Desensitization & Chemical Castration

I upload daily news weekly here on Podbean. I am live on Rumble Every Night at 9 PM: https://rumble.com/user/jamescarner/live

Desensitization is introducing small amounts of things into the public over years to produce the goal of making things normal. Like tattoos, horns, piercings, colored hair, dark music, sexual diversity and more. Society doesn’t realize it, and by the time it’s rampant, no one bats an eye. We have seen society move towards the above at a very fast pace and I believe this is by design. The above things are not necessarily evil in nature, but it appears to be if one would time travel from a few hundred years prior would be shocked to find the world we live in now. Some call this progress. Some call this perverse. Some do not bother to notice. Whatever the case may be, good or evil, the past few hundred years we have gone from traditional horse back riding and pulling wagons for thousands of years to nanotechnology, virtual reality and time manipulation. Splitting the atom was an achievement beyond our wildest dreams and now we are smashing photons at each other at nearly the speed of light just to see what happens. I am all for natural evolution where it takes time for society to evolve into whatever it becomes. But I have a problem with unnatural evolution and here it is forced upon our will through programming and conditioning. No, I am not talking about homosexuality, so that isn’t the problem if you are triggered because of my above comment of sexual diversity. But there is a line that we have to draw when it starts to harm children. As any rational critical thinker would agree on. Make believe is fine when it’s play time and story time. But medical procedures affecting a developing brain should be decided by the child when they turn the age of consent. This way, the parents can avoid a lifetime of regret and resentment from the child whom reverses the decision when their brains finally develop.

And this raises the question when did the parents decide that children should choose their gender? We dance around this topic scared of the LGBTQ mob who rally together against what they consider offensive. How can we have a debate, if we are attacked first? I would equate this to a group of scientists experimenting on a subject. Let’s say 2 out of 10 disagree with the testing. How can the conclusion or hypothesis be concluded if the scientists are attacked by the 2 that disagree with the process? Obviously, we don’t act that way in the lab, but we sure do outside in the social media spectrum. When did we evolve into being the test subjects? That’s what I want to know. For example, Germany was experimenting on people during world war 2 for the benefit of the German armed forces. This led to inhumane practices and eventually to the Nuremberg trials for crimes against humanity. The kinds of experiments were gruesome, psychotic and sick. But they weren’t the only ones doing it. Japan did the exact same thing. Unit 731 did invasive surgeries on prisoners after infecting them with diseases. Why? The excuse is always the same. They need data to help the medical field for future cases. Cadavers just don’t seem to work as a live subject with blood flowing through their veins gives a more accurate picture and a means for promising information. What if we are being experimented on without realizing it? Chemicals are being put into our food and water. Same with heavy metals and plastics. The combined don’t belong to our natural bodies and the side effects could be extremely hostile and intrusive. PBS did a report about round up’s glyphosate exposure and concluded it didn’t do any harm. Yet Dr. Chadi Nabhan tells the story behind court cases that concluded with Roundup maker Monsanto owing large sums to glyphosate users.

Atrazine, the second most commonly used pesticide, is a potent endocrine disruptor that both chemically castrates and feminizes male amphibians. It depletes androgens in adult frogs and reduces androgen-dependent growth of the larynx in developing male larvae. According to Google AI Some studies suggest a link between atrazine exposure and various types of cancer, including breast, ovarian, uterine, leukemia, and lymphoma. However, the EPA's Cancer Assessment Review Committee (CARC) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) have both determined that atrazine is not likely to be carcinogenic to humans. Can we make an argument here? Just because the Germans and Japanese said they were not doing experiments during world war 1 didn’t mean they were not doing it right? They got caught. Naturally, a perpetrator is going to deny and pay off scientists to write a different story don’t you think? Is it far fetched to assume the medical field would be compromised to lie on such paperwork? We will never know until we fight against those big agricultural arms. Just like Erin Brockovich and her work against Pacific Gas & Electric who had been poising a small town’s water supply for 30 years. Are we naive to think that this was the only case of chemical abuse against humans? Doesn’t absolute power corrupt absolutely? We are kidding ourselves to think society is safe against chemical corporations.

And what if the third Industrial Revolution, which we are phasing out of, has indeed abused the human body to the point where our dna has been corrupted? Norway has a seed vault of all earthly plants that are stored just in case of a natural disaster. Where is our human dna vault to reverse the effects of chemical consumption? That’s not even heard of. There was a lawsuit towards the Teflon non stick pans. The lawyer suing them created a scientist panel that tested hundreds of random people nationwide for PFOA or C8 in the bloodstream. The conclusion was shocking everyone had it in their bloodstream. After decades of appeals, DuPont finally settled for 1.85 billion. My point is people blindly trust companies and their gimmicks. All of the above chemicals I have mentioned could affect the body immensely. If forever chemicals can change a frog’s dna and produce genetic gender anomalies, would it be far fetched to say this is why we are seeing the huge spike in gender confusion? And the timing is suspicious as right after Tyrone Hayes’ scientific conclusion from Harvard proved just that and he has been silenced which I believe it’s in the plan for conditioning. Not including the link to plastic bottled water that does the exact same thing to humans. This is why Alex Jones was also humiliated for the catch phrase round up turns frogs gay. What if all of this chemical castration was done on purpose? To shift and move society towards an androgynous society of sexless workers? History is repeats as slaves used to be castrated to keep them from procreation. This also would explain the quick ramp up of society to accept this as the norm. I don’t believe this is by accident. The depopulation agenda by the CFR and WEF and allegedly the UN is in full swing, too. Just as the Georgia Guidestones used to say, we must maintain humanity at 500 million as that is a sustainable population for Mother Earth. Nothing is stopping them, either. Even after billions in fines and judgements, the chemical companies peruse their rotten and evil goals.