power in favor of European arrivals. Wampanoags today remember the Pilgrims’ entry to their homeland as a day of deep mourning, rather than a moment of giving thanks.
 
The myth is that friendly Indians, unidentified by tribe, welcome the Pilgrims to America, teach them how to live in this new place, sit down to dinner with them and then disappear. They hand off America to white people so they can create a great nation dedicated to liberty, opportunity and Christianity for the rest of the world to profit. That’s the story—it’s about Native people conceding to colonialism. It’s bloodless and in many ways an extension of the ideology of Manifest Destiny.
 
One is that history doesn’t begin for Native people until Europeans arrive. People had been in the Americas for least 12,000 years and according to some Native traditions, since the beginning of time. And having history start with the English is a way of dismissing all that. The second is that the arrival of the Mayflower is some kind of first-contact episode. It’s not. Wampanoags had a century of contact with Europeans–it was bloody and it involved slave raiding by Europeans. At least two and maybe more Wampanoags, when the Pilgrims arrived, spoke English, had already been to Europe and back and knew the very organizers of the Pilgrims’ venture.Most poignantly, using a shared dinner as a symbol for colonialism really has it backward. No question about it, Wampanoag leader Ousamequin reached out to the English at Plymouth and wanted an alliance with them. But it’s not because he was innately friendly. It’s because his people have been decimated by an epidemic disease, and Ousamequin sees the English as an opportunity to fend off his tribal rebels. That’s not the stuff of Thanksgiving pageants. The Thanksgiving myth doesn’t address the deterioration of this relationship culminating in one of the most horrific colonial Indian wars on record, King Philip’s War, and also doesn’t address Wampanoag survival and adaptation over the centuries, which is why they’re still here, despite the odds.
 
For quite a long time, English people had been celebrating Thanksgivings that didn’t involve feasting—they involved fasting and prayer and supplication to God. In 1769, a group of pilgrim descendants who lived in Plymouth felt like their cultural authority was slipping away as New England became less relevant within the colonies and the early republic, and wanted to boost tourism. So, they started to plant the seeds of this idea that the pilgrims were the fathers of America.What really made it the story is that a publication mentioning that dinner published by the Rev. Alexander Young included a footnote that said, “This was the first Thanksgiving, the great festival of New England.” People picked up on this footnote. The idea became pretty widely accepted, and Abraham Lincoln declared it a holiday during the Civil War to foster unity.It gained purchase in the late 19th century, when there was an enormous amount of anxiety and agitation over immigration. The white Protestant stock of the United States was widely unhappy about the influx of European Catholics and Jews, and wanted to assert its cultural authority over these newcomers. How better to do that than to create this national founding myth around the Pilgrims and the Indians inviting them to take over the land?This mythmaking was also impacted by the racial politics of the late 19th century. The Indian Wars were coming to a close and that was an opportune time to have Indians included in a national founding myth. You couldn’t have done that when people were reading newspaper accounts on a regular basis of atrocious violence between white Americans and Native people in the West. What’s more, during Reconstruction, that Thanksgiving myth allowed New Englanders to create this idea that bloodless colonialism in their region was the origin of the country, having nothing to do with the Indian Wars and slavery. Americans could feel good about their colonial past without having to confront the really dark characteristics of it.
 
It's incorrect as is widely assumed that native people had no sense of property. They didn't have private property, but they had community property, and they certainly understood where their people's land started and where it ended. And so, when Europeans come to the Americas and they buy land from the Wampanoags, the Wampanoags initially assume the English are buying into Wampanoag country, not that they're buying Wampanoag country out from under their feet.
 
Imagine a flotilla of Wampanoag canoes crosses the Atlantic and goes to England, and then the Wampanoags buy land from the English there. Has that land now passed out of the jurisdiction of England and become the Wampanoags’? No, that's ridiculous. But that's precisely what the English were assuming on this side of the Atlantic. Part of what King Philip's War was about is Wampanoag people saying, ‘Enough, you're not going to turn us into a landless, subjugated people.’
 
Did all Wampanoags want to enter into alliance with the English?
 
From the very beginning, a sizable number of Wampanoags disagreed with Ousamequin's decision to reach out to [the English] and tried to undermine the alliance. Ousamequin puts down multiple plots to wipe out the colony and unseat him. Some Wampanoags say, ‘Let's make an alliance with the Narragansetts and get rid of these English. They've been raiding our coast for decades, enslaving our people, carrying them off to unknown fates and they can't be trusted.’ Some Wampanoags believed they caused epidemics and there were prophecies that this would be the end of the People.
 
When the English arrived, they entered a multilateral Indian political world in which the internal politics of the Wampanoag tribe and the intertribal politics of the Wampanoag tribe were paramount. To the degree the Wampanoags dealt with the English, it was to adjust the power dynamics of Indian country.
 
The politics of Indian country are more important to native people than their differences with colonists. There were no ‘Indians’ when the English arrived. Native people didn't conceive of themselves as Indians—that's an identity that they have had to learn through their shared struggles with colleagues. And it takes a long time—they have been here for 12,000 plus years, and there are a lot of differences between them. Their focus is on their own people, not on the shared interests of Indians and very often, what's in the best interest of their own people is cutting deals with colonial powers with an eye towards combating their native rivals.
 
The main difference has to do with King Philip's War. The question is whether native people, led by Metacomet, or Philip as the English call him, were plotting a multi-tribal uprising against the English. I think they were. Some of my historian colleagues think it's a figment of paranoid English imagination. But I see a lot of warning signals building during the 1660s and 70s from Englishmen who lived cheek-by-jowl with Wampanoag people and were terrified of what they were seeing on the ground. I see a pattern of political meetings between native leaders who hated each other. And yet, they were getting together over and over and over again—it all adds up to me.
 
There's this tendency to see the English as the devils in all of this. I don't think there's any question they’re in the wrong, but it doesn't let them off the hook to say that native people wouldn't take it anymore. And regardless of that, I think the evidence shows that native people had reached their limit and recognize that if they didn't rise up immediately, they were going to become landless subordinates to English authority.
 
This is about as contrary to the Thanksgiving myth that one can get. That's the story we should be teaching our kids. They should be learning about why native people reached that point, rather than this nonsense that native people willingly handed off their country to the invaders. It does damage to how our native countrymen and women feel as part of this country, it makes white Americans a lot less reflective about where their privilege comes from, and it makes us a lot less critical as a country when it comes to interrogating the rationales that leaders will marshal to act aggressively against foreign others. If we're taught to cut through colonial rhetoric we'll be better positioned to cut through modern colonial and imperial rhetoric.
 
Silverman’s book examines the complex history of Wampanoag-English relations, challenging the traditional Thanksgiving narrative. It explores the impact of European colonization on Wampanoag society, including disease, warfare, and land dispossession, while also highlighting Wampanoag agency and resistance. The author analyzes historical sources, acknowledging their biases, and incorporates Wampanoag perspectives to offer a more nuanced understanding. The text argues for a more accurate and inclusive representation of this history, emphasizing the lasting impact of colonization on Wampanoag people. It also addresses the ongoing need to correct historical misrepresentations and promote a more complete understanding of Thanksgiving.
 
The Wampanoag Indians, Plymouth Colony, and the Troubled History of Thanksgiving by David J. Silverman (2019), supplemented with information from the index and endnotes.
 
Key Themes:
 
Wampanoag Life Before and After Contact: The document delves into the rich pre-colonial history of the Wampanoag, their creation myths, seasonal migration patterns, economic practices, and political structures. It highlights the transition from nomadic hunting and gathering to a more settled lifestyle based on horticulture, fishing, and the use of weirs. This shift led to increased territoriality and trade.
Impact of European Arrival and Colonial Expansion: The arrival of Europeans introduced new trade opportunities but also brought devastating epidemics, escalating violence, and ultimately dispossession of Wampanoag land. The document chronicles the growing tensions as colonial settlements expanded, encroaching on Wampanoag territory and resources, leading to land sales, jurisdictional disputes, and eventually war.
Wampanoag Resistance and Agency: Despite facing overwhelming challenges, the Wampanoag actively resisted colonial encroachment, strategically utilizing diplomacy, trade, alliances, and legal arguments to protect their land and autonomy. They adapted to changing circumstances, leveraging new technologies and knowledge systems, and maintaining a strong sense of identity and cultural resilience.
 
Important Ideas and Facts:
 
Pre-Colonial Life:
 
Creation Stories: Wampanoag stories grounded their people in the landscape, explaining the natural features through the actions of giants like Moshup and the Thunderbird, illustrating a deep connection to their territory.
Seasonal Round: Wampanoags followed a seasonal round, spending spring at riverside fish runs, summer along the shoreline, and fall and winter inland, demonstrating resourcefulness and environmental adaptation.
Horticulture and Trade: The adoption of maize horticulture led to increased population density, more complex social structures, and a reliance on trade with neighboring communities for resources not readily available in their local ecology.
Political Organization: Wampanoag sachems, who inherited their positions but could be removed for poor performance, managed inter-tribal relations, resolved disputes, and allotted land. Paramount sachems, like Ousamequin (Massasoit), held fragile authority over local sachems through alliances, kinship ties, and tribute payments.
 
European Arrival and Colonization:
 
Early Encounters and Epidemics: Explorers like Bartholomew Gosnold and John Smith established initial trade relations but also engaged in violence and kidnapping, foreshadowing future conflicts. The devastating epidemic of 1616-1619, possibly a "plague," dramatically reduced the Wampanoag population, creating a "virgin soil" environment that made them vulnerable to future outbreaks.
Plymouth Colony and Trade: The Pilgrims, initially reliant on Wampanoag assistance, established a fur trade, creating competition with the Dutch and other European traders. This led to the introduction of wampum as a valuable trade item and currency, further altering Wampanoag economic and political dynamics.
Land Sales and Displacement: Colonists' demand for land increased pressure on Wampanoag territory. Sachems, seeking to maintain peaceful relations and secure English support, began selling land, sometimes without the full consent of the people who held “planting rights.” This displacement fueled resentment and contributed to conflict.
 
Wampanoag Resistance and Agency:
 
Diplomacy and Alliances: Ousamequin skillfully navigated colonial politics, forming alliances with Plymouth to counter threats from rival tribes like the Narragansetts, while simultaneously using the English as a buffer against Dutch expansion.
Warfare and King Philip’s War: Facing increasing pressure on their land and autonomy, Wampanoag sachems like Wamsutta and Pumetacom (Metacom, King Philip) pursued a strategy of resistance, forging alliances with other tribes and acquiring arms in preparation for war. The conflict, known as King Philip’s War (1675-1676), resulted in devastating losses for both sides, with many Wampanoag captured, killed, or sold into slavery.
Cultural Resilience: Despite the devastating impact of war and colonization, Wampanoags continued to resist dispossession through legal arguments, emphasizing their prior ownership of the land and challenging the authority of colonial courts. They also maintained their cultural traditions and identity, adapting to changing circumstances while striving to preserve their way of life.
 
Notable Quotes:
 
On Land Ownership: “The Aquinnahs’ position was that Joseph Mittark never had the authority to alienate their homes in the first place.” (p. 214)
On Colonial Encroachment: “Truly we think it is this: We poor Indians soon shall not have any place to reside, together with our poor children, because these Englishmen trouble us very much in this place of ours.” (p. 233)
On Indian Subordination: Wampanoags remained willing to participate in the English system as coequals with the power to govern their own people, but not as subordinates. (p. 225)
On Self-Rule: “that all men were born free and equal; that as a tribe they were determined to rule themselves.” (p. 242)
 
Conclusion:
 
This document provides valuable insight into the complex history of Wampanoag-colonial relations, revealing a story of resilience, adaptation, and ultimately loss. It challenges the traditional Thanksgiving narrative, highlighting the devastating consequences of colonization while acknowledging the agency and resistance of the Wampanoag people. The excerpts and accompanying information offer a nuanced perspective on a pivotal period in American history and the enduring legacy of colonialism on indigenous communities.
 
The Puritans were not just simple religious conservatives persecuted by the King and the Church of England for their unorthodox beliefs. They were political revolutionaries who not only intended to overthrow the government of England, but who actually did so in 1649.
 
The Puritan “Pilgrims” who came to New England were not simply refugees who decided to “put their fate in God’s hands” in the “empty wilderness” of North America, as a generation of Hollywood movies taught us. In any culture at any time, settlers on a frontier are most often outcasts and fugitives who, in some way or other, do not fit into the mainstream of their society. This is not to imply that people who settle on frontiers have no redeeming qualities such as bravery, etc., but that the images of nobility that we associate with the Puritans are at least in part the good “P.R.” efforts of later writers who have romanticized them.
 
It is also very plausible that this unnaturally noble image of the Puritans is all wrapped up with the mythology of “Noble Civilization” vs. “Savagery.” At any rate, mainstream Englishmen considered the Pilgrims to be deliberate religious dropouts who intended to found a new nation completely independent from non-Puritan England. In 1643 the Puritan/Pilgrims declared themselves an independent confederacy, one hundred and forty-three years before the American Revolution. They believed in the imminent occurrence of Armegeddon in Europe and hoped to establish here in the new world the “Kingdom of God” foretold in the book of Revelation. They diverged from their Puritan brethren who remained in England only in that they held little real hope of ever being able to successfully overthrow the King and Parliament and, thereby, impose their “Rule of Saints” (strict Puritan orthodoxy) on the rest of the British people. So they came to America not just in one ship (the Mayflower) but in a hundred others as well, with every intention of taking the land away from its native people to build their prophesied “Holy Kingdom.”
 
The Pilgrims were not just innocent refugees from religious persecution. They were victims of bigotry in England, but some of them were themselves religious bigots by our modern standards. The Puritans and the Pilgrims saw themselves as the “Chosen Elect” mentioned in the book of Revelation. They strove to “purify” first themselves and then everyone else of everything they did not accept in their own interpretation of scripture. Later New England Puritans used any means, including deceptions, treachery, torture, war, and genocide to achieve that end. They saw themselves as fighting a holy war against Satan, and everyone who disagreed with them was the enemy. This rigid fundamentalism was transmitted to America by the Plymouth colonists, and it sheds a very different light on the “Pilgrim” image we have of them. This is best illustrated in the written text of the Thanksgiving sermon delivered at Plymouth in 1623 by “Mather the Elder.” In it, Mather the Elder gave special thanks to God for the devastating plague of smallpox which wiped out the majority of the Wampanoag Indians who had been their benefactors. He praised God for destroying “chiefly young men and children, the very seeds of increase, thus clearing the forests to make way for a better growth”, i.e., the Pilgrims. In as much as these Indians were the Pilgrim’s benefactors, and Squanto, in particular, was the instrument of their salvation that first year, how are we to interpret this apparent callousness towards their misfortune?
 
The Wampanoag Indians were not the “friendly savages” some of us were told about when we were in the primary grades. Nor were they invited out of the goodness of the Pilgrims’ hearts to share the fruits of the Pilgrims’ harvest in a demonstration of Christian charity and interracial brotherhood. The Wampanoag were members of a widespread confederacy of Algonkian-speaking peoples known as the League of the Delaware. For six hundred years they had been defending themselves from my other ancestors, the Iroquois, and for the last hundred years they had also had encounters with European fishermen and explorers but especially with European slavers, who had been raiding their coastal villages. They knew something of the power of the white people, and they did not fully trust them. But their religion taught that they were to give charity to the helpless and hospitality to anyone who came to them with empty hands. Also, Squanto, the Indian hero of the Thanksgiving story, had a very real love for a British explorer named John Weymouth, who had become a second father to him several years before the Pilgrims arrived at Plymouth. Clearly, Squanto saw these Pilgrims as Weymouth’s people. To the Pilgrims the Indians were heathens and, therefore, the natural instruments of the Devil. Squanto, as the only educated and baptized Christian among the Wampanoag, was seen as merely an instrument of God, set in the wilderness to provide for the survival of His chosen people, the Pilgrims.
 
The Indians were comparatively powerful and, therefore, dangerous; and they were to be courted until the next ships arrived with more Pilgrim colonists and the balance of power shifted. The Wampanoag were actually invited to that Thanksgiving feast for the purpose of negotiating a treaty that would secure the lands of the Plymouth Plantation for the Pilgrims. It should also be noted that the INDIANS, possibly out of a sense of charity toward their hosts, ended up bringing the majority of the food for the feast.
 
5. A generation later, after the balance of power had indeed shifted, the Indian and White children of that Thanksgiving were striving to kill each other in the genocidal conflict known as King Philip’s War. At the end of that conflict most of the New England Indians were either exterminated or refugees among the French in Canada, or they were sold into slavery in the Carolinas by the Puritans. So successful was this early trade in Indian slaves that several Puritan ship owners in Boston began the practice of raiding the Ivory Coast of Africa for black slaves to sell to the proprietary colonies of the South, thus founding the American-based slave trade.
 
Obviously there is a lot more to the story of Indian/Puritan relations in New England than in the thanksgiving stories we heard as children. Our contemporary mix of myth and history about the “First” Thanksgiving at Plymouth developed in the 1890s and early 1900s. Our country was desperately trying to pull together its many diverse peoples into a common national identity. To many writers and educators at the end of the last century and the beginning of this one, this also meant having a common national history. This was the era of the “melting pot” theory of social progress, and public education was a major tool for social unity. It was with this in mind that the federal government declared the last Thursday in November as the legal holiday of Thanksgiving in 1898.
 
source
 
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/thanksgiving-myth-and-what-we-should-be-teaching-kids-180973655/
https://itsgoingdown.org/real-story-thanksgiving/
This Land Is Their Land: The Wampanoag Indians, Plymouth Colony, and the Troubled History of Thanksgiving, By David J. Silverman.

Bigfoot

Bigfoot
 
Watch on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v5tj3at-bigfoot.html
 
I live in the Pacfific Northwest right next to the cascade mountains. I have had two encounters of Sasquatch in my lifetime that cannot be explained. I never had an interest in the subject until I turned 16 and heard one. I’ll save that story for later. My family are hunters and I have spent years in the woods hunting a camping, although my brtohers were better at hunting than me. I never felt comfortable in the woods like my family does and it was because of the event that happened to me personally.
 
The enigmatic figure of Bigfoot, or Sasquatch, has captivated the imaginations of people worldwide for decades. This elusive creature, often described as a large, hairy humanoid, is said to inhabit remote forested areas, primarily in North America, particularly the Pacific Northwest. While scientific consensus leans towards skepticism, the enduring allure of Bigfoot continues to fuel countless investigations, folklore, and popular culture references.
 
The Myth and the Mystery
 
The origins of the Bigfoot legend can be traced back to indigenous North American cultures, who have long shared stories of mysterious, ape-like creatures inhabiting their lands. These tales often intertwined with spiritual beliefs and served as cautionary reminders to respect the natural world. In the 19th century, as European settlers ventured into the wilderness, encounters with these legendary creatures began to be reported more frequently, sparking public interest and igniting a modern-day fascination with the unknown.
 
The Evidence, or Lack Thereof
 
Despite numerous alleged sightings, photographs, and footprint casts, concrete scientific evidence supporting the existence of Bigfoot remains elusive. Many of the purported proofs have been debunked as hoaxes or misidentifications of known animals, such as bears. Cryptozoologists, individuals who study creatures whose existence is not scientifically proven, continue to investigate the possibility of Bigfoot's existence, but their findings are often met with skepticism from the mainstream scientific community.
 
The Psychological Appeal
 
The enduring appeal of Bigfoot can be attributed to several psychological factors. Firstly, the idea of undiscovered creatures lurking in the wilderness taps into our innate fear of the unknown and our fascination with the mysterious. Secondly, the belief in Bigfoot offers a sense of wonder and possibility, allowing us to imagine a world beyond our current understanding. Additionally, the search for Bigfoot can be seen as a metaphor for the human quest for meaning and purpose, as we strive to uncover the secrets of our own existence.
 
Bigfoot in Popular Culture
 
Bigfoot has become a cultural icon, influencing countless books, films, and television shows. From the classic "Harry and the Hendersons" to more recent documentaries and reality shows, the image of Bigfoot continues to captivate audiences of all ages. This widespread cultural influence has helped to perpetuate the legend and maintain public interest in the elusive creature.
 
While the scientific evidence for Bigfoot's existence remains inconclusive, the enduring fascination with this mysterious creature is undeniable. Whether it is a product of folklore, misidentification, or something more extraordinary, Bigfoot continues to spark our imaginations and remind us of the enduring allure of the unknown. As we continue to explore the mysteries of the natural world, the legend of Bigfoot will likely remain a captivating part of our cultural landscape.
 
Inconclusive doesn’t take this phenomenon off the table. There have been too many stories and encounters via audio and video that have captivated the minds and hearts of all generations. To believe there is a tall hairy muscular creature living in the woods that covers up the animal bones by burying them is hard to believe since it’s too fantastical to believe anyways. Yet, the amount of evidence that is out there is certainly cause for investigation and they have been trying their best to find this elusive being.
 
My story
 
When I was a teenager, a group of friends decided it would be a good idea to go camping near Mt. Hood and have BB Gun wars. We got all decked out in camo and hunted each other with the welt creating armaments. The crazy one of the bunch was carrying his 22 pistol which made the war even scarier. I decided the best approach since I was not a good hunter was to find a spot and cover up. After all, who wants to get shot with a BB or a 22. Looking back, I am assuming the crazy one would never use it, but it was enough to make the experience terrifying for me since I didn’t know this guy as he he was a friend of a friend. We all woke up the next morning and started our hunt for each other in this canyon where only the young could hike up and down in. Definitely not a place to hunt for deer or elk as you would take an entire day to get the meat out of there. 
 
I crept slowly down the halfway point of the hill and found a few logs that were overlapping each other creating a nice cover to see through the cracks and yet be hidden. I watched the war from my post keeping still and observant. I had no intentions of shooting anyone as it would disclose my location and quite frankly, I didn’t want to get hit with anything from an air rifle, let alone a 22 caliber pistol. There were four of us. Danny, Jason, Duncan and myself. Danny and Jason were the elders of the group and Duncan was my best friend at the time. I really didn’t want to be there, but the beer gave me much incentivization to continue the assault. Danny, the crazy one, was kicked out of the army and had a grind to pick with everyone. He had no humor and I remember never seeing a smile on that bitter face of his.
 
Although I couldn’t see his face due to the camo, I did watch Danny slither down the canyon and scout out for the enemy with his binoculars. Duncan and myself were the enemy. Duncan, knowing Danny better than I, was fearless and crept closer down the ridge towards Danny. For some reason, Duncan never saw him and was headed straight towards him. I watched from my crevice Danny raise his air rifle and shoot Duncan right in the ass. Duncan winced like a little girl and fell down holding his left butt cheek. Later he showed me the welt as hald his ass cheek was purple and bright red. War wound among friends. Duncan headed back to camp while Danny and Jason hunted me.
 
For hours I watched them go up and down the ridge and meet up to try again. At one point, they were about 15 feet away from me but never saw my hiding place. All I could think of is, if I make it out of here alive, I will never go campign with these nutjobs ever again. I was never this dangerous, yet these guys would build huge wooden swards and hack away at each other every weekend for sport. Blood and broken bones were common for this clan. Duncan got bored and decided to come back and see if anyone found me yet. Hi brother Jason shot him in the arm. He went down holding his wound and yelled back, I am already dead you assholes! I am just here to watch! Satisfied with the response, the hunt was back on. Another few hours went by as they continued up and down left and right from my position.
 
I remember having many thoughts. Hours of laying down quiet, you think about spiders, snakes, mosquitoes and other bugs that could be crawling up and down your body. Me being ADHD, I would think of that and then to another subject of Mrs. Fazio, my 8th grade teacher whom I had a crush on. I also thought what would happen if Danny killed me. Would they bury me and make up a story? Thousands of thoughts popped in my head as I watched these posessed kids getting frustrated. I do rememeber praying. As the sun started going down, Danny stood up on a stump and yelled, “That’s it Jamie! I am thirsty! Come on out!” 
 
I didn’t understand what he meant. Did he mean, come out and let me shoot you so we can have beer or come out and we won’t shoot you? I was confused but determined to keep quiet. He thought about what he said for a moment and then yelled back, “I promise I won’t shoot you. Come on out so we can go back to camp. It’s over.” Knowing them, they will shoot me anyways when I pop my head out so I stayed quiet. Danny thought again for another moment and then yelled at Jason. “Don’t shoot Jamie. It’s over. I’m tired.” Jason gave the thumbs up. Should I get up? Should I wait for one more confirmation? While thinking this, Duncan said from the ridge, “Don’t worry Jamie, they are done.” This gave me enough confidence to slowly stand up.
 
I’ll never forget the look on Jason and Danny’s faces. They looked at each other for a while and you could tell they were in sync with extrasensory perception as if to say we were there like 2 or more times. How could we not have seen him? I remember thinking it’s probably because I was praying to keep me invisible. They walked over to me as Duncan waited for us to meet and come back up. Their weapons were down and they seemed impressed with my hiding capabilities. Danny was first to congratulate me on hiding so well. That felt good. Even though I didn’t like that kid. As we were walking up the steep ridge to meet Duncan to head back towards camp, Danny shot him in his other cheek. He made sure he had a matching pair. I kept my mouth shut.
 
A few hours and many beers later, we all were around the camp fire reminiscing of the day and telling jokes. Jason started talking about a hot springs he went to once. I was called Bagby hot springs and about an hour from our camp. Danny was interested and it seemds he made the choice for us as well. They packed the cooler and within what seemed like 30 seconds, Jason and Danny were in the cab while Duncan and I were riding in the back of the pickup. After an hour of driving, Jason seemed lost. Danny opened up the back window and looked at Duncan and myself, then asked us, “Do you know where you are?” Being a comedian, and knowning the war was over, i couldn’t help but reply, “We’re in the jungle baby! And you’re gonna die!” In my best Axl Rose impression. Danny wasn’t impressed and slammed the slide window shut. Duncan caughed up a lung and gave me a look as if, this is why we are friends.
 
An hour goes by again and it’s getting cold in the back. They finally found the hot springs and pulled into the parking lot. Keep in mind we were driving for 2 hours on dirt roads so it actually felt like we never were going to get there. It was dark and we had no flashligts. But there were no clouds and the moonliight lit up the trail as we all took turns carrying the beer an eight of a mile away from our truck. I remember there was no wind, the temperature was comfortable and since I never have been there, I was getting nervous as if we were lost. I learned later the trail was almost a mile but the boys neglected to tell me. Carrying a cooler full of better while not knowing where you are going witha psychopath in your group, you definitely get a little nervous.
 
Then I heard the sound of a radio playing some lame 80’s song and started to hear laughs and also running water. My ease lfited as I knew there were people here. I thought this is good because there needs to be a witnesses if Danny’s decides to kill me from that Guns N Roses joke. From my observation, there were around 10 people there in several different stations of the hot springs. There is a main building with small rooms with canoes inside them. Around 4 or 5 if I can remember. Each canoe was a hallowed out tub of wood that drew the water into. This was a naked hot springs so our eyes were peeled. I didn’t see anything, unfortunately. The last place available was the community tub which could fit about 10 people. No one was there and we claimed it as ours. We filled the tub, cracked open the beers and started what we left off back at the fire pit.
 
We didn’t have a radio so we evesdropped on the neighbors’ tunes. We were only about a half an hour in the tub starting another buzz when we heard something. This wasn’t natural. This sound traveled through the forest as if it was a sprit and swirled around all of the camp. While we were all wondering “what the hell was that”, the music shut off in the other camps and the entire place was quiet except for the drip of water coming into the tub. Danny turned that off and now it was eerily quiet. We all were moving our best ear towards where each of us thought the sound came from. Our memories were filled with the first sound and imaginations dancing to what kind of animal it is. Usually, a mountain lion can sound like a woman screaming and that was the most probable thing we all thought it was.
 
I think about a minute went by when everyone seemed to get bored and turn the water back on or grab their beer for another swig when the sound came back. I didn’t know at the time but birds have two voice boxes! They're called syrinxes, and they're located at the base of the trachea, where it splits into the lungs. This unique anatomy allows birds to produce a wide range of complex sounds, from simple chirps to intricate songs. Some birds can even produce two different sounds at the same time, thanks to the independent control of their two syrinxes. This ability is particularly impressive in songbirds, who use their complex vocalizations for mating, territorial defense, and communication with other birds.
 
This sound was no bird. If it was, the bird would have to weigh at least 1,000 pounds. The lungs on this thing that the sound came from could blow this sound for many seconds. I have tried to mimic it over the years and when screaming that large can only hold the sound for a second and a half. Imagine screaming from the base of your body and lungs as loud as you can for as long as you can. You too, will not be able to get anymore than a few seconds in. This sound was at least a solid 10 seconds non-stop. Count to ten and imagine you screaming with everything you got. Impossible. All of us looked to the strongest. Danny. This was fight or flight time. We knew Danny was carrying his 22 and for a split second we all felt a wince of security.
 
But a 22 would only piss off this thing. We all knew that from the many deer and elk hunts we did together and with family. We all knew that a weapon would just scare it off or buy us some time. All of those thoughts came to us together in less than a second after the sound stopped. Imagine 4 naked boys jumping up and out of the water scrambling to get their clothes on just a second after the sound stopped. That’s all you heard throughout the camp. Whispers, scrambling, things getting knocked over and just pure quiet chaos. Seconds later, you started to see people hopping out of the shelters on one boot while they are pulling the other on and running towards the trail in panic. Safety, at this point, was not welcomed here. It was a mile away in all of our cars and trucks. 
 
It was an every man for themselves moment. No one took a leadership role to calm one or two down. Jason was the first to have his pants and shoes on holding his tshirt as he bolted. Danny, the one you would think since he was in boot camp, would have been the first dressed but he froze at the tying of laces. A quick moment of pause for reasons I can only guess was racing throughout his mind. Duncan and I were dressed and quietly screaming at Danny to get up. About half of the entire camp of people were gone within seconds and the rest of us were trying to talk our friends into leaving now. The sound back back, but this time it was closer and louder. After the third time hearing it, I knew in my gut this was not an animal. The sound had a message to it. It said, leave for I am coming home. 
 
I mentioned ealirer the two voice boxes. This scream had two separate sounds come from it. A low and high pitched. Like a low growl and a high pitched sound all at once. It started together low and went up in range together in perfect sync. I often thought about reproducing the sound myself with friends as I did the low and they did the high. But none of us could even hold it for that long or move in sync like that without a mess up or two. This sound was not from two entities. I knew that. Imagine a hippo grunt and a woman screaming for terror at the same time for 10 seconds. That’s as close to it as I can visualize and hear in my mind. But it was worse. Scarier. Uninviting. It was a warning. As we finally got Danny’s boots on and were running on the trail at 3 in the morning, I was thinking about how fast that thing travelled from the second to the third sound. I was thinking of watching for rocks on the trail and calculating how a being can move a half a mile in just a few seconds.
 
Perhaps this was a second creature. It had to be. Impossible for it to run a half mile to a mile and scream again in just 5 - 10 seconds. I later confirmed to myself that there were two. One was calling the other. We were just in the middle of a pair of sasquatches calling each other for a report. We left the beer. All of it. The other campers left their stereos and booze as well. Everyone running down the trail were half naked and you could hear them holding their keys. You could hear the ones who made it out first yell at each other. Thinks like “leave it … go go go …” or “don’t stop!” Jason was gone. It was three of us who were now natural olympians hurdling over rocks, logs and sticks as if we did this before. I think the movies have it all wrong. When people run for their lives, a supernatural mechanism turns on where you have the ability to see time in slow motion. You have more time to pick your footing and jumping stances. None of fell once.
 
I was at the front, Danny before me and Duncan a little behind. I remember it took no time to get to the truck. We beat all records. As soon as my hand was on it, I felt a little safer. First thing out my mouth were, “Keys!” Danny and Duncan looked perplexed. Jason had them. I knew it, but I said it anyways. As I said that, there were already cars high taling it out of there down the dirt road. We were the second to last lifeline of cars and our new found safety was starting to look bleak. Without hesitation, all of us dove under the truck and waited for Jason. Shivering, shirtless, dirty, scared and wishpering where the hell is Jason. Turns out he took a fork on the longer way back as we learned later. What seemed like hours waiting under the truck, Jason came our of the brushes from a location which made no sense. He was completely lost doing circles in the dark. He heard us whispering and followed the noise to find us.
 
We all got in the cab and slammed the doors. Danny didn’t seem to mind Duncan and I riding up front this time. Jason turned the truck on and backed out hitting the garbage can. No damage, we later learned. And Jason earned his offroading drift awards for we were doing at least 100 miles an hour around dirt corners without any fear or accidents. They knew the way back to camp this time and we pulled in and fell out laying on the ground next to the dead campfire. The sun started coming up. We didn’t talk to each other as we packed up and left for home. Out of beer and out of bravery. Years later, we all met up at a party and wen’t over the details. Everyone’s story matched up and it confirmed our experience was actually real. Your mind tries to play it off and make you remember it was less scary, when in reality, the brain is trying to help you recover from trauma. 
 
Evidence
 
There are many theories out there as to what Bigfoot is. Some say it is what was left over from the evolution of man. Some say it is interdimensional and can travel between realms. Some say it visiting from another planet and some say demons. In 2019, the FBI released its four-decade-old file on Bigfoot including an analysis conducted on hair that allegedly belonged to the sasquatch.
 
Legends of large, ape-like beasts can be found all over the world. Since the 1950s, the U.S. version has been “Bigfoot,” a tall, hairy humanlike creature believed by some people to dwell in forests of the American Northwest. Sightings and even pictures have emerged, prompting research and raising questions about whether the creature, also known as Sasquatch, was real.
 
Since 1976, the FBI has had a file on him.
 
That year, Director Peter Byrne of the Bigfoot Information Center and Exhibition in The Dalles, Oregon, sent the FBI “about 15 hairs attached to a tiny piece of skin.” Byrne wrote that his organization couldn’t identify what kind of animal it came from, and was hoping the FBI might analyze it. He also wanted to know if the FBI had analyzed suspected Bigfoot hair before; and if so, what the bureau’s conclusion was.
 
At the time, “Byrne was one of the more prominent Bigfoot researchers,” says Benjamin Radford, deputy editor of Skeptical Inquirer magazine. “In 2019, a lot of people think of Bigfoot as being sort of silly and a joke, or whatever else. But in the 1970s, Bigfoot was really, really popular. That was when The Six Million Dollar Man had a cameo by Bigfoot.” 
 
This was also after Roger Patterson and Robert Gimlin released their famous video footage in 1967 supposedly showing Bigfoot in Northern California. It’s worth noting that the original “evidence” that launched the Bigfoot craze—a trail of oversized footprints discovered in the same region in 1958—was revealed to be a prank by logger Ray L. Wallace in 2002. Many people believe the “Bigfoot” creature in the Patterson-Gimlin film was a costumed prankster as well. Byrne has always believed the footage is real.
 
Jay Cochran, Jr., assistant director of the FBI’s scientific and technical services division, wrote back to Byrne that he couldn’t find any evidence of the FBI analyzing suspected Bigfoot hair, and that the FBI usually only examined physical evidence related to criminal investigations. Still, it sometimes made exceptions “in the interest of research and scientific inquiry,” and Cochran said he’d make such an exception for Byrne.
 
Unsurprisingly, Cochran found that the hair didn’t belong to Bigfoot. In early 1977, he sent the hair back to Byrne along with his scientific conclusion: “The hairs are of deer family origin.” Four decades later, the bureau declassified its “Bigfoot file” about this analysis.
 
To be clear, this is not evidence that the FBI endorsed the existence of Bigfoot, any more than the U.S. military’s decades-long investigation of unexplained aerial phenomena, popularly known as UFOs, is an endorsement of the existence of aliens.
 
“All it means is the FBI did a favor to a Bigfoot researcher,” Radford says. “There’s nothing wrong with that, but it shouldn’t be mistaken for de facto government endorsement of the reality of Bigfoot.” 
 
Even so, Bigfoot believers may be tempted to spin it that way. “They love the idea that there’s a smoking gun in the FBI files—‘See, look, Bigfoot must be real, otherwise the FBI wouldn’t have taken it seriously,’” he continues. “Well, the FBI didn’t send out a team of investigators to look for Bigfoot, they agreed to run an analysis of 15 hairs."
 
To add more layers to what is already an unusual case, 93-year-old Byrne doesn’t seem to remember receiving the FBI’s response that the “Bigfoot hair” was actually deer hair.
 
Because Byrne had been out of the country for several months, Cochran sent the letter to the executive vice president of the Academy of Applied Science, which was associated with Byrne’s Bigfoot organization. The executive wrote that he would give Byrne copies of the correspondence when he returned. Yet when the FBI released its Bigfoot file—which was exclusively about Byrne’s inquiry—on June 5, 2019, Byrne reacted as though he were hearing that it was deer hair for the first time.
 
“Obviously, I can’t speak for Peter Byrne,” Radford says. But “if you’re going to make a big enough deal about this unknown specimen to give it to the FBI, then you’re not going to want to publicize the fact that it turned out to be deer.”
 
Books
 
Obviously the government wouldn’t admit to these things being real or not and most likely will not. If we are to find any evidence, we have to turn to witness testimonies and books. The best books out there for this subject are The Locals: A Contemporary Investigation of the Bigfoot/Sasquatch Phenomenon, Where the Footprints End: High Strangeness and the Bigfoot Phenomenon, In the Valleys of the Noble Beyond: In Search of the Sasquatch and Enoch: A Bigfoot Story. 
 
Source: In the Valleys of the Noble Beyond
 
In the Valleys of the Noble Beyond is an excerpt from a travelogue recounting the author's journey through the Great Bear Rainforest of British Columbia, Canada, while investigating reports of Sasquatch sightings. The author interviews numerous residents, including Indigenous peoples, gathering firsthand accounts and exploring the cultural significance of the creature. The narrative interweaves personal experiences in remote locations with historical context, exploring the impact of logging and resource extraction on the region's ecology and Indigenous communities. The author also examines the psychology of belief and perception, questioning the validity of the Sasquatch reports while acknowledging the compelling narratives and cultural importance surrounding the legendary creature. The book ultimately combines elements of travel writing, investigative journalism, and anthropological study.
 
The Power of Place: The Great Bear Rainforest is portrayed as a place of immense natural power, imbued with mystery and a palpable sense of the unknown. This wildness fosters an environment where the possibility of Sasquatch's existence feels tangible. Indigenous Knowledge and Beliefs: The deep connection of First Nations people to the land is highlighted, emphasizing their oral histories and beliefs surrounding Sasquatch-like creatures. These narratives are presented as integral to understanding the region's cultural and spiritual landscape. The Limits of Perception: The author grapples with the subjectivity of perception and the role of belief in shaping our understanding of reality. He explores how the human mind interprets sensory experiences, particularly in environments that challenge conventional notions of what is real or possible. The Lure of the Unknown: The search for Sasquatch becomes intertwined with a broader human quest for meaning and connection to something beyond the ordinary. The pursuit of this enigmatic creature serves as a catalyst for personal introspection and a confrontation with the limitations of human knowledge.
 
Key Facts and Ideas:
 
The Great Bear Rainforest: Located on the Pacific coast of British Columbia, Canada, it is one of the largest intact temperate rainforests in the world, renowned for its biodiversity and cultural significance.
Sasquatch/Bigfoot: A large, ape-like creature said to inhabit remote forested regions of North America. The source material presents anecdotal accounts, folklore, and personal experiences related to the possible existence of this creature, particularly in the context of the Great Bear Rainforest. Heiltsuk First Nation: An Indigenous group with deep historical roots in the Great Bear Rainforest. Their traditional beliefs and stories about Sasquatch-like beings, such as the "Bukwus" and "Thla'thla", are explored as part of the region's rich cultural heritage.
 
Scientific Skepticism vs. Openness to the Unexplained: The author navigates the tension between mainstream scientific skepticism towards Sasquatch and the persistence of beliefs and anecdotal evidence that defy easy explanation. He examines the role of cognitive biases and the limits of human perception in shaping our understanding of the natural world. Personal Transformation: The author’s journey through the Great Bear Rainforest is presented as a transformative experience, prompting him to question assumptions, confront fears, and develop a deeper appreciation for the interconnectedness of nature and human consciousness.
 
Illustrative Quotes:
 
On the power of place: "The one thing that has caught me off guard, more than anything else, is the unbridled power of nature in this area—and its ability to wreak havoc upon the senses and emotions."
Indigenous knowledge: "In our culture, individuals and families own stories. They’re a kind of property. Like when someone writes a book and owns the copyright. To tell other people’s stories, you need to get permission from them first.” Perception and reality: "Contrary to our assumptions, humans don’t perceive the world in the way we think we do. The manner in which we register our surroundings is at best convoluted." The allure of Sasquatch: "All of us yearn to be heroes in narratives of our own making, if only to live lives brimming with purpose. Most of us take up that call, at one time or another, to a greater or lesser extent." The transformative journey: "The separation between past, present, and future also melts away. I realize that I’m floating down the river in its timeless, eternal form."
 
Notable Encounters and Individuals
 
The book features numerous encounters with individuals who contribute to the narrative, including:
 
Clark Hans: The author's initial guide into the Great Bear, who shares unsettling experiences and sets the tone for the exploration.
Dr. John Bindernagel: A wildlife biologist and Sasquatch researcher, presented as a thoughtful and dedicated scientist challenging stereotypical "monster hunter" portrayals.
William Housty ("House"): A Heiltsuk ecological researcher and cultural knowledge keeper, who provides insights into Heiltsuk perspectives and the importance of respecting their traditions.
Jess Housty: Shares her own Sasquatch sighting and reflects on its psychological impact.
Alex Chartrand Jr.: A Heiltsuk Guardian Watchman, who offers a glimpse into their role in protecting their territory and resources.
Johnny Johnson: A Wuikinuxv resident who recounts stories of the Hoodoo Valley, adding to the mystery surrounding the area.
Leonard Ellis: A hunting guide, whose perspective contrasts with the conservationists', offering a different lens on human interaction with the wilderness.
 
The document provides a rich tapestry of information and reflections on the Great Bear Rainforest, exploring the interplay of nature, culture, and the enduring human fascination with the unknown.
 
Further Research:
 
Investigate the specific cultural beliefs and stories of the Heiltsuk and other First Nations groups regarding Sasquatch-like creatures.
Explore the scientific arguments for and against the existence of Sasquatch, examining the available evidence and the challenges of proving or disproving its existence. Consider the psychological and sociological factors that contribute to the persistence of belief in cryptozoological creatures like Sasquatch.
 
Source: Thom Powell's "The Locals"
 
Thom Powell's "The Locals" presents a comprehensive exploration of Bigfoot evidence, challenging the commonly held skepticism surrounding its existence. Powell meticulously examines various types of evidence, including footprint casts (highlighting their anatomical detail and the difficulty of faking them), eyewitness accounts categorized by their reliability, and DNA analysis (explaining the difficulties of extracting usable DNA from hair samples). He critiques the scientific method's application to the enigma, emphasizing the need for rigorous testing and replication, while acknowledging the challenges posed by anecdotal evidence. Finally, the text delves into more extraordinary claims, such as Bigfoot's potential use of infrasound, its intelligence, and even its possible interaction with UFO phenomena, demonstrating a balanced approach that weighs scientific scrutiny against the compelling nature of the accumulated evidence.
 
Sasquatch Encounters and the Nature of Reality
 
Main Themes:
 
Sasquatch Sightings and Encounters: The primary focus of these excerpts is the recounting of various Sasquatch sightings and encounters, primarily along the Pacific Northwest coast of North America. This includes firsthand accounts of vocalizations, footprints, and even glimpses of the creatures themselves.
Indigenous Perspectives and Folklore: The excerpts delve into the cultural significance of Sasquatch within indigenous communities like the Heiltsuk First Nation. They highlight the deep-rooted belief systems and traditional stories that incorporate the creature as a part of their natural world and cultural heritage.
The Nature of Reality and Perception: Through the lens of Sasquatch sightings, the author explores the limitations of human perception and the role of belief in shaping our understanding of reality. The excerpts question how our minds process information, particularly in environments that challenge our preconceived notions.
 
Important Ideas and Facts:
 
Diverse Accounts: The excerpts present a diverse range of Sasquatch encounters, from intimidation tactics involving tree throwing ("The Locals") to more passive observations like bed impressions ("In The").
"There had been a tree thrown atop the fence, smashing down the strands of barbed wire. This tree was about 14 or 15 inches in diameter, lying where the fence used to be." - "The Locals"
"Beneath a few of the trees, the forest floor is packed down. Clark wanders over to one of the impressions and moves his open palm over it. 'Day bed,' he says. 'A mother and cub were just here.'" - "In The"
Elusive Nature: Sasquatch are often described as highly intelligent and elusive creatures, skilled at avoiding detection and manipulating human perception.
"So, I'm getting closer to this thing doing the belly crawl, but still too far away for a good picture. All of a sudden, I hear something else start screaming and howling behind me, but this one was behind me on my other side." - "The Locals"
The Role of Belief: The author emphasizes the significance of belief in shaping our interpretations of the unknown. The excerpts suggest that those who believe in Sasquatch are more likely to experience encounters, potentially due to heightened awareness and a willingness to accept the possibility.
"’Have you ever seen a sasquatch?’ Rocky asked, as does every other witness I interview. ‘Nope. But the Bible says, “Blessed are those who have not seen, but who believe.” Maybe that makes me blessed, though I don’t think the Bible was talking about bigfoots.'" - "The Locals"
The Human-Nature Connection: The excerpts highlight the author's growing connection with the natural world, particularly in remote wilderness areas like the Great Bear Rainforest. This connection, they suggest, might be essential for understanding creatures like Sasquatch, who exist on the fringes of human awareness.
"Something else happened in this period that became apparent only later: the forest made me one of its own, in the same way it does to those growing up or living in real wilderness regions. Its essence was injected into my blood, its pattern imprinted on my brain." - "In The"
Cultural Significance: The author acknowledges the importance of respecting indigenous perspectives on Sasquatch, recognizing that their beliefs are deeply rooted in their cultural heritage and connection to the land.
"’Everyone’s invited,’ she says, before giving me a penetrating look. ‘Maybe a chance for you to take a break from all your Sasquatch snooping and learn something dierent about us for a change.’" 
 
Key Quotes:
 
On the Elusive Nature of Sasquatch: “It's not that they never leave footprints. It's more like, they don't leave footprints when they can help it. And they're probably even more wary when they know people are around.” – "The Locals"
On the Significance of Belief: "The decision has been made to initiate me. Alex picks up a shell and grabs the gun before standing up. Both he and Archie have a look of impatient relish on their faces, as if they’re about to play a joke on me. I stand up without protest." – "In The"
On the Human-Nature Connection: "I realize that I’m oating down the river in its timeless, eternal form. Seen from its own vantage point, the valley has assumed its true character and scope.” – "In The"
On Indigenous Perspectives: “It’s not something that you’re afraid of when it happens. They’re there and part of the same landscape that we’re a part of.” – "In The"
 
Overall Impression:
 
The excerpts provide a compelling glimpse into the world of Sasquatch sightings and the people who dedicate themselves to understanding these enigmatic creatures. They challenge readers to consider the limitations of human perception and the potential for the existence of things beyond our current understanding. They also emphasize the importance of respecting indigenous perspectives on nature and the creatures that inhabit it.
 
Source: Where the Footprints End: High Strangeness and the Bigfoot Phenomenon
 
Volume Two of Where the Footprints End examines unusual phenomena reported alongside Bigfoot sightings, such as strange lights and sounds. The authors explore eyewitness accounts of Bigfoot's unusual physical characteristics, including multicolored eye glows and unique locomotion. The book also investigates Bigfoot's alleged abilities to mimic sounds and even communicate telepathically, exploring the potential connection between Bigfoot and UFOs or other paranormal events. Finally, the text analyzes the frequent disappearance or destruction of evidence related to Bigfoot encounters, suggesting that the phenomenon might be more complex and mysterious than previously understood. The authors consider the implications of folkloric parallels and the possibility of misidentification or intentional deception.
 
Where the Footprints End: High Strangeness and the Bigfoot - A Briefing Doc
 
This document summarizes key themes and insights from excerpts of "Where the Footprints End" by Timothy Renner and Joshua Cutchin. The book explores the intersection of Bigfoot sightings with various paranormal phenomena, drawing from folklore, witness accounts, and cultural anthropology.
Main Themes:
 
Eyeglow and the Demonic: Many Bigfoot reports describe the creatures as having glowing or fiery eyes. This motif connects to ancient folklore figures like demons, the monster Grendel, and various creatures from non-Western traditions, all characterized by luminescent eyes, linking Bigfoot with the supernatural and primal fear.
 
“His eyes glistened like burning cinders, and they were as big as saucers."
"In the Anglo-Saxon epic poem, Beowulf, the monster Grendel, the shadow-cloaked night-walker, has eyes that produce an “ugly light, most like a flame.”
 
Mimicry and Deception: Bigfoot is often associated with vocal mimicry, imitating bird calls, animal sounds, and even human voices. This behavior is linked to trickster archetypes found in various cultures, blurring the line between animal communication and supernatural deception.
 
“Sometimes it sounded like a bird call, other times it sounded like a two-finger mouth-whistle.”
"Don’t whistle in the home or in the wood… It’s only the Leshy who whistles.”
 
Altered States and Hypnotic Abilities: The book explores the idea that Bigfoot sightings might be linked to altered states of consciousness, either in witnesses or the creatures themselves. Entheogens, meditation, and potential hypnotic abilities of the creatures are discussed, challenging the objective reality of these encounters.
 
“Modern technological society idealises and is monopolistically focused on only one state of consciousness—the alert, problem-solving state of consciousness that makes us efficient producers and consumers of material goods and services,”
“Various cultures have employed the alkaloids of the Amanita muscaria mushroom—not always for benign purposes—and it’s been suggested that perhaps sasquatch might do the same.”
 
The Liminal Space of Bigfoot: Bigfoot is portrayed as inhabiting a liminal space, existing between the known and unknown, the natural and supernatural. This liminality is further emphasized by their association with thresholds, transitions, and ambiguous landscapes.
 
"Tricksters and liminality also share this feature… St. Francis’ association with birds is very well known, but medieval fools were also frequently connected with birds, as were novices in liminal periods.”
 
Questioning Reality and Perception: The book consistently challenges the reader to question their perception of reality and the nature of evidence. The ambiguity of Bigfoot tracks, the possible role of misidentification, and the influence of psychological factors on witness testimony all highlight the difficulty in ascertaining the truth behind these encounters.
 
"How can we ever hope to measure phenomena that defy our eyes, our most trusted means of navigating reality?"
Important Facts and Ideas:
 
The book presents a vast array of historical accounts and witness reports from various cultures, demonstrating the global prevalence of Bigfoot-like creatures and their association with the paranormal.
It delves into the possibility of Bigfoot being an interdimensional being, capable of manipulating perception and reality.
It explores the significance of tree structures, bent trees, and glyphs as potential markers or communication methods used by the creatures.
The book draws parallels between Bigfoot and other cryptids, like the MIB and Black Eyed Kids, suggesting a deeper connection within the realm of high strangeness.
It analyzes the role of the trickster archetype in Bigfoot lore, highlighting their deceptive nature, manipulation of reality, and ability to induce fear and awe.
The Minnesota Iceman case is presented as a prime example of the ambiguity and self-negation that often surrounds Bigfoot evidence.
 
Overall Impression:
 
"Where the Footprints End" challenges conventional approaches to Bigfoot research. It encourages readers to move beyond the limitations of physical evidence and explore the psychological, cultural, and spiritual dimensions of these encounters. By linking Bigfoot with ancient archetypes and paranormal phenomena, the book proposes that these creatures might represent something far more complex and enigmatic than previously imagined.
 
Source: Enoch
 
This text comprises excerpts from a book detailing the author's long-term interactions with a Bigfoot, nicknamed Enoch, through the perspective of a Bigfoot researcher who developed a close friendship with a long-term Bigfoot witness, Mike. The narrative intertwines the author's personal experiences with Bigfoot encounters, Mike's detailed accounts of his relationship with Enoch, and reflections on the challenges and ethical considerations of Bigfoot research. The author emphasizes the importance of respectful interaction and building trust with these creatures, contrasting this approach with the often exploitative methods employed by other researchers. The narrative ultimately argues for a shift in Bigfoot research towards understanding the creatures' emotional and social complexity rather than solely focusing on acquiring physical "proof." The text also explores broader themes of human-animal relationships, ethical implications of scientific pursuit, and the importance of respecting the boundaries and privacy of the subjects being studied.
 
Enoch: A Bigfoot Story - A Briefing Document
 
Source: Excerpts from "Enoch - A Bigfoot Story" by Autumn Williams (2010)
 
Main Theme: This book tells the extraordinary story of Mike, a man who has developed a unique, long-term relationship with a Sasquatch he calls Enoch, living in the swamps of Florida. It explores themes of trust, respect, interspecies communication, and the challenges of carrying such a profound secret.
 
Most Important Ideas & Facts:
 
1. Mike's Unique Relationship with Enoch:
 
Mike has interacted with Enoch, a "Skunk Ape," for over a decade, providing food and observing his behavior.
He describes their communication as non-verbal, relying on gestures, vocalizations, and an almost intuitive understanding of each other's emotions.
Their bond involves playful moments, mutual respect for boundaries, and instances where Enoch seemingly protected Mike from danger.
 
Quotes:
 
"He's not tame but he'll come up to me because I bring him food. He loves fresh fruit like peaches and pears, and he can eat a lot."
"He lets me know that he can kill me whenever he wants."
"He trailed me for a while and I lost sight of him, so I stopped and sat down on a log and waited."
"It's one of my favorite memories of all. On the other hand, it was a reminder of how powerful he is and that I should be more careful around him."
"When you look into the eyes of a Skunk Ape, you'll know what mood he's in and if he's going to hurt you - just like a human."
"They can tell if you're trouble or not."
 
2. Enoch's Physical Description and Behavior:
 
Mike provides detailed descriptions of Enoch's physical features, comparing his eyes to "chocolate Tootsie Pops" and noting his wide mouth, thick beard, and bristly hair.
Enoch demonstrates intelligence through his actions: using found objects, mimicking human behaviors, and seemingly communicating with other Sasquatches.
 
Quotes:
 
"His eyes are dark brown ... you ever eat a Tootsie Pop? A chocolate one? ... It's ... striated. Like that."
"His nose is kind of broad and flat ... He's got these little pig bristles that stick out from it."
"He will hide behind a tree with a big stick ... and wait for a wild pig to walk by and then he whacks the pig on the head and kills it."
"I've seen him follow a boat that was drifting downriver. The men in it who were fishing were unaware that they were being studied."
 
3. Mike's Internal Conflict and Trust Issues:
 
Mike struggles with the burden of his secret, the fear of ridicule, and the moral dilemma of revealing Enoch's existence.
He grapples with trust issues, even with Autumn, the researcher documenting his story.
 
Quotes:
 
"The way you speak has nothing to do with what you say," I told him, gently.
"People are always making fun of the way I talk. I don't write no better."
"I don't believe we have the right to 'take a specimen'. Personally, it's a moral dilemma."
"I believe this story to be true as I feel the same way he did: it becomes your life and takes a lot away from you, and replaces it with knowledge you cannot share."
 
4. The Importance of Respect and Observation:
 
Mike emphasizes the need for respecting Sasquatches, understanding their boundaries, and letting them choose the terms of engagement.
He advocates for observation over invasive research methods, believing this is the key to understanding these elusive creatures.
 
Quotes:
 
"The only way to find a Skunk Ape is to let him find you."
"They are a noble tribe and deserve respect."
"Researchers don't understand this and never will. That's why they fail over and over again. They think they are smarter than what they chase."
"For me, it took learning to look through the eyes of my friend and opening my mind to understand what he is and who I am."
 
5. The Search for Proof and Documentation:
 
Autumn and Mike discuss methods for obtaining evidence of Enoch's existence, including DNA samples and video footage.
They acknowledge the challenges of proving the existence of Sasquatches without resorting to harmful methods.
 
Quotes:
 
"DNA, I suppose. If you could get him to lick a plate clean, the saliva would be testable."
"Hair would be helpful, in addition to the saliva. If you could collect some hair ... would he let you brush him?"
"If you could film him licking the plate and you collecting it, the video evidence would go a long way toward supporting test results if they came back 'unknown primate'..."
 
Overall Impression:
 
"Enoch: A Bigfoot Story" presents a compelling narrative of a unique interspecies friendship. While lacking traditional scientific evidence, the book offers valuable insights into potential Sasquatch behavior, emphasizing the importance of respect and understanding. It raises thought-provoking questions about the ethics of research and the impact of human actions on these creatures.
 
Conclusion
 
While all of the sources discuss bigfoot and bigfoot research, none of them offer definitive proof of bigfoot's existence.
 
Instead, the sources focus on topics like:
 
The challenges of bigfoot research.
 
The types of evidence researchers have gathered.
 
The importance of respecting bigfoot and the people who report encounters.
 
Let's examine what the sources say about proof.
 
The Nature and Challenges of Proof
 
Many people believe that the only way to prove bigfoot exists is to find a body. However, Autumn Williams argues that a body would not necessarily tell us what bigfoot is, and she questions whether the public would ever learn about such a discovery.
 
Williams also explores whether people who vehemently deny bigfoot's existence would accept proof, suggesting that some might cling to their beliefs regardless.
 
Thom Powell acknowledges the desire of bigfoot researchers to be the first to present a body or bones to the scientific community but suggests that physical remains may have already been acquired and kept from public view. He also questions whether certain authorities might actively suppress evidence.
 
Powell notes the role of the internet in bigfoot research, both as a tool for gathering evidence and a potential threat to bigfoot's privacy.
 
Timothy Renner and Joshua Cutchin argue that even if physical evidence were found, it would not erase the mystery surrounding bigfoot, which they believe is connected to a larger super-reality.
 
The author of "inthe.pdf" emphasizes the lack of consensus and frequent infighting among bigfoot researchers, which, along with the elusive nature of the creature, makes it difficult to convince skeptics. This source also expresses frustration with the lack of photographic evidence.
 
Evidence, Interpretation, and Ethics
 
Williams discusses the distinction between long-term witnesses, who claim ongoing interactions with bigfoot, and incidental witnesses, who have only had a single sighting. She criticizes researchers who dismiss long-term witnesses as unreliable and emphasizes the importance of eyewitness advocacy.
 
Williams shares an anecdote about finding and erasing bigfoot tracks, highlighting her concern for protecting bigfoot from those who might seek to kill them.
 
She recounts her frustration with researchers who focus on physical evidence and disregard the potential for deeper understanding through long-term witness accounts. She argues that this pursuit of proof could lead to bigfoot's demise. Ultimately, she chooses to step back from bigfoot research, believing that seeking proof is not only futile but potentially harmful.
 
Powell examines various types of evidence, including hair and scat, but notes that these can be inconclusive or difficult to interpret. He emphasizes the need for credible eyewitness accounts and discusses the challenges of verifying them.
 
Renner and Cutchin catalog a wide range of peripheral oddities associated with bigfoot sightings, such as mystery lights, peculiar sounds, stick signs, and anomalous footprints. They argue that these oddities often defy conventional explanations and support the idea that bigfoot is part of a larger, unexplained reality.
 
They also address the issue of hoaxes in bigfoot research, acknowledging that some individuals have fabricated evidence or exploited the phenomenon for personal gain. However, they caution against assuming that all evidence is fake, arguing that the sheer volume of reports and the persistent patterns within them suggest something genuine is happening.
 
In summary, all four books highlight the complexities and ethical considerations surrounding the search for bigfoot proof. While physical evidence is often sought, the sources emphasize the importance of eyewitness testimony, the challenges of interpretation, and the potential for harm if proof is obtained. The focus is not on proving bigfoot's existence but on understanding the phenomenon and protecting the creatures from exploitation. This information does not include the video evience that Todd Standing who supposedly caught many sasquatch on camera up close and personal including a scene where a family harrassed him. Unfortunately, you only get to see video of heads and not the torso and them moving about. This report also does not include the audio footage of Ontario Mike who built a relationship with one and recorded it calling his name.
 
Any person who investigates, skeptic or not, always comes to the inconclusive report that it either exists or it doesn’t. No one says after a thorough review that it is not real. This is telling, but doesn’t answer the phenomenon. The Bible doesn’t say anything about Bigfoot. But it does talk about the first murderer, Cain who was cursed by God to wander the earth. Some believe that Bigfoot is a descendant of Cain. However, Cain was not cursed with immortality, and there is no reason to believe he would still be alive. It also talks about the nephilim. A race of giants that lived before the Flood, produced by the union of fallen angels and human women. Some believe that Bigfoot is a remnant of the Nephilim. 
 
They are all reported in North America, Europe and Asia. Not South America, Middle East, Australia or Africa. This is a big clue. They are called Skunk Ape, Almas, Yeti, Yowie, Ebu Gogo, Abominable Snowman and Bigfoot. I do not believe they are the Nephilim. I tend to point to the demonic. These creatures are spotted in thick brush and always grainy through film. The amount of hoaxes are high which makes it hard to validate, especially from witness testimonies. The forests, especially old growth, hold amazing elements that can be attractive to spirits. I would imagine the old growth hold mysteries that harness energy. Most likely enough for the beings to manifest through voice and body. Logically, this doesn’t really explain Bigfoot, but biblically speaking, it has to align with my own beliefs. I am torn about this phenomenon because it doesn’t fit the demonic narrative. Meaning, I can’t rationally explain this via the Bible. 
 
But I personally believe I heard them that night in the cascade mountains with my old friends. They believe it, too. After years of analyzing the details between us and our reational ideas of what it could have been, we are no closer to an explanation. Maybe we embelished it. Added details that were not there or remembered it wrong. Being human, we definitely do such things. I don’t think so. Oregon, Washington and California made it illegal to hunt them. This is real legislation. If this thing isn’t real, why bother going to the trouble?
 
source
 
https://www.history.com/news/bigfoot-fbi-file-investigation-discovery
https://www.amazon.com/Valleys-Noble-Beyond-Search-Sasquatch/dp/0802129358
https://www.amazon.com/Locals-Thom-Powell/dp/0888395523
https://www.amazon.com/Where-Footprints-End-Strangeness-Phenomenon/dp/B08QRB3HR3/ref=pd_lpo_d_sccl_1/145-9772956-4294504?pd_rd_w=sRh3J&content-id=amzn1.sym.4c8c52db-06f8-4e42-8e56-912796f2ea6c&pf_rd_p=4c8c52db-06f8-4e42-8e56-912796f2ea6c&pf_rd_r=2W2HWS7EMGRN1CBDCKMH&pd_rd_wg=UUuL1&pd_rd_r=2e1b6a52-8da9-4466-b0a1-307aedd63967&pd_rd_i=B08QRB3HR3&psc=1
https://www.amazon.com/Enoch-Bigfoot-Story-Autumn-Williams/dp/145154992X
 

Spirit, Body & Soul

Spirit, Body & Soul
 
Watch on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v5t6juq-spirit-body-and-soul.html
 
1 Thessalonians 5:23 is often cited as a key verse: "May the God of peace himself sanctify you entirely, and may your spirit and soul and body be kept sound and blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. What does this mean? How are we made up of 3 things? And most importantly what are the differences between them?
 
Matthew 22:37: "Jesus replied: ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’" Mark 12:30: "Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength."
 
While the Bible doesn't explicitly outline the differences between the spirit, soul, and body in great detail, it does provide enough information to understand the distinctions between them. Here's a breakdown based on biblical understanding:
 
Spirit:
 
Connection to God: The spirit is the part of us that connects directly with God. It's the spiritual essence of a person.  
Eternal: The spirit is eternal and survives physical death.  
Renewal: It can be renewed and transformed through the Holy Spirit.
 
Soul:
 
Mind, Will, Emotions: The soul encompasses our mental, emotional, and volitional faculties. It's the seat of our consciousness, thoughts, feelings, and decisions.  
Humanity: It's the part of us that makes us human.  
Salvation: The soul is the part of us that can be saved or lost.
 
Body:
 
Physical Form: The body is our physical vessel, the tangible part of us.
Mortal: It's subject to decay and death.  
Temple of the Holy Spirit: For believers, the body is considered a temple of the Holy Spirit.  
Key Differences:
 
Origin: The spirit is from God, the soul is part of human nature, and the body is physical.
Eternity: The spirit is eternal, the soul's eternal destiny is determined by faith, and the body is temporary.
Function: The spirit connects us to God, the soul enables us to think, feel, and choose, and the body allows us to interact with the physical world.
This is as close to as explanation as we can get. The Bible doesn’t explain it any more. But I believe there is more to it. 
 
The Creation Story (Genesis 2:7):
 
Body: God formed man from the dust of the ground.
Spirit: God breathed into man's nostrils the breath of life.
Soul: Man became a living soul.
 
This passage suggests that the body, spirit, and soul are distinct components of human existence.
 
The Temptation of Jesus (Matthew 4:1-11):
 
Body: Jesus was physically hungry and tempted to turn stones into bread.
Soul: He was tempted to bow down and worship Satan.
Spirit: He resisted the temptations, relying on the Word of God.
 
This story demonstrates how the body, soul, and spirit can be subjected to different kinds of temptations, and how spiritual strength is essential to overcome them.
 
The Transfiguration of Jesus (Matthew 17:1-9):
 
Body: Jesus' physical appearance was transformed, becoming radiant and glorious.
Spirit: His divine nature was revealed, and he conversed with Moses and Elijah.
 
This event suggests that the body can be transformed, but the spirit remains eternal and can transcend physical limitations.
 
In Genesis 2:7, we learn that God formed man from the dust of the ground, breathed into him the breath of life, and man became a living being. Let’s look at that again: He formed man from the dust—there’s the body. He breathed into that body the breath of life—the Hebrew word here is ruach, which literally means “spirit.” As a result, man became a living being, which could be translated as soul (in fact, the American Standard Version of the Bible actually translates it this way).
 
The soul is the result of body and spirit coming together. Your mind, will, and emotions are directly affected by the condition of you body and the condition of your spirit at all times. Even though your body may be healthy, if you are spiritually away from God, your soul will be in turmoil. Likewise, even those who are spiritually right with God could have a purely physical sickness or disease in their body that affects their soul. [Consider how cranky we get when we have a lack of sleep!] A healthy soul can typically only be experienced by someone who has both a healthy spirit and a healthy body. Both parts play a role.
 
So does man consist of three parts? Yes and no. In our example earlier, the picture we imagined had three colors, but it was comprised of only two circles. So yes, we have a body, soul, and spirit; but the soul is merely the result of body and spirit coming together.
 
This is why the two scriptures I’ve shared so far are the ONLY places in all of Scripture where all three parts are listed or alluded to. On the other hand, verses that compare and contrast body and spirit show up throughout the Bible.
 
James 2:26 says that “the body without the spirit is dead.” What happens to the soul when we die? Well, without a body and a spirit existing together, there really is no soul. But the truth is that we will indeed have a body in the afterlife, and therefore, we will have a soul.
 
Consider how Jesus said in Matthew 10:28 that both body and soul are destroyed in hell. First of all, this shows us that hell is a real, physical place where a body can go! But it also reveals something about the soul: If the body is destroyed, the soul must also cease to exist. But this verse says nothing about the eternal spirit that has rebelled against God. It is the eternal spirit that will suffer the agonies of hell after body and soul are destroyed.
 
But what about those who do not go to hell when they die? The Scriptures give us an answer:
 
1 Corinthians 15:35–44, 50–52—But someone may ask, “How are the dead raised? With what kind of body will they come?” How foolish! What you sow does not come to life unless it dies. When you sow, you do not plant the body that will be, but just a seed, perhaps of wheat or of something else. But God gives it a body as he has determined, and to each kind of seed he gives its own body. All flesh is not the same: Men have one kind of flesh, animals have another, birds another and fish another. There are also heavenly bodies and there are earthly bodies; but the splendor of the heavenly bodies is one kind, and the splendor of the earthly bodies is another. The sun has one kind of splendor, the moon another and the stars another; and star differs from star in splendor.
 
So will it be with the resurrection of the dead. The body that is sown is perishable, it is raised imperishable; it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body.
 
If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body….
 
I declare to you, brothers, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. Listen, I tell you a mystery: We will not all sleep, but we will all be changed—in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. (NIV)
 
As Christians with faith in Christ, we will one day receive perfect eternal bodies for our eternal spirits to inhabit. As a result, we will have an everlasting soul. Heaven will be great because you will have a pure mind, a righteous will, and Christ-like emotions with which to experience all the joys of God’s Kingdom and presence! This is why 1 Peter 1:8-9 refers to the “salvation of our souls!”
 
The right and only correct answer is… the SOUL is the part of us that collects all our memories, decisions, regrets, emotions, self awareness, hopes, dreams, wishes, etc. including our subconsciousness and unconscious State of mind. In other words our Soul -=’s the Conscious Mind.
 
The SPIRIT, is the Energy that makes our bodies come to life. It is the energy that animates our flesh, bones, muscles, etc. providing movement, life itself. In other words Spirit equals Energy.
Since Spirit =’s Energy and the Soul =’s Consciousness, they are both equally important. One cannot exist without the other. We cannot exist without one or the other. So when you hear the phrase; Body, Soul, and Mind, it is incorrect. The correct phrase should be; Body , Soul, and Spirit! This is the vital Trinity needed to compose and complete a human being.
 
We need to know and understand that we are not humans having a spiritual experience, in fact we are spiritual beings having a human experience.
 
A combination of, body, soul, and spirit is required to live in this realm of existence, However, when our mortal bodies perish the Spirit and the Soul continue to exist. This is because it is scientifically proven that energy cannot be made nor destroyed it cannot cease to exist. It can only change in shape and form and it flows freely beyond the physical.
Now, in a biblical sense, it is written that together we all form and complete the body of Christ. God Lives within us. We are gods. This is because we all possess a piece, a small portion of energy. If combined, we form a perfect union. Together we become one. Whole, perfect, complete. Holy.
 
God made us in his own image and likeness, meaning we are made of 3 things just like he is. He is the Father, Son and Spirit. Hebrews 4:12 implies that the soul and spirit are closely connected because it says the Word of God is sharper than a double edged sword and it penetrates and divides the soul and the spirt, and judges the thoughts and intentions of the heart. When we die the first death, the body does not go, but we are to inherit a new one.
 
Let’s think of a robot. It has a shell and internal parts. It cannot work without without electricity. The shell is the body, which is the CPU and memory. The software is the soul and the spirit is the electricity. The electricity is the spark of the Father. It came diectly from him which gives us life. The soul doesn’t turn on without electricity. The shell doesn’t move or operate without the soul’s software instructions. The soul is what we call data. Information. It collects everything we do, hear, say and learn from. The soul and body are like an artifical intelligent being but it has no life without the spirit.
 
Mankind is working diligently to create sentience or awareness inside a machine that he created. I believe he will never reach that goal. However, man is also working on takiing a spirit and placing it into a machine or robot which gives it life. The spirits they are working with are demons which are the wandering nephilim without a home or body. Demons are limited to what they can do to us. They are like hackers but can only hack certain parts of your applications. They cannot get to the operating system unless you give them permission. Every day, they hack into your other applications like things they can relate to. Sin. Anything that hurts the body and soul including others. 
 
The demons are jealous and want to inhabit and control you to feel again. They are always trying to get you to accept their application. They also know all of your habits because since birth, they have recorded everything you do. They look for ways to get inside your operating system and never stop. Your operating system (like windows or mac OS) has an antivirus. It’s an application called The Bible on your desktop. As long as you keep it open and working, you are protected from malicious cookies, trojan horses and viruses. Close the application, and you are vulnerable to attacks.
 
Your body or shell is an antenna with bluetooth wifi. It picks up on information flying through the air. When you close the Bible Application, you will notice incoming messages from your browser which are your eyes and ears. The messages are like spam and are tempting sales and marketing subject lines trying to get you to download an application to use daily. Sometimes the messages are click bait and you just can’t help yourself. Because you don’t have The Bible Antivirus running full time behind the scenes, you will inadvertantly download a virus because your soul and body were attracted to the message.
 
Most of the people in the world barely open up the antivirus Bible. They are at the mercy of scams, viruses and bots. It hurts the body and soul when opening all of the other appllications because there isn’t enough memory and space on the hardrive to keep them going all the time. The shell and components start to wear down and break. Only a small percentage of all the robots worldwide keep the Bible Antivirus open all day and night. They learned how to program their body and soul to keep the Bible Antivirus running in the background at all times. They realized that the programmer, in this case God, had instructions in the Bible Antivirus tool that teaches you how to write the code to put on the full armor of God. 
 
Most don’t realize they have to seek and find this source code in The Bible Antivirus Application to cut and paste the source code on the backend to keep the application open and running in the background. This means you have to learn a little about the creator, programming language and understand how the code affects the body and soul or the shell and software. By studying the bible, you are able to learn the history of robots, shells, CPU’s, Memory and software that has been evolving over the last 6,000 years. Without this knowledge, you wouldn’t understand what a virus, malware or spyware looks like. You now have good understanding of what malicious attacks look like and what to avoid. Every now and then, a clever ad makes it past your senses and you give in to temptation, but you have a new application that can cleanout the virus.
 
5% of the world have enough faith in their understanding and relationship with their shell, software and electricity to operate with little harm. Because they took the intiative to seek first the kingdom of heaven, they found the tools to help them write code. Your soul isn’t alive. It’s aritifically intelligent and only knows the world by what it has learned. The soul has to listen to the spirit and has to obey the spirit as long as the Spirit understands it is in control. This means you have to program your soul to do what you want instead of operating on auto-pilot. If you know nothing about your history and God, you will not be able to write the code to turn auto-pilot off.
 
When we walk around the world of robots, 95% of all other robots are operating on auto-pilot. Each robot’s spirit doesn’t even realize it exists. It’s dormant. One day, a robot who is a skilled programmer, starts asking questions to the oblivious robot in hopes to see a spark. Sometimes they get one and sometimes they don’t. This is the Christian walk. Challenging people’s visible world and asking questions that proves the world isn’t lining up to logic. Many of those robots received the spark and for fear of not fitting in, they accept the idea of a spirit but never learn how to program the body and soul to put on the full armor of god. They eventually lose faith or are attacked so hard, they have to shut down or be operated on.
 
The spirit has access to code that is hidden in the body. There are lines of code that is hidden inside called an easter egg, which is a hidden compartment the creator made for someone to find. In programming, an "Easter egg" is a hidden message, feature, or joke intentionally placed within software by a developer, often undocumented and only accessible through a specific sequence of actions or inputs, essentially a secret surprise for users who discover it; similar to the concept of hunting for hidden Easter eggs in real life. Smith Wigglesworth and the 7 Pentecostal pioneers have found this easter egg. It is a clever little hidden program that bypasses the operating system to do supernatural things. The body and soul were programmed to be limited and almost all doors have been closed. The easter egg application that they found allows the spirit to tell the body and other robot bodies to heal themselves. It’s just a software code that bypasses all the restraints.
 
This easter egg is called Faith. The funny thing is, all of these helpful tools and applications have always been there. But no one wants to do the work to find it. This is seeking the kingdom of heaven. It takes a lot of work. You can’t find it if you have no passion to look. It takes a disciple of Jesus who did the work to give examples of the easter eggs they found. Those that want what they have turn into disciples themselves. The people who find the easter eggs are from all different denominations from baptist, pentacolstal, luterhan, catholic and all others. It doesn’t matter what software language (or religion) you use to find the easter egg. In fact, many have found this outside of religion. I believe the creaator put it there for us to find after the fall.
 
Software or your soul is just 1’s and 0’s. Your body or shell and components have been built with plenty of hard drive space and memory. Software is the 1’s and 0’s compiled into different ways. Each code of a memory or how to do an action is stored in the body. Academia says we use 100% of our brain. This is the CPU. But it has the ability to store much more data. The hard drive is stored inside the brain. It stores the main operating system and all of the applications. Memory is like a hard drive but it’s tempoary. When the brain or hard drive gets full, it places a lot of data that isn’t used throughout the body. Our organs and cells hold a lot of our memories that we don’t use. 
 
This is where the easter eggs are. You won’t find faith in your pineal gland or brain. After study, reflection, experiences and a yearning for the truth, you stumble upon the specific sequence of actions to bypass the operating system. Most that find it, forget the sequence and action to make it happen again. This is because they were not recording. They have no way of going back in time to look at what sequence they did to perform the miracle. It could have been something like waking up, giving thanks in prayer, opening the bible and reading a verse. The sequence is then turned on and when they do an action, it works. But the antivirus bible application can be turned off when the eyes or ears see something (what we call sin) that distracts them.
 
It doesn’t mean you are a bad robot and deserve hell. It means you are still learning and finding your way. It is rare that one finds and records the sequences and can perform miracles full time. This is a level of faith and understanding that scares the other robots. They all gather around and find ways to cancel you from society because since they can’t access what you can, you must be removed to keep the peace. This is why disciples and prophets are always hunted down and destroyed. They are a threat to the world and could possibly change it and since all the other robots have no idea they have a spririt, they remove the freak.
 
Your body, soul and spirit are one of the mysteries that the lord has left for us to understand. This example is a crude and simple way to describe what they are. They are extremely more difficult to understand because they all were created by an entity that is from another realm or dimension that is better in all things and ways. A place where the body, soul and spirit is what you learn in pre-school and understand the complexities at an early fourth dimensional age. A place so advanced that we could never fathom it’s intellect and being.
 
According to the Bible, when a person dies, their "spirit" (often used interchangeably with "soul") leaves their body, returning to God who gave it, as stated in Ecclesiastes 12:7: "Then the dust returns to the earth as it was, and the spirit returns to God who gave it.". We are not sure if the sofware and data goes, too. We are told through countless near death experiences that all of the meory does leave with the spirit. Many experiencers say they can access all of their past life experiences and some even talk of being shown their entire life after death.
 
Christianity is the only religion where you receive eternal life or get to eat of the tree of life after death. It comes with a condition, like all religions do. You have to believe that the creator sent his son to pay for your bad deeds. This is sketchy given the information we have to work with and what is the real truth. Whatever is out there waiting for us after we die, according to all religions, will only allow us freedom if we do something in return. This is a choice where the robot has to face logic. Is his creator angry at him for making mistakes or is his creator waiting for him with open arms? I refuse to worship a creator who sets condictions of heaven or hell based on an eternity while you are given 120 years only to figure everything out.
 
When Jesus said if you look at a woman in lust, you committed a sin. HIs disciples all said then who could ever enter heaven? This means they all still looked at women with lust and guilty. Jesus’ response was with God all things are possible. Be a humble robot. Appreciate the handywork your creator did. Appreciate that he sent his son to fix the problem of the fall and what his past creation did to us. Realize that you are just a robot without all the answers. And realize there is a war going on between fourth dimension beings and you are just in the way. Continue to find the easter eggs, cause there are more, and show other robots what you found. We all are probably deceived and do not have the truth to hold onto. Humble yourself and believe that your creator spent too much time and effort into creating you just to throw you in the garbage dump. Remember, the Bible says God made adam with his own hands. We are the first to be created with touch instead of just his mouth or word. 
 
source
 
https://www.supernaturaltruth.com/body-soul-and-spirit