Cause Before Symptom

Pastor James Carner breaks down the real controllers of the world and their divide and conquer plans for a satanic utopia where only a select few will reign over a small population of adrogenous, complacent workers.

Listen on:

  • Apple Podcasts
  • YouTube
  • Podbean App
  • Spotify
  • Amazon Music
  • iHeartRadio
  • BoomPlay

Episodes

Sunday Sep 28, 2025

The Blood of the Serpent: Crude Oil, Pharmakeia, and the Rise of the Beast System is a prophetic exposé uncovering how crude oil — the so-called lifeblood of modern civilization — is not merely an industrial resource, but a spiritual counterfeit. Through ten gripping chapters, the series traces oil’s transformation from fuel to pharmakeia, from energy to sorcery, and from underground commodity to the backbone of the beast system prophesied in Revelation.
Drawing from historical documents, Rockefeller-funded education reforms, geopolitical warfare, environmental devastation, and the petrochemical foundations of modern medicine and AI, this series lays bare the global covenant forged in crude. It shows how the serpent’s blood has replaced God’s breath — in our bodies, our rituals, and our cities — and calls for a radical exodus back to the healing leaves of Eden.
This is not just a warning. It is a map. A summons. A cry to come out of Babylon, before the image speaks and the smoke rises for the last time.

Friday Sep 26, 2025

Satan’s Little Season Ends in 2026?
For 250 years, a global deception has unfolded in plain sight — masked as liberty, progress, and enlightenment. But Revelation 20 warned us: after Christ's reign, Satan would be loosed for a short season to deceive the nations one last time. That season began in 1776 — the year of the American Revolution and the founding of the Bavarian Illuminati — and it ends in 2026.
In this ten-part exposé, we trace the rise of a counterfeit kingdom:– The replacement of the true Ark with a throne of digital sorcery– The suppression of Enoch, Jubilees, and the Ethiopian canon that foretold this deception– The construction of false portals and alien saviors to mimic Christ’s return– And the final convergence of financial, genetic, and spiritual control systems
At the heart of it all stands Ethiopia, the hidden custodian of God’s covenant — preserving the Ark, the true scriptures, and a living rebuke to Babylon. As the short season ends, the enemy prepares his last move. But the throne still stands, and the King is coming.
This is not speculation. It’s Revelation unfolding.
#ShortSeasonEnds #EthiopiaArk #Revelation2026 #AlienDeception #WatchersReturn #BookOfEnoch #KebraNagast #JesuitAgenda #BabylonSystem #CBDCMark #ArkOfTheCovenant #DigitalThrone #SatanLoosed #FalseMessiah #Transhumanism #HomoBorgensis #ProjectBlueBeam #EndTimeProphecy #HiddenRemnant #ChristReturns

Friday Sep 26, 2025

Operating Sovereign: The Power of the Unincorporated Association
 
Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6zhako-operating-sovereign-the-power-of-the-unincorporated-association.html
 
Kirk Carmichael at Unincorporated Associations
https://unincorporatedassociations.com
 
info@unincorporatedassociations.com
11440 W. Bernardo Court, Ste 300
San Diego, CA 92127
619-603-0233
 
Join the 10 minute call every day! https://register.unincorporatedassociations.com/join_the_call
 
“The secret to success is to own nothing, but control everything.” ~ Nelson Rockefeller
Begin Your Own Unincorporated Association Today!
 
What is an Unincorporated Association?
 
When you reorganize your financial affairs and shift your tax liability onto a private organization by beginning a member-based entity called an "Unincorporated Association."
 
A private Unincorporated Association is a Secretary of State registered entity offering a more convenient, flexible, and cost-effective way to manage assets and transactions. Unlike corporations and LLCs, this association is private and not available to the public, giving you the privacy and control you desire.
 
Tax Exempt EIN Number: EIN Number assigned with 575-E status.
Complete Control Over Membership: As a member, you have the final say over all transactions and activities.
 
Privacy: Your association is not publicly listed, ensuring your complete privacy.
Asset Management: Assign ownership of property (vehicle, house, bank account, etc) to the association to limit/eliminate personal liability.
 
Easy Transfer of Assets: Sale or transfer of assets is made simple via membership resignation and reassignment as opposed to subjecting the asset to taxes and fees of selling the asset.
 
Minimal Ongoing Costs: Lifetime registration with no annual fees (vs Corp. & LLC’s are $800 per year)
 
Get your UNA questions answered by an attorney!*
Meet Chrystan,
 
Chrystan Carlton began her legal and professional career with the mission to make the road to entrepreneurship and social enterprise development accessible. 
 
Using her expanded negotiation, finance, and legal skills, she can help entrepreneurs and social enterprises bring their vision to life. 
 
With more than 25 years of experience as a business professional and 10 years of experience as a licensed attorney, Chrystan Carlton is well-seasoned in a wide range of business and legal concerns. 
 
Her areas of expertise are comprehensive, including:
 
Tax Litigation,
Business Entity Formation,
NonProfit 501(c)3 filings, 
Business Strategy,
and more.
 
Chrystan excels in Contract Drafting, Corporate Compliance, and Start-up Financing, covering everything from SAFE agreements to international commerce.
 
Chrystan is dedicated to simplifying legal challenges and empowering entrepreneurs and social enterprises to succeed.
 
https://register.unincorporatedassociations.com/bookwchrystan

The Joker

Thursday Sep 25, 2025

Thursday Sep 25, 2025

In this hour we trace the joker from ancient carnival to modern pop culture and show how a sanctioned figure of inversion quietly became a cultural grammar that normalizes exception, erodes reverence, and baptizes mockery as virtue. We move from Bakhtin’s carnivalesque and Rome’s Saturnalia into medieval Feast of Fools, follow the tarot Fool’s liminal initiation into the nineteenth-century playing-card Joker, and then track the image’s ritual adoption by elite fraternal circles and its mass marketing in comics, film, and memes. Along the way we diagnose the devil’s tactic: using humor as plausible deniability to trivialize holiness, weaponize cruelty, and teach a generation that cleverness can substitute for conscience. The show closes with pastoral tools for discernment that do not ban joy but reclaim it—teaching reparative humor, restoring practices of reverence, and rehearsing the gospel’s holy inversion so laughter heals rather than hardens.
 
#joker, #jester, #carnivalesque, #feastoffools, #tarotfool, #wildcard, #mockery, #discernment, #spiritualwarfare, #consecratedjoy, #prophetichumor, #eliteculture, #culturalcritique, #satire, #reclaimingworship

What Was Hidden Shall Be Known

Wednesday Sep 24, 2025

Wednesday Sep 24, 2025

This episode explores the biblical and Ethiopian command to expose evil, showing that silence is complicity and obedience demands revelation. From the prophets to the apostles to the Ethiopian fathers, scripture is saturated with warnings against concealing corruption. We then trace the patterns we’ve uncovered in our mission: bloodline dynasties, financial secrecy, propaganda loops, false treaties, and genetic manipulation. History confirms the same truths through the Panama and Pandora Papers, Cambridge Analytica, and 1MDB. In real time, our own work has been echoed by journalists, researchers, and independent voices, proving that our labor has not been in vain. Though the cost of obedience is ridicule and resistance, the hope of light is greater, for darkness cannot overcome it. The call now is to persevere, keep exposing, and keep shining until Christ Himself ends the counterfeit kingdom.
 
#ExposeEvil #ShineTheLight #ScriptureReveals #EthiopianCanon #UnfruitfulWorks #TruthInDarkness #NoMoreSilence #PropagandaLoops #BloodlinePower #FinancialSecrecy #FalsePeace #GeneEditing #RighteousResistance #PersevereInTruth #CauseBeforeSymptom

Tuesday Sep 23, 2025

In this episode of Cause Before Symptom, James lifts the Eastern veil to reveal how Hinduism, Buddhism, Zoroastrianism, and Tibetan esotericism preserve fragments of truth but twist them into cycles, avatars, and counterfeit registries that deny the cross. From the Vedas and Upanishads to the wellness industry and Silicon Valley, elites have repackaged these systems to prepare the world for a universal “World Teacher” — the Antichrist — who will unite all faiths under one false banner. This show exposes the counterfeit and proclaims the true escape from death, written not in cycles or mantras but in the blood of Jesus Christ and the Lamb’s book of life.
#EasternVeil #EsotericKnowledge #AntichristCounterfeit #CauseBeforeSymptom #Prophecy #EndTimes #Hinduism #Buddhism #Zoroastrianism #TibetanEsotericism #Theosophy #Crowley #Occult #FalseMessiah #RegistryOfNames #LambsBookOfLife #JesusChristIsLord

Monday Sep 22, 2025

The Mock Tribulation: Rehearsals, Rituals, and the World’s Exhale
 
Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6zad18-the-mock-tribulation-rehearsals-rituals-and-the-worlds-exhale.html
 
Monologue:
We stand at a threshold where prophecy, ritual, and politics collide. The world is weary — seven years of fire, disease, war, and loss have drained the breath out of nations. People are desperate for relief, for anything that feels like closure. And just as scripture warned, it is at that very moment of exhaustion that a counterfeit peace is offered, wrapped in ceremony and applause, as if the signing of a treaty could redeem the human soul.
 
Look carefully. This is not just geopolitics. This is ritual. The Revelation sign in 2017 set the stage. Three and a half years later, conflict flared. Six years later, the Gaza war erupted with unrelenting force. Each stage felt like a mock trial run of tribulation, conditioning humanity to sigh in relief at the promise of resolution. But when the world exhales its breath toward agreements and accords, that breath does not rise to God — it is siphoned away, harvested by powers who long to be worshiped in His place.
 
The prophets warned us of this deception. Jesus said false Christs and false prophets would arise, performing signs to deceive even the elect. Paul said the man of sin would come with lying wonders. Revelation speaks of a beast who mimics the Lamb, calling fire from heaven, staging a liturgy of false peace. These are not random headlines; they are rehearsals, a counterfeit tribulation preparing the world to adore a false messiah.
 
And while Western churches sleep, the Ethiopian canon has held a witness we ignored. In Enoch and Jubilees, the watchers are condemned for bending the cycles, for crafting counterfeit covenants, for turning jubilees into prisons. Ethiopia’s testimony tells us what we now see: that the law of God can be mirrored and mocked by those who twist times and seasons.
 
So here we are. The world will soon be invited to worship peace itself — not the Prince of Peace, but the altar of political survival. They will call it justice. They will call it necessary. But if it demands our breath, our awe, our worship, and does not return that breath to God, it is an idol. And idols always betray those who bow to them.
 
Tonight, I ask you to see through the pageantry. To refuse to exhale your worship into false treaties. To give your breath back to the One who formed it in the beginning, when He breathed life into man. Our peace is not negotiated in halls of power; it is sealed in the covenant of Christ’s blood. Every other altar is false, and every other peace is fragile.
 
The question before us is simple: when the world breathes out in relief, where will your breath go? To the treaties of men, or to the throne of God?
 
Part 1: The World Weary of War
 
The past seven years have not been ordinary years. They have been years of upheaval, of breath stolen from humanity in wave after wave. The pandemic that locked people in their homes was not only a public health crisis — it was a ritual of fear, teaching us to inhale dread every morning and exhale obedience every night. Economies staggered, freedoms were curtailed, and people lost their sense of place. That alone would have been enough to exhaust the soul. But then came the fires, the floods, the wars.
 
In 2021, the streets of Jerusalem erupted and Gaza shook under rocket fire. The conflict lasted just eleven days, but it scarred the world’s memory. That was 3½ years after the Revelation 12 sign — a tremor that signaled what was to come. Two years later, in 2023, the horror of October 7 shattered any illusion of security. Thousands dead, families broken, entire neighborhoods erased in days. What followed was not a war measured in weeks, but in years of blood, siege, and famine. Gaza became a symbol of what tribulation looks like, even if it was only a mock trial of what is still ahead.
 
And in all of this, the people grew tired. In America, in Europe, in the Middle East itself, there is a palpable sigh that runs through society: “Just end it.” When the human heart is this weary, it no longer hungers for truth; it hungers for rest. And that is when the enemy strikes — not with bullets or rockets, but with false solutions. Because when people are desperate, they will worship whatever promises relief.
 
The Bible warns us of this dynamic. When Israel was crushed under foreign rule, they often turned not to God but to alliances, to treaties with Egypt or Babylon, hoping those covenants would save them. Isaiah thundered against such bargains, calling them “a covenant with death” (Isaiah 28:15). The people thought they were buying peace, but what they were really doing was bowing to an idol of human power.
 
That is where we are now. The world’s exhaustion is not random; it has been cultivated. Wars and crises create a vacuum, and into that vacuum elites offer agreements, accords, and staged ceremonies. These are not neutral politics — they are rituals. They are altars dressed in flags and handshakes. And when the cameras capture the applause, the world exhales in relief, giving its breath — its worship — not to the Creator, but to the covenant of men.
 
This is why the past seven years matter. They have been a slow draining of our spirit, a conditioning of the nations. The people are now ready to worship peace itself, no matter who offers it. And that weariness, that exhaustion, is the first sacrifice laid on the false altar.
 
Part 2: Counterfeit Signs and Lying Wonders
 
When Jesus warned His disciples about the end of the age, He did not begin with earthquakes or wars. He began with deception. “Take heed that no man deceive you,” He said, because the first strategy of the enemy is not destruction, but imitation. A war may break bodies, but a lie breaks souls. That is why Satan specializes in counterfeits — events that look like prophecy, feel like prophecy, but are hollow performances staged to harvest worship.
 
The Revelation 12 sign in the heavens on September 23, 2017 was such a dividing line. To the secular world, it was just another planetary alignment. To prophecy watchers, it was a sign of the woman clothed with the sun, travailing to give birth. But whether you believed it was cosmic coincidence or divine marker, what followed cannot be ignored: three and a half years later, a sudden flare of violence between Israel and Gaza; six years later, an eruption of horror that has not ended. These intervals mimic the cadence of Daniel’s weeks and Revelation’s 1,260 days — not to fulfill them, but to stage them. The world has been given a script, rehearsed step by step, to condition us for the false tribulation.
 
Paul spoke of this in his letter to the Thessalonians: the man of sin would come “with all power and signs and lying wonders” (2 Thessalonians 2:9). Notice the word — lying wonders. They are real events, real signs, but they do not testify to God. They testify to a counterfeit. Revelation 13 shows us a beast that looks like the Lamb but speaks like the dragon. He calls fire down from heaven to dazzle the crowds, and the world worships not because they understand, but because they are tired and ready to follow whoever offers relief.
 
We are watching that play unfold now. The wars are real. The blood is real. The tears are real. But the framing of these events as the very tribulation the Bible foretold — that is the counterfeit. It is a rehearsal meant to make people believe the climax has already come, so that when a false messiah offers peace, they will bow down thinking the story is finished.
 
This is the danger: counterfeit signs do not simply confuse. They redirect worship. They make people breathe out their awe and surrender, not to the God who warns us of such deception, but to the very powers that staged the show. That is why Jesus said the deception would be so great that, if possible, even the elect could be misled. Because the signs will look like prophecy. They will feel like prophecy. But their fruit will be worship of man, not worship of God.
 
Part 3: War, Exhaustion, and the Need for Relief
 
War does not only kill bodies — it strangles the spirit. Every rocket that falls, every funeral procession, every image of rubble and children crying, pulls something out of the collective chest of humanity. Breath by breath, the nations are being drained. When war is relentless, when the news is nothing but smoke and sirens, people stop thinking about justice and truth. They only think about survival. They whisper, “Make it stop. End it somehow. Give us a moment to breathe.”
 
This is where the enemy waits. Because exhaustion is the soil where false worship takes root. The devil does not need to convince the weary to believe in his lies — he only needs to convince them to rest in his solution. After years of killing and chaos, people no longer question the source of relief. They only sigh in gratitude when the pain stops, even if the cost of that relief is their freedom, their conscience, their worship.
 
History shows us this pattern again and again. After the carnage of World War I, the nations rushed to Versailles. They worshiped the treaty as salvation, applauding the ink on paper as if it could undo the graves of millions. But what did it produce? More resentment, more debt, and the seeds of an even greater war. It was not peace — it was an altar built on exhaustion. The people breathed out in relief, and their breath was stolen.
 
Scripture names this dynamic. In Isaiah 28, the prophet thunders against Judah for making “a covenant with death” and an “agreement with hell.” They thought their alliances and treaties would save them from destruction, but Isaiah saw the truth: those covenants were idols, crafted in desperation, destined to betray. The same pattern holds now. Israel and Gaza bleed, the world sighs, and leaders stand ready to offer a peace that is not peace but bondage.
 
This is the counterfeit sacrament: to take the world’s exhaustion, the drained breath of millions, and channel it into worship of treaties, handshakes, and staged ceremonies. To make humanity adore the agreement rather than the God who alone gives rest. When Jesus promised, “Come unto me, all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest,” He meant that true peace comes from His yoke, not from the accords of kings. But a weary world will take the nearest substitute, bowing at the altar of paper and signatures if it promises one night of sleep.
 
The war is real. The exhaustion is real. But the relief offered is a trap. It is a ritual of breath-harvest — a siphoning of worship away from the Creator toward the agreements of men. And in that exhale, the nations lose not only their strength, but their soul.
 
Part 4: The Ritual of Treaties
 
When most people watch a peace accord on television, they see politics. They see leaders at a table, pens poised over documents, cameras flashing, flags draped behind them. But if you look through spiritual eyes, what you see is liturgy. It is ritual. The setting is a temple of statecraft, the documents are scrolls, the signing is sacrament, and the applause of the crowd is worship. This is the false altar of peace.
 
History has rehearsed this again and again. The Treaty of Versailles in 1919 was not only a political settlement; it was a ritualized spectacle. The victors processed into the Hall of Mirrors like priests into a sanctuary, the defeated were humiliated as scapegoats, and the world sighed in relief. Versailles was celebrated as the end of war, but it was really the consecration of resentment and debt. Out of that false altar came Hitler and another world war. The worship was misplaced, and the fruit was bitter.
 
The same theater appeared in the 1993 Oslo Accords. Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat shook hands on the White House lawn while Bill Clinton stood between them with arms outstretched like a high priest. The cameras captured the moment, and the world breathed out — peace at last. But behind the stagecraft, the covenant was fragile, full of compromises that neither side could keep. Within years, blood ran again. Yet the ritual was powerful enough to capture the imagination of the world, proving that even a fleeting covenant could harvest breath and redirect worship.
 
That pattern will come again. Picture it: September 23 or some other symbolic date, leaders gather in New York or Jerusalem, the United Nations or the Vatican behind them, and a “historic agreement” is announced. Sanctions are lifted, territories divided, and the world exhales in relief. The applause echoes like a hymn. The handshakes become icons. The documents are displayed like relics. And once again, the nations worship the covenant of men rather than the covenant of God.
 
This is what makes treaties dangerous when they are staged as spectacle. They are not only legal documents — they are rituals that capture the soul. They take the exhaustion of war and transmute it into false worship, into adoration of human saviors. And when the world sings the praises of politicians and negotiators, the breath that belongs to God is siphoned away.
 
The prophets saw this clearly. Isaiah called it “a refuge of lies” and “a covenant with death.” Ezekiel spoke against prophets who “whitewash the wall,” painting over cracks so the people think it stands strong. Jesus Himself warned that false messiahs would come in His name, offering salvation that is not salvation. These treaties are the modern whitewash, the modern false altar. They promise peace, but they enthrone idols.
 
Every ceremony has its priests, its sacrifice, and its worshipers. In the ritual of treaties, the priests are the diplomats, the sacrifice is truth and justice, and the worshipers are the nations, sighing in relief. But the true altar is in heaven, and only one covenant holds. Every other ritual is theft of breath.
 
Part 5: The Harvest of Breath
 
At the dawn of creation, the book of Genesis gives us a picture unlike any other: “And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul” (Genesis 2:7). Life itself is not mechanical. It is not merely blood or bone. It is breath — divine breath. That breath is the seal of God’s image in us, the invisible thread tying humanity to its Creator.
 
If God’s breath is what makes us living souls, then to steal that breath — to redirect it away from Him — is the highest act of rebellion. This is what false altars are designed to do. They harvest breath. They take the exhale of the nations — the relief after war, the sigh after terror, the applause after treaties — and they siphon it away from heaven. Instead of rising as worship to God, it descends into the coffers of principalities and powers.
 
Think of what happens after every great bloodletting. The world groans in grief, then suddenly, a “solution” is offered. A treaty is signed, a resolution passed, a ceasefire declared. The people breathe out in relief. That collective breath is energy. It is worship. And it does not vanish into thin air. It is directed. It is channeled. In spiritual terms, it is harvested.
 
The enemy knows this well. Satan cannot create breath; he can only devour it. In the Ethiopian canon, books like Enoch and Jubilees describe the watchers as beings who lost their divine estate and now feed on what is not theirs — siphoning worship, consuming what belongs to God. Their great sin was to corrupt cycles, to twist jubilees, to trap humanity in patterns that drain rather than replenish. What we see today is the same theft: the ritual manipulation of humanity’s breath through staged tribulations and counterfeit covenants.
 
Every sigh of relief at a false peace becomes an offering at the wrong altar. Every cheer for a human savior becomes incense at a counterfeit temple. The agreements themselves are paper; the real prize is the spiritual energy they extract. This is why media broadcasts them endlessly, why ceremonies are choreographed like sacraments. The world is being trained to pour out its spirit into these moments, giving away the very breath God intended for prayer, worship, and truth.
 
But remember: breath is not neutral. In Genesis, it is gift. In Revelation, it is contested. And at the end of the age, it will be judged — whether our breath was poured out for idols or returned to the One who gave it. The false altars may harvest breath now, but their storehouses will collapse. Only God can sustain what He breathed into existence.
 
Part 6: The Ethiopian Canon’s Warning
 
The Western church, for centuries, read only the slimmer canon — 66 books that spoke truly but not always fully. Ethiopia, however, preserved more. Their canon holds Enoch, Jubilees, the Ascension of Isaiah, and other writings that peel back the veil on how heavenly law and earthly cycles intertwine. These books were not added as curiosities; they were preserved as warnings. And in them, we find an uncanny description of the very counterfeit patterns being played out before our eyes.
 
In the Book of Enoch, the watchers are condemned for teaching mankind forbidden knowledge — cycles, enchantments, and oaths. They corrupted what God had written in the stars, bending times and seasons to fashion false worship. Their punishment is to be bound until judgment, but their influence lingers in the way humanity still uses ritual calendars to drain life rather than bless it. The Ethiopian witness makes plain what our Western canon only hints at: that manipulation of time itself is one of the enemy’s oldest tools.
 
The Book of Jubilees is even clearer. It describes history not just as random events but as measured cycles — jubilees of forty-nine years, weeks of years, seasons of reckoning. When the cycles are honored, blessing follows; when they are twisted, bondage results. Jubilees 23 warns of a time when humanity will “forget the ordinances,” despising the true calendar and living in corruption. In that forgetting, men will call false covenants peace, but the fruit will be blood and breath stolen from the righteous. Sound familiar? Treaties without God become “covenants with death,” cycles twisted into snares.
 
The Kebra Nagast, though written later, anchors this theme in kingship. It presents Solomon’s lineage as custodians of the Ark, not for Israel alone but for all nations. The warning in that text is subtle but powerful: when kings rule without covenant, when they enthrone themselves instead of serving God, their agreements with other nations become idols. The Ark is God’s true throne, the covenant unbroken. All other thrones and treaties are counterfeit shadows.
 
This is why the Ethiopian canon matters for us now. It reveals that what we are witnessing is not random geopolitics but ritual theft. The watchers’ pattern — twisting cycles, staging false covenants, harvesting breath — has returned in modern form. Western Christians, trained to dismiss apocrypha, miss the pattern. Ethiopians preserved it, perhaps so that in this late hour the church would not be blind.
 
We are watching jubilees turned into cages, covenants made into idols, and cycles of years staged as mock tribulation. And the canon whispers to us: do not fall for it. Do not worship the counterfeit. Do not pour your breath into the treaties of men. For the true covenant is eternal, and the true breath belongs to the One who gave it.
 
Part 7: Modern Countdown and Mock Tribulation
 
The pattern reads now like a staged drama rather than random headlines. A visible marker in 2017 became a cultural metronome for prophecy communities, and once a sign is ritualized it ceases to be merely astronomical or anecdotal: it becomes the zero point of a living calendar. From that anchor point social and religious actors began to count forward in meaningful intervals. The 3½-year flare in 2021 appeared to many like a dress rehearsal, a sudden, sharp puncture that taught the watching world what a “taste” of tribulation felt like. Two years later the October 7, 2023 bloodletting arrived with far greater force, and the months and years that followed functioned as an extended act in the same drama. Each stage tuned public expectation, teaching people the rhythm of suffering and the shape of relief so that the next gesture of “peace” would feel like the natural conclusion rather than a negotiated compromise.
 
Media culture is the amplifier of that rehearsal. News cycles, anniversaries, memorials, and viral hashtags are the drums and trumpets that give the script its sound. When an anniversary is memorialized on television, when a ceasefire is celebrated with montage and music, the masses are being trained in a liturgical language. These rituals are repeated with choreography — candles, speeches, flags, slow camera pans on grieving families — and repetition makes ritual. Over time the public learns the posture required: watch, weep, sigh, then accept the official fix. That learned posture is the commodity the ritual sellers want: predictable human response that can be harvested and redirected into worship of an outcome rather than repentance toward God.
 
States and institutions provide the ceremonial props. Recognitions, sanctions, public condemnations, and “historic agreements” are not merely policy instruments; they become the scrolls on the altar, the signatures that validate the ceremony. When multiple governments move in near unison — coordinated recognitions, simultaneous sanctions proposals, or a tightly scripted UN session — what looks like diplomacy also functions as synchronized liturgy. The optics matter as much as the clauses. Photographs of leaders signing, live broadcasts of handshakes, and scripted speeches turn legal acts into sacraments people can bow to. That is how a political settlement is transmuted into cultic attraction: the more theatrical and unanimous the performance, the more likely crowds are to exhale their worship into it.
 
Read as ritual, the modern countdown has two purposes. The first is pedagogical: to teach the world what tribulation feels like without delivering the final blow, so that when the ultimate false solution appears people will accept it as the desired end. The second is acquisitive: to collect the emotional and spiritual energy — the breath — produced by mass exhaustion and channel it toward institutions and leaders who profit politically, economically, and spiritually from that transfer. The Ethiopian texts put language around this: measured cycles, jubilees, and heavenly registers that can be honored or abused; when cycles are weaponized they bind peoples into timetables not ordained by God but manufactured by watchers and lawgivers who profit from confusion.
 
That framework changes what we watch for. Small procedural moves — a sudden cluster of recognitions, a rapid sequence of sanctions votes, a high-profile commemoration staged on a symbolic date — cease to be mere footnotes and become ritual ticks. The pastoral work is to teach people to test those ticks: ask what the covenant actually requires, who benefits materially from the relief, whether justice and accountability are present, and whether the ceremony demands the surrender of worship. Keep lament as a public practice so grief is not whitewashed by spectacle; insist on memorials that center victims and tangible restitution; demand public, verifiable measures of justice before any “closure” is celebrated.
 
Finally, the spiritual verdict is a moral one. A mock tribulation that trains the world to adore a false peace is an act of spiritual theft. The true remedy is not another treaty; it is repentance and a return to the covenant that issues life — Christ’s blood and the justice that issues from it. Our refusal to give away our breath to false altars is a witness in the world: it interrupts the ritual, it denies the harvest, and it keeps the people of God awake to the difference between a polished political solution and the peace that only God can grant.
 
Part 8: The False Altar of Peace
 
When the cameras are rolling and diplomats step onto the dais, what the public sees is closure; what the spiritually aware should see is a liturgy being rehearsed. Sanctions, resolutions, and declarations are not neutral tools when they are staged as drama; they become sacraments. A sanctions package passed with fanfare reads like an absolution, a resolution celebrated like a creed, and the lifting or imposition of trade concessions becomes the altar call that invites nations to kneel. In that moment the world is offered salvation for its exhaustion: obedience to the new order in exchange for calm. But the bargain is thin. Paper cannot restore graves, rhetoric cannot unmake injustice, and theatrical compromise can conceal the lack of true accounting. The danger is not the existence of treaties or sanctions per se, but their transformation into objects of worship—when applause replaces repentance, when applause becomes the public liturgy that consecrates human fixes and redirects breath away from God.
 
Look at how these rituals work: a problem is televised; leaders promise action; symbolic penalties are announced; a “historic” vote follows; and the public exhales. The exhale is the harvest. The architects of spectacle do not need to secure every clause or guarantee every enforcement mechanism; they only need the appearance of resolution to collect the awe and relief. That emotional energy is convertible: it buys political capital, it legitimizes actors who thrive on centralized authority, and it lubricates the machinery that will demand further compromises of conscience. The great irony is that what the world calls “peace” often sanctifies the very structures that enabled the violence. The true victims are left in the footnotes while the treaty becomes a relic to be paraded each anniversary.
 
Scripture gives us language to name this. The prophets condemn “peace” that is without righteousness; the psalms teach that God delights not in curtains of ceremony but in justice and truth. When the global liturgy celebrates a settlement that replaces restitution with expediency, the people have been invited to worship a thing that will not sustain them. The Ethiopian witness warns of cycles turned into snares; modern states, like ancient watchers, can weaponize calendars so that the political ritual becomes indistinguishable from spiritual enticement. In practical terms that means we must test every celebrated agreement by its fruit: does it protect the vulnerable, does it restore what was stolen, does it require repentance, and does it leave room for the God who alone judges rightly? If the answer is no, then the agreement is altar, not covenant.
 
Resistance to this false altar is both prophetic and pastoral. Refuse to let spectacle substitute for justice; insist on memorials that foreground victims and reparations rather than photo ops; demand that any “peace” include transparency, enforceable accountability, and visible restoration before cameras are asked to bless it. Teach congregations to keep lament as ritual—public lament that refuses premature closure—so that grief is not washed away by pageantry. Cultivate a discipline of corporate prayer and fasting at moments when the world is invited to sing; make the church’s posture one of sober discernment rather than reflexive relief. When a treaty is signed and the crowd cheers, let the church be the remnant that holds its breath until justice has been served and true repentance has been demonstrated.
 
The false altar will always be alluring because it promises what the human heart most wants: an end to pain. But true peace costs what false peace will not pay: humility, confession, restitution, and a reorientation of worship to God alone. Our duty is to expose the altar, refuse the harvest, and call the people back to the One who breathed life into us—so that when breath is given, it ascends where it belongs.
 
Part 9: Discernment for the Church
 
Discernment begins with theology: the church must remember that worship is the currency of the soul and that breath given to anything other than God is misspent. That means our first posture is spiritual sobriety—regular corporate lament, times of fasting and prayer that refuse the quick exhale, and preaching that names the difference between human expedience and covenantal justice. A people trained to weep and wait will not be easily seduced by pageantry; grief protects truth. Teach your congregation the Scriptures that warn against false peace—Matthew’s warnings about false Christs, Paul’s about lying wonders, the prophets’ condemnations of covenants bought in desperation—and make those texts the church’s first interpretive lens rather than the last resort after the cameras have blessed a deal.
 
Discernment also requires institutional muscle. Test every proposed “peace” by hard, measurable criteria: does this agreement include enforceable protections for the vulnerable; is there a truth-telling process and reparations where theft or atrocity occurred; are independent monitors and legal mechanisms in place to guarantee compliance; and who materially benefits from the timing and optics of the ceremony? Refuse to allow ceremonies to substitute for these instruments. When negotiators demand public adoration but cannot point to verifiable safeguards for victims, the church should refuse to acquiesce. Insist that memorials are paired with restitution, that anniversaries center survivors rather than politicians, and that any narrative of closure includes the hard work of accountability.
 
Discernment is communal action as much as spiritual posture. The church must be a sanctuary for victims and a civic engine for justice: fund legal representation, support truth commissions, create public memorials that preserve testimony, and build local networks of care that do not rely on televised settlements for legitimacy. Train elders and leaders to read the politics of spectacle—recognitions, coordinated sanctions, “historic” votes—and to speak publicly when those moves amount to whitewashing. The prophetic voice must be exercised not merely as denunciation but as construction: propose concrete alternatives to premature closure, model transparent reconciliation practices within your own congregations, and partner with trusted NGOs and human-rights actors to make the demand for justice operational.
 
Finally, keep worship pure by practicing refusal. Publicly withhold the church’s liturgical blessing from any political ritual that lacks repentance and restitution. Make withholding an act of love, not merely critique: explain to your people why you will not celebrate a photographed handclasp until victims have been heard, until reparations are underway, and until enforceable guarantees exist. Teach your people to give their breath as prayer—intercession, praise, steadfast witness—not as applause for men. In doing so the church becomes the remnant that denies the harvest, that interrupts the ritual economy of power, and that preserves a living testimony to the only covenant that truly heals: the blood of Christ and the justice it demands.
 
Part 10: The True Covenant
 
The story we’ve been tracking — signs, rehearsals, staged settlements, and the siphoning of the world’s breath — finally points us back to one question: what is the real alternative to the false altar? The Bible gives that answer in the language of covenant. A human treaty promises order and borders; a divine covenant promises new life and restored justice. The true covenant is not ink on paper that buys temporary calm; it is a blood-sealed promise that remakes the soul and reorders society. Christ’s covenant is the only real remedy for the theft of breath because it returns life to its rightful Owner, demands repentance where wrongs have been done, and calls for a justice that cannot be bought as a photo op. Hebrews urges us that Jesus is the mediator of a better covenant, founded on better promises; Jesus does not trick the nations with spectacle — He summons them to humble confession, to mercy, and to faithful restitution.
 
Practically, the true covenant shows up as a rhythm of repentance, repair, and worship that orients the heart before it ever signs a document. Repentance turns the gaze inward and requires those who hold power to confess theft and make amends. Repair is not rhetorical; it is measurable — restitution, reparations, legal safeguards, truth-telling processes, and protection for the vulnerable. Worship is the final test: where does the people’s breath ascend? If our prayers, our songs, and our daily loyalties lift God’s name and press for justice, then the covenant is alive; if our applause is reserved for negotiators and institutions that barter away the weak, then we have traded down. The true covenant insists that reconciliation with God and neighbor precedes political closure, not the other way around.
 
For the church this means a reconstitution of practice. The sacraments, rightly lived, are not mere rites but instruments that renew the body and bind the community to the divine economy of grace and justice. Corporate lament must be a practiced discipline so that grief is honored and cannot be swallowed by spectacle. Public memorials must center survivors and require transparent steps toward remedy. Congregations should organize legal and practical support for victims, insist on independent monitoring of any settlement, and withhold liturgical blessing from staged ceremonies that lack repentance and enforceable justice. This is not obstructionism but stewardship: the church is called to guard the breath of the people and to refuse the commodification of worship.
 
Hope is not naïve. It recognizes the mockeries and the snares but refuses despair because the covenant that binds us is stronger than the oldest tricks of the watchers. Christ’s cross exposes every false altar for what it is and inaugurates a different economy: one that costs the Redeemer Himself and therefore demands costly discipleship from us. Our task now — pastoral, prophetic, and practical — is to keep vigil, to teach the distinction between temporary fixes and covenant life, to embody reparative justice in our communities, and to train our people to pour their breath upward in prayer rather than outward in applause. Refuse the false altar. Tend the wounded. Speak truth publicly. Fast and pray privately. Worship only the One who gave you breath. In that fidelity there is life, and in that life the real peace — the shalom that justice and mercy together produce — will finally have its witness in the world.
 
Conclusion
 
What we have traced together is not merely a pattern of dates and headlines but a spiritual choreography: signs ritualized, shocks rehearsed, and theatrical solutions offered at moments when the world is most ready to surrender its breath. That surrender is never neutral. Genesis tells us that breath is God’s gift (Genesis 2:7); when nations exhale into treaties, ceremonies, and photo-ops that demand adoration, that breath is being redirected away from its rightful Owner. The prophets and the apostles warned us about this very strategy — false signs, lying wonders, and covenants that look like peace but carry the smell of death (Isaiah 28; Matthew 24; 2 Thessalonians 2). Reading current events through those lenses, and with the additional witness of the Ethiopian canon (Enoch, Jubilees, Kebra Nagast), gives us sharper categories to name the theft and resist it.
 
The practical verdict is simple: do not let spectacle stand where justice belongs. When the world offers a photographed peace, ask hard, verifiable questions about restitution, protection, and accountability. Let memorials be instruments of truth-telling rather than theatrical closures. Teach your people to practice corporate lament and fasting so grief is honored and cannot be swallowed by pageantry. Organize concrete aid and legal support for survivors so that the church’s response is more than critique — it is repair. Withhold liturgical blessing from political rituals that lack repentance and enforceable measures for the vulnerable, not as petty obstruction but as pastoral stewardship of the people’s breath.
 
Spiritually, remain a people of discernment and worship. Train your congregation to give breath back to God through prayer, praise, and obedience rather than pouring it out as applause for negotiators or institutions. Keep Scripture central: test every promised peace by its fruit, and refuse any altar that demands the surrender of conscience. Remember that the true covenant is a covenant of blood and justice, mediated by Christ (Hebrews), and that only He can restore life without cheapening it.
 
Finally, refuse despair. The mockeries we name are real and grievous, but they are not undefeatable. The cross exposes every counterfeit altar and calls a people to costly faithfulness. If we refuse the harvest the enemy seeks, if we keep lament and insist on repair, we interrupt the ritual economy that seeks our breath. That refusal is itself a prophetic act: it protects the vulnerable, preserves testimony, and witnesses to a different kind of peace — the shalom that is born of justice and mercy together.
 
Bibliography
 
Primary Scripture (translations cited here):
Genesis 2:7; Matthew 24; 2 Thessalonians 2; Revelation 12–13 (ESV / KJV / standard translations available online). Bible Gateway+3Bible Gateway+3Bible Gateway+3
Ethiopian canon / apocrypha (translations & editions):
Knibb, Michael A., The Ethiopic Book of Enoch: A New Edition in the Light of the Aramaic Dead Sea Fragments(Oxford, 1978). Internet Archive+1
Charles, R. H., The Book of Jubilees (translation, early 20th c.; many reprints/online editions). Internet Archive+1
Budge, E. A. Wallis, The Kebra Nagast (English translation; standard older edition). Internet Archive+1
History / case studies on treaties & consequences:
MacMillan, Margaret, Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World (on Versailles and its consequences). BNK
Primary source: Declaration of Principles (Oslo Accords), 1993 — U.S. Department of State / UN text of the Oslo agreements. State Department Archive+1
Contemporary events / timeline sources:
October 7, 2023 attacks and aftermath — CSIS explainer and Congressional Research Service background (useful, citable overviews). CSIS+1
May 2021 Israel–Gaza crisis (11-day flare) — BBC / consolidated timelines and reporting. Wikipedia
Ritual, spectacle, and media:
Debord, Guy, The Society of the Spectacle (classic critique of images/spectacle). Marxists
Herman, Edward S., & Noam Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media (media & consent). Riseup
Turner, Victor, The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure; Bell, Catherine, Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions (key ritual studies texts on liminality, ritual performance). Taylor & Francis+1
Astronomy & the 2017 “Revelation 12” conversation:
Phil Plait (Bad Astronomy / Syfy) — critical take on the social/media hype about Sep 23, 2017. SYFY
Vatican Observatory / astronomers’ explanations of the sky configuration and how it was framed as a “sign.” Vatican Observatory
Science / example anchor (useful for symbolic-date history):
Neptune discovery (Le Verrier prediction / Galle observation, Sept 23–24, 1846) — NASA / historical accounts. NASA+1
 
Endnotes
On “Revelation-12 / Sept 23, 2017” as a public ritual anchor: contemporary media and astronomy writers documented how the sky alignment was framed by some as the Revelation-12 sign, and astronomers and skeptical commentators explained why the claim became a social signal rather than a straightforward astronomical prophecy. See Phil Plait’s critical piece and the Vatican Observatory explanation. SYFY+1
Why Sept 23 matters in popular timelines: Sept 23 has multiple historical echoes (e.g., Neptune’s observation 1846), which contributes to its symbolic resonance — historians and science writers note the Neptune observation occurred on/around Sept 23, 1846. Use as an exemplar of how dates accrete symbolic weight. NASA+1
Biblical texts invoked repeatedly in the script: core citations used for theological claims: Genesis 2:7 on breath-of-life; Matthew 24 on false Christs and false prophets; 2 Thessalonians 2 on lying wonders; Revelation 13 on mimicry of the Lamb. (Use your preferred translation for on-air reading.) Bible Gateway+3Bible Gateway+3Bible Gateway+3
Ethiopian canon as a distinct witness: scholarship and translated editions of Enoch, Jubilees and the Kebra Nagast show the additional ancient material you referenced. See Michael Knibb’s edition of Ethiopic Enoch, R. H. Charles on Jubilees, and E. A. W. Budge’s Kebra Nagast translation for primary read-throughs and scholarly apparatus. Internet Archive+2Internet Archive+2
The “watchers” and corrupting cycles (Enoch / Jubilees): textual overviews and translations demonstrate the watchers theme and Jubilees’ emphasis on counted jubilees and cycles. See the Jubilees text and scholarly notes. Pseudepigrapha+1
Versailles as a vivid historical example of ritualized treaty consequences: for the claim that spectacle at Versailles produced political outcomes that later fed a deeper catastrophe, consult Margaret MacMillan’s Paris 1919and contemporaneous primary source collections. BNK
Oslo Accords as a ritualized peace moment: the primary text of the Declaration of Principles and UN submissions are the direct sources for the 1993 Oslo choreography and its public theatrical framing. State Department Archive+1
Modern conflict timeline — 2021 flare and Oct 7, 2023 eruption: for the brief 11-day May 2021 Israel–Gaza flare and the October 7, 2023 attacks (and their role as puncta in the recent decade), use consolidated reporting/timelines from BBC / CSIS / CRS and major outlets for verification and chronology. Wikipedia+2CSIS+2
Media amplification and “manufactured consent”: the theoretical backbone for the argument that media and spectacle shape mass uptake includes Debord’s Society of the Spectacle and Herman & Chomsky’s Manufacturing Consent (propaganda model). These help justify claims about repeated replay, montage, and the conversion of image into legitimacy. Marxists+1
Ritual theory for reading treaties-as-liturgies: Victor Turner and Catherine Bell (and similar ritual theorists) provide the anthropological vocabulary used in the script (liminality, ritual formation, performance). If you want a short hand-quote to read on air, Turner’s concepts of liminality/communitas are concise and evocative. Taylor & Francis+1
Why anniversaries and coordinated recognitions matter: see the Oslo and Versailles examples plus modern diplomatic choreography (UN sessions, joint recognitions) that act as synchronized ritual moments; primary UN / State Dept texts are linked above for citation. United Nations+1
On the “harvest of breath” as metaphor grounded in Genesis: Genesis 2:7 is the explicit biblical basis for breath as divine gift — use this verse when reading the theological claim about breath being the proper currency of worship. Bible Gateway
On “lying wonders” and deceptive signs in Scripture: 2 Thessalonians 2:9 and Matthew 24:24 supply the language you used about lying wonders and false Christs; cite these when you want listeners to hear the biblical warning. Bible Gateway+1
On modern claims that dates are ‘countdowns’ — skeptic and explanatory coverage: journalists and scientists explained the social mechanisms at work in popularizing countdowns (e.g., 2017 hype), see Phil Plait and other critical commentators. SYFY+1
Neptune / historical date resonance (example of date-symbolism, not causal link): the 1846 observation by Galle following Le Verrier’s prediction is an illustration of an important historic date falling on Sept 23 — included as an example of why people attach meaning to dates. See NASA / Wired historical notes. NASA+1
On practical demands for enforceable safeguards (truth commissions / monitors / reparations): for models of truth commissions and reparative mechanisms, look to UN/OHCHR practice papers and the historical literature on transitional justice (this is a bibliographic pointer — I can pull specific UN guidance if you want). (If you want those documents now I can fetch them.) United Nations
On the role of photo-ops and media montage in sanctifying treaties: see Debord and modern media studies (Manufacturing Consent) for the theory; for practical examples look at contemporary reporting on Oslo, Versailles retrospectives, and how modern UN/Vatican/major-power platforms are used as stage. Marxists+2Riseup+2
Further reading / quick recommended list (if you need a one-page handout):
Genesis; Matthew 24; 2 Thess 2; Rev 12–13 (Bible). Bible Gateway+3Bible Gateway+3Bible Gateway+3
M. Knibb, The Ethiopic Book of Enoch (1978). Internet Archive
R. H. Charles, Jubilees (translation). Internet Archive
E. A. W. Budge, Kebra Nagast. Internet Archive
Margaret MacMillan, Paris 1919. BNK
Guy Debord, Society of the Spectacle; Herman & Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent.
 
Synopsis: In this episode, “The Mock Tribulation: Rehearsals, Rituals, and the World’s Exhale,” we trace a deliberate choreography: a 2017 marker ritualized into a prophetic timetable, 2021 and 2023 as successive rehearsals of tribulation, and modern diplomacy presented as theatrical peace that harvests the world’s exhausted breath. Drawing on Scripture, the Ethiopian canon, historical case studies, and media theory, the episode argues that treaties and photo-ops can function as false altars—siphoning worship and legitimizing power without repentance or restitution—and issues a pastoral call to refuse the quick exhale, demand enforceable justice, practice corporate lament, and keep our worship for the true covenant in Christ.
 
Hashtags: #TheMockTribulation #BreathStolen #RefuseTheExhale #FalseAltar #RitualOfPeace #Revelation12 #EthiopianCanon #LamentAndJustice #KeepYourBreath #PeaceTheatre #CounterfeitPeace #PropheticWatch

Saturday Sep 20, 2025

Stolen Breath: Propaganda, Fear, and the Fight for Truth
 
Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6z8sga-stolen-breath-propaganda-fear-and-the-fight-for-truth.html
 
Monologue
 
Tonight, we speak about the theft of breath. Not through bullets or blades, but through headlines and broadcasts. For generations, rulers have known that if you can keep a people afraid, you can keep them docile, compliant, and divided. Propaganda is not merely the art of persuasion—it is the art of suffocation. It starves the lungs of calm, it keeps the heart racing, it makes the soul believe it is under constant threat. And when the breath is stolen, faith weakens, reason collapses, and men forget that they were made in the image of God.
 
Science itself bears witness to this theft. When fear grips us, the body shifts into shallow, rapid breathing. Cortisol surges. The memory clings to shadows more than light. Repetition of alarm rewires the nervous system until even the sound of a news alert makes us tense. Our book Breath War called this out long before the studies caught up—what propaganda steals first is not the ballot or the battlefield, but the breath itself. For when a man cannot breathe freely, he cannot think freely, and when he cannot think freely, he cannot act freely.
 
The media empires know this. They lace their stories with words designed to spike the pulse—“surge,” “crisis,” “plague,” “chaos.” They frame every event in a way that nudges us toward dread, despair, or division. They know that you will click what you fear. They know that you will share what makes your stomach turn. Fear is currency in the kingdom of this world. And yet Scripture tells us plainly: “God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power, of love, and of a sound mind.”
 
So how do we see through it? First, we slow down. We strip the story to its bones. Remove the adjectives and the panic words, and ask: what is the actual claim? Who is speaking, and who is silent? Cross-check the same event from voices that hate each other, and you will find the grain of truth lying between them. And above all, breathe. Remember that every breath is on loan from God, not from CNN or Fox, not from the algorithms of Silicon Valley. To breathe deeply in the midst of propaganda is itself an act of rebellion, a declaration that fear does not own you.
 
Tonight, we will dissect the machine. We will expose its wordplay, its omissions, its programming. We will show you the code behind the curtain, and we will arm you with the tools to resist. But more than that, we will remind you of the breath that cannot be stolen—the breath of God that hovered over the waters in Genesis, that filled the disciples at Pentecost, and that Christ still breathes into His people today. Propaganda may choke, but it cannot conquer. For the One who gave us breath also gave us truth, and His truth sets us free.
 
Part 1 – The Science of Fear and Breath for Stolen Breath: Propaganda, Fear, and the Fight for Truth
 
When propaganda speaks, the body listens—whether you want it to or not. Scientists have proven what our book Breath War described: when the mind is saturated with messages of danger, the body shifts into survival mode. Heart rate climbs. Muscles tighten. Breathing becomes shallow and rapid, the kind of breath that belongs to prey, not to free men and women. The body is tricked into believing it is cornered, even when the threat exists only on a glowing screen.
 
Neuroscience tells us that constant exposure to fear-laden media reshapes the pathways of the brain. The amygdala, that small almond-shaped cluster deep inside, becomes hyperactive. Cortisol and adrenaline flood the system. Memory becomes biased toward the negative, making us recall the disasters far more than the quiet mercies of daily life. This is why after a week of headlines, you feel drained, hopeless, short of breath—because your nervous system has been programmed into a loop of vigilance and despair.
 
Medical research shows that breathing itself is both the signal and the lever. Anxious breathing—fast, shallow, chest-based—tells the brain there is no safety, no rest. That, in turn, keeps the body locked in fight-or-flight, even if you are just sitting in your living room with the television on. And the longer the cycle continues, the more natural it feels. Fear becomes the baseline. Calm feels foreign. This is not an accident—it is design. Propaganda keeps you in this breathless state because it makes you easier to guide, easier to sell, easier to divide.
 
But there is another way. Just as shallow breath deepens fear, deliberate breath restores calm. Slow, steady inhalations through the diaphragm shift the nervous system from fight-or-flight to rest-and-restore. It is no coincidence that Scripture so often ties breath to Spirit. In Genesis, God breathes life into Adam. In John 20, Jesus breathes on His disciples and says, “Receive the Holy Spirit.” Breath is not just biology—it is a sacred exchange. Propaganda steals it, but God restores it.
 
In this first segment, we lay down the evidence: propaganda works not by convincing the mind with reason, but by hijacking the body through breath. To resist, you must not only see the lie—you must also reclaim the breath. For whoever controls the breath controls the soul’s posture, and only God has that rightful claim.
 
Part 2 – The Propaganda Machine for Stolen Breath: Propaganda, Fear, and the Fight for Truth
 
Propaganda is not random, nor is it simply the result of bad journalism or sloppy reporting. It is a machine, built with precision, powered by money, and maintained by those who benefit from keeping the people anxious. The machine has five gears, and each one turns the news toward fear.
 
The first gear is ownership. Media is not free; it belongs to conglomerates, billionaires, and financiers. Their interests are not your peace, but their profit. If calmness does not sell, then calmness does not air. Crisis drives numbers; numbers drive revenue. So the very structure of media rewards panic.
 
The second gear is advertising. News outlets are not funded by subscriptions alone—they are fueled by corporations that want your eyes locked to the screen. Fearful people watch longer, click more, and check constantly. Every frightened breath is another second of ad revenue. Fear is not just a byproduct; it is the product.
 
The third gear is sourcing. Most stories do not come from the investigative grit of journalists, but from government agencies, press releases, and corporate spokesmen. These official voices provide the raw material, and the media packages it for the public. If the source is already steeped in political or corporate interest, then the narrative is born compromised. The people think they are hearing truth, but they are hearing curated fragments.
 
The fourth gear is flak. When a journalist strays too far from the script, they are attacked, discredited, or silenced. Governments pressure, advertisers pull funding, lobbyists threaten access. This keeps the herd in line. Few dare to resist.
 
The fifth gear is ideology. In the Cold War it was anti-communism. Today it is a blend of security, progress, and global unity. Fear is always tied to an ideology that justifies more control. Terrorism, pandemics, climate catastrophe—the themes shift, but the method remains. The machine tells you the world is falling apart, and then it offers you its ideology as the only salvation.
 
This is the propaganda machine as described by scholars, but it is also the beast described by prophets: a system that feeds on fear and demands worship through obedience. And like every beast, it is not satisfied with half your heart—it wants your whole breath.
 
Part 3 – How Fear Sells for Stolen Breath: Propaganda, Fear, and the Fight for Truth
 
Fear is the oldest currency in human history. Before men traded gold or silver, they traded in the language of dread—threats of enemies, storms, and curses. Modern media has refined this into an industry. Fear sells because fear sticks. A calm headline drifts past the eye, but a fearful headline hooks into the chest.
 
The science of attention confirms this. The human brain is wired to give priority to danger. Psychologists call it the “negativity bias.” If ten things happen in a day, and one of them is frightening, that is the one your mind replays. Advertisers and media companies exploit this instinct, because every fearful replay is another page view, another broadcast, another dollar.
 
So the headlines are sculpted accordingly. You rarely read “Cases reported.” Instead you read “Cases surge.” You rarely hear “Market shifts.” Instead it is “Market collapses.” Every verb is sharpened, every adjective intensified. The goal is not information—it is retention. You are meant to feel, not to think.
 
Then come the algorithms. Social media platforms feed on engagement, and nothing engages like outrage and fear. Studies show that high-arousal content—especially negative emotions—spreads faster and farther than calm reporting. Fear multiplies. Panic trends. Entire nations can be steered by a single keyword storm. And when people are afraid, they are more likely to share the very content that frightened them, multiplying the effect like a contagion.
 
This is why, when you scroll, you feel your breath shortening. It is not an accident—it is the architecture of the system. Fear is not a side effect of the news; it is the business model. The industry thrives on the stolen breath of its audience, keeping lungs shallow and hearts restless, because anxious people do not unplug.
 
And yet, Scripture reminds us, “Perfect love casts out fear.” What the media peddles as crisis, Christ answers with peace. But to reach that peace, you must first recognize the transaction taking place: every time you give your breath to fear, you are paying into someone else’s profit.
 
Part 4 – Wordplay and Framing for Stolen Breath: Propaganda, Fear, and the Fight for Truth
 
Words are not neutral. They are weapons, and in the hands of propagandists they become sharper than swords. A single phrase can turn a fact into a crisis, and a simple report into a national panic. This is the craft of framing—the subtle art of shaping perception without ever telling an outright lie.
 
Consider the difference between “protesters gathered” and “angry mob swarmed.” Both may describe the same scene, but one frames it as civic action and the other as imminent chaos. Or take “cases reported” versus “cases surge.” The numbers are identical, but the second headline drives the breath from your chest, planting the seed that things are spinning out of control.
 
This is why propaganda rarely needs to fabricate whole cloth. It thrives on selection and exaggeration. By amplifying certain words, repeating them across outlets, and embedding them in every headline, the machine creates an echo that feels like reality itself. When you hear “pandemic surge,” “unprecedented crisis,” or “worst ever,” the words lodge in your body before your mind has time to verify them. You begin to breathe as if the danger were already in the room.
 
Another weapon of wordplay is repetition. The same phrase, hammered again and again, becomes truth through familiarity. Psychologists call it the “illusory truth effect.” Say it enough, and the mind stops questioning. This is why slogans work. This is why every news cycle feels like déjà vu. The repetition is designed to wear you down until resistance feels pointless.
 
And then comes omission. The frame is not just what is said, but what is left unsaid. When context is stripped, when contrary voices are ignored, when facts that would calm are buried, the narrative tilts. The silence itself screams. You are not being shown reality—you are being shown a curated corner of it, carefully arranged to provoke.
 
This is the spell of wordplay and framing. It does not demand your agreement; it demands your reaction. It wants your pulse, your breath, your panic. And unless you learn to strip words down to their bare claim, you will remain trapped in the theater they stage for you.
 
But the Bible teaches us to test every word. “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God.” In the same way, test every headline. Ask: what is the claim once the adjectives fall away? Who benefits from the framing? Only then can you begin to breathe freely again.
 
Part 5 – Omission as Propaganda for Stolen Breath: Propaganda, Fear, and the Fight for Truth
 
Propaganda is not only in what is spoken, but in what is silenced. Sometimes the most powerful lie is the truth that never makes it to print. The machine thrives not just on fiery headlines but on careful omissions that sculpt the story into the shape desired by those in power.
 
When you watch the news, ask: who is quoted, and who is missing? You may hear government officials, corporate spokesmen, or hand-picked experts, but rarely the voices of ordinary people most affected by the events. Their absence is no accident. Silence shapes perception as effectively as speech. If the voice that would soften fear or expose corruption is not heard, the picture remains tilted.
 
History offers many examples. Wars have been sold to the public by broadcasting only the voices of generals and politicians, while silencing the mothers who buried their sons. Economic policies are praised with statistics, but the factory worker or the small business owner is quietly omitted. Pandemics are described with numbers, but stories of survival and resilience rarely see the light of day. By omission, the narrative paints the world darker than it is, breeding despair, not balance.
 
This is why entire populations can be made to believe a crisis is insurmountable. The truth may be that victories are happening quietly, that communities are rebuilding, that healing is underway—but when those truths are silenced, the air you breathe is heavy with dread. Propaganda does not need to invent new horrors; it simply withholds the hope.
 
Scripture warns us of this tactic. In the days of the prophets, kings silenced truth-tellers while surrounding themselves with voices that only echoed fear or flattery. Jeremiah cried out against such omission, declaring, “They have healed the wound of my people lightly, saying, ‘Peace, peace,’ when there is no peace.” Today, the omission runs in reverse—they say, “Chaos, chaos,” when there is also quiet faith, quiet strength, quiet victories that God is still bringing forth.
 
So we must learn to listen for silence. Ask not only, “What am I hearing?” but “What am I not hearing?” For often the breath stolen is not by the scream of terror, but by the muting of truth that would have calmed you. To resist propaganda, you must train your spirit to notice the absence as much as the noise.
 
Part 6 – Scientific Proof of Manipulation for Stolen Breath: Propaganda, Fear, and the Fight for Truth
 
The prophets warned us that the enemy would work through deception, but today even science testifies to the same reality: fear is not just an emotion, it is a programmable state. When the news cycle drowns us in panic, the body, the brain, and the breath all bend beneath its weight.
 
Researchers have shown that repeated exposure to alarming media coverage alters the body’s stress response. The amygdala—the brain’s alarm bell—fires constantly when fed a diet of dread. Cortisol, the stress hormone, pours into the bloodstream, leaving people restless, irritable, and unable to think clearly. Memory becomes biased toward the negative. When you recall yesterday, you don’t remember the good meal with your family or the small blessing God gave—you remember the headline that screamed “crisis.” This is not an accident. It is programming, reinforced by repetition.
 
Studies on breathing reveal the same story. Fear-driven media triggers shallow, chest-based breathing, the same pattern seen in panic attacks. That pattern then tells the brain, “you are in danger,” even when you are safe at home. The cycle feeds itself: news fuels shallow breath, shallow breath fuels anxiety, anxiety drives you back to the news, desperate for reassurance that never comes. In Breath War, we named this loop the theft of God’s breath—it is the very spirit of manipulation written into physiology.
 
Clinical evidence also ties media-induced despair to mental health collapse. After weeks of crisis reporting, people report higher rates of depression, insomnia, and hopelessness. Psychologists now speak openly of “headline stress disorder.” The symptoms are real, measurable, and widespread. Entire nations are being held in a chokehold of the nervous system.
 
And then there is decision-making. When fear is heightened, the prefrontal cortex—the part of the brain responsible for logic and discernment—dims. People make impulsive choices, accept restrictions they would normally resist, and surrender freedoms for the promise of safety. This is why leaders lean on propaganda in times of upheaval. It is not about informing—it is about manipulating physiology to secure compliance.
 
This is the scientific witness: propaganda works not through reasoned persuasion, but through hijacking biology. It steals the breath, it clouds the mind, it bends the will. Scripture already revealed this when it said the enemy comes “to steal, to kill, and to destroy.” Now research echoes the same truth in the language of neurons, hormones, and lungs.
 
Part 7 – Programming Demonstrations for Stolen Breath: Propaganda, Fear, and the Fight for Truth
 
The propaganda machine hides behind sophistication, but its fingerprints are simple. With only a handful of tools, anyone can peel back the curtain and see how fear is stitched into the story. Tonight, we reveal three demonstrations that make the invisible visible, so that every listener can recognize propaganda on sight.
 
The first demonstration is the fear-word counter. Every article carries certain “hot words”—panic, surge, crisis, catastrophic, deadly, unprecedented. By scanning for these terms, you can measure the level of emotional manipulation in a story. A factual report will use clear verbs and neutral language; propaganda will lean heavy on words meant to squeeze the lungs. Imagine pasting a headline into a simple program and watching the fear words light up in red. Suddenly the spell is broken. You see that your fear was not born of facts, but of vocabulary.
 
The second demonstration is the source map. Most articles rely on only a few voices—usually government agencies, corporate spokesmen, or partisan think tanks. When the same source is repeated line after line, the illusion of consensus is created. But in truth, it is one voice echoed across a chamber of mirrors. By running a source check, the article is stripped down to its authorities. If ninety percent of the story traces back to a single agency, then you know you are not hearing a broad witness, but a single narrative dressed as many.
 
The third demonstration is the claim check. Propaganda thrives on implication and unverified assertion. With simple cross-referencing, you can take the central claim of an article and compare it against primary sources—official transcripts, raw data, or fact-checking archives. More often than not, the frightening headline turns out to be a distortion of something far less dire. In this way, the veil is lifted, and the truth stands quietly behind the noise.
 
None of these tools are complicated. They can be coded in a few lines or even practiced manually with pen and paper. The point is not to create machines that do the thinking for us, but to awaken eyes that see. Propaganda feeds on unawareness; awareness starves it. When the fearful words glow, when the sources shrink, when the claims wobble under scrutiny, the power of the broadcast evaporates.
 
In Breath War we warned that propaganda steals breath through invisibility—it slides past unnoticed until you are already suffocating. These demonstrations restore sight, and with sight comes breath. For when you can see the gears, you are no longer trapped in the machine.
 
Part 8 – Case Studies in News Headlines for Stolen Breath: Propaganda, Fear, and the Fight for Truth
 
It is one thing to speak about propaganda in theory, but it is another to feel it in your own body. Tonight, we take real headlines and peel them apart, exposing the machinery beneath. As we do, notice your breath. Notice how your chest reacts to words meant to alarm, and how it relaxes when the noise is stripped away.
 
Consider this headline: “Hospitals Overrun as Deadly Virus Surges Out of Control.” At first reading, it sounds apocalyptic. The words “overrun,” “deadly,” “surges,” “out of control” all squeeze the breath. But remove the fear words, and what remains is this: “Hospitals report increase in patients due to virus.” The fact is still serious, but the panic is gone. Your breath steadies. Truth remains, but terror evaporates.
 
Or this one: “Markets Collapse Amid Global Chaos.” Again, the language crushes the chest—“collapse,” “chaos.” Yet the stripped version is simple: “Markets fell 3% following international uncertainty.” The data is the same. The frame is entirely different. One headline makes you gasp, the other makes you think.
 
Finally, look at omission. An article might thunder: “Record unemployment threatens millions.” It is true, but if you look for what is missing, you may find that job recovery in other sectors is quietly underway, or that government relief has lessened the blow. The omission tilts the picture, making it darker than reality. You are not lied to, but you are not told the whole truth either.
 
This is how propaganda breathes down our necks daily. The facts are rarely false; the framing is weaponized. When we strip away the loaded words and the silence, we find a reality that is challenging, but not suffocating. And once the fear is gone, we are free to respond with reason and faith, not with panic.
 
In this practice, we reclaim the sacred rhythm of breath. We stop gasping at headlines and start breathing with clarity. And as Jesus said, “You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.” The truth is not only in the data—it is in the freedom to read without fear.
 
Part 9 – Spiritual Resistance for Stolen Breath: Propaganda, Fear, and the Fight for Truth
 
The battle against propaganda is not only intellectual—it is spiritual. For fear is more than a tactic; it is a spirit. And Scripture tells us plainly: “God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.” If fear is not from God, then it is from the enemy, and resisting it is an act of faith as much as discernment.
 
The Word of God anchors us where headlines cannot. Psalm 46 declares, “Though the earth give way, though the mountains fall into the heart of the sea, we will not fear.” This is not denial of trouble; it is the declaration that God remains present in the storm. Propaganda thrives by convincing us that chaos is ultimate, but the Bible reminds us that Christ is Lord over chaos. He walked upon the waves, He calmed the storm, and He still whispers, “Peace, be still.”
 
Prayer is resistance. Every time you stop to breathe the name of Jesus, you interrupt the cycle of fear. The media wants your pulse to quicken and your breath to shorten; prayer slows the rhythm and resets the soul. Breath prayers—short phrases whispered on inhale and exhale—have been practiced since the desert fathers. On the inhale: “The Lord is my shepherd.” On the exhale: “I shall not want.” In that moment, you reclaim what the enemy tried to steal.
 
Community is resistance. Propaganda isolates by making each person believe the danger is everywhere and no one can be trusted. But gathering in the body of Christ restores perspective. In fellowship, we hear testimonies of God’s faithfulness, see evidence of His provision, and remind one another that we are not alone.
 
Finally, truth itself is resistance. Jesus said, “Sanctify them by the truth; Your word is truth.” To dwell in Scripture daily is to armor the mind against manipulation. When fear words strike, the Word of God answers louder. Where the media says, “collapse,” God says, “My kingdom shall not be shaken.” Where headlines declare, “out of control,” the Spirit reminds, “The Lord reigns forever.”
 
This is the essence of spiritual resistance: prayerful breath, scriptural truth, and communal witness. It does not deny the storm, but it refuses to give the storm your breath. Fear may knock, but faith answers the door.
 
Part 10 – Tools for Daily Discernment for Stolen Breath: Propaganda, Fear, and the Fight for Truth
 
It is one thing to understand propaganda in theory, and another to resist it day by day. The war for your breath is fought not only in the newsroom, but in the quiet moments when you pick up your phone, turn on the television, or scroll through your feed. To stand, you need weapons of discernment you can carry into every encounter with the news.
 
The first tool is word stripping. Before reacting to a headline, remove every adjective and dramatic verb. Replace “crisis,” “surge,” “catastrophic,” with neutral terms. What remains is the fact. You will often find the story is far less dire than the frame suggests.
The second tool is the silence check. Ask: who is not being quoted? What voices are absent? Often the story is tilted by omission, and naming the silence restores balance. This habit keeps you from swallowing a half-truth as the whole.
 
The third tool is cross-viewing. Compare how opposing outlets report the same event. Truth often shines where their stories overlap, while the partisan slants cancel each other out. This practice guards against being discipled by only one narrative.
The fourth tool is breath awareness. Notice your body as you read. If your chest tightens, if your breath shortens, pause. Step away, pray, and take slow, steady breaths before continuing. This is not weakness—it is reclaiming control of the temple God gave you.
 
The fifth tool is time-limiting. Endless scrolling feeds endless fear. Set boundaries. Choose when and how long you will expose yourself to the news. A people who pace their intake are harder to manipulate than a people chained to the cycle of panic.
 
And above all, the final tool is Scripture. Each time you consume news, balance it with the Word. Let the last voice you hear each day not be the anchor at the desk, but the Shepherd of your soul. Let the final word over your life not be “chaos” or “collapse,” but “peace I leave with you; My peace I give to you.”
 
With these tools, every believer can step into the news cycle without being enslaved by it. Discernment is not reserved for prophets or scholars—it is the inheritance of every child of God who walks in His Spirit. Propaganda may roar, but the quiet breath of the faithful can silence its grip.
 
Conclusion for Stolen Breath: Propaganda, Fear, and the Fight for Truth
 
We have walked through the anatomy of propaganda—the science of fear, the gears of the machine, the wordplay, the omissions, and the very physiology of breath. We have seen how headlines are engineered to shorten our breath, cloud our judgment, and bend our will. And we have seen how Breath War spoke prophetically of this theft long before the studies confirmed it: propaganda is not just lies—it is suffocation. It is the slow robbery of the Spirit’s rhythm within us.
 
But we have also uncovered the counterforce: truth. The breath of God that cannot be stolen. From Genesis to Pentecost, Scripture reveals that breath is life, and life belongs to Him. No machine, no algorithm, no government broadcast has the authority to sever the lifeline God Himself has placed in you. The enemy may stir fear, but Christ still breathes peace. The media may shout “collapse,” but the Kingdom is unshaken.
 
So tonight, the call is simple: reclaim your breath. Refuse to gasp when the world demands it. Strip away the loaded words. Seek the silenced voices. Cross-check, pause, pray. Breathe in the Word of God and exhale the panic of this age. For in that rhythm, you defy the machine.
 
And remember this: the war for breath is not won on screens or in studios, but in the temple of your own body. Each time you choose faith over fear, truth over panic, Christ over chaos, you declare to the powers of this world that they do not own you. The breath in your lungs belongs to the One who gave it, and He alone is Lord.
 
So let the headlines rage. Let the machine churn. We will not suffocate under its weight. We will breathe freely in the Spirit, and in that breath, we will find truth, strength, and victory.
 
Bibliography
 
Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon Books, 1988.
Isildak, Muratcan. “The Pentagon Pizza Index as a Case Study in Low-Tech OSINT.” Modern Diplomacy, July 23, 2025.
McNaughton-Cassill, Mary E. “The Effects of Negative News on Stress and Mood.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 78, no. 3 (2001): 515–528.
Nabi, Robin L. “The Theoretical and Practical Utility of the Extended Parallel Process Model: A Critical Review.” Health Communication 13, no. 2 (2001): 239–255.
Soroka, Stuart N., Patrick Fournier, and Lilach Nir. “Cross-National Evidence of a Negativity Bias in Psychophysiological Reactions to News.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, no. 38 (2019): 18888–18892.
Vosoughi, Soroush, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. “The Spread of True and False News Online.” Science 359, no. 6380 (2018): 1146–1151.
World Health Organization. Mental Health and COVID-19: Early Evidence of the Pandemic’s Impact. Geneva: WHO, 2022.
 
Scripture References
 
Genesis 2:7 – “The LORD God formed man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life.”
Psalm 46:2 – “Therefore we will not fear, though the earth gives way and the mountains fall into the heart of the sea.”
Jeremiah 6:14 – “They have healed the wound of my people lightly, saying, ‘Peace, peace,’ when there is no peace.”
John 20:22 – “And when He had said this, He breathed on them and said to them, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit.’”
2 Timothy 1:7 – “For God gave us not a spirit of fear but of power and love and self-control.”
1 John 4:18 – “There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear.”
John 14:27 – “Peace I leave with you; My peace I give to you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be afraid.”
John 8:32 – “Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
 
Endnotes
McNaughton-Cassill, “The Effects of Negative News on Stress and Mood,” shows direct links between repeated negative coverage and stress response.
Soroka et al., “Cross-National Evidence of a Negativity Bias,” demonstrates the brain’s bias toward fearful stimuli and its role in media retention.
Nabi, “Extended Parallel Process Model,” explains how fear appeals can manipulate both thought and behavior through heightened arousal.
Vosoughi et al., “The Spread of True and False News Online,” confirms that high-arousal, often fearful content spreads faster than calm reporting.
Herman and Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent, lays out the propaganda model—ownership, advertising, sourcing, flak, ideology—that still frames modern news.
WHO, Mental Health and COVID-19, documents measurable increases in anxiety, depression, and breath-related disorders linked to constant crisis reporting.
Scripture throughout consistently reveals breath as divine gift, fear as foreign spirit, and truth as liberator.
 
Synopsis:
The news doesn’t just inform—it steals your breath. In this episode of Cause Before Symptom, we expose how propaganda is designed to keep you in fear, using science, scripture, and simple techniques to strip the panic from the truth. From headlines engineered to shorten your breath, to algorithms that profit from your anxiety, we show you how the machine works—and how to break free. Learn how to spot the wordplay, hear the silences, and reclaim the breath that belongs to God alone. Fear is the weapon, but truth is the cure.
 
Teaser line for social:
“They don’t just want your mind—they want your breath. Tonight we expose the propaganda machine and show you how to breathe free again.”
 
#StolenBreath #PropagandaExposed #FearControl #FightForTruth #MindWars #PsychologicalOperations #MediaManipulation #TruthSeekers #BreakTheSpell #CauseBeforeSymptom

Saturday Sep 20, 2025

Who Built the New Nephilim? Homo borgensis, Gene-Editing, and the Cost of Ignored Doubt
 
Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6z7ffc-who-built-the-new-nephilim-homo-borgensis-gene-editing-and-the-cost-of-igno.html
 
Monologue: Homo Borgensis — The New Nephilim
 
Tonight we step into a shadow that is no longer the stuff of ancient myth, no longer relegated to the margins of prophecy or the whispers of conspiracy. The shadow has a name, a modern name — Homo borgensis. A name that sounds like it was born in a comic book, but it was born instead in the laboratory, at the crossroads of Pentagon contracts, DARPA roadmaps, and corporate patents. A name that means “the man of the machine, born again in a new genesis.”
 
For thousands of years, the story of the Nephilim has haunted our scriptures. “There were giants in the earth in those days,” the book of Genesis tells us, when the sons of God mingled with the daughters of men and produced something not quite human, not quite angel — a hybrid. In Noah’s day, it was flesh corrupted. Today, it may be code spliced into chromosomes, synthetic strands woven into the registry of life. Different methods, same result: a counterfeit creation, a challenge to the image of God written into our very being.
 
They will tell you it is impossible. They will tell you the science is settled. They will mock anyone who dares to suggest that gene-editing tools, synthetic chromosomes, or cDNA constructs could alter the essence of what we are. But history has always mocked the doubters — until time revealed the truth. The doctors once said thalidomide was safe. They said cigarettes were harmless. They said Vioxx would heal. They said radiation could cure what ailed you. And when the graves were filled, they shrugged and said, “Whoops.”
 
So I ask you, what arrogance drives a man to declare, with certainty, that the needle which delivers synthetic code into the temple of God’s creation could never alter that creation? What pride blinds an institution to think it can toy with the registry of life without consequence? Just because they say so, doesn’t mean they are right. And if history is any teacher, it means they are likely wrong.
 
Tonight, we will follow the paper trail — the contracts, the labs, the programs hidden under “defense” and “biosecurity.” We will read the documents where DARPA dreams aloud of inserting new chromosomes, where the Pentagon funds projects to rewire insects, pathogens, and yes, even mammalian genomes. And we will set those documents beside the Word of God, which tells us plainly: there is nothing new under the sun. The Nephilim of Noah’s day wore flesh and bone; the Nephilim of our day may wear patents and silicon.
 
This is not science fiction. This is not hysteria. This is the cold rhythm of history: men reaching for power they cannot control, building towers they cannot finish, and inviting judgments they cannot bear. Homo borgensis is the name the technocrats whisper, but I will give it another name — a new Nephilim. And the Bible tells us what became of them.
Stay with me.
 
Part 1 — Origins of the Name and the Fear
 
The name Homo borgensis is not ancient, but it borrows power from both science and myth. The word “homo” ties it to our human lineage — homo erectus, homo sapiens, homo sapiens sapiens. Every new branch in the tree of man has carried both promise and peril. And then comes “borgensis” — a grafted word. “Borg,” for assimilation, the collective of man and machine. And “genesis,” the act of beginning, of creation. Together it whispers: “the new man has been born, but not by God’s hand.”
 
Where did this language come from? Some trace it to sloppy anthropology — misreadings of heidelbergensis or antecessor. But in the last two decades, it has been pulled into transhumanist talk. Journalists, technocrats, even Pentagon scientists have quietly used the term as shorthand for what lies beyond us — the engineered human, part biological, part synthetic. DARPA calls their programs “Safe Genes,” “Insect Allies,” “Advanced Tools for Mammalian Genome Engineering.” It sounds sterile. But underneath, it is the same dream: to write a new species into the registry of life.
 
The fear around this name is not groundless. For centuries, the march of science has been tethered to the hope of control — control over disease, over fertility, over the environment, over death itself. And each time we take another step, we are told this is progress, this is salvation. But Homo borgensis embodies a darker kind of salvation — one born not of redemption but of reprogramming. A salvation where man becomes his own creator.
 
The ancients called them Nephilim. Today the technocrats call them hybrids, cyborgs, transhumans. Different language, same impulse. The drive to build something greater than man, but without God. The Bible told us plainly what happened in the days of Noah: “all flesh had corrupted its way upon the earth.” The corruption was not just moral, it was genetic, it was cosmic. God preserved Noah because his generations — his DNA — were still whole.
 
So when you hear the name Homo borgensis, don’t dismiss it as wordplay. It is a banner. A flag planted in advance by those who dream of remaking mankind. They whisper the name into the culture so that by the time the engineered child is born, the shock has already been softened. They want you ready to accept it.
 
And here is the warning: names have power. When elites name a thing, they often reveal more than they intend. To call it borgensis is to admit that assimilation is the endgame, that man and machine are being joined in a genesis not of heaven but of the laboratory. It is a counterfeit creation story. And if history holds true, it is also a warning of judgment to come.
 
Part 2 — The Real Programs: Contracts, Contractors, and Classified Lines
 
If you want to follow the money and the paper trail, you will find the story in contracts and solicitation titles, not in the theatrics of social feeds. There are whole budgets, named programs, and recurring contractors that give us a sober map of capability and intent. The Defense Threat Reduction Agency quietly funds a global Cooperative Biological Engagement Program that places laboratories and project work in nations where oversight is weaker, and it pays outside firms to run the science. Those firms — names like Battelle, Metabiota, CH2M Hill, Southern Research and Black & Veatch — appear again and again in public contract records, which means the work is real, continuous, and routinized. The programs are often couched in the language of partnership, “capacity building,” or disease surveillance, but the technical deliverables recorded in those contracts include genome sequencing, collection and cataloging of regional biomes, studies of vectors, and support for high-containment labs where advanced work can be done. That combination — money, contractors, and classified or restricted reporting — is how dual-use capability migrates from a research paper into an operational asset.
 
DARPA and related Defense science shops do the same thing at a different scale and with different branding. Public solicitations and program names — “Safe Genes,” “Insect Allies,” “Advanced Tools for Mammalian Genome Engineering,” and others — tell you the technical ambitions without spelling out intent in moral language: tools to edit genomes reliably, delivery platforms that work in the wild, ways to control traits across populations. Those program descriptions are not fantasies; they are funding ask-sheets and technical roadmaps reviewed by peer panels and awarded to firms that already have lab capacity. When a program explicitly discusses inserting synthetic chromosomes or engineering insects to carry modified payloads, you do not need a conspiracy theory to be alarmed; you simply need to read the contract language and recognize the plausible pathway from “research” to “capability.”
 
Classified lines and diplomatic cover deepen the worry. Some projects are run under agreements that limit public disclosure and give foreign facilities and U.S. personnel certain privileges; in practice that can mean access and control over samples, data, and operational decisions without the usual transparency. Private contractors often perform the hands-on work, meaning there is less congressional scrutiny and more commercial insulation. Add to that the existence of Top Secret facilities and historical programs that tested dissemination methods and entomological vectors, and you see how capability to engineer and distribute biological effects is not merely theoretical. The documents show a system: fund the basic science, outsource the lab work, protect sensitive steps behind classification or diplomatic arrangements, and retain plausible deniability by framing projects as defensive or capacity-building. That is the architecture that makes a Homo borgensis scenario technically plausible even if it remains unproven as an accomplished reality.
 
We will go deeper into specific contract lines and program language in the dossier, but the pattern is clear now: repeated contractor names, recurring program titles, and a mix of open solicitations plus restricted reporting create an ecosystem where powerful actors can pursue genome engineering at scale without ordinary public oversight. That is the hard fact we must wrestle with — not the shouted meme that a court already declared people “patented,” but the quiet, documented build of tools that could remake what it means to be human.
 
Part 3 — The Tools of Creation: CRISPR, cDNA, Synthetic Chromosomes, and Delivery Platforms
 
To talk about Homo borgensis honestly, we must speak plainly about the tools people whisper about in labs and program offices. These are not magic; they are engineering steps, and knowing what each tool actually does is the difference between sensible fear and sensational panic. Start with CRISPR. At heart CRISPR is a molecular pair of scissors guided by a tiny address tag — it finds a sequence in a genome and cuts. That cut can disable a gene, and when a cell repairs the break it can introduce changes. In lab settings scientists use CRISPR to alter traits, to knock out genes that cause disease, or to insert new sequences. Conceptually simple, technically fussy, ethically loaded. CRISPR is the technology most often named when people imagine edited humans; it’s powerful, but it’s also blunt and error-prone in many contexts, which is why the scientific community has both raced and hesitated to push it into the human germline.
 
Next is cDNA and synthetic constructs. cDNA is a lab-made copy of an RNA message — it’s not the same as the natural stretch of DNA inside a cell, and the Supreme Court’s Myriad decision dealt with whether naturally occurring sequences and lab-made constructs are patentable, not whether people become property. Lab-made DNA, synthetic genes, and even whole synthetic chromosomes are technical possibilities: researchers have built small synthetic chromosomes in cell culture as a way to deliver sets of genes that behave together. The moral red flag here is that synthetic chromosomes are by design persistent and heritable inside the cells that accept them; they are a route toward stable change rather than a temporary tweak. That difference — transient versus permanent, somatic versus germline — is the hinge on which the whole debate turns.
 
Delivery is the practical bottleneck and the moral danger. You can design a sequence in a computer, but getting it into the right tissue, into enough cells, and in the right form to change an organism is fiendishly hard. Two broad delivery strategies dominate public discussion: viral vectors and non-viral nanoparticles. Viral vectors hijack a virus’s efficient cell-entry machinery to carry a genetic payload; they are effective but raise concerns because of immune reactions and the chance of insertion near human genes that cause cancer. Lipid nanoparticles, the vehicle used to ferry mRNA in recent vaccines, are elegant and transient by design: they deliver RNA to the cytoplasm where it is translated and then degraded. That transient property is why many experts say mRNA vaccines are unlikely to rewrite genomes. Yet delivery research includes programs explicitly aimed at making delivery robust in wild conditions — for insects, for plants, for animals — and those programs shift the calculus because they seek population-scale effects rather than single-patient treatments.
 
There’s also the problem of target tissue and germline access. Editing somatic cells (the heart, the liver, the lungs) affects only the treated person and is, in principle, easier to regulate. Editing the germline — eggs, sperm, or embryos — creates inheritable changes and therefore a different ethical category altogether. The papers, solicitations, and contract descriptions we’ve pulled together show interest across these domains: safer somatic therapies, tools for population control of pests, and exploratory work that could someday touch germline methods. The difference between what is being discussed and what has been achieved is enormous, but the roadmap is visible: better editing tools, more reliable delivery, and longer-lasting constructs all point toward increased capability.
 
Finally, two lessons bind the technical to the spiritual. First, engineering intent matters: a tool can be used defensively or offensively, and dual-use research is the norm in biodefense. Second, secrecy and commercialization change incentives: when power, profit, and classification cluster around capability, the checks that slow risky tech — open peer review, broad ethical debate, and democratic oversight — are weakened. That is why documents showing DARPA solicitations or DTRA contracts do not prove a finished Homo borgensis, but they do show a plausible, funded route toward ever more durable and consequential biological modification. We must therefore treat the tools with respect, not myth: they are capable of real change, they are not inevitable miracles, and the responsibility for how they are used lies in the choices institutions and communities make today.
 
Part 4 — Where Myth Meets Method: Nephilim, Giants, and Cultural Memory
 
When we hear the name Homo borgensis, it resonates beyond science. It touches something older, deeper, and more primal in us — the ancient memory of hybrids that should not be. The scriptures describe the Nephilim as the offspring of a forbidden union: “the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them” (Genesis 6:4). These were beings of power, stature, and corruption — not fully angel, not fully human, but something in-between. They were the corruption that provoked God’s judgment on the earth in Noah’s day.
 
Today, the laboratory replaces the mountain altar, and the tools of CRISPR, synthetic chromosomes, and engineered viruses replace the forbidden mingling of angels and men. But the spirit is the same. It is the spirit of counterfeit creation — to build a race not authored by God. The ancients called them Nephilim. The modern technocrat whispers transhuman, posthuman, borgensis. Different words, same ambition.
 
And history shows us why these archetypes persist. Cultures around the world tell stories of giants, demigods, hybrids, or unnatural offspring. From the Titans of Greece, to the Anunnaki of Mesopotamia, to the Watchers of Enoch, humanity has always remembered a time when something “other” walked among men. Whether you treat those stories as literal or symbolic, they encode a warning: when the boundary between human and non-human is crossed, destruction follows.
 
That is why believers respond so viscerally when they hear of Pentagon labs experimenting with insects as vectors, DARPA programs seeking to edit mammalian genomes, or biotech firms building artificial chromosomes. We are not just reacting to science — we are remembering the oldest story we know: that corruption of flesh brings judgment. What once was myth is now written in program solicitations and research contracts.
 
So, when we place the myth beside the method, we see the warning in stereo. The method says: “we can do this.” The myth says: “we have done this before, and it ended in ruin.” The challenge for us today is not to confuse myth with science, nor to dismiss the resonance of myth as irrelevant, but to let the ancient memory sharpen our discernment. To say clearly: if we repeat the days of Noah by creating hybrids in our laboratories, we should not be surprised if we inherit the judgment of Noah’s flood.
 
Part 5 — Documented Experiments That Raise Real Questions
 
It is one thing to speak of myths and archetypes, but what about the hard evidence? What do the paper trails, contracts, and lab reports actually reveal? When we strip away the hype and propaganda, we still find enough to disturb anyone who takes scripture seriously.
 
Take the Lugar Center in Tbilisi, Georgia. On paper, it is a disease research facility funded by the U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA). In practice, documents show it has been a hub for projects on anthrax, tularemia, Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever, and even the collection of thousands of ticks and insects for study. Private contractors like Battelle and Metabiota worked there under diplomatic cover, shielded from oversight, despite not being diplomats. These firms are not novices: Battelle has a history of classified bioweapons research dating back decades, and Metabiota was contracted during the Ebola outbreak in West Africa.
 
Then there is DARPA’s Safe Genes and Insect Allies programs. These are not hidden — the solicitations are public. Safe Genes funds teams to develop tools that can precisely control or edit genomes in mammals, including reversible gene drives. Insect Allies seeks to engineer insects that can deliver modified genetic material to crops. The stated goal is food security, but the subtext is clear: once you can reliably insert genetic payloads via insects, the line between agriculture and human populations is perilously thin.
 
We also see patterns of experiments on entomological warfare. Declassified U.S. Army reports describe past projects where mosquitoes, fleas, and sand flies were deliberately infected and tested as vectors of disease. Today, we read of “surveillance” projects collecting biting flies and mosquitoes in Georgia and Russia, species not native to those climates suddenly appearing after U.S.-funded projects began. Local populations reported being bitten indoors, all year round — a behavior unnatural for those species before. The coincidence raises questions the official story does not answer.
 
DARPA’s mammalian genome engineering projects add another layer. One contract described inserting an additional artificial chromosome into human cells as a delivery platform. It is cloaked in the language of therapeutic research, but the mechanism — to alter the body’s registry of life itself — echoes the very fears people have about Homo borgensis.
 
None of these documents prove that a new Nephilim has already been born in a lab. But they show the plausibility. They show an appetite for dual-use research, the deliberate outsourcing to private contractors for deniability, and the quiet pursuit of technologies that could alter human life at its foundations. This is not rumor or telegram hysteria; it is written in contracts, budgets, and program reports.
 
So when someone asks, “Why are you worried about Homo borgensis? Isn’t that just science fiction?” you can point to these records and answer: “If the tools exist, if the money flows, and if the secrecy shields them, then the possibility is not fiction — it is policy.” And policy, unchecked, becomes practice.
 
Part 6 — The Patent and Legal Myth
 
There is a simple legal truth that gets turned into a terrifying lie by bad reading and bad intent: patents give exclusive rights over inventions, not ownership of people. The Supreme Court’s decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics dealt narrowly with whether isolated, naturally occurring DNA sequences are patentable. The Court said they are not; it distinguished those natural sequences from cDNA — lab-made copies of messenger RNA that lack noncoding regions — and allowed some patent protection for engineered constructs. That is a narrow, technical point about what kinds of molecular claims meet the legal test for invention, novelty, and human handiwork. It is not, and never was, a ruling that turns a vaccinated or genetically altered person into a corporate chattel. The difference between “patent on a synthetic sequence” and “title to a human being” is not hairline semantics; it is the whole edifice of modern law and human rights.
 
How the myth forms is predictable. Someone finds a Supreme Court slip opinion, highlights phrases about cDNA or synthetic constructs, omits the limiting language, and then layers a conspiratorial inference on top — patented sequence equals patented person. Then the story hops onto social platforms that reward outrage. The result is propaganda that looks like legal argument but collapses under even modest scrutiny: courts and legislatures recognize basic human personhood as outside the domain of patent claims, and international human-rights instruments bar enslavement or property status for persons. Patent offices and judges decide whether a molecule or method is patentable; they do not, and cannot, adjudicate personhood or transfer human rights by issuing a patent.
 
There is a related but distinct worry that feeds the myth and that deserves our attention: companies and labs do hold patents on engineered sequences, delivery systems, and therapeutic methods, and those patents can give firms market power and control over technologies that touch bodies. Patents can restrict who may make, use, or sell a patented product, and that creates control over access to treatments, over follow-on research, and over commercial deployment. That is a real policy concern — monopoly control over essential technologies — but it is not the same thing as legal ownership of people. The right response to this real worry is civic and legal pressure: stronger regulatory oversight, compulsory licensing in health emergencies, antitrust scrutiny, and public funding for open science, not wild claims that courts have declared vaccinated people “products.”
 
Another legal line people confuse is the difference between property rights and contractual or corporate governance. In some contexts, companies can claim rights over strains, cell lines, or engineered organisms they create; courts have enforced those property-like rights over laboratory materials. That legal logic never extends to natural persons under U.S. constitutional and statutory law. Even if an engineered cell line derived from human tissue is owned by an institution, that institutional “ownership” is a narrow legal mechanism limited to biological materials in laboratory contexts, not a ruling about the status of living human persons in society. Conflating those domains is a rhetorical sleight of hand common in disinformation.
 
Finally, the patent myth serves a political purpose: it terrifies and mobilizes people while steering attention away from the real, provable problems we should be wrestling with — secret contracts, dual-use research, opaque procurement channels, and corporate capture of critical public-health tools. If the public chases a fantasy about “patented humans,” then the hard work of demanding transparency, reforming procurement, and insisting on independent long-term safety studies gets sideline. The responsible move is to expose the bad legal reading clearly and swiftly while using that moment to point to the real policy levers that need pressure: patent reform where public health is concerned, mandatory transparency for defense-funded research, stronger ethical review for germline work, and support for independent science that monitors long-term biological effects.
 
Part 7 — Historical Precedents: When Medicine Said “Settled” and Time Said “Whoops”
 
To understand why suspicion of Homo borgensis matters, you have to see the rhythm of history. Again and again, the guardians of medicine and science declared a thing safe, proven, and beyond question — only for time to expose it as folly, negligence, or worse.
Thalidomide was marketed in the 1950s as the gentle pill that calmed nausea in pregnancy. Doctors reassured mothers it was harmless. By the time the truth emerged, tens of thousands of children had been born with missing limbs and other deformities. What had been settled science was revealed as one of the great scandals of modern pharmacology.
 
Diethylstilbestrol — DES — was given to women to prevent miscarriages. It was hailed as a miracle drug. Decades later, it became clear that daughters of those women developed rare cancers and reproductive damage. A promise of life became a curse passed down generations.
 
Cigarettes once carried the smiling faces of doctors in white coats, assuring the public that smoking soothed nerves and cleared the chest. For decades the medical establishment was slow to connect tobacco with lung cancer, bowing to industry money and pressure. How many graves were filled while the “settled” voices kept repeating the line?
 
Vioxx was launched in the late 1990s as a breakthrough painkiller. The data said safe, the ads said proven. But tens of thousands of patients later, the hidden heart risks forced its withdrawal, and lawsuits revealed how much the manufacturer had known and downplayed.
 
Even the materials of daily life bear witness. Lead was once laced into gasoline, paint, and plumbing, defended by industry and regulators as safe. Now we know it robbed generations of children of their brain development. Radiation too was once sold as a cure: radium water, X-ray shoe fitters, glowing tonics. By the time cancer clusters exposed the cost, it was too late for the first victims.
 
The pattern is undeniable: what was called safe, what was marketed as progress, what was defended as “settled,” was often later confessed as catastrophic error. The cycle is always the same: promise, promotion, denial, revelation, apology. And always too late for those already harmed.
 
That is why the present claims about mRNA, gene editing, or synthetic chromosomes cannot be swallowed without discernment. It is not enough to say, “The mechanism says it can’t alter your DNA.” Mechanisms once said cigarettes soothed the lungs. Mechanisms once said thalidomide was harmless. Mechanisms once said radium was healing.
 
If the past teaches us anything, it is this: just because they say so, doesn’t mean they are right. The graveyards of the last century are filled with the victims of scientific arrogance. And when you hear the phrase Homo borgensis, you are hearing the next great arrogance announced in advance.
 
Part 8 — Moral Architecture: Who Decides What a Human Is?
 
At the core of this debate lies a question that no scientist, no Pentagon program, no biotech patent board has the right to answer: what is a human being? For millennia, the answer was anchored in the conviction that man is made in the image of God, a living soul breathed into flesh, a creature of dignity beyond measure. Our laws, our rights, our sense of morality all flow from that foundation. But when engineers speak of synthetic chromosomes, when defense programs speak of altering mammalian genomes, when venture capital speaks of the “post-human,” we see that foundation under assault.
 
The language itself gives it away. They do not say “son” or “daughter.” They say “platform.” They do not say “flesh and blood.” They say “host.” They do not say “image of God.” They say “resource.” The human is quietly recast as a chassis, a carrier, a medium to be upgraded or repurposed. This is the moral architecture of the coming age — a world where humanity is defined not by its origin in God, but by its utility to systems of power.
 
And who decides? Not the people whose bodies are altered. Not the families who live with the consequences. The decision is made in boardrooms, behind classified doors, or inside laboratories funded by agencies whose mandate is “threat reduction” but whose work opens up new threats beyond imagining. The authority is claimed by those with patents and contracts, not by those who bear the risks. It is a silent theft: not only of health, but of identity itself.
 
From a theological view, this is the oldest lie in the book. In Eden, the serpent said, “Ye shall be as gods.” Today the technocrat whispers the same promise: “You shall be upgraded. You shall be stronger, smarter, longer-lived. You will evolve beyond the limits of mortality.” But the serpent never told Eve what would be lost. In the same way, the architects of Homo borgensis do not confess the price — that in seeking to surpass man, they risk destroying man altogether.
 
This is why vigilance is not paranoia but duty. Because if we surrender the definition of “human” to the laboratory and the contractor, then what it means to be made in God’s image will be rewritten without our consent. And once rewritten, it cannot be undone. Just as the Nephilim of old marked a point of no return that required divine judgment, so too does the specter of Homo borgensis confront us with the same question: will we guard the boundaries of creation, or will we yield them to those who see us not as children of God, but as clay to be molded for their designs?
 
Part 9 — Attack Surface: How the Elite Narrative, Propaganda, and Panic Work Together
 
Here is the cruelest irony: the more shocking the truth, the easier it is to bury beneath layers of falsehood. The architects of power know this. They have learned to defend their programs not only with classification and redacted documents, but with noise. On one side, you have the official line — “safe, effective, necessary, settled science.” On the other side, you have wild claims — “vaccinated people are patented property,” “you are no longer human under the law.” Both serve the same master, because they keep the public from looking squarely at the sober evidence in the middle.
 
When a Pentagon contractor wins millions to insert synthetic chromosomes into mammalian cells, that fact should make headlines. When DARPA funds insect vectors to deliver engineered payloads into living organisms, the churches should rise up and demand answers. But instead, the news cycle fills with two competing narratives: the mainstream mocking any dissent as “conspiracy,” and the alternative channels pushing memes that overreach and misquote Supreme Court opinions. The result is the same: the public tunes out, overwhelmed, unable to separate fact from fiction.
 
This is how the enemy works in every age. Confusion is a weapon. Babylon thrived on divided tongues. Rome thrived on bread and circus. Our elites thrive on disinformation and distraction. If you are chasing the lie that you are already patented property, you will never notice the real contracts and solicitations that build the scaffolding for a future where humanity is treated as raw material. And if you are lulled by the mainstream line that “nothing to see here, trust the science,” you will not press for oversight, hearings, or independent inquiry.
 
So the attack surface is not only the lab or the genome — it is the mind of the public. By flooding it with contradictions, they make it impossible to focus on the provable. And in that fog, the real work continues. The patents are filed. The contracts are signed. The labs are built. The definitions of life are quietly shifted.
 
To expose this, we must walk a narrow road. We cannot parrot the mainstream, because history shows they are too often wrong. We cannot parrot the hysteria, because it collapses under scrutiny. We must hold the line in the middle: naming what is documented, rejecting what is false, and interpreting both in the light of prophecy. Only then can we see the battlefield clearly. And only then can the Church understand what kind of war we are in — not of flesh and blood, but of truth and deception, of creation and counterfeit creation.
 
Part 10 — A Pastoral and Practical Closing
 
We have walked through names and myths, through programs and patents, through the graveyards of history and the smoke of present confusion. The picture that emerges is not a single headline, not a one-sentence scandal, but a pattern. It is the pattern of men who believe they can out-create the Creator. The pattern of institutions that declare certainty today, only to issue apologies tomorrow. The pattern of elites who fund projects in shadows while distracting the public with noise. And it is the pattern of judgment that follows every time humanity crosses the boundary of what it means to be made in God’s image.
 
So what do we do with Homo borgensis? We do not laugh it off as science fiction. We do not swallow whole the propaganda that says vaccinated people are already patented chattel. We do not lull ourselves to sleep with the lullaby of “settled science.” Instead, we stand where watchmen must stand: on the walls, warning, discerning, praying, and refusing to surrender the definition of human life to those who would reduce us to platforms, hosts, or resources.
 
Practically, this means demanding transparency from the programs we fund with our tax dollars. It means calling on our lawmakers to open the books on DARPA’s “Safe Genes” and the Pentagon’s overseas labs. It means supporting investigative journalists who trace the contracts and follow the money when mainstream media will not. It means pastors and Christian leaders must step up, not hiding behind vague platitudes about science and faith, but engaging with the ethical questions head-on: What does it mean to be made in God’s image? What line must never be crossed? And what should the church say when the world seeks to birth a new Nephilim in the laboratory?
 
Spiritually, it means holding fast to the truth that our identity is not in what is done to our flesh but in Who breathed life into us. It means refusing to be assimilated into the Borg-like collective of transhumanist dreams, and instead remaining grafted into the Vine who is Christ. It means praying not only for protection, but for clarity, so that we do not lose sight of the real threats while chasing phantoms.
 
And above all, it means remembering that judgment always follows corruption. In Noah’s day, the earth was filled with violence, and all flesh had corrupted its way. Yet God preserved a remnant whose generations were still whole. Today, as the world toys with the registry of life, we too must be that remnant — undefiled, watchful, and faithful.
 
Because in the end, the story is not about DARPA or patents or Pentagon contracts. It is about the oldest war in the universe: the attempt to counterfeit creation and steal the glory of God. Homo borgensis is just the latest mask of the same rebellion. And the answer remains the same: “As it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of Man.”
 
Stay vigilant, stay awake, and stay in the image of the One who made you. That is the only safeguard when giants rise again.
 
Conclusion — Homo Borgensis: The New Nephilim
 
We began with a strange word — Homo borgensis — and tonight we have traced it from the pages of anthropology into the laboratories of DARPA, from the myths of giants into the contracts of defense contractors, from the whispers of prophecy into the headlines of science. What we find is not one neat revelation, but a repeating pattern: men reaching beyond their God-given bounds, confident they can re-write the registry of life without consequence. Every age that has tried has paid the price.
 
The Nephilim of Genesis were hybrids, born of a union God forbade, and their corruption filled the earth until only Noah and his household remained untainted. The Nephilim of today wear different clothing — gene-edited chromosomes, patented constructs, Pentagon contracts, and corporate roadmaps. But the spirit is the same: counterfeit creation, rebellion disguised as progress.
 
We have seen how history mocks “settled science.” Thalidomide, DES, Vioxx, tobacco, lead, radiation — all declared safe until the graves were full. We have seen how propaganda on both sides blinds the public, how the myth of “patented humans” distracts from the hard evidence of funded programs. We have seen how secrecy, money, and arrogance create the perfect storm where mistakes are not only possible but inevitable.
 
So the message is this: just because they say so, doesn’t mean they are right. And if the past is any guide, the louder they insist, the more likely time will expose the gross miscalculation. Our task is not to surrender to panic, nor to swallow official assurances, but to stand in vigilance — to pray, to discern, to demand transparency, and to remember that we are not clay for technocrats to mold, but children of the Living God, made in His image.
 
The giants may rise again, clothed in patents and pixels, but they will fall the same way the first ones did: under the judgment of the Creator they sought to replace. And until that day comes, it is our duty to speak, to watch, and to stand as Noah did — faithful in a world that forgot what it means to be human.
 
Bibliography and Endnotes
 
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576 (2013). U.S. Supreme Court decision clarifying that naturally occurring DNA sequences are not patentable, while synthetic cDNA can be.Full text: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf
“Vaccinated Legally Not Human.” Truth11.com (March 1, 2022). Viral article misreading the Myriad ruling to claim vaccinated people are patented “products.” Document recovered in PDF form .
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva. The Pentagon Bio-weapons (Dilyana.bg, 2018). Investigative dossier documenting U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) programs in Georgia and Ukraine, contractors including Battelle and Metabiota, and DARPA gene-editing initiatives .
DARPA Program Solicitation HR0011-17-S-0026, “Safe Genes.” (2017). Public DARPA call for proposals to develop tools for genome editing, control, and reversibility.Available: https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2017-07-19
DARPA Program Solicitation HR0011-16-C-0114, “Insect Allies.” (2016). Public DARPA program to explore engineered insect vectors for delivery of genetic material to crops.Overview: https://www.darpa.mil/program/insect-allies
U.S. Army Chemical Corps. Entomological Warfare Trials (Declassified Reports, 1950s–1960s). Tests on mosquitoes, fleas, and sand flies as potential vectors of disease in warfare scenarios.
Jørgensen, T. R., et al. “Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, no. 21 (2021). Study noting LINE-1 mediated reverse transcription in vitro.
McBride, W. G. “Thalidomide and congenital abnormalities.” The Lancet 278, no. 7216 (1961): 1358. Landmark report exposing the teratogenic effects of thalidomide.
Herbst, A. L., et al. “Adenocarcinoma of the vagina: association of maternal stilbestrol therapy with tumor appearance in young women.” New England Journal of Medicine 284, no. 16 (1971): 878–881. First major study linking DES exposure to rare cancers in daughters.
U.S. Surgeon General’s Report on Smoking and Health (1964). The first official recognition of tobacco’s link to cancer despite decades of industry denial.
Topol, Eric. “Failing the Public Health — Rofecoxib, Merck, and the FDA.” New England Journal of Medicine351, no. 17 (2004): 1707–1709. Analysis of the Vioxx scandal and hidden cardiovascular risks.
Markowitz, Gerald, and David Rosner. Deceit and Denial: The Deadly Politics of Industrial Pollution. University of California Press, 2002. Detailed history of the lead and chemical industry cover-ups.
Rowland, Richard E. “The Radium Girls: Women and Industrial Health Reform, 1910–1935.” The Journal of American History 76, no. 2 (1989): 674–675. Historical case study of radium poisoning.
Holy Bible, Genesis 6:4. “There were giants in the earth in those days…” Biblical anchor text for the Nephilim.
 
Sources
 
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8SHjCQC/

Friday Sep 19, 2025

The Corporate Republic: Citizenship Replaced by Shareholding
 
Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6z5n2k-the-corporate-republic-citizenship-replaced-by-shareholding.html
 
Monologue: The Corporate Republic
 
Tonight, I want you to set aside the familiar image of the nation-state — flags, borders, constitutions, and parliaments — and look with me into the architecture that is quietly replacing it. What is being built in plain sight is not a restoration of the old order, but something altogether new: a corporate republic, a system in which you and I are no longer citizens of sovereign nations but shareholders in a planetary enterprise.
 
Here’s how it works. The promise is simple: a universal income, a guaranteed dividend for every man, woman, and child, credited not as charity but as your rightful share. But look closer — because in this system, you are not a citizen with inalienable rights; you are a stockholder with conditional privileges. Your share entitles you to a payout, yes, but also binds you to bylaws, arbitration, compliance, and terms of service written not by your people, but by boards, foundations, and coded contracts. Citizenship is replaced by corporate membership. Rights are reframed as benefits. And law itself dissolves into contract.
 
The pieces of this machine are already in place. European scholars like Michael Zürn and Christian Joerges have shown how compliance and enforcement can be built beyond the state, using treaties, arbitration, and supranational law. Others document how corporations, NGOs, and cities bypass governments and act as international authorities in their own right. And most revealing, thinkers like Jarrad Hope and Peter Ludlow proclaim openly that the nation-state is an obsolete technology, a relic of Westphalia to be replaced by blockchain communities and DAOs.
 
The backbone of this system is the ledger: digital identity, blockchain, programmable money, and automated compliance. To the technocrats it is neutral code, but to those with eyes to see, it is a counterfeit Book of Life, an Akashic record of every transaction and every soul, immutable and unforgiving. Where Scripture tells us that God will blot out sin, here every action is fixed forever, every compliance scored, every disobedience punished by exclusion from the dividend.
 
But here is the problem for the elites: they have the architecture, the rhetoric, the pilots — but not the legitimacy. People will not willingly surrender their citizenship for corporate membership. They need a shock, a rupture, a cataclysm that will make the old order look so broken that this new order appears as salvation. A global financial collapse, a climate disaster, a pandemic more brutal than the last, or a cyberattack that paralyzes governments — any of these could be the “Babel moment” that convinces the world to accept a corporate charter in place of the Constitution, a dividend in place of wages, and bylaws in place of rights.
 
Friends, this is the true esoteric meaning: the alchemical process of solve et coagula. Dissolve the nations, coagulate them into a single body politic. It is Babel rebuilt with servers and ledgers. It is Revelation replayed as code, where no man may buy or sell save he that has the mark. It is the eternal counterfeit — offering equality and sustenance at the cost of freedom and spirit.
 
So tonight we name it plainly: the corporate republic is coming. And unless we understand its architecture and the crisis it waits upon, we may mistake it for progress, for fairness, even for salvation. But it is not the Kingdom of God — it is the kingdom of man, wrapped in silicon and ledgers, awaiting the day of its unveiling.
 
Part 1: The Nation-State as Obsolete Technology
 
To understand where we are going, we must first recognize how the elites themselves view the present order. For centuries, the nation-state has been the primary “governance technology” of mankind. Borders, constitutions, armies, and bureaucracies became the machinery by which order was maintained and legitimacy secured. But within elite circles today, the nation-state is increasingly described not as sacred, not as permanent, but as outdated software — a legacy system waiting to be replaced.
 
This is not speculation. In the book Farewell to Westphalia, Jarrad Hope and Peter Ludlow declare bluntly that the sovereign state is nothing more than a “governance technology,” a mechanism of control like an operating system, now approaching obsolescence. Just as feudal lords were replaced by centralized monarchies, and monarchies gave way to nation-states, so too will the nation-state yield to something new. And what they envision is not another political form, but a corporate one: blockchain-based entities, sovereign digital communities, and global boards of governance acting like directors over shareholders.
 
History bears out the pattern. The Peace of Westphalia in 1648 is often celebrated as the birth of modern sovereignty, the moment when rulers and peoples alike agreed that political power would be organized within fixed territorial boundaries. For nearly four centuries, that model held — though always contested — until the last century exposed its cracks. Two world wars showed how fragile sovereignty could be. The creation of the United Nations and the European Union proved that states would cede parts of their power to larger, supranational structures. And in the twenty-first century, as multinational corporations outgrow national economies, and as digital networks connect more people than any state could govern, elites see the nation-state as insufficient, even inefficient.
 
Legal scholars echo the same theme. Michael Zürn and Christian Joerges describe how compliance and enforcement are already achieved in supranational law without relying on a single sovereign. Trade regimes like the WTO, environmental treaties, and arbitration courts already bind states to rules they cannot simply ignore. Power has migrated upward and outward, and the elites now ask: why not complete the process? Why not declare the state obsolete and shift governance to a corporate, contractual model?
 
And so the stage is set. In their eyes, you and I are not primarily citizens of nations, but nodes in a global network, future shareholders in a planetary enterprise. Your “nationality” is a temporary placeholder until your new role as stockholder in the corporate republic is formalized.
 
But do not miss the esoteric echo here. What they call “progress” is in truth the ancient dream of Babel — to dissolve the divisions God established and to construct a single tower of human governance. The modern Tower is not brick and stone but code and contracts. To the technocrats it is evolution, but to those with eyes to see, it is rebellion dressed as modernization.
 
Part 2: From Citizenship to Shareholding
 
The next step in this transformation is the redefinition of what it means to belong. For centuries, the central bond of political life has been citizenship. To be a citizen meant you were part of a people, bound by laws, protected by rights, and included in a covenant of shared destiny. Citizenship was not merely transactional; it was sacred, rooted in history, identity, and sacrifice.
 
But in the corporate republic being built, citizenship is to be dissolved and replaced with shareholding. You will not be valued as a member of a nation, but as a stockholder in a planetary enterprise. Your rights will no longer flow from the inherent dignity of being human or from the social contract of your people; instead, they will flow from the dividends of your corporate share.
 
Here is how it is framed. Instead of welfare or wages, you will receive a universal basic income. But it will not be called charity — it will be called a dividend, your rightful payout as a shareholder. This dividend will come not from governments, but from the revenues of global corporate structures — data monetization, carbon markets, programmable currencies, and public-private partnerships that funnel profit back to the global ledger. Each person is allotted a single share. Each person is, therefore, equal — or so the rhetoric will say.
 
But understand the shift. In this model, your income is not unconditional. It is tied to identity credentials and governed by bylaws. To receive your dividend, you must comply with rules — vaccination requirements, carbon limits, behavior scores, or any other condition the board decides. Miss a compliance check, and your dividend can be reduced, delayed, or revoked. In short: rights become privileges, and privileges are contingent on obedience.
 
This is the quiet genius of the model. Where governments must win legitimacy through elections and constitutions, corporations require only contracts. And contracts can be updated. Terms of service can be changed at any time. By accepting the dividend, you tacitly accept the bylaws — and the bylaws can evolve without your vote. This is how citizenship is transformed into employment, and citizens into corporate dependents.
 
The echoes of this already exist. Digital platforms like Facebook, YouTube, or PayPal treat their users not as citizens but as participants bound by terms of service. Violate the terms, and your access is revoked. No trial, no due process, no appeal to a higher law — only arbitration inside the company. This is the model now being scaled to encompass not just your media, but your money, your mobility, and your very identity.
 
Esoterically, this is a counterfeit covenant. Where God makes His people sons and daughters, heirs by grace, the corporate republic makes its people stockholders by contract. Where true citizenship reflects belonging to a community and a Kingdom, this false citizenship binds you as an employee, a unit of compliance within an artificial order.
 
And remember: the language will be fairness. They will tell you: everyone has a share, everyone has a dividend, everyone is equal. But equality here is only the equality of livestock in a herd — equally numbered, equally tagged, equally dependent on the master who distributes the feed.
 
So when the nation is dissolved and the shareholder society unveiled, it will not be liberation but servitude — servitude in the guise of fairness, dependence in the language of equality, obedience enforced by the ledger.
 
Part 3: The Legal and Institutional Foundations
 
For a corporate republic to replace the nation-state, there must be a framework of law that allows it to operate. Elites cannot simply announce the death of nations; they must construct a legal order where sovereignty has already been eroded, where compliance can be enforced, and where legitimacy can be claimed without the traditional forms of citizenship. And in truth, this scaffolding has been under construction for decades.
 
Consider the European Union. Legal scholars such as Michael Zürn and Christian Joerges have documented how compliance in the EU and WTO is achieved without a single sovereign authority. Regulations passed in Brussels bind every member state. Dispute mechanisms in Geneva can overrule national courts. In both cases, law exists and is enforced beyond the boundaries of any one nation. This proves the model: rules can be made and obeyed even when no sovereign stands behind them. The elites take this as evidence that post-national governance is not only possible, but already here.
 
Another building block is the rise of arbitration courts in trade agreements. Corporations and investors can already bypass national courts and sue governments in special tribunals. These panels operate outside of democratic oversight, yet their rulings are binding. When a corporation can override the will of a people expressed through its parliament, you are already living in a legal order where sovereignty is a façade. Arbitration has been the wedge that makes contract more powerful than constitution.
 
Then there are the so-called “transnational actors.” Jonas Tallberg and Christer Jönsson have catalogued how NGOs, multinational firms, and advocacy networks secure formal roles in global institutions. What this means is that non-state entities now participate in governance alongside states, drafting rules, setting agendas, and enforcing norms. Corporations are no longer just regulated; they are regulators. Philanthropies are no longer just donors; they are lawmakers in disguise. This is the quiet privatization of law, and it is the core of the coming corporate republic.
 
And at the city and regional level, the shift is even clearer. Herrschel and Newman’s work on Cities as International Actors shows how urban governments bypass their nations and deal directly with international bodies. Cities sign climate treaties, adopt global standards, and partner with multinationals without waiting for national approval. If governance can flow to cities and corporations, the nation-state becomes one actor among many, no longer the supreme vessel of sovereignty.
 
This legal pluralism is hailed as progress, but it creates a vacuum of legitimacy. Without a sovereign people, who grants authority? Without a constitution, what limits exist? Scholars themselves call this the “democratic deficit” of postnational law. And here is where elites see opportunity. By framing the corporation as the provider of universal dividends, they can fill the legitimacy vacuum. The law provides the scaffolding; the dividend provides the consent. Together, they transform citizenship into a contract, and the constitution into bylaws.
 
Esoterically, this shift is not without meaning. In the old covenant of nations, law was imperfect but rooted in the consent of peoples, echoing the biblical idea that rulers exist by the will of God mediated through their people. In the new covenant of corporations, law is contract, rooted not in grace or identity but in compliance and performance. This is a counterfeit law, one that mimics justice but delivers only obligation.
 
So the legal and institutional foundations are laid: supranational law, arbitration panels, transnational actors, and city diplomacy. The walls of the nation-state still stand, but the scaffolding of the corporate republic is already built around them. All that remains is to knock out the supports and let the old edifice fall.
 
Part 4: The Technological Backbone
 
Law and treaties alone cannot bind the world into a new order; they need enforcement, identity, and infrastructure. This is where technology steps in. The elites have been constructing not only the legal architecture of a post-nation corporate republic but also its technological backbone. That backbone is built on three pillars: digital identity, blockchain ledgers, and programmable money.
 
First, digital identity. To turn people into shareholders, every human being must be registered, verified, and bound to a single global credential. This is not theory — pilot programs already exist. Systems like ID2020 and the European Digital Identity framework propose one ID per person, used across borders for banking, healthcare, travel, and benefits. Without that ID, you cannot access services. With it, you are legible to the system. It is the shareholder certificate of the new corporate order.
 
Second, blockchain ledgers. Blockchain is sold as a neutral tool for trust and transparency, but its esoteric role is deeper. It is the registry of the corporate republic, the counterfeit Book of Life. Every transaction, every movement, every compliance check is etched immutably into the chain. Unlike the God who blots out sin, the ledger never forgets. Forgiveness is impossible; all that remains is compliance or exclusion. What once was covenant with grace becomes contract with code.
 
Third, programmable money. Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are being piloted from China to Europe to the Bahamas. These are not just digital dollars or euros — they are tokens that can be programmed. A payment can be conditioned: spendable only on approved goods, expiring after a set time, or revoked instantly if a rule is broken. Imagine your universal dividend issued each month, but spendable only on what the board permits. Imagine losing access because you failed a carbon compliance check. This is money as contract, obedience enforced by code.
 
These three tools — identity, ledger, and currency — form the nervous system of the corporate republic. They connect the legal scaffolding of supranational law to the lived experience of every person. They make rights conditional, benefits programmable, and obedience measurable.
 
And once they are in place, enforcement no longer requires armies or police in every street. It requires only the flick of a switch. Deny an ID credential, freeze a dividend, revoke access to services, and a person is disciplined. Compliance becomes automatic, invisible, enforced not by force but by necessity.
 
Esoterically, this is the perfection of Babel. A single tower of data, rising skyward, binding humanity into one record. A counterfeit kingdom where every person is numbered, every act recorded, every privilege conditional. It is the registry the fallen angels dreamed of, now realized in silicon and code.
 
The elites will call it fairness, efficiency, and progress. But to those with discernment, it is a spiritual inversion: the replacement of God’s covenant with man’s contract, the replacement of mercy with ledger, the replacement of freedom with programmable chains.
 
Part 5: Pilot Projects in Plain Sight
 
What we’ve been describing might sound like a plan still on the drawing board, but the truth is that it’s already being tested. The post-nation corporate republic is not a theory waiting for the future; it’s a collection of pilot projects quietly unfolding around us, hiding in plain sight.
 
Start with city diplomacy. Herrschel and Newman’s work on Cities as International Actors makes it clear: cities are already bypassing their national governments. They join climate networks, adopt global standards, and enter partnerships with multinational corporations. Mayors sign agreements that once only presidents could sign. Cities are being groomed as the first units of the new corporate republic — nimble, cooperative, and ready to adopt global governance structures.
 
Then there are carbon markets. Governments and corporations alike are building systems where every unit of carbon must be tracked, traded, and offset. Blockchain is already being tested to monitor emissions, prove compliance, and issue credits. These markets are not just about the environment; they are about habituating people and businesses to programmable compliance. If your dividend is tied to your carbon footprint, then the corporate republic has the perfect lever of control: breathe too much, travel too far, and your payout shrinks.
 
Next, digital ID pilots. From India’s Aadhaar to the EU Digital Identity Wallet, from African biometric registries to World Bank-funded ID-for-all programs, digital identity is being normalized. These IDs are not limited to passports or driver’s licenses. They are gateways to payments, healthcare, education, and even voting. Tie the universal dividend to such an ID, and you have a turnkey system for binding people to their corporate share.
 
And let us not forget the pandemic passports. During COVID-19, millions of people accepted QR codes, digital passes, and tracking apps in the name of public health. That infrastructure is still in place. It is proof that in times of crisis, the public will accept digital credentials in exchange for safety. The elites now know that compliance can be achieved if the emergency is great enough.
 
Finally, crypto jurisdictions and DAOs. Special economic zones, blockchain-friendly islands, and decentralized autonomous organizations are already experimenting with sovereignty-lite governance. In these spaces, contracts, tokens, and digital bylaws replace constitutions and courts. They are laboratories for the corporate republic, training grounds where future rules are written and tested.
 
When you put all these pilots together, the picture is unmistakable. The architecture of the corporate republic is not hidden; it is scattered across cities, markets, IDs, and networks. Each pilot is presented as a solution to a problem — climate change, digital convenience, public health, innovation. But taken together, they reveal a pattern: the slow replacement of citizenship with conditional participation, of law with contract, of nations with corporations.
 
Esoterically, these pilots are rehearsals. In alchemy, transformation requires repeated trials before the final transmutation is achieved. So too here: every pilot is a trial, every compliance system a rehearsal for the great unveiling. The elites are practicing Babel, brick by brick, until the tower is strong enough to stand.
 
Part 6: The Rhetoric of Equality and Efficiency
 
Every empire, every counterfeit kingdom, has always clothed itself in noble language. Rome called itself the bringer of peace. The Soviet Union called itself the workers’ paradise. And now, the corporate republic wraps its chains in the language of equality and efficiency.
 
First, the promise of equality. The elites will tell us: “Everyone gets a share. Everyone receives a dividend. No one is left behind.” Universal income is sold not as charity but as fairness, the great equalizer in an unequal world. It sounds irresistible — and for the desperate, it will be. But look closer. The equality here is not the dignity of persons created in the image of God; it is the equality of livestock in a herd. Each tagged, each fed, each accounted for. Equal, yes — but only as units of compliance.
 
Then comes the promise of efficiency. Politicians and think tanks already frame national democracies as “too slow,” “too divided,” “too corrupt” to meet the challenges of the twenty-first century. In contrast, corporate governance is presented as agile, data-driven, and meritocratic. Algorithms don’t argue, boards don’t deadlock, smart contracts don’t need elections. What takes parliaments years can be done in days by code. But efficiency without justice is tyranny at lightning speed.
 
And then there is the promise of resilience. We are told the world faces “polycrises” — climate, pandemics, cyberattacks, financial instability — and only a global, coordinated system can withstand the shocks. The rhetoric is clear: sovereignty is fragility, integration is resilience. Yet in truth, resilience here means only one thing: obedience. If you comply, the dividend flows. If you resist, you are cut off. That is not resilience; that is dependency.
 
Notice the emotional weight of these words. Equality, efficiency, resilience — who could oppose them? To resist such words is to appear selfish, backward, dangerous. The rhetoric is not only a cloak for the new order; it is a weapon against dissent. If you speak against the corporate republic, you will be accused of standing against fairness, against progress, against survival itself.
 
Esoterically, this is the same mask worn by every counterfeit kingdom. Babel promised unity, but it was unity against God. The Antichrist will promise peace, but it will be peace through submission. The corporate republic promises fairness and efficiency, but it is fairness without freedom, efficiency without mercy. It is the inversion of God’s justice: a counterfeit equality enforced by code, a counterfeit peace built on obedience, a counterfeit order secured by fear of exclusion.
 
This is the rhetoric being prepared. And in the day of crisis, it will roll off tongues like honey, soothing a terrified people into surrender.
 
Part 7: Obstacles Holding Them Back
 
If the corporate republic is already scaffolded in law, tested in pilots, and clothed in the rhetoric of fairness, why has it not yet been unveiled? The answer is simple: legitimacy. The machinery is built, but the people have not yet consented. Without a catalyzing shock, the system cannot flip from pilot to permanence.
 
The first obstacle is the democratic deficit. Legal scholars themselves admit that postnational governance suffers from a legitimacy vacuum. Arbitration panels and supranational courts can enforce rules, but they cannot command loyalty. Without elections, without a demos, who grants consent? The elites know this, and it gnaws at their project. The dividend is designed to fill this gap, but until a crisis makes people desperate enough, legitimacy remains fragile.
 
The second obstacle is geopolitical rivalry. The European Union, the United States, China, and Russia each dream of shaping the new order on their own terms. The EU speaks the language of postnational law, the U.S. of innovation and markets, China of digital authoritarianism, Russia of sovereign resistance. Their visions collide, and so the corporate republic cannot yet be universal. For elites, this rivalry is a problem to be solved — and a global cataclysm may be the only solvent strong enough to dissolve these competing models into one.
 
The third obstacle is public backlash. Nationalism, populism, and cultural identity remain stubborn forces. People cling to flags, languages, histories, and traditions. They resist the reduction of citizenship to contract, of heritage to a share. This is why elites invest so heavily in narrative management, education campaigns, and controlled opposition. They must soften the ground before the transplant can take root.
 
The fourth obstacle is technical fragility. Blockchain pilots collapse, DAOs implode, CBDC trials stumble. The infrastructure is not yet flawless. Hacks, errors, and capture by powerful actors expose the immaturity of the system. Elites know they cannot roll out the corporate republic while it still looks like a toy. They need time to refine the code, harden the contracts, and normalize the failures.
 
The fifth obstacle is constitutional law. In many nations, sovereignty is still protected by charters that cannot be easily dissolved. Supreme courts, legislatures, and public referenda still have teeth. This is why so much energy is spent in soft law, pilot projects, and private contracts — because direct constitutional transfer is too difficult. A crisis that justifies emergency powers, however, can sweep those barriers aside.
 
All these obstacles converge on a single truth: the corporate republic is ready in pieces but not in whole. It can function as scaffolding, as pilot, as experiment. But it cannot yet replace the nation without a rupture. It cannot yet command the loyalty of billions without an event that terrifies, disorients, and compels consent.
 
Esoterically, we see the pattern of initiation. In occult ritual, a candidate must be broken before being remade. The old identity must be shattered before the new identity is imposed. So too here: the old order of nations must be broken in crisis before the new order of corporate shareholding can be revealed. The elites are waiting, watching, and preparing for that moment.
 
Part 8: The Role of Crisis as Catalyst
 
The machinery of the corporate republic is assembled. The scaffolding of law is in place, the technology is waiting, the rhetoric is rehearsed. But all of it hangs in suspension, incomplete. What is missing is the spark, the cataclysm that will burn away resistance and make people accept the new order as salvation. The elites know this. They are not simply planning governance; they are waiting for crisis.
 
Consider a financial collapse. If the dollar loses its grip, if debt markets seize, if banks fail in a contagion that sweeps across nations, chaos would spread faster than governments can respond. In that moment, the solution could be unveiled: a global ledger, a digital currency backed by central banks or corporate alliances, distributed instantly to every registered citizen-shareholder. The universal dividend, long pitched as fairness, would appear as rescue. People would accept the contract just to survive.
 
Or imagine a climate catastrophe. A series of cascading disasters — megastorms, wildfires, crop failures — could be framed as proof that nations are powerless. In that chaos, a corporate carbon market tied to digital IDs and programmable money would be presented as the only rational solution. Want your dividend? Prove your carbon compliance. The rhetoric of fairness and sustainability would mask the chains of conditional existence.
 
Or a pandemic more severe than the last. COVID-19 showed how quickly populations submit to digital passes and emergency decrees. A future pathogen, more lethal and less forgiving, would justify a global health passport tied directly to identity and dividend. Compliance would not be optional; refusal would mean exclusion not only from healthcare but from economic life itself.
 
And looming behind them all is the specter of a cyberattack on infrastructure. If grids go dark, markets freeze, and communications fail, panic would be immediate. In the aftermath, blockchain systems would be framed as incorruptible, untouchable, immune to attack. “Trust the ledger,” they would say, “it cannot be hacked.” In one stroke, the digital registry would become the new ark, carrying people across the flood of chaos.
 
Each of these crises could stand alone. Together, they could form the “polycrisis” that elites already speak of, a convergence of disasters that overwhelms the old order and demands a new one. And here lies the esoteric truth: crisis is not merely a threat; it is the initiation. Just as alchemy requires fire to transmute base metals into gold, so too does the corporate republic require fire to transmute citizens into shareholders.
 
The elites cannot impose this system in peacetime; resistance would be too strong. But in catastrophe, people accept what they would otherwise reject. Fear erases memory, desperation silences resistance, and the counterfeit covenant is embraced as salvation. The dividend becomes manna in the wilderness, but it is manna with a contract, manna that binds you to the tower of Babel rebuilt.
 
So when the catastrophe comes — whether natural, financial, or manufactured — it will not just be a tragedy. It will be the ignition of the corporate republic. The crisis is the key, and they are waiting for the door it will open.
 
Part 9: Esoteric Undercurrents
 
Beneath the surface language of law, technology, and crisis management, there is an older script at work. The elites may speak of efficiency, fairness, and resilience, but their architecture carries with it ancient archetypes, echoes of spiritual rebellion that stretch back to Babel and forward to Revelation.
 
The first archetype is Babel. Genesis tells us that humanity, united in pride, sought to build a tower that reached the heavens. God scattered them, not out of cruelty, but mercy — to restrain their hubris and protect them from a counterfeit unity. What we see today is Babel rebuilt, not with bricks and mortar, but with servers and ledgers. The post-nation corporate republic is a new tower, a human attempt to unify apart from God, to create salvation through code. It is the same spirit, dressed in modern garb.
 
The second archetype is the Book of Life. In Scripture, God alone holds the Book in which the names of His people are written, and in His mercy, sins can be blotted out. But in the blockchain ledger, every action is etched permanently, without forgiveness. This counterfeit book is merciless, immutable, and transactional. Where God’s book is relational, the ledger is mechanical. It promises order but delivers bondage — a record without grace.
 
The third archetype is alchemy. The occult dream of transformation has always been “solve et coagula” — dissolve and recombine. Dissolve the old forms, then coagulate them into a new whole. This is exactly the method of the elites: dissolve nations, dissolve citizenship, dissolve constitutions — then coagulate the fragments into a single global corporate entity. It is the alchemical transmutation of politics into contract, of citizens into shareholders.
 
And finally, the fourth archetype is the mark of the Beast. Revelation warns of a system in which no one can buy or sell without the mark. For centuries, interpreters wondered how such control could be exercised. Now we see it: programmable money, tied to digital identity, enforced by global contracts. To accept the dividend, you must accept the ID. To buy and sell, you must be registered. This is not speculation; it is the exact architecture being assembled in plain sight.
 
These archetypes are not coincidental. The architects of this system are not only technocrats and lawyers; many are steeped in occult philosophies, transhumanist visions, and Gnostic dreams. They long for a counterfeit Logos, a mathematical word made flesh in code. They dream of a registry that rivals God’s. They seek a unity that abolishes nations and enthrones man as his own savior.
 
But here is the warning: these esoteric currents are not simply cultural metaphors. They are spiritual realities. What the elites are building is not merely a political order; it is a spiritual counterfeit. It is rebellion disguised as progress, bondage disguised as fairness, and damnation disguised as salvation.
 
So when you hear words like “universal income,” “fairness,” “resilience,” or “global governance,” remember the esoteric undercurrents. Behind the rhetoric lies Babel, the counterfeit Book of Life, the alchemical transmutation, and the mark of the Beast. It is the same story retold in code: humanity uniting against God, building its own tower, writing its own book, and branding its own people.
 
Part 10: What This Means for Us
 
We stand, then, at the threshold of a new order. The corporate republic is not fantasy. It is not a distant plan. The pieces are here: the legal scaffolding, the technological backbone, the pilot projects, the rhetoric, and the esoteric current flowing beneath it all. The only thing missing is the fire of crisis to fuse it into permanence.
 
What this means for us is sobering. First, we must recognize that citizenship is under siege. To be a citizen once meant that your dignity and rights were grounded in something higher than contract. It meant that you belonged to a people, a story, a covenant that could not simply be revoked. But in the corporate republic, your dignity is conditional, your benefits are programmable, and your belonging is nothing more than a share that can be suspended or revoked.
 
Second, we must see that rights are being transmuted into privileges. Freedom of speech becomes the privilege of access to platforms. Freedom of movement becomes the privilege of a scannable pass. Freedom to trade becomes the privilege of a programmable wallet. These privileges appear stable until the moment you resist. Then the dividend is cut, the wallet frozen, the ID denied. What was once your birthright is now a conditional contract.
 
Third, we must face that obedience will be the currency of survival. To keep your share, you must comply. To receive your dividend, you must meet the conditions. To buy and sell, you must bear the credential. And so the system enforces not through violence but through necessity. Few will resist when the price of resistance is exclusion from food, shelter, and work.
 
But fourth, and most important, we must remember that this is not the Kingdom of God. The corporate republic will masquerade as fairness, salvation, even peace. It will claim to solve the crises of climate, poverty, and instability. It will offer manna in the wilderness. But it is counterfeit. True peace does not come from contracts; true fairness does not come from dividends; true salvation does not come from ledgers. These come only from Christ, whose covenant is not conditional, whose ledger is mercy, whose kingdom is eternal.
 
So what this means for us is choice. When the crisis comes — and it will — the choice will be presented as survival or collapse, order or chaos. But in truth, the choice will be between the counterfeit covenant of the corporate republic and the true covenant of God. Between obedience to a ledger that never forgives, and faith in a Lord who blots out sin. Between the tower of Babel rebuilt, and the New Jerusalem descending.
This is what it means for us. To see the counterfeit clearly, to name it, to resist it, and to cling to the Kingdom that cannot be shaken.
 
Conclusion: The Corporate Republic Unveiled
 
We have traced the blueprint of a world in transition: the dissolution of nations into contracts, the redefinition of citizenship into shareholding, the rise of corporations and cities as sovereign actors, the scaffolding of supranational law, and the technological spine of digital ID, blockchain, and programmable money. We have seen how pilot projects already train us for obedience, how rhetoric of fairness and efficiency cloaks dependency, and how crisis is the ignition key the elites wait for. And we have unveiled the esoteric undercurrents — Babel reborn, the counterfeit Book of Life, the alchemical transmutation, and the mark of the Beast foretold in Revelation.
 
The message is stark. The corporate republic is not a theory; it is an edifice already built. Its walls are treaties, its windows are algorithms, its doors are IDs, and its throne is the ledger. All that restrains it is the legitimacy of the old order. When catastrophe strikes — whether by chance or by design — that restraint will snap, and the unveiling will begin.
 
But this is not the first time mankind has reached for heaven with its own hands. From Babel to Rome to every counterfeit empire since, God has allowed rebellion for a season, but only a season. The corporate republic is not the final word. It is a counterfeit kingdom, a parody of justice, a shadow of sovereignty. Its very existence testifies that the true Kingdom is near, the Kingdom where citizenship is not a share but a sonship, where law is not contract but covenant, where the ledger of sin is not immutable but erased by grace.
 
So we must prepare, not with fear but with clarity. The world will tell us that survival depends on obedience to the ledger. But eternal survival depends on obedience to the Lamb. The world will promise dividends for compliance. But Christ promises inheritance for faith. The world will build Babel again. But God will bring down Babylon, as He always has.
 
This is the hour of decision. The elites prepare their corporate republic, but we prepare for the Kingdom that cannot be shaken. One is temporary, brittle, and counterfeit. The other is eternal, unbreakable, and true.
 
Bibliography & Endnotes
 
Michael Zürn and Christian Joerges (eds.), Law and Governance in Postnational Europe: Compliance Beyond the Nation-State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005). Demonstrates how legal compliance and enforcement can operate beyond sovereign states, using the EU and WTO as case studies.
Jonas Tallberg and Christer Jönsson (eds.), Transnational Actors in Global Governance: Patterns and Democratic Legitimacy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010). Documents the rising role of corporations, NGOs, and advocacy networks in shaping global rules, highlighting the democratic deficit.
Jarrad Hope and Peter Ludlow, Farewell to Westphalia: Crypto Sovereignty and Post-Nation-State Governance(FOSS edition, 2025). Declares the nation-state an obsolete “governance technology” and advocates blockchain and DAOs as its replacement.
Tassilo Herrschel and Peter Newman, Cities as International Actors: Urban and Regional Governance Beyond the Nation State (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017). Explores how cities bypass national sovereignty and engage directly in global governance.
Cesare Pinelli, “The Discourses on Post-National Governance and the Democratic Deficit Absent an EU Government,” European Constitutional Law Review 9, no. 3 (2013): 563–584. Analyzes the EU as a model of postnational constitutionalism and the legitimacy problems it faces.
Michael Zürn, A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018). Expands the discussion of global governance beyond Europe into a general model of authority and legitimacy in a postnational order.
Ernst B. Haas, Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964). A foundational work theorizing how international organizations can erode state sovereignty through functional integration.
Nicolas Berggruen and Nathan Gardels, Intelligent Governance for the 21st Century: A Middle Way Between West and East (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012). Advocates hybrid governance models blending Western democracy with Eastern meritocracy, foreshadowing post-national hybrids.
Daniel Innerarity, with Saskia Sassen, Governance in the New Global Disorder: Politics for a Post-Sovereign World(New York: Columbia University Press, 2016). Examines how governance is shifting in an age of fragmentation, complexity, and overlapping jurisdictions.
Susanna Cafaro, “Towards Postnational and Denationalized Citizenship” (2012, final draft in fcavinato,+CafaroFinal.pdf). Discusses cultural and legal paradigm shifts toward postnational democracy and citizenship models.
 
Endnotes
The phrase “governance technology” applied to the nation-state comes directly from Hope & Ludlow (Farewell to Westphalia, 2025).
The concept of a “democratic deficit” in postnational governance is widely discussed in European constitutional law (Pinelli, 2013).
The esoteric framing (Babel, Book of Life, alchemical dissolve and coagulate, and Revelation’s mark of the Beast) is interpretive, drawn from biblical texts (Genesis 11; Revelation 13; Revelation 20) and mirrored against the mechanisms described in the sources above.
Pilot projects mentioned (digital IDs, carbon markets, CBDCs, city diplomacy) are documented across Herrschel & Newman (2017), WEF and UN white papers, and ongoing pilot deployments globally.
The term “polycrisis” is now commonplace in WEF and global governance rhetoric, used to describe converging crises that demand integrated solutions.
 
Social Media Sources
 
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8SmJKpK/
 

Image

Cause Before Symptom

For over 1,000 years, planet Earth has been controlled by two bloodline familes who play good and evil giving the appearance of duality while the sleeping commoners fall prey to their agendas. By using religion, they control the past, present and future through ancient and new black magic technology manipulating events for greed and control.

Copyright 2024 - All rights reserved

Podcast Powered By Podbean

Version: 20241125