The Chevron Decision explained

I upload daily news weekly here on Podbean. I am live on Rumble Every Night at 9 PM: https://rumble.com/user/jamescarner/live

The Chevron Decision explained.

The Chevron deference doctrine means, when a legislative delegation to an administrative agency on a particular issue or question was not explicit but rather implicit, a court may not substitute its own interpretation of the statute for a reasonable interpretation made by the administrative agency. That’s the “legalize answer. Let’s dumb it down. Chevron deference is the latitude federal judges give agencies over how to interpret the statutes they administer when a dispute arises. Some 40 years ago, the Supreme Court articulated a relatively simple two-part test. The opinion overturned a long-standing legal doctrine which required judges to defer to an agency's interpretation when it comes to regulations about laws that are ambiguous. Because of the Chevron case, DHS, FDA, NIH, WHO and other agencies that represent industry cannot dictate or create their own outcomes outside of a judge. 

The left says it will undercut executive branch agencies, environment regulation, public health and workplace safety. The right says this will remove agencies like the council on foreign relations, world economic forum and all those international agencies that regulate our laws through their interpretation. So it appears to be a win for the right. But in reality, it just makes us more of a third world country. For example, let’s say Electric Company runs energy through one state. They have a lot of influence and money. They lease a 100 mile stretch of land that their power lines are on and say hunting is dangerous for their power lines. Hunters used that stretch of land for centuries and they were told not to hunt there. Even if no accidents were ever reported. The hunters take Electric Company to court. Before the chevron ruling, both parties would state their case and the judge makes a decision. After the chevron ruling, the judge refers to the electric company who has more experience than the judge about such matters to offer what regulations should be put into place instead of asking the hunters to put one in place. 

The chevron case favored corporations to create an outside agency that they controlled to analyze and interpret the situation and offer a solution. The problem is, a corrupt paid off panel can fudge data and create any scenario that favors the corporation. The left feel most corporations are honest and this has helped our efforts in keeping people safe and cleaning up the environment and the right feels this gives too much power to corrupt companies which are believed by the right to be all of them. Now, the hunters can hunt that land again and the Electric Company will have to pay for anything that goes wrong. See the dilemma that both sides have the right? Like if the hunter shoots the power line by accident or if it never happens, it’s a conundrum. Now, the corporation has to agree to whatever the judge says instead of offering a solution through regulation.

I can see why this decision can harm corporations’ profit and push them to go around the law by doing it the easy way. The Chevron decision appears in paper to hold corporations more accountable to what solution they put into place. But no one regulates them. The Chevron case was about oil drilling in the ocean and fishermen losing their good spots. The case actually gave the Environmental Protection Agency more power to push climate change rules which gave wind and solar a huge push. The left think this is great because we are removing ourselves from fossil fuels. But the right think it’s horrible because wind and solar still hasn’t caught up to the amount of energy fossil fuels offer versus the latter and gripe about the eye sores. Both sides are right and both sides are wrong. 

It’s all meant to divide and conquer you. The Supreme Court is just a corporation reporting to Washington DC, which is a private company. Their job is to see division in the United States over matters like this. Both left and right believe in what the news tells them so they naturally gravitate towards this perfect fallacy. Just like when they overturned Roe v. Wade. It’s a trick to get the population talking about this rather than the fact that we are being robbed through this racket. It’s all a con job. I see Chevron overturned as a tool to distract the population from the debate of Trump and Biden. And the fact we are broke. The decision will most likely push the corporations to trample on the earth which gives the left more ammo to be mad at the right. It also will stop safety groups and committees which we will definitely see a rise in “on the job accidents”. It also may show third world installations of buildings without proper code just like we see in Mexico. Corporations will always find a cheaper alternative even if they have to form a committee to get out of a law suit. It doesn’t matter whether Chevron is in law or not. The corporations always find a workaround. The left would rather they try to make safety and environmental improvements than to sidestep the matters. Even if it is corrupt, they at least still do something. Which the right never seem to do when it comes to such matters. See the argument here? The Supreme Court isn’t about overturning sound laws. It’s a gossip train designed to disrupt the public via slide of hand. 

No one will ever be able to stop the corrupt government and corporations until they see through this control strategy. It never was about doing the right thing according to the constitution. It was about dividing the people to give them something to hate each other about policies. History has shown only 2% of the population ever sees through the veil of control. It never is enough to rebel against the system. By the time word gets out a small group of people decide that it’s enough, the enemy creates controlled opposition and steers the people toward them instead of the original creators of truth. This is why nothing ever gets done and power continues to take freedom away. Covid should have given enough clues as to who the enemy really is, but once again, controlled opposition took over and our selected representatives steered the real movement away from the people.